1
|
de Groot AC. Systemic allergic dermatitis (systemic contact dermatitis) from pharmaceutical drugs: A review. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 86:145-164. [PMID: 34837391 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The literature on systemic allergic dermatitis (SAD; also known as systemic contact dermatitis) is reviewed. Both topical drugs (from absorption through mucosae or skin) and systemic drugs (oral, parenteral, rectal) may be responsible for the disorder. The topical route appears to be rare with 41 culprit topical drugs found to cause SAD in 95 patients. Most reactions are caused by budesonide (especially from inhalation), bufexamac, and dibucaine. SAD from systemic drugs is infrequent with 95 culprit drugs found to cause SAD in 240 patients. The drugs most frequently implicated are mitomycin C, methylprednisolone (salt, ester), and hydrocortisone (salt). The largest group of culprit drugs consisted of corticosteroids (19%), being responsible for >30% of the reactions, of which nearly 40% were not caused by therapeutic drugs, but by drug provocation tests. The most frequent manifestations of SAD from drugs are eczematous eruptions (scattered, widespread, generalized, worsening, reactivation), maculopapular eruptions, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE [baboon syndrome]) and widespread erythema or erythroderma. Therapeutic systemic drugs hardly ever cause reactivation of previously positive patch tests and infrequently of previous allergic contact dermatitis. The pathophysiology of SAD has received very little attention. Explanations for the rarity of SAD are suggested.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim EJ, Youn NH, Yi JS, Kim JH, Cho YJ, Nam KT, Park KS, Lee JK. Evaluation of the skin phototoxicity of systemically administered pharmaceuticals in Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Res 2021; 37:435-442. [PMID: 34631500 DOI: 10.1007/s43188-020-00078-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In vivo phototoxicity testing is important for predicting drug-induced phototoxicity in humans. Currently, there is no internationally validated in vivo test method for the photosafety evaluation of pharmaceuticals. In this study, we evaluated the phototoxicity of systemically administered drugs using SD rats. We first determined the appropriate ultraviolet A (UVA) dose using 8-methoxypsoralen, a well-known phototoxic drug. Compared to lower and higher UVA doses, we found that a UVA dose of 10 J/cm2 allowed for the detection of phototoxic responses in both a dose- and time-dependent manner. We next performed a phototoxicity study using seven pharmaceutical drugs which included known phototoxic and non-phototoxic drugs using a UVA dose of 10 J/cm2. In order to improve the accuracy of our assessment, we evaluated both gross skin findings as well as histopathological findings. Using gross skin findings alone resulted in an accuracy of 85.7% which could be increased to 100% accuracy when the gross skin findings were combined with histopathological findings. This study suggests that the inclusion of histopathological findings increases the accuracy of the phototoxicity evaluation of systemically administered drugs in SD rats. In conclusion, we found that for studying drug-induced phytotoxicity, a 10 J/cm2 UVA dose serves as the optimal radiation dose, and that the inclusion of histopathological findings increases the accuracy of the phototoxicity evaluation of the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ji Kim
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Hee Youn
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Sun Yi
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Hwan Kim
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| | - Ye-Jin Cho
- Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Taek Nam
- Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722 Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Sook Park
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Kwon Lee
- Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, 28159 Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Korzeniowska K, Cieślewicz A, Chmara E, Jabłecka A, Pawlaczyk M. Photosensitivity reactions in the elderly population: questionnaire-based survey and literature review. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2019; 15:1111-1119. [PMID: 31571889 PMCID: PMC6748316 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s215308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older people are at risk of developing adverse drug reactions, including photosensitivity reactions. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the use of potentially photosensitizing medications and photoprotection in the elderly population. Patients and methods Three hundred and fifty-six respondents (223 [63%] women and 133 [37%] men) aged ≥65 years filled in the original questionnaire concerning photosensitivity reactions to drugs. The diagnosis of drug-induced photosensitivity was based on medical history and clinical examination. Results and conclusion We found that drugs potentially causing phototoxic/photoallergic reactions comprised more than one fifth of all drugs used by the participants. The most numerous group was patients treated with 3–5 drugs potentially causing phototoxic/photoallergic reactions simultaneously. Of all drugs, ketoprofen was found to cause the highest number of photosensitivity reactions. Cutaneous adverse reactions were also observed for hydrochlorothiazide, atorvastatin, simvastatin, telmisartan, and metformin. Moreover, it was found that the incidence of photosensitivity reactions can be significantly reduced by using proper photoprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Korzeniowska
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań 61-848, Poland
| | - Artur Cieślewicz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań 61-848, Poland
| | - Ewa Chmara
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań 61-848, Poland
| | - Anna Jabłecka
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań 61-848, Poland
| | - Mariola Pawlaczyk
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań 60-781, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brockow K, Ardern‐Jones MR, Mockenhaupt M, Aberer W, Barbaud A, Caubet J, Spiewak R, Torres MJ, Mortz CG. EAACI position paper on how to classify cutaneous manifestations of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2019; 74:14-27. [PMID: 30028512 DOI: 10.1111/all.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common, and the skin is by far the most frequently involved organ with a broad spectrum of reaction types. The diagnosis of cutaneous DHRs (CDHR) may be difficult because of multiple differential diagnoses. A correct classification is important for the correct diagnosis and management. With these guidelines, we aim to give precise definitions and provide the background needed for doctors to correctly classify CDHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology und Allergology Biederstein Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Michael R. Ardern‐Jones
- Department of Dermatology Southampton General Hospital University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
- Department of Dermatoimmunology Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories Clinical, Experimental Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
| | - Maja Mockenhaupt
- “Dokumentationszentrum schwerer Hautreaktionen” (dZh) Department of Dermatology Medical Center and Medical Faculty University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
| | - Annick Barbaud
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Tenon Hospital (AP‐HP) Sorbonne Universities, Pierre et Marie Curie University Paris 6 France
| | | | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Unit IBIMA‐ Regional University Hospital of Malaga‐UMA, Aradyal Malaga Spain
| | - Charlotte G. Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Drug-induced photosensitivity reactions are significant adverse effects. Ketoprofen is one of the most common drugs that can cause skin rash in sun-exposed areas. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ketoprofen, are often used for a variety of symptoms, including pain and fever. An understanding of the presentation and clinical course of ketoprofen-induced photosensitivity is necessary to correctly diagnose and manage this condition. Ketoprofen-induced photosensitivity reactions usually present as photoallergic dermatitis, which is a cell-mediated immune process. The benzophenone moiety in ketoprofen plays a major role in ketoprofen's ability to act as a photosensitizer. Several agents, such as fenofibrate and octocrylene have been found to be associated with aggravation of ketoprofen-induced photoallergic dermatitis or cross-photosensitization, and these reactions result from structural similarities with ketoprofen. Treatment of ketoprofen-induced photoallergic dermatitis includes discontinuation of ketoprofen, topical or systemic corticosteroids and avoidance of sun exposure and agents known to exacerbate dermatitis. In conclusion, photoallergic dermatitis is a significant adverse effect of ketoprofen. Some agents known to worsen dermatitis may be found in sun protection products (notably, octocrylene in sunscreen). Educating the patient to avoid these products is critical to treatment. Since NSAIDs, such as ketoprofen, are used commonly for a variety of illnesses, drug-induced photoallergic dermatitis should be high on the differential in individuals using these medications who present with acute onset of a rash in sun-exposed areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Yvonne Loh
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Philip R Cohen
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schümann J, Boudon S, Ulrich P, Loll N, Garcia D, Schaffner R, Streich J, Kittel B, Bauer D. Integrated Preclinical Photosafety Testing Strategy for Systemically Applied Pharmaceuticals. Toxicol Sci 2014; 139:245-56. [DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
7
|
Kowalski ML, Asero R, Bavbek S, Blanca M, Blanca-Lopez N, Bochenek G, Brockow K, Campo P, Celik G, Cernadas J, Cortellini G, Gomes E, Niżankowska-Mogilnicka E, Romano A, Szczeklik A, Testi S, Torres MJ, Wöhrl S, Makowska J. Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Allergy 2013; 68:1219-32. [PMID: 24117484 DOI: 10.1111/all.12260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute only a subset of all adverse reactions to these drugs, but due to their severity pose a significant burden to patients and are a challenge to the allergist. In susceptible individuals, NSAIDs induce a wide spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions with various timing, organ manifestations, and severity, involving either immunological (allergic) or nonimmunological mechanisms. Proper classification of reactions based on clinical manifestations and suspected mechanism is a prerequisite for the implementation of rational diagnostic procedures and adequate patient management. This document, prepared by a panel of experts from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force on NSAIDs Hypersensitivity, aims at reviewing the current knowledge in the field and proposes uniform definitions and clinically useful classification of hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. The document proposes also practical algorithms for the diagnosis of specific types of NSAIDs hypersensitivity (which include drug provocations, skin testing and in vitro testing) and provides, when data are available, evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypersensitive patients, including drug avoidance and drug desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. L. Kowalski
- Department of Immunology Rheumatology and Allergy; Medical University of Lodz; Lodz; Poland
| | - R. Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia; Clinica San Carlo; Paderno Dugnano; Italy
| | - S. Bavbek
- Department of Immunology and Allergy; Ankara University School of Medicine; Ankara; Turkey
| | - M. Blanca
- Allergy Service; Carlos Haya Hospital; Malaga; Spain
| | | | - G. Bochenek
- Department of Respiratory Diseases; Jagiellonian University; Krakow; Poland
| | - K. Brockow
- Department of Dermatology und Allergology Biederstein and Division Environmental Dermatology and Allergology; Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen/TUM; Technical University Munich; Munich; Germany
| | - P. Campo
- Allergy Service; Carlos Haya Hospital; Malaga; Spain
| | - G. Celik
- Department of Immunology and Allergy; Ankara University School of Medicine; Ankara; Turkey
| | - J. Cernadas
- Department of Allergy; University Hospital of SanJoão; Porto; Portugal
| | - G. Cortellini
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology; Rimini Hospital; Rimini; Italy
| | - E. Gomes
- Department of Allergy; Hospital Pediatrico Maria Pia; Porto; Portugal
| | | | | | - A. Szczeklik
- Department of Medicine; Jagiellonian University; Krakow; Poland
| | - S. Testi
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit; Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze; San Giovanni di Dio Hospital; Florence; Italy
| | - M. J. Torres
- Allergy Service; Carlos Haya Hospital; Malaga; Spain
| | - S. Wöhrl
- Floridsdorf Allergy Centre (FAZ); Vienna; Austria
| | - J. Makowska
- Department of Immunology Rheumatology and Allergy; Medical University of Lodz; Lodz; Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nardelli A, Carbonez A, Drieghe J, Goossens A. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, andMyroxylon pereiraeand colophonium, over a 21-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68:307-13. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
9
|
|
10
|
Corrigendum. Contact Dermatitis 2011. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01980.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|