1
|
Takács A, Hardi E, Cavalcante BGN, Szabó B, Kispélyi B, Joób-Fancsaly Á, Mikulás K, Varga G, Hegyi P, Kivovics M. Advancing accuracy in guided implant placement: A comprehensive meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement Methods. J Dent 2023; 139:104748. [PMID: 37863173 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This meta-analysis aimed to determine the accuracy of currently available computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) modalities under in vitro conditions and investigate whether these novel techniques can achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. DATA In vitro studies comparing the postoperative implant position with the preoperative plan were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN Tool) and a sensitivity analysis was conducted using funnel plots. SOURCES A systematic search was performed on April 18, 2023, using the following three databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. No filters or restrictions were applied during the search. RESULTS A total of 5,894 studies were included following study selection. Robotic- and static CAIS (sCAIS) had the most accurate and clinically acceptable outcomes. sCAIS was further divided according to the guidance level. Among the sCAIS groups, fully guided implant placement had the greatest accuracy. Augmented reality-based CAIS (AR-based CAIS) had clinically acceptable results for all the outcomes except for apical global deviation. Dynamic CAIS (dCAIS) demonstrated clinically safe results, except for horizontal apical deviation. Freehand implant placement was associated with the greatest number of errors. CONCLUSIONS Fully guided sCAIS demonstrated the most predictable outcomes, whereas freehand sCAIS demonstrated the lowest accuracy. AR-based and robotic CAIS may be promising alternatives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of robotic CAIS and investigate the accuracy of various CAIS modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Takács
- Department of Community Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 40. 1088 Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eszter Hardi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 52. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bianca Golzio Navarro Cavalcante
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oral Biology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4. 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bence Szabó
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Barbara Kispélyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 47. 1088 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Árpád Joób-Fancsaly
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, Semmelweis University, Mária utca 52. 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Mikulás
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Prosthodontics, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 47. 1088 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Varga
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oral Biology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4. 1089 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12. 7624 Pécs, Hungary; Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor utca 68. 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Márton Kivovics
- Department of Community Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi utca 40. 1088 Budapest, Hungary; Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26. 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19042026. [PMID: 35206217 PMCID: PMC8872312 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the in vitro accuracy of dental implants impressions taken with intraoral scanner compared with impressions taken with conventional techniques. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic electronic search in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Some of the employed key terms, combined with the help of Boolean operators, were: "dental implants", "impression accuracy", "digital impression" and "conventional impression". Publication dates ranged from the earliest article available until 31 July 2021. A total of 26 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 14 studies simulated complete edentation (CE), nine partial edentation (PE) and only two simulated a single implant (SI); One study simulated both CE and SI. In cases of PE and SI, most of the studies analyzed found greater accuracy with conventional impression (CI), although digital impression (DI) was also considered adequate. For CE the findings were inconclusive as six studies found greater accuracy with DI, five found better accuracy with CI and four found no differences. According to the results of this systematic review, DI is a valid alternative to CI for implants in PE and SI, although CI appear to be more accurate. For CE the findings were inconclusive, so more studies are needed before DI can be recommended for all implant-supported restorations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7:97. [PMID: 34312701 PMCID: PMC8313656 DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00352-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With the development of intraoral scanners, their trueness and precision have been evaluated in various studies. Through these studies, the amount of accuracy that can be expected from intraoral scanners has gradually been disclosed, at the same time, it was difficult to integrate the results of individual studies due to differences in evaluation methods between studies. The purpose of this article was to review the currently available evidence, summarise what is currently known about IOS, analyse the evaluation methods of each study, and list points to note when interpreting the results. Main text Most of the studies were conducted in vitro. The accuracy is evaluated in situations such as single missing teeth, partially edentulous ridges with multiple missing teeth, and fully edentulous jaws. To evaluate the accuracy, direct measurement of distance or angle by coordinate measuring machines and calculation of surface deviation by superimposing surface data were predominantly performed. The influence of parameters such as the number of implants, distance between implants, angle between implants, and experience of the operator was evaluated. Many studies have shown that trueness tends to decrease as the distance between the implants and the scan range increases. It was agreed that the implant angle did not affect either trueness or precision. Regarding other factors, the results varied among studies. Therefore, the effects of these parameters are not clear. Conclusions Heterogeneity in the research methodology was prevalent among the studies considered in this review. Therefore, we cannot make a decisive statement regarding the trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by IOSs. So far, the comparison of the numerical values of error between studies has yet to elucidate any clear answers, despite small methodological differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Sanda
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Keita Miyoshi
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Baba
- Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 145-8515, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen Y, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, Chochlidakis K. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Prosthodont 2020; 29:660-678. [DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Panos Papaspyridakos
- Department of Prosthodontics Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston MA
- Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health University of Rochester Rochester NY
| | | | - Yo‐wei Chen
- Department of Prosthodontics Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston MA
| | | | - Zuhair Natto
- Department of Dental Public Health King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia
- Department of Periodontology Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston MA
| | - Kiho Kang
- Department of Prosthodontics Tufts University School of Dental Medicine Boston MA
| | - Konstantinos Chochlidakis
- Department of Prosthodontics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health University of Rochester Rochester NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flügge T, Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant‐supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 Suppl 16:374-392. [DOI: 10.1111/clr.13273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tabea Flügge
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryMedical Center – University of FreiburgFaculty of MedicineUniversity of Freiburg Germany
- Department of Oral ImplantologyAcademisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Wicher Joerd Meer
- Department of OrthodonticsUniversity Medical Center GroningenUniversity of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
- W.J. Kolff Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Materials Science Groningen the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Gimenez Gonzalez
- Department of Oral ImplantologyAcademisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Kirstin Vach
- Institute for Medical Biometry and StatisticsFaculty of MedicineUniversity of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
| | - Daniel Wismeijer
- Department of Oral ImplantologyAcademisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA) Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Ping Wang
- Maurice H. Kornberg School of DentistryTemple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moreira AHJ, Rodrigues NF, Pinho ACM, Fonseca JC, Vilaça JL. Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 Suppl 2:e751-64. [DOI: 10.1111/cid.12310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- António H. J. Moreira
- ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory; University of Minho; Braga Portugal
- Algoritmi Center, School of Engineering; University of Minho; Guimarães Portugal
- DIGARC - Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave; Barcelos Portugal
| | - Nuno F. Rodrigues
- ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory; University of Minho; Braga Portugal
- Algoritmi Center, School of Engineering; University of Minho; Guimarães Portugal
- DIGARC - Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave; Barcelos Portugal
| | - António C. M. Pinho
- Mechanical & Materials Technologies Centre, School of Engineering; University of Minho; Guimarães Portugal
| | - Jaime C. Fonseca
- Algoritmi Center, School of Engineering; University of Minho; Guimarães Portugal
| | - João L. Vilaça
- ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory; University of Minho; Braga Portugal
- DIGARC - Polytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave; Barcelos Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 26:882-890. [DOI: 10.1111/clr.12414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eszter Somogyi-Ganss
- Discipline of Prosthodontics; Faculty of Dentistry; University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Howard I. Holmes
- Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Faculty of Dentistry; University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
| | - Asbjørn Jokstad
- Discipline of Prosthodontics; Faculty of Dentistry; University of Toronto; Toronto ON Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences; UiT The Arctic University of Norway; Tromsø Norway
| |
Collapse
|