The significance of tixocortol-pivalate-positive patch tests in leg ulcer patients

Hypersensitivity to topical corticosteroids in otitis externa

Over a12-monthperiod, nine patients were seen in a contact dermatitis clinic with an inflammatory dermatosis localized predominantly to the external auditory canal. Of these patients, four were found to have an allergic contact dermatitis which was exacerbating their dermatitis. All were allergic to one or more corticosteroids and topical antibiotics used in the treatment of their dermatitis. We would suggest that hypersensitivity to topical corticosteroids and other medicaments be considered in patients with otitis externa which fails to respond to treatment.

Contact sensitization in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers in Singapore

Contact sensitization rates are high in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Allergic contact dermatitis poses a significant hindrance to the healing of the wounds. There are no published studies examining the rate of contact sensitization in Asian patients. Our objective was to determine the rate of contact sensitization in patients with chronic venous leg ulcer in Singapore and the variation in the common allergens based on local practices in comparison with Western countries. 44 patients were patch tested to the National Skin Centre standard series, steroid series, medicaments, topical Chinese medicaments, and to modern wound dressings used. The overall rate of contact sensitization was 61.4%. The common allergen groups were topical antibiotics (18.2%) and topical traditional Chinese medicaments (TTCM) (15.9%). Individually, colophony (11.3%), Saw Hong Choon skin ointment (Kam Bo Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong) (11.3%), Balsam of Peru (9.1%), and povidone iodine (9.1%) were among the most frequent allergens. The sensitization rate among users of TTCM was notably high (41%). A high rate of contact sensitization was found in our study, similar to previous reports from the West. TTCM play a major role as possible allergens in our patients. In Asian patients, a history of its usage should be elicited, and patch testing should include the commonly used TTCM where possible.

Corticosteroids

Up to 5% of dermatitis patients are allergic to corticosteroids. Because such allergy may be difficult to suspect due to the anti-inflammatory action of the corticosteroid, markers for corticosteroid allergy should be present in any standard series. Budesonide and tixocortol pivalate are two such markers, and they seem to detect a majority of corticosteroid allergy. The patch test concentration for a given corticosteroid may be crucial. A false-negative reaction may follow despite the patient being allergic, if too high a test concentration is used, because of the anti-inflammatory action of the corticosteroid. Patch test readings must be performed not only on Day 3 or Day 4 but also on a late occasion, i.e., Day 7 after test application, also because the anti-inflammatory action may suppress an allergic reaction at an early reading. Once a patient has reacted to a corticosteroid, an extended corticosteroid series should be tested, so that information may be given on which corticosteroids to use and, above all, which corticosteroids to avoid.

A high prevalence of sensitization still persists in leg ulcer patients: a retrospective series of 106 patients tested between 2001 and 2002 and a meta-analysis of 1975-2003 data

BACKGROUND

Sensitization to topical treatments used in leg ulcers is common. Questioning and patch testing are used to identify causative drugs or dressings.

OBJECTIVES

To study the current frequency of sensitization in our centre, to analyse previously published studies, and to compare sensitization in recent years with studies published before 1990.

METHODS

A retrospective study was undertaken of all patients admitted with leg ulcers in 2001 and 2002. Of the files of 235 patients with leg ulcers reviewed, we identified 106 patients (group A) who had been patch tested in our institution between 2001 and 2002 with the European standard series and an additional series. The frequency of sensitization was compared with an earlier unpublished retrospective study in our centre of 36 leg ulcer patients tested in 1988 (group B), with a group of unselected contact dermatitis patients tested between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2000 in our centre (group C), and with results published in the literature. We performed a computerized database search of MEDLINE and compared results obtained in recent years with those obtained before 1990 to obtain evidence of changing trends.

RESULTS

Seventy-five per cent of the 106 patients had at least one positive reaction, and 57% had two or more positive reactions. Balsam of Peru was positive in 40% of cases, followed by lanolin (21%), fragrance mix (18%), trichlocarban (13%), colophony (11%), Cetavlon (cetrimide cream) (9%) and neomycin (9%). Thirty-five of the 36 group B patients had at least one positive reaction. Lanolin was the most frequent (31%), followed by balsam of Peru (22%), Cetavlon (19%), colophony (14%), terebenthene (14%), quinoline mix (11%) and benzocaine (8%). Two hundred and eighty-six of 526 patients of group C were positive in at least one test (54.4%). Three allergens gave a sensitization rate >10%: balsam of Peru (12.5%), fragrance mix (15.2%) and nickel sulphate (21.1%). Review of the literature and calculation of sensitization rates in a pool of 3043 patients extracted from 24 series, plus our own, showed persistence of high sensitization rates and a significant (8.5%) increase in sensitization between the two periods compared. There was a decrease in sensitivity to lanolin, constant sensitization to aminoglycosides, a slight increase in sensitivity to thiuram mix and glucocorticoids, and a marked increase in sensitivity to balsam of Peru in France. Newer topical treatments and dressings showed very low rates of sensitivity with the exception of hydrogels.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite warnings, sensitization to topical treatments for leg ulcers is still frequent and, moreover, continues to increase, some variations reflecting local nursing practices and variations in topical treatment available. Although a decrease in sensitization rate with lanolin has been observed throughout the world, no decrease in sensitization rate has been demonstrated with aminoglycosides, and sensitization to glucocorticoids, thiuram mix and new products (hydrogels) is now increasingly being reported.

Corticosteroid-induced contact dermatitis: a pragmatic approach

It is only in the past 10 years that the allergenic potential of topical corticosteroids has been fully realized. This has an important impact on the management of patients with chronic eczematous eruptions. Nonhalogenated topical steroids are more frequent sensitizers than halogenated molecules. Tixocortol pivalate and budesonide should be added to the standard series of patch test allergens. The topical steroid products that the patient has used should also be tested. If a patient has a positive reaction to tixocortol pivalate and/or budesonide then further patch testing with a commercial corticosteroid series should be undertaken.

Contact hypersensitivity to tixocortol pivalate

BACKGROUND

Tixocortol pivalate is an established marker to topical corticosteroid allergy. The prevalence of tixocortol pivalate hypersensitivity is well established in Europe, where exposure to this corticosteroid as a therapeutic agent varies. In the United States, tixocortol pivalate is not commercially available and the prevalence of hypersensitivity to it is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the prevalence of tixocortol pivalate hypersensitivity in our patch-tested population. We further characterized these patients by clinical background, other contact allergens, and the reactivity to other corticosteroids.

METHODS

Tixocortol pivalate has been incorporated in our standard 1-52 patch test series since November 1992. We reviewed the histories and patch test results in all patients tested with the standard 1-52 series from November 1992 to December 1996.

RESULTS

Of 1536 patch-tested patients, 45 had hypersensitivity to tixocortol pivalate. Dermatitis involving the face was the most common (14 patients). Of the 45 patients, 40 had another allergen identified on patch testing. Eighteen patients underwent further patch testing to an extended corticosteroid panel, and 14 had sensitivity to another steroid agent.

CONCLUSION

The 2.9% prevalence of tixocortol pivalate hypersensitivity in our patch test population is within the range reported in Europe. Patients with tixocortol pivalate hypersensitivity tend to have other contact allergens on patch testing. Predisposing factors to tixocortol pivalate hypersensitivity include facial dermatitis and sensitivity to other contact allergens.

Hypersensitivity to topical corticosteroids

Contact hypersensitivity from topical corticosteroids is becoming increasingly recognized; it is present in 2-5% of the patients attending contact dermatitis clinics. The use of a corticosteroid series containing tixocortal pivalate 1% (petrolatum), to detect hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone, and other steroids 1% (ethanol), depending on local corticosteroid usage, detects the majority of cases of corticosteroid hypersensitivity. In selected cases, the use of intradermal tests further improves the diagnosis of corticosteroid hypersensitivity. Corticosteroid hypersensitivity occurs most frequently among patients with stasis dermatitis. However, corticosteroid hypersensitivity is also common in other types of dermatitis, occurring as frequently as hypersensitivity to several allergens (e.g. wool alcohols and colophony) in the European standard battery. Although hypersensitivity has mainly been reported with corticosteroids applied to the skin, reactions may also occur on mucosal surfaces, following systemic administration and with sex steroids.

Contact allergy to corticosteroids

Recent evidence shows that contact allergy to topical corticosteroids is more frequent than earlier believed. This review summarizes the current knowledge of this condition, including methods for clinical diagnosis.

Contact hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone-free-alcohol in patients with allergic patch test reactions to tixocortol pivalate

It has been suggested that contact allergy to hydrocortisone alcohol is a frequent phenomenon. A recent study showed that all patients with allergic patch reactions to tixocortol pivalate reacted to intradermal hydrocortisone sodium phosphate. We studied patients with positive patch test reactions to tixocortol pivalate but negative to hydrocortisone alcohol, with penetration enhancers in hydrocortisone alcohol patch tests and oral challenges with hydrocortisone alcohol. Additionally, prick and intradermal tests with hydrocortisone sodium succinate were used. Using penetration enhancers and oral challenges enabled detection of more contact allergies to hydrocortisone alcohol compared to conventional patch testing alone. 9/12 patients with allergic reactions to tixocortol pivalate reacted to intradermal hydrocortisone sodium succinate. No immediate reactions were seen in prick or intradermal tests, suggesting that hydrocortisone contact hypersensitivity is probably not associated with immediate allergy to hydrocortisone. The present study suggests that allergic patch test reactions to tixocortol pivalate are caused by hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone alcohol itself or to one of its metabolites in the skin.

Hydrocortisone sensitivity: clinical features of fifty-nine cases

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity to topical steroids is becoming increasingly recognized.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to establish factors associated with allergy to topical hydrocortisone.

METHODS

Data from 59 consecutive patients allergic to hydrocortisone were compared with 199 consecutive patients who were not allergic to hydrocortisone.

RESULTS

Patients with stasis dermatitis and leg ulceration were significantly more likely to be allergic to hydrocortisone. In patients with hand eczema, in whom hydrocortisone sensitivity was less common, hydrocortisone was still a common allergen, occurring as frequently as wool alcohols and colophony. In four patients with atopic eczema, hydrocortisone was the only allergen. Duration of dermatitis was not important in determining the presence of hydrocortisone allergy. However, patients allergic to hydrocortisone were more likely to have multiple allergies when compared with control subjects.

CONCLUSION

Allergy to topical hydrocortisone is associated with stasis dermatitis and multiple positive patch test reactions.

A prospective study into the value of patch and intradermal tests in identifying topical corticosteroid allergy

We have prospectively performed patch and intradermal tests on 105 consecutive patients, attending for patch testing, to determine the optimum method of screening for corticosteroid hypersensitivity. Patch tests with Pivalone and a corticosteroid series (all 1% in ethanol) detected all the patients with steroid sensitivity. However, intradermal tests were essential to exclude false positive reactions and detect all relevant steroid allergies in any individual patient.

Hydrocortisone: an important cutaneous allergen

We have found a high incidence (4.8%) of allergy to hydrocortisone in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. In view of this finding we would suggest that, in any condition that does not improve or that deteriorates after administration of hydrocortisone, allergy to this compound should be considered.

Screening for corticosteroid contact sensitivity. Comparison of tixocortol pivalate, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and hydrocortisone

3 corticosteroids have so far been tried as markers for corticosteroid contact sensitivity: hydrocortisone, tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate. The present study compared these steroids for screening in addition to a standard patch test series. Of 727 patients, 28 (3.9%) reacted to tixocortol pivalate and 10 (1.4%) to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate; hydrocortisone gave an allergic reaction in 2 of 521 (0.4%) patients. Serial dilutions suggested that tixocortol pivalate, not marketed in Finland, caused allergic reactions which could possibly be cross-reactions to hydrocortisone. In contrast to previously published data, frequent cross-reactions occurred with hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and tixocortol pivalate. All allergic reactions to other corticosteroids found by testing with tixocortol pivalate concurred with reactions to hydrocortisone-17-butyrate. The study suggests that the most effective choice for routine testing for corticosteroid contact sensitivity would be both tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone-17-butyrate.