Reliability of personality disorder diagnosis during depression: the contribution of collateral informant reports

Trajectories of Mental Health-Related Service Use Among Adolescents With Histories of Early Externalizing Problems

PURPOSE

To inform efforts to reduce costly service utilization, the present study examined longitudinal trajectories of mental health-related outpatient and residential service use among at-risk youth with a history of early externalizing problems.

METHODS

A cohort of 809 children in the Fast Track Project, a multisite longitudinal study of children at risk for conduct disorder, were followed prospectively from kindergarten through 12th grade. They resided in high-risk areas with high rates of poverty, crime, and violence. Their outpatient and residential service use was assessed annually between sixth and 12th grades through parent report. Growth mixture modeling was applied to model individual differences in trajectories of service use during this period. Teacher, parent, and observer-reported childhood predictors of those trajectories were also examined.

RESULTS

Most youths had minimal service use during preadolescence into adolescence. However, approximately 31% had moderate probability of using outpatient counseling services, and approximately 8% had elevated probability of seeing a family doctor for mental health needs. For residential services, approximately 6% had moderate to high probability of service use that peaked during transition to high school, whereas close to 5% had service use that dramatically increased during high school. Childhood predictors of these trajectories included earlier externalizing, internalizing, and emotion regulation problems.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to use person-centered analytic methods to examine longitudinal trajectories in mental health-related service use among at-risk adolescents. Timely treatment for severe externalizing problems, comorbid internalizing problems, and emotion dysregulation during childhood may be crucial for preventing chronic service use.

Comparing the validity of informant and self-reports of personality using laboratory indices of emotional responding as criterion variables

Personality traits relate to risk for psychopathology and can inform predictions about treatment outcome. In an effort to obtain a comprehensive index of personality, informant reports of personality are sometimes obtained in addition to self-reports of personality. However, there is limited research comparing the validity of self- and informant reports of personality, particularly among those with internalizing psychopathology. This is important given that informants may provide an additional (and perhaps different) perspective on individuals' personality. The present study therefore compared how both reports of positive affectivity (PA) and negative affectivity (NA) relate to psychophysiological and subjective measures of emotional responding to positive and negative stimuli. Given that our sample (n = 117) included individuals with no history of psychopathology, as well as individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and/or panic disorder (PD), we were also able to explore whether these internalizing diagnoses moderated the association between personality reports and measures of emotional responding. Informant-reported PA predicted physiological responses to positive stimuli (but not negative). Informant-reported NA predicted physiological responses to negative stimuli (but not positive). Self-reported personality did not predict physiological responding, but did predict subjectively measured emotional responding (NA for negative responding, PA for positive responding). Diagnoses of internalizing psychopathology (PD or MDD) did not moderate these associations. Results suggest self- and informant reports of personality may each provide valid indices of an individual's emotional response tendencies, but predict different aspects of those tendencies.

Agreement Between Self- and Informant-Reported Ratings of Personality Traits: The Moderating Effects of Major Depressive and/or Panic Disorder

Several personality traits are risk factors for psychopathology. As symptoms of psychopathology may influence self-rated personality, informant reports of personality are also sometimes collected. However, little is known about self-informant agreement in individuals with anxiety and/or depression. We investigated whether self-informant agreement on positive and negative affectivity (PA and NA) and anxiety sensitivity differs for individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) and/or panic disorder (PD; total n = 117). Informant- and self-reported PA was correlated among those with MDD, but not among those without MDD. Informant- and self-reported anxiety sensitivity was correlated among those with PD, but not among those without PD. Informant- and self-reported NA was correlated irrespective of diagnosis. Results indicate that the agreement of self- and informant-reported personality may vary as a function of depression and/or anxiety disorders.

Considering DSM-5: personality diagnostics in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence of personality disorders (PD) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), to examine the interaction of axis-I and axis-II symptoms to provide an estimate on the confounding potential of SSD psychopathology in the establishment of DSM-IV PD diagnoses, and to discuss implications concerning the proposed changes in DSM-5. Patients with SSD, aged 18 to 65 years, and being at least partially remitted (PANSS total score < 75) were included. PD was examined categorically and dimensionally using the SCID-II screening questionnaire and interview, and SSD psychopathology was rated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS). Forty-five patients (31 with schizophrenia) were included in the current study. Mean age was 37.2 years, and the median duration of illness was 9.5 years. Mean PANSS total score was 42.5. The cumulative prevalence of PD in our collective was 20%, with obsessive-compulsive, antisocial, and borderline PD being the most frequent. There were no cases of cluster A PD diagnoses. In the dimensional analysis, numerous correlations of small to medium effect size emerged between maladaptive personality traits and SSD psychopathology. PD is present in a clinically relevant subgroup of SSD patients and has to be recognized in SSD treatment. Currently, it remains unclear to what extent correlations between personality traits and SSD symptoms can be explained by content overlap or co-variation of SSD psychopathology and PD traits. SSD psychopathology may bias PD diagnostics and lead to a higher percentage of categorical PD diagnoses, especially considering the proposed changes in DSM-5.

Childhood maltreatment and adult personality disorder symptoms: influence of maltreatment type

The present study examines the effects of different types of childhood maltreatment on personality disorder symptoms in a sample of adults with no Axis I psychopathology. Participants reporting a history of moderate to severe maltreatment on the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (n = 70) were grouped by type of abuse and compared with a non-abused group (n = 35) with regard to the number of personality disorder symptoms endorsed. Physical/sexual abuse and emotional abuse/neglect each were associated with elevated symptoms of all three personality disorder clusters. Elevated symptoms of several specific personality disorders were also seen, including paranoid, borderline, avoidant, dependent, obsessive-compulsive, and depressive personality disorder. There were no significant differences between the maltreatment groups. These findings indicate that emotional abuse/neglect and physical/sexual abuse are risk factors for a broad array of personality outcomes in a non-clinical sample.