Ultrasound evaluation of acute experimental and chronic clinical wounds

Utility of high-frequency ultrasound: moving beyond the surface to detect changes in skin integrity

Ultrasound imaging is a versatile modality frequently used in clinical medicine, most likely due to its low cost, low risk to patients, and the ability to provide images in real time. Ultrasound used typically in clinical settings has frequencies between 2 and 12 MHz. Lower frequencies produce greater resolution but are limited in depth penetration; higher frequencies produce greater resolution, but depth of penetration is limited. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) shows promise for detection of certain changes in the skin and this has implications for early detection of changes associated with pressure ulcer formation and wound healing. The purpose of this article was to provide an overview of where HFUS has been used with the skin and provide some discussion on its utility with detecting skin changes related to pressure.

Effects of position and operator on high-frequency ultrasound scan quality

OBJECTIVES

High-frequency ultrasound may evaluate those at risk for pressure ulcers. Images may be obtained by clinicians with limited training. The prone position is recommended for obtaining sacral scans but may not be feasible in the critically ill. This study investigated image quality using multiple operators and a variety of patient positions.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Sacral scans were performed in three randomised positions in 50 volunteers by three different investigators using a 20 MHz ultrasound system. General linear models and ANOVA random effects models were used to examine the effects of operator and position on image quality rating, and measures of dermal thickness and dermal density.

RESULTS

The best scan for each position and operator was used for analysis (n=447 images). Image rating varied by operator (p=0.0004), although mean ratings were 3.5 or above for all operators. Dermal thickness was less for the prone position than in 90° or 60° side-lying positions (p=0.0137, p=0.0003). Dermal density was lower for the prone position than for the 90° or 60° positions (p<0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that overall scan quality was acceptable in all positions with all operators. However, differences were found between side-lying positions and the prone for dermal thickness and dermal density measures.

Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury

BACKGROUND

Acute traumatic wounds are one of the common reasons why people present to the emergency department. Primary closure has traditionally been reserved for traumatic wounds presenting within six hours of injury and considered 'clean' by the attending surgeon, with the rest undergoing delayed primary closure as a means of controlling wound infection. Primary closure has the potential benefit of rapid wound healing but poses the potential threat of increased wound infection. There is currently no evidence to guide clinical decision-making on the best timing for closure of traumatic wounds.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect on time to healing of primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours post injury. To explore the adverse effects of primary closure compared with delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours post injury.

SEARCH METHODS

In May 2013, for this first update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing primary closure with delayed closure of non bite traumatic wounds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated the results of the searches against the inclusion criteria. No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review.

MAIN RESULTS

Since no studies met the inclusion criteria, neither a meta-analysis nor a narrative description of studies was possible.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no systematic evidence to guide clinical decision-making regarding the timing for closure of traumatic wounds. There is a need for robust research to investigate the effect of primary closure compared with delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours of injury.

Primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds within 24 hours post injury

BACKGROUND

Acute traumatic wounds are one of the common reasons why people present to the emergency department. Primary closure has traditionally been reserved for traumatic wounds presenting within six hours of injury and considered 'clean' by the attending surgeon, with the rest undergoing delayed primary closure as a means of controlling wound infection. Primary closure has the potential benefit of rapid wound healing but poses the potential threat of increased wound infection. There is currently no evidence to guide clinical decision-making on the best timing for closure of traumatic wounds.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect on time to healing of primary closure versus delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours post injury. To explore the adverse effects of primary closure compared with delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours post injury.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 14 July 2011); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to July Week 1 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, July 13, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 27); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 14 July 2011). There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing primary closure with delayed closure of non bite traumatic wounds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated the results of the searches against the inclusion criteria. No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review.

MAIN RESULTS

Since no studies met the inclusion criteria, neither a meta-analysis nor a narrative description of studies was possible.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no systematic evidence to guide clinical decision-making regarding the timing for closure of traumatic wounds. There is a need for robust research to investigate the effect of primary closure compared with delayed closure for non bite traumatic wounds presenting within 24 hours of injury.

Automatic evaluation of pressure sore status by combining information obtained from high-frequency ultrasound and digital photography

In this study, the different phases of pressure sore generation and healing are investigated through a combined analysis of high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz) images and digital color photographs. Pressure sores were artificially induced in guinea pigs, and the injured regions were monitored for 21 days (data were obtained on days 3, 7, 14, and 21). Several statistical features of the images were extracted, relating to both the altering pattern of tissue and its superficial appearance. The features were grouped into five independent categories, and each category was used to train a neural network whose outputs were the four days. The outputs of the five classifiers were then fused using a fuzzy integral to provide the final decision. We demonstrate that the suggested method provides a better decision regarding tissue status than using either imaging technique separately. This new approach may be a viable tool for detecting the phases of pressure sore generation and healing in clinical settings.

Noninvasive assessment of diabetic foot ulcers with diffuse photon density wave methodology: pilot human study

A pilot human study is conducted to evaluate the potential of using diffuse photon density wave (DPDW) methodology at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths (685 to 830 nm) to monitor changes in tissue hemoglobin concentration in diabetic foot ulcers. Hemoglobin concentration is measured by DPDW in 12 human wounds for a period ranging from 10 to 61 weeks. In all wounds that healed completely, gradual decreases in optical absorption coefficient, oxygenated hemoglobin concentration, and total hemoglobin concentration are observed between the first and last measurements. In nonhealing wounds, the rates of change of these properties are nearly zero or slightly positive, and a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) is observed in the rates of change between healing and nonhealing wounds. Differences in the variability of DPDW measurements over time are observed between healing and nonhealing wounds, and this variance may also be a useful indicator of nonhealing wounds. Our results demonstrate that DPDW methodology with a frequency domain NIR device can differentiate healing from nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers, and indicate that it may have clinical utility in the evaluation of wound healing potential.

Wound healing assessment using 20 MHz ultrasound and photography

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare two non-invasive techniques of assessing wound healing, photography and high resolution ultrasound (HRUS) scanning, in experimentally induced full-thickness human skin wounds.

METHODS

Punch biopsy wounds, 4 mm in diameter, were made aseptically through locally anaesthetised skin on the anterior (volar) surface of the non-dominant forearm, 3 cm below the base of the cubital fossa, of 20 human participants. The wounds were treated with a topical antibiotic and covered for 3 days with Mepore sterile dressings. Wound healing was assessed on post-operative days 3, 7, 14 and 21 from photographs and HRUS B-scans. All photographs were taken of the wound site and adjacent intact skin under standardised conditions. The prints obtained were examined visually and digitised. Digital HRUS B-scans were taken through the centre of the wound bed and the adjacent intact skin parallel to the epidermis. Using the scanner's calibrated linear measurement capability, the wound width was measured adjacent to the deep surface of the scab, at the base of the wound, and midway between these two levels.

RESULTS

The wound margins were more clearly defined in the HRUS scans than in the photographs of the wounds; in some of the latter the scab masked the wound margins. Changes in the surface width of the wound were affected by the time of scab dehiscence, which varied between volunteers. There was less individual variation in the width of the base of the wound, as measured from the HRUS scans.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to photography, which allows recording of changes in the superficial aspect of the wound only, HRUS scanning permits the quantitative assessment of structural changes deep within the wound. Temporal changes in the width of the base of the wound can be used as an indication of the progress of repair.