An evaluation of dose/unit area and time as key factors influencing the elicitation capacity of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) in MCI/MI-allergic patients

S3 guidelines: Epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs - Short version, Part 1

Epicutaneous patch testing is the diagnostic standard for the detection of allergic contact dermatitis. The present guidelines are aimed at residents and board-certified physicians in the fields of dermatology and allergology as well as other medical specialties involved in establishing the indication for patch testing and its execution in patients with contact dermatitis and other forms of delayed-type hypersensitivity. The target audience also includes other health care providers and insurance funds. Based on a systematic literature search and a formal consensus process (S3), the guidelines were developed by dermatologists in collaboration with pediatricians, occupational medicine physicians, nursing staff as well as patient representatives. The systematic methodological approach and appraisal of evidence upon which the recommendations are based are outlined in a separate method report that also contains evidence tables. The guidelines address general aspects of patch testing as well as medicolegal issues. The recommendations given relate to topics such as the indication for patch testing, informed patient consent, as well as the choice of test substances, test chambers and test site, duration of exposure, reading times and interpretation of test reactions. Furthermore, recommendations are provided with respect to endogenous and exogenous factors, specific patient groups (children, pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals) as well as possible risks and adverse events associated with patch testing using contact allergens. Note: This publication is part 1 of the short version of the S3 guidelines for "Epicutaneous patch testing using contact allergens and drugs" (registry no. 013 - 018; date: March 20, 2019; valid until December 31, 2021). Part 2 of the short version will be published in the next issue. The long version of these guidelines can be accessed at www.awmf.org. The method report is available as online publication (https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/013-018.html) and contains the evidence tables in its appendix.

Devising a Tier-based Skin Sensitisation Screening Strategy for Personal Care and Cosmetic Products

Concerns regarding the use of potential skin sensitisers in personal care and cosmetic products continue to grow. The goal of this study was to develop a proof-of-concept tier-based screening strategy for the assessment of skin sensitisation potential by using non-animal methodologies. As a case example, this screening framework was applied to three WEN® by Chaz Dean cleansing conditioners. The first tier of testing utilised the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Toolbox profiler to evaluate the skin sensitisation potential of individual ingredients within the formulation; a literature review was performed on the substances that generated in silico alerts. Tier 2 testing utilised the OECD in chemico Test Guideline (TG) 442C to evaluate these substances. Tier 3 testing adapted OECD TG442C to evaluate the formulated product. The literature review on the four substances that generated in silico alerts revealed that they were not sensitising at the concentrations reported in the formulated products. Tier 2 testing demonstrated that these substances were not sensitising at the concentrations tested. Finally, Tier 3 testing revealed that the evaluated cleansing conditioners had low mean percentage peptide depletion at the concentrations tested. Together, the results obtained suggest that the products tested are unlikely to induce skin sensitisation under the given experimental conditions. These findings are in agreement with other in vitro and clinical studies. The proposed tier-based testing approach may be used as a conceptual framework for the prospective safety screening of other personal care and cosmetic products. However, to establish the validity of the proposed testing strategy, further studies must be performed, including comparisons with established models.

Isothiazolinone Content of US Consumer Adhesives: Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Mass Spectrometry Analysis

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the prevalence and concentration of isothiazolinone preservatives in consumer adhesives.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and concentration of 5 specific isothiazolinones (methylisothiazolinone [MI], methylchloroisothiazolinone [MCI], benzisothiazolinone [BIT], butyl BIT, and octylisothiazolinone) in US adhesives.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consumer adhesives were analyzed using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometry. Fisher exact tests were used to test for isothiazolinone content and: 1) glue format (2) application purpose and 3) extraction method.

RESULTS

Nineteen adhesives (50%) had at least 1 isothiazolinone, and 15 contained 2 isothiazolinones. Frequencies and concentrations were as follows: MI (44.7%; 4-133 ppm), MCI (31.6%; 7-27 ppm), BIT (15.8%; 10-86 ppm), and octylisothiazolinone (2.6%; 1 ppm). Butyl BIT was not detected in any of the adhesives. Format (stick vs liquid) was not statistically associated with isothiazolinone presence. At least half of adhesives in the following application purposes had at least 1 isothiazolinone: shoe, craft, fabric, and school. All-purpose glues had a statistically significant lower concentration of MI and MCI, whereas craft glues were associated with higher concentrations of MI and MCI. Compared with other glues, fabric adhesives were associated with a higher risk of containing BIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the tested adhesives contained at least 1 isothiazolinone. Methylisothiazolinone and MCI were the most common. Consumers and dermatologists should be aware of adhesives as a source of isothiazolinones.

Water adherence factors for human skin

On incidental dermal exposure to chemicals in water, a key exposure factor is the amount of water adhering to skin. Although soil adherence factors have been developed for risk assessment, measurements of water adherence on human skin have not been described. In the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) dermal risk assessment guidance, dermal dose from environmental exposures is based upon the flux rate across the skin, which assumes that an unlimited amount of chemical is available for absorption. This assumption is applicable to certain exposure scenarios such as swimming and bathing. However, exposures to contaminated water frequently involve scenarios where the available chemical is limited by the amount of water adhering to the skin, for example, during accidental splashes.

Low-level efficacy of cosmetic preservatives

Preservation using combinations of preservatives has several advantages. This study shows that the concentration of some of the most frequently used allergenic preservatives can be markedly lowered when they are combined with phenoxyethanol. The antimicrobial efficacy of cosmetic preservatives and known allergens of various potency [diazolidinyl urea, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), methylisothiazolinone (MI) and phenoxyethanol] was tested alone and in various combinations of two or three preservatives together. The preservatives were tested for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and possible synergy using fractional inhibitory concentration. MCI/MI was the only preservative showing low-level MIC against all four tested microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. Different combinations of the preservatives indicated additive effects against the microorganisms. No combination of preservatives showed any inhibitory action on each other. Challenge tests with different concentrations and combinations were performed in a cosmetic cream. Diazolidinyl urea and MCI/MI alone were ineffective against C. albicans in a challenge test at concentrations up to 16 times higher than the observed MIC values. When combining phenoxyethanol with either one of the allergenic preservatives diazolidinyl urea, MCI/MI or MI, the cosmetic cream was adequately preserved at concentrations well below the preservatives' MIC values as well as 10-20 times below the maximum permitted concentrations. By using combinations of preservatives, effective preservation can be achieved with lower concentrations of allergenic preservatives.

Repeated low-dose skin exposure is an effective sensitizing stimulus, a factor to be taken into account in predicting sensitization risk

BACKGROUND

Contact sensitization by ingredients in personal products is an important clinical problem. It is not clear how sensitization is induced by the generally low concentrations at which they occur but it might be the result of repeated exposure.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the strength of contact sensitization induced by a single exposure to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) (60 microg cm(-2)) or three repeated exposures to a subsensitizing dose (10 microg cm(-2)).

METHODS

Two groups (n = 10) of healthy adult volunteers were randomized to receive either a single patch of DNCB 60 microg cm(-2) or three once-weekly applications to the same site of 10 microg cm(-2) DCNB. Four weeks after the last application, sensitization was quantified by measurement of responses (skinfold thickness) to a graded series of four challenge doses.

RESULTS

All the volunteers were sensitized and the strength of the responses was virtually identical between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The same degree of sensitization was induced by three exposures to DNCB 10 microg cm(-2) as by one exposure to 60 microg cm(-2) of DNCB. Thus repeated exposure to low doses of contact sensitizers may increase the sensitizing potency. This must be taken into account in future risk assessments.

The relationships between exposure dose and response in induction and elicitation of contact hypersensitivity in humans

Like all physiological systems, the human immune system exhibits dose-response relationships in its reactions. The strength of sensitization is related to the potency of the immunogen and the dose that reaches the immune system. In skin, as sensitizing dose per unit area (mug cm(-2)) is increased on a log scale, there is a sigmoid dose-response curve for subsequent reactivity. Similarly, the response to elicitation shows a classical sigmoid response to increasing challenge dose, with the dose per unit area again being the determinant. There is a clear inverse correlation between the strength of sensitization and the subsequent dose of antigen to which an individual will respond. This is reflected in the different challenge systems used to diagnose the existence of allergic contact sensitization to a given allergen. The occluded patch test aims to use the highest concentration possible to detect the weakest degrees of allergy, whereas the repeated open application test uses much lower concentrations similar to those encountered in real life, applied repeatedly but without occlusion, to assess clinical relevance. Many authors have attempted to use the lowest concentrations to which rare, highly sensitized individuals can react to define the concentrations which might be free of risk in terms of inducing allergic sensitization. However, it is clear that the dose-response relationships for induction of sensitivity by repeated low-dose exposures must be carefully defined in future studies. This article reviews the dose-response relationships of human contact sensitization.

Contact allergy epidemics and their controls

Contact dermatitis can be severe and lead to sick leave as well as significant healthcare expenses. The aim of this review is to present the published knowledge on 6 historical epidemics of contact allergy to apply this knowledge on the prevention and control of future contact allergy epidemics. A historical review is performed on nickel, chromium, methyl-chloro-iso-thiazolinone/methyl-iso-thiazolinone, methyl-di-bromo glucaro-nitrile, formaldehyde, and para-phenylenediamine. The first cases of contact dermatitis are mostly occupational, whereas consumer cases appear later. There is often a latency period from the first cases are observed until an epidemic occurs, and the problem is recognized. Finally, no one seems to take responsibility of dealing with the situation, and there are no attempts of regulation until an epidemic is consolidated among consumers for many years. Steps should be taken to prevent contact allergy epidemics. It is essential that dermatologist, scientists, administrators, and consumers organize and structure known methods to accelerate the control of emerging contact allergens.