Contact sensitization to acyclovir

Systemic allergic dermatitis (systemic contact dermatitis) from pharmaceutical drugs: A review

The literature on systemic allergic dermatitis (SAD; also known as systemic contact dermatitis) is reviewed. Both topical drugs (from absorption through mucosae or skin) and systemic drugs (oral, parenteral, rectal) may be responsible for the disorder. The topical route appears to be rare with 41 culprit topical drugs found to cause SAD in 95 patients. Most reactions are caused by budesonide (especially from inhalation), bufexamac, and dibucaine. SAD from systemic drugs is infrequent with 95 culprit drugs found to cause SAD in 240 patients. The drugs most frequently implicated are mitomycin C, methylprednisolone (salt, ester), and hydrocortisone (salt). The largest group of culprit drugs consisted of corticosteroids (19%), being responsible for >30% of the reactions, of which nearly 40% were not caused by therapeutic drugs, but by drug provocation tests. The most frequent manifestations of SAD from drugs are eczematous eruptions (scattered, widespread, generalized, worsening, reactivation), maculopapular eruptions, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE [baboon syndrome]) and widespread erythema or erythroderma. Therapeutic systemic drugs hardly ever cause reactivation of previously positive patch tests and infrequently of previous allergic contact dermatitis. The pathophysiology of SAD has received very little attention. Explanations for the rarity of SAD are suggested.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to antimicrobials in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Adverse reactions to medication are significant contributors to morbidity and mortality in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Cutaneous events not only constitute a significant portion of these reactions, they may also herald developing systemic reactions such as hemato-, nephro-, and hepatotoxicity. The identification of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug culprits and the proper management of reactions are of paramount importance for these patients. This review focuses specifically on adverse cutaneous reactions to antimicrobials that are commonly used in the management of patients with HIV infection.

Anogenitaldermatosen - allergische und irritative Auslosefaktoren Analyse von Daten des IVDK1 und Literaturubersicht. Anogenital dermatoses - allergic and irritative causative factors Analysis of IVDK2 data and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Anogenital dermatoses (AGD) are common and often very distressing. Clinically it is often unclear if allergic contact dermatitis or irritant dermatitis is involved. In order to optimize therapy and prophylaxis, it is essential to identify relevant allergens or irritants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK, data center in Göttingen) collected between 1999 and 2003 were analyzed. The anogenital area was involved in 1 168 patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Clinical variables and patch test results were statistically compared with the remaining IVDK patch test population, the latter standardized for age and sex.

RESULTS

Allergic contact dermatitis had been suspected prior to patch testing in 39.5 %, while in 24.6 % this diagnosis was eventually confirmed. Irritant contact dermatitis was diagnosed in 11.8 %. Other diagnoses, included balanitis, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and herpes genitalis. Positive reactions to cinchocaine (6.6 %), bufexamac (3.5 %) and benzocaine (2.4 %) were observed significantly more often among patients with anogenital dermatitis. Among those in whom co-factors were considered important (n = 422), wetness (38.4 %), occlusion (30.3 %), mechanical strain (4.7 %) and heat (3.6 %) were mentioned as irritation factors.

CONCLUSION

Because of the significantly higher frequency of sensitization to cinchocaine, benzocaine and bufexamac in patients with anogenital dermatitis, these ingredients should be used only with caution. According to the literature, ingredients of toiletries, cosmetics and contraceptives of any kind seem to cause allergic contact dermatitis rarely although there are several case reports. Comprehensive patch test including the standard series plus major sensitizers such as cinchocaine, benzocaine and bufexamac, and in particular patients' own skin care products, is recommended.

Systemic acyclovir reaction subsequent to acyclovir contact allergy: which systemic antiviral drug should then be used?

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acyclovir is rare. We report the 5th case of systemic acyclovir reaction subsequent to acyclovir contact dermatitis, with investigations made to determine an alternative antiviral treatment. A 23-year-old woman, after dermatitis while using Zovirax cream, went on to develop urticaria after oral acyclovir. Patch tests were performed with the components of Zovirax cream (acyclovir, propylene glycol and sodium lauryl sulfate) and with other antiviral drugs. Patch tests were positive to Zovirax cream, acyclovir, valacyclovir and propylene glycol. Patch and prick tests with famciclovir were negative, but its oral administration caused an itchy erythematous dermatitis on the trunk and extremities. Our patient developed a systemic acyclovir reaction subsequent to acyclovir allergic contact dermatitis, with cross-reactions to valacyclovir and famciclovir. Their common chemical structure is the 2-aminopurine nucleus. It is probably this part of the molecule that provokes both contact allergy and systemic reactions. The only antiviral drugs not having this core are foscarnet and cidofovir, and these could therefore be alternatives.

Contact dermatitis from topical antiviral drugs

The literature has been reviewed for contact dermatitis from topical antiviral drugs. 15 agents have been identified including acyclovir, imiquimod, podophyllin, podofilox, cidofovir, penciclovir, vidarabine, idoxuridine, trifluridine, tromantadine, lamivudine, interferon intralesional injections and ophthalmic solution, fomivirsen and foscarnet intravitreal injections and ganciclovir intraocular implants. Patch testing has been documented in certain individuals and cross-sensitization has been observed to contribute significantly to some allergic reactions.

No evidence of contact sensitization to acyclovir in acute dermatitis of the lips following local application of Zovirax cream

We report 4 patients with acute contact dermatitis of the lips following application of Zovirax cream. Patch tests with pure acyclovir, and combinations of the ingredients of the cream base, with and without acyclovir, provided no evidence of sensitization to any constituents of the cream.

Vesicular eruptions following acyclovir administration

OBJECTIVE

To report the occurrence of vesicular lesions on the skin of a child receiving intravenous acyclovir therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 12-year-old boy with presumed herpes simplex encephalitis developed cutaneous vesicular lesions following intravenous acyclovir administration. The lesions were initially thought to be herpetic. Further evaluation of the vesicle fluid and the temporal relationship of the development of the lesions with acyclovir administration led to the conclusion that the reaction was drug induced.

DISCUSSION

Although inflammation and phlebitis are fairly common after acyclovir infusion, the development of vesicular lesions appears to be rare. Only two cases, both in adults, have been published in the medical literature. Although several theories have been proposed, including hypersensitivity, local drug toxicity, and tissue damage associated with extravasation, the mechanism of this reaction remains unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Vesicular eruption is a rare adverse reaction in patients receiving acyclovir. Careful evaluation is necessary to differentiate this reaction from herpetic lesions.