The risk of HIV, HBV, HCV and HTLV infection among musculoskeletal tissue donors in Australia

Transition from Secondary Blood Test to Nucleic Acid Amplification for Safe Allograft Transplantation

Background

Given the incubation period of viral diseases, a secondary blood test should be performed at least 3–6 months after the first test to ensure the safety of allogenic bone grafts obtained from living donors in some tissue banks. The allograft is discarded if a secondary blood test was unavailable. The secondary blood test can be replaced with a nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) to reduce the discarded allograft. The purpose of this study was to analyze the comparative efficiency of secondary blood test and NAT to determine the donor suitability of allogenic bone grafts.

Methods

Allogenic bones were retrieved from 452 living donors between January 2013 and December 2019. A secondary blood test was conducted in 182 patients and NAT was performed in 270 patients. The average age of donors was 69 years (range, 33–87 years). They included 86 men and 366 women. The initial blood tests including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, AIDS, and syphilis were conducted before retrieving grafts. The results were analyzed after the secondary blood test was performed at least 3 to 6 months after the first test because of the incubation period of the viral diseases. NAT was performed within 2 months after the first blood test.

Results

Sixty-seven of the 452 cases (14.8%) were discarded. In the secondary blood test group, 50 out of 182 cases (27.4%), and in the NAT group, 17 out of 270 cases (6.3%) were discarded. None of the 132 donors tested positive in the secondary blood test after testing negative in the first test.

Conclusions

It is extremely rare that the secondary blood test yields positive results in donors who tested negative in the initial test. However, quite a few grafts are discarded only because the secondary blood test is not available. In terms of economics and ethics, the secondary blood test may not be necessary or if required, a single test such as NAT for infectious diseases may be performed to determine donor suitability of allogenic bone.

Infection and utilization rates of bone allografts in a hospital-based musculoskeletal tissue bank in north India

BACKGROUND

The bone bank unit of interest in this article was established in January 2018, in a tertiary care teaching institute of north India. Aim of this article is to describe the sources of allografts obtained, discard rates of allografts and infection rates in the recipients after use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All the relevant details of donors and recipients were maintained, and donors were screened for standard inclusion and exclusion criteria before obtaining the grafts. Aerobic culture was performed before storage and just prior to use. Samples with incomplete documentation, incomplete donor screening or positive cultures were discarded. Data on surgical site infection in recipients was collected from hospital records retrospectively. Initially ELISA based serological tests were used for screening. Donor has to undergo these tests again after 6 months to account for the window period of proliferation of viruses. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for these viral agents were introduced in the hospital in May 2018.

RESULTS

Allografts from a total of 196 donors were obtained in the bone bank over 2 years. Major source of bone was femoral heads harvested during total hip arthroplasty or hemi-arthroplasty. 44(22.4%) grafts had to be discarded. 95 allografts were used in 88 patients during this time. Most common indication for use was surgery for bone tumors (40%), followed by complex primary or revision arthroplasty (30.5%). Three (3.4%) recipients developed deep infection postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Frozen allograft bone from hospital based bone banks is a reliable source of allografts. When meticulous precautions for sterility are followed, risk of infection is low. Monitoring of such bone banks should fall within a framework of the local legislature. Incomplete documentation is the major reason for wastage of the samples obtained. NAAT may be useful in screening of donors, as it reduces the wastage and the holding time of the allografts.

Algorithms for the Testing of Tissue Donors for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus

Background

Although transmission of pathogenic viruses through human tissue grafts is rare, it is still one of the most serious dreaded risks of transplantation. Therefore, in addition to the detailed medical and social history, a comprehensive serologic and molecular screening of the tissue donors for relevant viral markers for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is necessary. In the case of reactive results in particular, clear decisions regarding follow-up testing and the criteria for tissue release must be made.

Methods

Based on the clinical relevance of the specific virus markers, the sensitivity of the serological and molecular biological methods used and the application of inactivation methods, algorithms for tissue release are suggested.

Results

Compliance with the preanalytical requirements and assessment of a possible hemodilution are mandatory requirements before testing the blood samples. While HIV testing follows defined algorithms, the procedures for HBV and HCV diagnostics are under discussion. Screening and decisions for HBV are often not as simple, e.g., due to cases of occult HBV infection, false-positive anti-HBc results, or early window period positive HBV NAT results. In the case of HCV diagnostics, modern therapies with direct-acting antivirals, which are often associated with successful treatment of the infection, should be included in the decision.

Conclusion

In HBV and HCV testing, a high-sensitivity virus genome test should play a central role in diagnostics, especially in the case of equivocal serology, and it should be the basis for the decision to release the tissue. The proposed test algorithms and decisions are also based on current European recommendations and standards for safety and quality assurance in tissue and cell banking.

Serological testing for infectious diseases markers of donor specimens from 24 h after death show no significant change in outcomes from other specimens

There is increasing demand for organ and tissue donations to cater for a growing waiting list of recipients. Serological screening of donors remains the initial assessment upon which many decisions are made, particularly if donors are found to be seropositive. Multiple different platforms are now available, although the Abbott ARCHITECT platform assays are currently licensed globally for testing of blood collected at less than 15 h post-mortem. Compliance with the specified maximum collection times drastically decreases the number of eligible deceased donors, with ~ 70% more donations available if screened at up to 24 h post mortem. A large scale study on deceased donors was performed where blood was collected between 12 and 25 h post-mortem. A total of 194 cadaveric serological specimens were tested using the Abbott ARCHITECT analyser for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Human T Lymphotropic Virus type I/II, and syphilis infection. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility and influence of storage conditions were assessed for testing with Abbott ARCHITECT platform for HIV antigen/antibody Combo, HCV antibody, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV core antibody (HBcAb), HTLVI/II antibody (rHTLV-I/II), and Syphilis TP assays. There was no significant difference between testing of sera from living and cadaveric individuals in terms of assay specificity, sensitivity and accuracy. The findings show testing of human serum and plasma specimens collected up to 24 h post-mortem with these assays is acceptable and reflects host status accurately.

Evaluation of occult hepatitis B infection in tissue donors: a multicenter analysis in Spain

Traditionally, when antibody to the Hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and antibody to the Hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) are positive, the donor is considered suitable. However, the literature contains cases with this profile and circulating hepatitis B virus DNA. The aim of the study is to analyze the incidence of occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI). Retrospective data were evaluated for deceased tissue donors in ten Tissue Establishments (Spain) during 2017. The data included demographic data and the serological markers for hepatitis B that each tissue establishment performed. A total number of 1933 tissue donors were evaluated. A total of 180 donors were excluded: 6 (0.3%) with Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs positive), and 174 in which DNA testing was not performed. Anti-HBc was positive in 175 donors (10%), in which anti-HBs was negative in 30 (17.1%) and positive in 145 (82.9%). In total, 27 donors with DNA positive (1.5%) were found, of which 3 of 117 donors (1.7%) showed anti-HBc negative and anti-HBs positive (> 10 IU/ml), 4 of 30 donors (13.3%) showed anti-HBc positive and anti-HBs negative and 20 of 145 donors (13.8%) showed both anti-HBc and anti-HBs positive. The highest probability of finding DNA occurs when anti-HBc is positive, regardless of the presence of anti-HBs. In our study, the probability of OBI was 1.5%. The classic concept that when anti-HBc and anti-HBs are positive (even with a titer of over 100 IU/ml) the donor can be accepted should, therefore, be reconsidered, and DNA testing should be mandatory.

Donor-derived infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation will review the current state of the art of donor-derived infections. Specifically, the guideline will summarize standardized definitions and approaches to defining imputability, updated data on the epidemiology of donor-derived infections, and approaches to risk mitigation against transmission of infections. This update will additionally provide guidance on the use of HIV+ donors in HIV+ recipients, the use of HCV-viremic donors in non-viremic recipients, donors with endemic infections, and donors with bacteremia, meningitis, and encephalitis. Lastly, the guidance will summarize an approach to recipients with a suspected donor-derived infection.

Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission

In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Organ and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summarizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered.

Organ utilization from increased infectious risk donors: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Donors with an increased risk of transmitting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) (increased risk donors [IRDs]) are a potential source of organs for transplant. Organs from IRDs can be utilized with appropriate recipient consent and post-transplant follow-up. We reviewed the characteristics and utilization of IRDs in our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) over a 2-year period.

METHODS

Donor information from April 1, 2013 to March 31, 2015 was obtained through the OPO database. Only consented donors were included. Donors were categorized as IRDs according to Health Canada/Canadian Standards Association (CSA) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 494 potential donors were identified, of which 92 (18.6%) were IRDs. Of these, at least one organ was transplanted from 76 (82.6%). Risk factors for IRDs included injection drug user (IDU) (12%), men having sex with men (MSM) (7%), commercial sex worker (CSW) (4%), and incarceration (24%). Fifty-nine percent (253/429) of IRD organs were utilized. The most frequently used organ was kidney, followed by liver. Median number of organs recovered per IRD was 3 (interquartile range: 2-5). Nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed in 18.5% (17/92) of IRDs. Reasons for NAT were IDU (n = 2), MSM (n = 2), CSW (n = 2), and previous incarceration (n = 7). Organ utilization from donors that had NAT was similar to donors who did not (94% vs 80%, P = .29). Follow-up NAT was done in <5% of recipients from IRDs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, IRDs comprised a significant proportion of donors. Utilization of IRD organs occurred at a significant rate regardless of pre-transplant NAT. These data suggest that multiple factors contribute to the perception of infectious risk from such organs.

Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: a literature review

Many bone substitutes have been proposed for bone regeneration, and researchers have focused on the interactions occurring between grafts and host tissue, as the biologic response of host tissue is related to the origin of the biomaterial. Bone substitutes used in oral and maxillofacial surgery could be categorized according to their biologic origin and source as autologous bone graft when obtained from the same individual receiving the graft; homologous bone graft, or allograft, when harvested from an individual other than the one receiving the graft; animal-derived heterologous bone graft, or xenograft, when derived from a species other than human; and alloplastic graft, made of bone substitute of synthetic origin. The aim of this review is to describe the most commonly used bone substitutes, according to their origin, and to focus on the biologic events that ultimately lead to the integration of a biomaterial with the host tissue.

Histological evaluation of fresh frozen bone integration at different experimental times

The aim of this work was to investigate, through histological evaluation, the in vivo behavior of fresh frozen bone (FFB) used as particulate bone substitute in intraoral regenerative procedures. A total of 10 patients (group 1) received particulate FFB graft for bone regeneration in postextractive sockets, and 10 (group 2) underwent maxillary sinus augmentation by using the same bone substitute as filling. Fresh frozen bone was supplied from the Tissue Bank of the Veneto Region, Treviso Section.Healing was uneventful for all the patients and was monitored by periodical radiographs. Patients were scheduled for implant insertion according to the radiographic aspect. However, the mean healing time for group 1 was 45 days, whereas for group 2 patients, it was 100 days. At the moment of implant insertion, bone specimens were collected at the site of implant placement, from both groups and processed for histological analysis.Histological analysis after hematoxylin-eosin staining obtained from group 1 patients showed the presence of newly formed bone tissue, still well distinguishable from the grafted bone substitute. In samples from group 2 patients, a better integration could be recognized associated with active bone remodeling phenomena.These results showed a good integration of the considered FFB graft within the host tissue both at 45 and 100 days after grafting, displaying this biomaterial as suitable for preimplant regenerative procedures.

Living donor bone banking: processing and discarding--from procurement to therapeutic use

Skeletal muscle and osteoarticular tissue banks are responsible to procure, process, store and distribute tissues, from living and cadaveric donors. The procedures involve the application of protocols covering all aspects of the banking, ensuring the best tissue quality and maximum safety for the recipient. An analysis on the causes of bone tissue discarded by Biotar Tissue Bank between January 2005 and December 2012 was carried. Bone tissue was obtained from both hip and knee replacement (femoral heads and tibial plateau respectively) in living donors treated at different medical-surgical institutions in Argentina. These tissues were processed at the Bank to produce both frozen and lyophilized cancellous bone. Out of 3413 donated bones received by the Bank, 77.55 % resulted in final product, while the remaining 22.44 % was discarded in compliance with the quality standards of both the Bank and the regulatory authority. Comparing the last and the first year of the studied period, the number of discarded tissue increased 3.6 times, while the number of collected bones was approximately 10 times higher. Related to total disposed tissue, reactive serology was the most frequent cause (62.14 %), followed by inappropriate collection/storage of blood sample (30.81 %). A progressive reduction in the percentages of total discard was observed, and this was proportional to inappropriate collection/storage of blood sample. No significant differences were found in the discard rates due to positive serology throughout all the years studied. The success of a tissue bank requires full commitment of all the personnel especially the team members responsible for donor selection and the processing of allografts. It is important to critically screen donors in the early stages of donor recruitment. All of the procedures carried out by the tissue bank are parts of the quality control system which must be strictly carried out. Biotar Tissue Bank is continuously committed to ensure safety to the recipients.

Donor-derived infection--the challenge for transplant safety

Unusual clinical syndromes or clusters of infections in recipients of organs from the same donor suggest donor-derived infection as a possible source of transmission

The incidence of transmission of unexpected infection by organ allografts is low, but precise data are lacking

Screening of donors for common pathogens involves both epidemiologic history and microbiological assays, and is highly effective for preventing the transmission of HIV and hepatitis B and C viruses

Donor screening for uncommon pathogens must be guided by knowledge of changes in the local epidemiology of infection

The key element in the detection of donor-derived infection is suspicion on the part of the clinicians caring for organ recipients

Application of newer microbiological techniques will increase the speed of donor screening and enhance transplant safety

Each year, over 70,000 organs are transplanted worldwide. The degree of risk of transmission of infection from transplanted organs to the recipient is largely unknown and is difficult to assess for specific organs. Here, Jay A. Fishman and Paolo A. Grossi describe the major risk factors for organ donor-derived transmission of infection and discuss opportunities to reduce the incidence of such events.

Organ transplantation, including of the heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas, and small bowel, is considered the therapy of choice for end-stage organ failure. Each year, over 70,000 organs are implanted worldwide. One donor may provide multiple organs, as well as corneas and other tissues, for multiple recipients. The degree of risk for transmission of infection carried with grafts, notably of viruses, is largely unknown and, for a specific organ, difficult to assess. The approach to microbiological screening of organ donors varies with national and regional regulations and with the availability and performance of microbiological assays used for potential donors. Transmission of both expected or common, and unexpected infections has been observed in organ transplants, generally recognized after development of clusters of infections among recipients of organs from a common donor. Other than for unusual or catastrophic events, few data exist that define the incidence and manifestations of donor-derived infections or the ideal assays to use in screening to prevent such transmissions. Absolute prevention of the transmission of donor-derived infections in organ transplantation is not possible. However, improvements in screening technologies will enhance the safety of transplantation in the future.

Expanded criteria donors

The greatest challenge facing liver transplantation today is the shortage of donor livers. Demand far exceeds supply, and this deficit has driven expansion of what is considered an acceptable organ. The evolving standard has not come without costs, however, as each new frontier of expanded donor quality (i.e., advancing donor age, donation after cardiac death, and split liver) may have traded wait-list for post-transplant morbidity and mortality. This article delineates the nature and severity of risk associated with specific deceased donor liver characteristics and recommends strategies to maximally mitigate these risks.

Prevalence of microbiological markers in bone tissue from live and cadaver donors in the musculoskeletal tissue bank of Passo Fundo

Objective

To conduct an epidemiological analysis on the main microbiological markers in bone tissue that was processed at the musculoskeletal tissue bank of Hospital São Vicente de Paulo, in Passo Fundo, between August 2007 and October 2011.

Methods

Between August 2007 and October 2011, 202 musculoskeletal tissue samples were collected for the tissue bank. Among these, 159 samples were from living donor patients and 43 were from cadaver donors. The following serological tests were requested: hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis, cytomegalovirus, Chagas disease, toxoplasmosis, HIV and HTLV.

Results

Among the 159 living donors, 103 (64.75%) were men and 56 (35.25%) were women. The patients’ mean age was 59.35 ± 8.87 years. Out of this total, 76 tissue samples (47.8%) from donors were rejected. There was no difference in the number of rejections in relation to sex (p = 0.135) or age (p = 0.523). The main cause of rejection was serologically positive findings for the hepatitis B virus, which was responsible for 48 rejections (63.15%). Among the 43 cadaver donors, the mean age was 37.84 ± 10.32 years. Of these, 27 (62.8%) were men and 16 (37.2%) were women. Six of the samples collected from cadaver donors were rejected (13.9%), and the main cause of rejection was serologically positive findings for the hepatitis C virus, which was responsible for three cases (50%). There was no significant difference in the number of rejections in relation to sex (p = 0.21) or age (p = 0.252).

Conclusion

There were a greater number of rejections of tissues from living donors (47.8%) than from cadaver donors (13.9%). Among the living donors, the main cause of rejection was the presence of serologically positive findings of the hepatitis B virus, while among the cadaver donors, it was due to the hepatitis C virus.

Reducing infection transmission in solid organ transplantation through donor nucleic acid testing: a cost-effectiveness analysis

For solid organ transplant (SOT) donors, nucleic acid-amplification testing (NAT) may reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission over antibody (Ab) testing given its shorter detection window period. We compared SOT donor NAT + Ab versus Ab alone using decision models to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs; cost per quality-adjusted life year [QALY] gained) from the societal perspective across a range of HIV/HCV prevalence values and NAT costs. The cost per QALY gained was calculated for two scenarios: (1) favorable: low cost ($150/donor)/high prevalence (HIV: 1.5%; HCV: 18.2%) and (2) unfavorable: high cost ($500/donor)/low prevalence (HIV: 0.1%; HCV: 1.5%). In the favorable scenario, adding NAT screening cost $161 013 per QALY gained for HIV was less costly) for HCV, and cost $86 653 per QALY gained for HIV/HCV combined. For the unfavorable scenario, the costs were $15 568 484, $221 006 and $10 077 599 per QALY gained, respectively. Universal HCV NAT + Ab for donors appears cost-effective to reduce infection transmission from SOT donors, while HIV NAT + Ab is not, except where HIV NAT is ≤$150/donor and prevalence is ≥1.5%. Our analyses provide important data to facilitate the decision to implement HIV and HCV NAT for deceased SOT donors and shape national policy regarding how to reduce infection transmission in SOT.

Opportunistic infections--coming to the limits of immunosuppression?

Possible etiologies of infection in the solid organ recipient are diverse, ranging from common bacterial and viral pathogens to opportunistic pathogens that cause invasive disease only in immunocompromised hosts. The recognition of infectious syndromes in this population is limited by alterations in the clinical manifestations by immunosuppression. The risk of serious infections in the organ transplant patient is determined by the interaction between the patients' recent and distant epidemiological exposures and all factors that contribute to the patient's net state of immune suppression. This risk is altered by antimicrobial prophylaxis and changes in immunosuppressive therapies. In addition to the direct effects of infection, opportunistic infections, and the microbiome may adversely shape the host immune responses with diminished graft and patient survivals. Antimicrobial therapies are more complex than in the normal host with a significant incidence of drug toxicity and a propensity for drug interactions with the immunosuppressive agents used to maintain graft function. Rapid and specific microbiologic diagnosis is essential. Newer microbiologic assays have improved the diagnosis and management of opportunistic infections. These tools coupled with assays that assess immune responses to infection and to graft antigens may allow optimization of management for graft recipients in the future.

Effect of hydrogen peroxide on human tendon allograft

Bacterial contamination of tendon allografts at the completion of processing has historically been about 2 %, with tendons that are found to be culture positive being discarded. Treatment of tendon allograft with hydrogen peroxide at the beginning of tissue processing may reduce bacterial contamination, however, the potential side effects of hydrogen peroxide treatment include hydrolysis of the collagen and this may alter the mechanical properties of the graft. Pairs of human tendons were used. One was washed in 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 5 min and the untreated tendon was used as a control. The ultimate tensile strength of the tendons was determined using a material testing machine. A freeze clamp technique was used to hold the tendons securely at the high loads required to cause tendon failure. There was no statistical difference in the ultimate tensile strength between the treated and untreated tendons. Mean strength ranged from Extensor Hallucis Longus at 588 Newtons to Tibialis Posterior at 2,366 Newtons. Hydrogen peroxide washing may reduce bacterial contamination of tendon allograft and does not affect the strength of the tendon.

Hepatitis C virus and nonliver solid organ transplantation

: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in solid organ allograft recipients and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after transplantation, so effective management will improve outcomes. In this review, we discuss the extent of the problem associated with HCV infection in donors and kidney, heart, and lung transplant candidates and recipients and recommend follow-up and treatment.Patients with end-stage kidney disease without cirrhosis and selected patients with early-stage cirrhosis can be considered for kidney transplant alone. In HCV-infected kidney allograft recipients, the progression of fibrosis should be evaluated serially by Fibroscan or serologic measures of fibrosis. Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors should be restricted to HCV-positive recipients as it is associated with a reduced time waiting for a graft and does not affect posttransplant outcomes. Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy should be considered for all HCV-RNA-positive kidney transplant candidates, irrespective of the baseline liver histopathology. Protease inhibitors have yet to be fully evaluated in patients with renal dysfunction and in the transplant population. As these agents may cause anemia in patients with normal renal function, tolerability may be a problem in patients with end-stage kidney disease.The impact of HCV infection on survival in heart and lung transplantation is unclear. Because of the shortage of organs, few HCV-infected patients are accepted for transplantation.Universal use of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) for the screening of potential organ donors should be reserved to high-risk donors. Assays that quantify HCV core antigen may become more cost-effective than NAT for the screening of potential organ donors.

Trends in transfusion-transmissible infections among Australian blood donors from 2005 to 2010

BACKGROUND

Routine monitoring of trends in transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) is essential to maintaining and improving transfusion safety. Although periodic studies have been published there is no comprehensive trend analysis for TTIs in Australian donors. This study determined recent trends in TTIs for which testing is conducted in Australia and described key attributes of infected blood donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis using data on donation testing for TTIs (2005-2010) from the national blood service donor database and data on postdonation interviews with TTI-positive donors (2008-2010) from a risk factor database incorporating responses to standardized interview questions. The study measured the prevalence and incidence of TTIs in Australia and assessed their time trends. Multivariate analysis of time trends was conducted using Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, the prevalence and incidence of TTIs in 2005 to 2010 remained low and steady. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus decreased (rate ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97) and the prevalence of active syphilis increased (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.15-1.99) significantly during the study period. Prevalence of TTIs among Australian blood donors was substantially lower than that in the general population and no unique risk factors were identified in test-positive blood donors when compared with the general population.

CONCLUSION

Both the prevalence and the incidence of TTIs in Australian blood donors remained low, with a steady or declining trend for most infections except active syphilis. The lower prevalence of TTIs in blood donors compared with the general population reflects the effectiveness of donor education and donor selection measures in Australia.

Evaluating the risk of transmission of infection from donor to recipient of a solid organ transplantation

In the context of solid organ transplantation, screening of potential organ donors is crucial, and should be performed with great rigor to minimize the risk of transmission of certain infectious processes. This review aims to update understanding of the possible pathologies involved, as well as of emerging infections that, as a result of globalization, are gaining increasing prominence on a daily basis.

Trends in prevalence, incidence, and residual risk of major transfusion-transmissible viral infections in United Arab Emirates blood donors: impact of individual-donation nucleic acid testing, 2004 through 2009

BACKGROUND

United Arab Emirates (UAE) has a heterogeneous population consisting of more than 160 nationalities and 85% of the population being non-UAE. In 2007, Dubai Blood Donation Centre (DBDC), the major local supplier of blood in the UAE, introduced six-minipool nucleic acid test (NAT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which in 2008 upgraded to individual-donation (ID)-NAT. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of the donor screening program in the UAE and evaluate the impact of NAT on the yield and residual risk of transfusion-transmissible viral infections (TTVIs).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 169,781 blood donations collected at DBDC between 2004 and 2009 were screened for TTVIs. During the period 2008 through 2009, a total of 59,283 donations were tested with both ID-NAT and serologic assays. The incidence, prevalence, and residual risk for each viral agent were estimated and analyzed.

RESULTS

The individual prevalences of HBV, HCV, and HIV per 100,000 donation were 234.4, 110, and 4, respectively. Calculated residual risk per million donations for HBV was decreased from 1.41 in pre-NAT period to 0.92 in post-NAT period. These figures were decreased for HCV and HIV from 1.73 and 0.39 to 0 and 0.32, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Incidence rates and estimated residual risk indicate that the current risk of TTVIs attributable to blood donation is relatively low in the UAE. The study recommends the parallel use of both serology and ID-NAT TTVIs screening in blood donations and suggests the exclusion of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen-positive donations as this can eliminate the potential infectivity of these units with marginal effects on the blood stock in UAE.

Transmission of infection with human allografts: essential considerations in donor screening

Transmission of infection via transplantation of allografts including solid organs, eyes, and tissues are uncommon but potentially life-threatening events. Donor-derived infections have been documented following organ, tissue, and ocular transplants. Each year, more than 70 000 organs, 100 000 corneas, and 2 million human tissue allografts are implanted worldwide. Single donors may provide allografts for >100 organ and tissue recipients; each allograft carries some, largely unquantifiable, risk of disease transmission. Protocols for screening of organ or tissue donors for infectious risk are nonuniform, varying with the type of allograft, national standards, and availability of screening assays. In the absence of routine, active surveillance, coupled with the common failure to recognize or report transmission events, few data are available on the incidence of allograft-associated disease transmission. Research is needed to define the optimal screening assays and the transmissibility of infection with allografts. Approaches are reviewed that may contribute to safety in allograft transplantation.

Organ donor screening using parallel nucleic acid testing allows assessment of transmission risk and assay results in real time

Expansion of the donor pool may lead to utilization of donors with risk factors for viral infections. Donor laboratory screening relies on serological and nucleic acid testing (NAT). The increased sensitivity of NAT in low prevalence populations may result in false-positive results (FPR) and may cause unnecessary discard of organs.We developed a screening algorithm to deal, in real time, with potential FPR. Three NAT assays: COBAS AmpliScreen assay (CAS), AmpliPrep Total Nucleic Acid Isolation/CAS, and AmpliPrep/TaqMan assays, were validated and used in parallel for prospective screening of increased-risk donors (IRD), and the probability of FPR was calculated. The lower limit of detection of this algorithm was 9.79, 21.02, and 4.31 IU/mL for human immunodeficiency virus-1, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, respectively, with an average turn-around-time of 7.67 h from sample receipt to result reporting. The probability that a donor is potentially infectious with two NAT concordant results was >90%. NAT screening of 35 IRD within 18 months resulted in transplantation of 102 additional organs that without screening would either not be used or used with restrictions in Australia. Using a parallel testing algorithm, real-time confirmation of seropositive donors allows use of organs from IRD and safer expansion of the donor pool.

CURETTAGE AND CALCIUM PHOSPHATE BONE CEMENT INJECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF ENCHONDROMA OF THE FINGER

Ten consecutive patients with digital enchondroma were treated by curettage and calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC) injection under digital nerve block. Mean patient age at surgery was 39 years old (range, 26–54), and the mean follow-up period was 19 months (range, 12–31). Two patients had a pathologic fracture at the first visit. Active finger motion was allowed at three days postoperatively and all patients returned to work within four weeks of surgery. The surgical procedures were uneventful in all patients, and no complications were encountered during follow-up. The mean total arc of motion of the PIP joints and MP joints of the affected fingers was 93% of and 99%, respectively, of the arcs of the corresponding joints of the contralateral unaffected fingers at final follow-up. CPC injection is a good option for the treatment of enchondroma of the finger.

Design and development of a quantitative real time PCR assay for monitoring of HTLV-1 provirus in whole blood

BACKGROUND

Proviral load quantification of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is an essential marker for disease progression. Therefore, accurate and precise quantification of the virus is important. However, many articles published about detection and quantification of HTLV-1 virus neither reported any databank for the pre-validation of their primer and probe sequences nor stressed on its importance. Consequently, this failure may cause proviral load measurement variations of different HTLV-1 strains.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a TaqMan assay for HTLV-1 proviral load quantification which is based on a conserved region of tax gene with minimal sequence variability.

STUDY DESIGN

For the purpose of finding the most conserved region of tax gene, all the HTLV-1 Gene Bank records including tax gene sequence (524 records by December 2009) were aligned in order to design on the most conserved region of this gene. The specificity, sensitivity, inter and intra assay and the dynamic range of the assay were experimentally determined by their respective methodology.

RESULT

The assay has a dynamic range of 10-10(7) HTLV-1 plasmid DNA/rxn (reaction) and the limit of detection (LOD) less than 10 copies/rxn. The assay gave coefficient of variation (CV) for the Ct values of less than 1% and 4.8% for intra and inter assay, respectively. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 97.8% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This TaqMan assay is able to reliably quantify proviral load due to the fact that it has been designed on a conserved region of HTLV-1 tax gene with minimal sequence variability.

Zero risk tolerance costs lives: loss of transplantable organs due to human immunodeficiency virus nucleic acid testing of potential donors

Patients' deaths due to the organ donor shortage make it imperative that every suitable organ be transplanted. False-positive results of tests for infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) result in lost organs. A survey of US organ procurement organizations collected the numbers of donors and ruled-out potential donors who had a positive result on an HIV test from January 1,2006, to October 31, 2008. Sixty-two percent of US organ procurement organizations participated. Of the 12397 donor/nondonor cases, 56 (0.45%) had an initial positive result on an HIV antibody or HIV nucleic acid test, and only 8 (14.3%) of those were confirmed positive. Of the false-positive results, 50% were from HIV antibody tests and 50% were from HIV nucleic acid tests. Organs are a scarce, finite, and perishable resource. Use of HIV antibody testing has produced a remarkably safe track record of avoiding HIV transmission, with 22 years of nonoccurrence between transmissions. Because false positives occur with any test, including the HIV Ab test, adding nucleic acid testing to the standard donor testing panel doubles the number of false-positive HIV test results and thus the number of medically suitable donors lost. The required HIV antibody test is 99.99% effective in preventing transmission of the HIV virus. Adding the HIV nucleic acid test to routine organ donor screening could result in as many as 761 to 1551 unnecessary deaths of patients between HIV transmission events because medically suitable organs are wasted.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Combination with Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

This article reviews past and current strategies of the use of bone graft substitutes along with the future biologic alternatives that can enhance the functional capabilities of those grafts. Many of these bone graft substitute alternatives include ceramic-based, allograft-based, factor-based and polymer-based whereas others are cell-based. The ways of achieving the goal of tissue engineering using stem cells and their lineage to regenerate tissue have been detailed with regard to both the generation of sufficient vascular invasion of the tissue to improve oxygen and nutrient supply, and the development of innovative physical/chemical stimuli to induce bone formation with the proper biomaterial to carry the cells. It is imperative to integrate basic polymer science with molecular biology and stem cell biology, in the design of new materials that perform very sophisticated signaling needed for integration and function.

Histopathology of femoral head donations: a retrospective review of 6161 cases

BACKGROUND

Although total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopaedic surgical procedures, it remains unclear whether histopathological examination of the excised femoral head adds to the quality of patient care. We propose that assessment of femoral heads resected during total hip arthroplasty and donated for allograft use may provide a profile of femoral head pathology that benefits total hip arthroplasty patients and bone donors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the histological findings reported for 6161 femoral heads donated for allograft use between 1993 and 2006. Specimens obtained during total hip arthroplasty and specimens donated at death were reviewed. Follow-up investigations that resulted from abnormal histopathological findings were also reviewed. The Western Australian Cancer Registry was used to determine whether patients with a suspected neoplasm were subsequently diagnosed with such a disease. A retrospective review of the histopathological findings was conducted to evaluate and reclassify all previous observations of abnormalities.

RESULTS

One hundred and five femoral heads demonstrated abnormal or reactive histopathological features not reported prior to surgery and were rejected for allograft use. A reactive lymphocytic infiltrate, most likely due to osteoarthritis, was the most commonly identified feature (forty-five cases). Other features observed in twenty-seven cases were also most likely due to the presence of severe osteoarthritis. Ten femoral heads demonstrated plasmacytosis, which may have been related to osteoarthritis. Two patients were diagnosed with Paget's disease, and two, with rheumatoid arthritis. Nineteen patients had a suspected neoplasm. Of these nineteen, eight cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia and one case of myelodysplastic syndrome were confirmed on further investigation. One subsequently confirmed malignancy was detected per 770 femoral heads examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that, even with a detailed medical history and careful physical examination, clinically important diseases including neoplasms and Paget's disease are observed in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty. Histological examination plays an integral role in quality assurance in femoral head banking, and it also represents a possible early diagnostic test for bone and bone-marrow-related diseases in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Stability of hepatitis C virus, HIV, and hepatitis B virus nucleic acids in plasma samples after long-term storage at -20°C and -70°C

The storage of biological samples may affect detection of viral nucleic acid, yet the stability of viral nucleic acid at standard laboratory storage temperatures (-70°C and -20°C) has not been comprehensively assessed. Deterioration of viral RNA and DNA during storage may affect the detection of viruses, thus leading to an increased likelihood of false-negative results on diagnostic testing. The viral loads of 99 hepatitis C virus (HCV), 41 HIV, and 101 hepatitis B virus (HBV) patient samples were measured before and after storage at -20°C and -70°C for up to 9.1 years using Versant branched DNA assays, Cobas Monitor assays, and/or AmpliPrep/AmpliScreen assays. Clinical samples stored at -20°C for up to 1.2 years and at -70°C for up to 9 years showed a statistically significant difference from baseline with respect to HCV RNA titer, although this difference was not greater than 0.5 log(10) unit. The concentration of HIV RNA in clinical samples stored at -20°C for 2.3 years and at -70°C for up to 9.1 years did not differ significantly from the baseline viral load. HBV DNA-positive clinical samples stored at -20°C for up to 5 years and at -70°C for up to 4 years differed significantly in viral load. In all studies, however, the loss of viral load of HCV, HIV, or HBV in clinical samples tested after storage at -20°C and -70°C for up to 9 years ranged from 0.01 to 0.35 log(10) IU/ml and did not exceed 0.5 log(10), which is the estimated intra-assay variation for molecular tests. Hence, the loss was considered of minimal clinical impact and adequate for the detection of HCV, HIV-1, and HBV nucleic acids using nucleic acid assays for the assessment of the infectious risk of cell, blood, and tissue donors.

Estimated risk of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection among potential organ donors from 17 organ procurement organizations in the United States

To prevent unintentional transmission of bloodborne pathogens through organ transplantation, organ procurement organizations (OPOs) screen potential donors by serologic testing to identify human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Newly acquired infection, however, may be undetectable by serologic testing. Our objective was to estimate the incidence of undetected infection among potential organ donors and to assess the significance of risk reductions conferred by nucleic acid testing (NAT) versus serology alone. We calculated prevalence of HIV and HCV-stratified by OPO risk designation-in 13,667 potential organ donors managed by 17 OPOs from 1/1/2004 to 7/1/2008. We calculated incidence of undetected infection using the incidence-window period approach. The prevalence of HIV was 0.10% for normal risk potential donors and 0.50% for high risk potential donors; HCV prevalence was 3.45% and 18.20%, respectively. For HIV, the estimated incidence of undetected infection by serologic screening was 1 in 50,000 for normal risk potential donors and 1 in 11,000 for high risk potential donors; for HCV, undetected incidence by serologic screening was 1 in 5000 and 1 in 1000, respectively. Projected estimates of undetected infection with NAT screening versus serology alone suggest that NAT screening could significantly reduce the rate of undetected HCV for all donor risk strata.

Infectious disease screening of blood specimens collected post-mortem provides comparable results to pre-mortem specimens

Serology assays for standard screening are optimised for use with sera collected from living adults and children. Because of potential changes in the vascular compartments after death, methods used for screening sera from cadaveric organ donors need to be validated before testing these specimens. Serum was separated from blood collected from cadaveric donors within 24 h of death and biochemical parameters measured to detect dilution of protein and haemolysis. In order to demonstrate if any inhibitors that might interfere with the assays were present, pre and post-mortem specimens were spiked with aliquots of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus (HTLV) and T. pallidum-positive sera. Comparison of serum from living subjects with serum obtained post-mortem showed that while the concentration of total protein decreased, concentrations of albumin, immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) remained unchanged. The degree of haemolysis, as measured by free haemoglobin, was within the limits accepted for the Architect analyser. Spiking of pre- and post-mortem specimens with aliquots of HIV, HCV, HBV, HTLV and T. pallidum-positive sera showed no statistical difference in the signal between pre-mortem and post-mortem results when tested on the Abbott Architect analyser. Positive results were obtained in each of a further nine subjects who had tested positive for HIV (n=1), HCV (n=8), HBV (n=1) on pre-mortem serological testing. These findings suggest that the sensitivity of the Abbott Architect serological screening tests is not significantly affected in specimens collected within 24 h of the cessation of life.

Tissue donation and virus safety: more nucleic acid amplification testing is needed

In tissue and organ transplantation, it is of great importance to avoid the transmission of blood-borne viruses to the recipient. While serologic testing for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and -2, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc), and Treponema pallidum infection is mandatory, there is until now in most countries no explicit demand for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) to detect HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and HCV infection. After a review of reports in the literature on viral transmission events, tissue-specific issues, and manufacturing and inactivation procedures, we evaluated the significance of HIV, HCV, and HBV detection using NAT  in  donors of various types of tissues and compared our results with the experiences of blood banking organizations. There is a significant risk of HIV, HCV, and HBV transmission by musculoskeletal tissues because of their high blood content and the high donor-recipient ratio. If no effective virus inactivation procedure for musculoskeletal tissue is applied, donors should be screened using NAT  for  HIV, HCV, and HBV. Serologically screened cardiovascular tissue carries a very low risk of HIV, HCV, or HBV transmission. Nevertheless, because effective virus inactivation is impossible (retention of tissue morphology) and the donor-recipient ratio may be as high as 1:10, we concluded that NAT  should be performed for HIV, HCV, and HBV as an additional safety measure. Although cornea allografts carry the lowest risk of transmitting HIV, HCV, and HBV  owing to corneal physiology, morphology, and the epidemiology of corneal diseases, NAT  for  HCV should still be performed. If the NAT  screening of a donor for HIV, HCV, and HBV is negative, quarantine storage of the donor tissue seems dispensable. In view of numerous synergistic effects with transfusion medicine, it would be advantageous for tissue banks to cooperate with blood bank laboratories in performing virological tests.

Accepting a donor kidney: an evaluation of patients' and transplant surgeons' priorities

BACKGROUND

Despite a trend toward patient autonomy in clinical practice, the decision whether or not to accept a kidney for transplantation is made predominantly by the transplant surgeon. The purpose of this study is to examine how patients and surgeons prioritize relevant factors when deciding to accept or decline an available kidney.

METHODS

We elicited patient and surgeon rankings for a list of factors involved in the decision using a validated computer survey. We computed the relative importance of each factor and examined associations between patient characteristics and priorities using Spearman's correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients placed the greatest value on kidney quality and predictors of transplant outcome. Patients who were on the waiting list longer gave less importance to kidney quality and function. Surgeons placed the greatest value on kidney quality, difficulty for the patient to be matched to a kidney, and the age of the donor.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that decision support tools can be used to improve the understanding of patient priorities in the decision to accept a donor kidney.

Provider utilization of high-risk donor organs and nucleic acid testing: results of two national surveys

Fears of infectious transmission from CDC high-risk donors (HRDs) remain a significant disincentive, and the potential for human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV) nucleic acid testing (NAT) to allay these fears remains unstudied. We hypothesized that NAT, which narrows the window period between infection and detectability compared to the standard ELISA, might lead to increased provider willingness to use HRDs. Between January and April 2008, we performed two national surveys: one of current NAT practice among organ procurement organizations (OPOs); a second of HRD use among transplant surgeons. Surgeons who reported accepting 10% or more offers for a given HRD behavior and organ type were classified as 'high utilizers' of that subgroup. We built hierarchical models to examine associations between OPO NAT performance and provider utilization. Providers who ranked medical risks of HIV or HCV as important disincentives to HRD use had significantly lower odds of being high utilizers (HIV odds ratio 0.22, HCV odds ratio 0.41, p < 0.005). Furthermore, both HIV and HCV NAT performance were associated with significantly higher odds of being high utilizers (HIV odds ratio 1.58, HCV 2.69, p < 0.005). The demonstrated associations between OPO NAT performance and high provider utilization of HRDs should be considered in the ongoing debate about NAT in transplantation.

Viral nucleic acid testing (NAT) and OPO-level disposition of high-risk donor organs

The use of Public Health Service/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (PHS/CDC) high-risk donor (HRD) organs remains controversial, especially in light of a recent high-profile case of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. Nucleic acid testing (NAT), while more expensive and time consuming, reduces infectious risk by shortening the period between infection and detectability. The purpose of this study was to characterize HRDs and disposition of their organs by organ procurement organization (OPO), to measure NAT practices by OPO and to examine associations between NAT practices and use of HRD organs. We analyzed 29 950 deceased donors (2574 HRDs) reported to UNOS since July 1, 2004 and May 8, 2008. We then surveyed all OPO clinical directors about their use of NAT, average time to receive NAT results, locations where NAT is performed and percentage of the time NAT results are available for allocation decisions. In total, 51.7% of OPOs always perform HIV NAT, while 24.1% never do. A similar pattern is seen for HCV NAT performance, while the majority (65.6%) never perform HBV NAT. AIDS prevalence in an OPO service area is not associated with NAT practice. OPOs that perform HIV NAT are less likely to export organs outside of their region. The wide variation of current practice and the possibility that NAT would improve organ utilization support consideration for a national policy.

Formal policies and special informed consent are associated with higher provider utilization of CDC high-risk donor organs

A new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy mandates special informed consent (SIC) before transplanting organs from donors classified by the Public Health Service/Center for Disease Control (PHS/CDC) as high-risk donors (HRDs); however, concerns remain that this policy may cause suboptimal organ utilization. Currently, consent and disclosure policy is determined by individual centers or surgeons; as such, little is known about current practices. The goals of this study were to quantify consent and disclosure practices for HRDs in the United States, identify factors associated with SIC use and analyze associations between SIC use and HRD organ utilization. We surveyed 422 transplant surgeons about their use of HRD organs and their associated consent and disclosure practices. In total, 52.7% of surgeons use SIC, but there is a high variation in use within centers, between centers and by donor behavior. A defined HRD policy at a transplant center is strongly associated with SIC use at that center (OR = 4.68, p < 0.001 by multivariate hierarchical logistic regression). SIC use is associated with higher utilization of HRD livers (OR 3.37), and a trend toward higher utilization of HRD kidneys (OR 1.74) and pancreata (OR 1.28). We believe our findings support a formalized national policy and suggest that this policy will not result in decreased utilization.

Comparison of the risk of viral infection between the living and nonliving musculoskeletal tissue donors in Australia

Screening of musculoskeletal tissue donors with nucleic acid testing (NAT) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been implemented in the United States and other developed nations. However, in contrast to the donor demographics in the United States, the majority of Australian musculoskeletal tissue donations are primarily from living surgical donors. The objective of our study was to determine and compare the risk of viral infection associated with musculoskeletal tissue donation from living and nonliving donors in Australia. We studied serum samples from 12 415 consecutive musculoskeletal tissue donors between 1993 and 2004. This included 10 937 surgical donations, and 1478 donations obtained from postmortem organ donation patients and cadaveric donors. Current mandatory retesting of surgical donors 6 months postdonation reduces the risk of viral infection by approximately 95% by eliminating almost all donors in the window period. The addition of nucleic acid amplification testing for nonliving donors would similarly reduce the window period, and consequently the residual risk by approximately 50% for hepatitis B virus, 55% for HIV, and 90% for HCV. NAT, using appropriately validated assays for nonliving donors, would reduce the residual risk to levels comparable to that in living donors (where the 95% reduction for quarantining pending the 180-day re-test is included).