A generic consensus assessment of undergraduate competence in forceps exodontia in the United Kingdom

Articaine improves anesthetic achievement for exodontia performed by undergraduate dental students: A clinical comparative study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical performance of undergraduate dental students in delivering inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with either articaine or lidocaine, and to compare the success rate of their IANBs between articaine and lidocaine for the extraction of mandibular molar teeth.

METHODS

In this clinical trial, patients were randomly distributed into 2 study groups: articaine and lidocaine groups. In each group, dental students performed IANB followed by forceps extraction of 1 mandibular molar under close supervision. The operative parameters measured included: assessment of anesthetic technique (on 10 points visual analogue scale 'VAS-10'), onset and depth of anesthesia, intra-operative pain perceived by patients and their satisfaction level (on VAS-10), and the success rate of IANB (in terms of need to additional anesthesia). Data analyses used were descriptive statistics, t-test, χ² test, and Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

One-hundred sixty patients were included in the final analysis, 80 in each group. The overall students' IANB technique was assessed as good (mean score 7.3). Articaine group showed significantly higher success rate of IANB (71%) compared to (55%) in lidocaine group, (P = 0.03). Patients also reported significantly higher satisfaction scores in the articaine group (P = 0.04). There were no significant difference in the onset of action and intra-operative pain level between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Students' IANBs were generally assessed as "good." Articaine IANBs performed by undergraduate students showed significantly higher success rate than lidocaine IANBs. By using articaine, the anesthetic achievement was greater for mandibular molar extraction performed by undergraduate students.

Student perceptions of exodontia competency assessment in a UK dental school

INTRODUCTION

Modern medical and dental training has migrated from assessing only the quantity of procedures performed to a combined assessment of both competency and quantity. This study explores student perceptions of competency assessment in exodontia at a UK dental school.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to dental students in years three, four and five at the School of Dentistry, Cardiff University (n=149). Responses consisted of dichotomous tick boxes and 5-point Likert scales, with thematic analysis of free-text responses. Discrete variables were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Recurring themes were identified from the responses.

RESULTS

A total of 129 questionnaires were returned (response rate 87%). Feedback from students indicated that they felt well prepared to undertake the competency assessment, agreeing that year three is the most appropriate year to assess competency (69%; n=86). In 50% of cases (n=65), the clinical supervisor was not present for the duration of the assessment. The undergraduate student body would like further teaching in the use of elevators (89%; n=114).

CONCLUSION

The competency assessment was deemed fit for purpose by the undergraduate student body. Further developments in the areas of clinical supervision and teaching on the use of elevators were considered and recommendations made to the School of Dentistry, Cardiff University. The current oral surgery course incorporates some of the recommendations.

Tooth extraction education at dental schools across Europe

Objectives/Aims:

To explore students’ opinion about theoretical and clinical training in tooth extraction at different European dental schools.

Materials and Methods:

An online questionnaire, containing 36 dichotomous, multiple choice and Likert scale rating questions, was distributed among students of 56 different dental schools. After excluding schools where <20 students responded, 656 questionnaires from 23 dental schools remained for statistical analysis.

Results:

Dental schools showed a wide variation in the initial practical teaching of tooth extraction, from years 2 to 6. Several schools used a preclinical training model, and most students considered this useful. Some students considered their knowledge about forceps and elevators insufficient (6–60%), as well as their preparation for complications (5–60%). Students usually had received education in forceps and elevator techniques. Inclusion of (non)surgical removal of retained roots and surgical removal of third molars showed a wide variety between dental schools. Less than half of the students reported education in surgical removal of impacted teeth. Students from four of the 23 dental schools felt insufficiently prepared in tooth extraction (Likert scale ⩽3).

Conclusion:

There is a wide variation among European dental schools in teaching programs of tooth extraction and the rating of these programs by students.

Planning the content of a brief educational course in maxillofacial emergencies for staff in accident and emergency departments: a modified Delphi study

It is well known that staff in accident and emergency (A&E) departments lack the knowledge and confidence needed to deal with maxillofacial emergencies, and that it is related to limited education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. We therefore aimed to design a syllabus for a short course to educate staff about the most common emergencies. To find out which learning outcomes should be included and to reach a consensus, we did a 3-stage modified Delphi study of the opinions of members of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS). Of a possible 890 members, 188 responded (21%) in the second round and 105 in the third (12%). Eighteen (37%) of the 49 proposed learning outcomes were rated very important and all of them were retained in the syllabus after the third round. Thirty (61%) items were retained with a consensus of 51% or above in the final round. The Delphi technique is a useful addition to the armamentarium of those involved in education, and has been used effectively in syllabus design. We achieved good consensus on the items to be included and the syllabus will be piloted locally.

Management of impacted wisdom teeth: teaching of undergraduate students in UK dental schools

INTRODUCTION

Wisdom tooth removal is one of the most common oral surgical procedures performed across the world. The aim of this study was to gauge the teaching and training of impacted wisdom teeth in undergraduate dental programmes across the UK. The objectives were to identify consistencies and variations in theoretical instructions and clinical training as well as approaches to management of impacted wisdom teeth.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey utilising an online questionnaire. A purposefully designed pro forma with open- as well as closed-ended questions was used. The questionnaire was hosted online on the school's blackboard academic suite (Emily). Prior to conducting the study, approval was gained from the Research and Ethics Committee, and all the ethical principles pertaining to data protection were strictly followed. E-mail invitations were sent to oral surgery leads in all dental schools in the UK. The participants were provided with an information sheet, and an informed consent was obtained. The participants were invited by e-mail to complete the questionnaire online voluntarily.

RESULTS

A total of 16 dental schools offering an undergraduate course in dentistry in the UK, 13 responded positively. (response rate = 81.25%). In majority of dental schools, this subject is taught in the 4th and 5th years. A pre-clinical competency on phantom heads is a requirement in six schools, whilst only one school requires the students to pass a clinical competency. The clinical exposure of students to wisdom tooth surgery is quite variable. Although the dental schools are fairly consistent in their teaching with regard to the indications for surgical intervention, diagnostic/treatment modalities as well as the post-operative care, interesting variations were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, perhaps the first of its kind, provides useful insights into management of impacted wisdom teeth, as taught in the undergraduate dental programmes across the UK.

Dental student suturing skills: a multicentre trial of a checklist-based assessment

BACKGROUND

The assessment of clinical skills is essential to determine whether an undergraduate is competent to perform the tasks outlined in the curriculum. Such assessments in dentistry have historically not been subjected to large scale validity and reliability testing due the relatively small student numbers at each institute. The aims of this study were to test the validity and reliability of a standardised, checklist-based, suturing objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and then to perform a multicentre trial to determine its performance over a large cohort of students.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of seven UK schools agreed to take part in the trial. To test the validity and reliability of the checklist, the examiner at each institution reviewed and scored video footage of 10 students performing the assessment. Each institution then carried out the assessment providing a checklist score and a global score for each of their own students.

RESULTS

The assessment was well received by the staff, with acceptable inter-examiner variability. In total, 496 students completed the suturing OSCE with a success rate of 81% with a variation between schools of between 66% and 96%. A significant correlation was found between the checklist score and the global score (r = 0.361, P = 0.000). No one item on the checklist was found to be a determinant factor in the outcome of the OSCE.

CONCLUSIONS

This checklist-based assessment of suturing skills was found to have face and content validity. Its reliability was promising, but merits further investigation. There may be an argument for the standardisation of the assessment of this core surgical skill throughout several UK-based dental schools.