Tumor burden of sentinel lymph node metastasis in Merkel cell carcinoma

Prognostic Significance of "Nonsolid" Microscopic Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Our recent work regarding Merkel cell carcinoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis found that "solid" pattern microscopic metastasis conferred worse prognosis than the "nonsolid" ones. The goals of the present study were to (1) compare the prognostic significance/outcomes of 2 diagnostic groups-patients with a nonsolid pattern of SLN metastasis and those with diagnostically negative SLN biopsies (SLNB), and (2) evaluate the durability of SLN metastasis after extensive sectioning. Five-level, step-wise sectioning at 250-μm intervals was performed in all SLN blocks with an immunohistochemical stain for CK20 on all levels. The presence and pattern of metastases were recorded and analyzed as were corresponding patient and tumor parameters. Median follow-up durations for all patients (n=38), positive SLNB (n=16) and negative SLNB (n=22) groups were 56.3, 50.4, and 66.8 months, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) did not differ between the 2 diagnostic groups (OS P=0.65, DSS P=0.37) but did differ by immune status (immunocompetent vs. immunosuppressed, OS P=0.03, DSS P=0.005) and primary tumor category (OS P<0.0001, DSS P=0.001). On deeper sectioning, all 16 diagnostically positive SLNB continued to show nonsolid microscopic metastasis, and 32% (7/22) diagnostically negative SLNB revealed nonsolid metastasis. DSS was worse for sinusoidal-pattern metastasis versus all others (P=0.02). Five of 38 patients (13%) died of disease; the only immunocompetent patient had sinusoidal-pattern metastasis discovered in a diagnostically negative SLNB. Our data suggest that outcome for nonsolid metastasis is similar to that of negative SLNB with the exception of the sinusoidal pattern, which was associated with worse outcome. Larger studies are warranted to quantify and compare microscopic metastatic tumor burden by pattern and confirm whether the sinusoidal pattern confers an intermediate prognostic risk between solid and other nonsolid microscopic metastases.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for the Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive malignant neoplasm. Traditionally, wide local excision has been used for local control. However, the tissue-sparing capability of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and the greater certainty of complete tumor removal offer a potential advantage over wide local excision if MMS offers acceptable cure rates.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to help elucidate management of MCC and includes one of the largest groups of patients from a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of 22 patients with cutaneous MCC treated with MMS at our practice over 20 years. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were examined. The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in the approval by our institution's human research review committee.

RESULTS

The overall local recurrence rate was 5% (1/22). The overall rate of biopsy-proven metastasis to regional lymph nodes was 14% (3/22). No cases of distant metastases were documented.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest group of patients with MCC treated with MMS from a single institution and indicates that MMS may be a useful treatment modality for this rare aggressive disease.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: An Update of Key Imaging Techniques, Prognostic Factors, Treatment, and Follow-up

Merkel cell carcinoma, though rare, is one of the most aggressive tumors a dermatologist faces. More than a third of patients with this diagnosis die from the disease. Numerous researchers have attempted to identify clinical and pathologic predictors to guide prognosis, but their studies have produced inconsistent results. Because the incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma is low and it appears in patients of advanced age, prospective studies have not been done and no clear treatment algorithm has been developed. This review aims to provide an exhaustive, up-to-date account of Merkel cell carcinoma for the dermatologist. We describe prognostic factors and the imaging techniques that are most appropriate for evaluating disease spread. We also discuss current debates on treating Merkel cell carcinoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in Merkel cell carcinoma: a 15-year institutional experience and statistical analysis of 721 reported cases

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy that frequently metastasizes to the regional lymphatic basin. Pathological assessment of regional lymph nodes with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients without clinical involvement has permitted more accurate staging and more appropriate management. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of this technique and its prognostic implications. We conducted a review of previously published data analysing the positive and false negative rates of SLNB in MCC. A search of the Medline and Embase databases to April 2015 identified 36 published studies between 1997 and 2015 comprising 692 patients. With the addition of 29 patients treated at our own institution, we conducted an analysis of 721 patients. Among this cumulative cohort, SLNBs were performed from 736 regional sites with 29·6% recorded as positive. Regional metastasis occurred in 45 cases following a negative SLNB, for a false negative rate of 17·1%. Adjuvant regional radiotherapy in the setting of a negative SLNB did not affect regional recurrence (P = 0·31), providing credence to emerging evidence that regional therapy can be safely omitted in the setting of a negative SLNB. Distant relapse was noted far more frequently following a positive rather than negative SLNB (17·6% vs. 7·3%, P < 0·001).

A systematic review of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck and a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy

Background

A negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) from patients with head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma (HNMCC) may allow the patient to avoid further adjunctive therapies. However, there is considerable regional variability of lymphatic drainage from primary sites involving the head and neck, and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has aggressive biologic behavior.

Objective

The primary aim of this systematic review was to document the incidence of regional recurrence and mortality from HNMCC patients after a negative SLNB.

Methods

A systematic search of the English literature was conducted via Ovid Medline and Embase from inception until 2013 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1991 to January 2014.

Results

Twenty-three studies, with a total of 81 patients matched the inclusion criteria. The incidence of regional recurrence from the entire cohort was 12.3%, and there was a 5% mortality rate. The mean follow-up time, excluding the 30 patients who did not have individual follow-up times specified, was 32.8 months.

Limitations

This review included studies had variable follow-up durations and treatments for MCC.

Conclusions

Despite negative pathologic staging of the neck using SLNB in HNMCC patients, there is still a high incidence of regional recurrence and mortality, over a short follow-up period.

•

Merkel cell carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm.

•

Patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy from head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high incidence of future regional lymph node involvement.

•

In this context, a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessarily reassuring for the patient or the clinician.

The role of OCT4 immunohistochemistry in evaluation of retroperitoneal lymph node dissections: a pilot study

We investigated the role of OCT4 immunohistochemical staining in detecting germ cell tumor lymph node metastases. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is important for staging and treatment of testicular germ cell tumors, and OCT4 is sensitive and specific for pluripotent testicular germ cell tumors; however, micrometastases, particularly from seminoma, can be difficult to detect. We examined 262 lymph nodes in 45 retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimens from germ cell tumor patients. Specimens were categorized as postchemotherapy and untreated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with or without clinical suspicion, based on lymphadenopathy or elevated serum germ cell tumor markers. Sections were stained with anti-OCT4 antibody. Twenty-one additional positive lymph nodes in 12 cases were detected to harbor scattered seminoma cells, singly and in small clusters, from 256 previously considered benign in: untreated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with clinical suspicion (13% increase), postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (7%), and untreated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection without suspicion (4%). However, no patient with an entirely negative dissection specimen was reclassified as positive. OCT4 immunohistochemistry detected scattered seminoma cells and small clusters of seminoma cells in lymph nodes previously considered to be benign for an overall increase of 8%, greatest in the setting of untreated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with clinical suspicion. However, immunohistochemistry did not convert any entirely negative specimen to positive. Future studies will be useful to determine whether the small volume of disease detected by immunohistochemistry has the same impact as routinely detected lymph node metastases.

A practical update of surgical management of merkel cell carcinoma of the skin

The role of surgeons in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin is reviewed, with respect to diagnosis and treatment. Most of the data in the literature are case reports. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. A wide local excision, with sentinel node (SLN) biopsy, is the recommended treatment of choice. If SLN is involved, nodal dissection should be performed; unless patient is unfit, then regional radiotherapy can be given. Surgeons should always refer patients for assessment of the need for adjuvant treatments. Adjuvant radiotherapy is well tolerated and effective to minimize recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for selected node-positive patients, as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Data are insufficient to assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival. Recurrent disease should be treated by complete surgical resection if possible, followed by radiotherapy and possibly chemotherapy. Generally results of multimodality treatment for recurrent disease are better than lesser treatments. Future research should focus on newer chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents in the adjuvant setting and for gross disease.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single institutional experience

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy occurring mostly in older immunocompromized Caucasian males. A growing incidence of MCC has been reported in epidemiological studies. Treatment of MCC usually consists of surgical excision, pathological lymph node evaluation, and adjuvant radiotherapy. This paper reports the experience of a single tertiary center institution with 17 head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma patients. Median followup for the cohort was 37.5 months. After five years, recurrence-free survival, disease specific survival, and overall survival were 85%, 90%, and 83%, respectively. Our limited data support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy. We also report two cases of MCC located at the vestibule of the nose and two cases of spontaneous regression after diagnostic biopsy. About 40% of our patients were referred to our center for surgical revision and pathological lymph node evaluation. Increased awareness of MCC and an interdisciplinary approach are essential in the management of MCC.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: an emerging role and the Westmead hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous malignancy which has a high rate of nodal metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) enables the identification of occult nodal metastases. We sought to calculate the rates of positive and false negative SLNB and to evaluate the impact of SLNB on the staging and management of patients with MCC at our institution.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with stage I or II MCC who had undergone SLNB were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 114 patients with MCC who presented to Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia between 2000 and 2010. Data on patient characteristics, tumour and treatment details and patient follow up were extracted from a computer database and patient medical records.

RESULTS

Eight patients (50%) had a positive SLNB and eight had a negative SLNB. The median follow up from diagnosis was 19.5 months (range 4-40) with most patients (69%) alive without evidence of disease at the time of last follow up. All eight patients with a positive SLNB subsequently underwent nodal treatment. This consisted of radiotherapy in five and completion lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in three. None of the eight patients who had a negative SLNB underwent any nodal treatment following SLNB. Two of these patients developed nodal relapse, giving a false negative rate of 20%.

CONCLUSION

Half of our patients were upstaged and underwent nodal treatment as a result of their SLNB. Given the high rate of SLNB positivity, we believe that SLNB has a role in the management of MCC. As there is a risk of a false negative SLNB, close observation of the regional nodal basins is warranted in patients who have had a negative SLNB. Further studies are required to investigate the impact of SLNB on survival.