Ensuring the safety of living kidney donors and recipients in China through ethics committee oversight: an early experience

Effect of donor age and parent-to-child transplant on living-related donor kidney transplantation: a single center's experience of 236 cases

To study the impact of parent-to-child transplant and older donor age on recipients' post-transplant creatinine levels, a total of 236 patients who received living donor kidney transplantation were evaluated for kidney viability based on creatinine (Cr) level. Of the 236 pairings, 113 (48%) were parent-to-child followed by sibling transplants (66, 30%). Recipient Cr levels were significantly higher at 6 months and 3 years post-transplant in the parent-to-child transplants compared to other donor-recipient relationships. In addition, donor age (average age: 44.1 ± 11.5; range: 19-66) contributed to higher recipient post-transplant Cr levels (p < 0.01). Pre-transplant donor and recipient Cr levels tended to result in higher post-transplant Cr levels in recipients (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of both parent-to-child transplant and older donor significantly increased the risk of elevated post-transplant Cr levels in recipients with an estimated odds ratios ranging from 3.46 (95% CI: 1.71-6.98) at 6 months to 8.04 (3.14-20.56) at 3 years post-transplant. Donor age significantly affected transplant survival as measured by higher recipient post-transplant Cr levels. In addition, parent-to-child transplant pairings, along with older donor age, significantly increased the risk of elevated post-transplant Cr levels in recipients.

Do multiple renal arteries in the remnant kidney have a negative influence on kidney donors after kidney donation?

AIM

To investigate whether the presence of multiple renal arteries in the remnant kidney has implications for lower renal function or increased incidence of hypertension.

METHODS

We reviewed the intraoperative and follow-up data of 101 live kidney donors who underwent nephrectomies at our institution. Sixty-nine donors (68.3%) had single artery in the remnant kidney (Group A), while 32 donors (31.7%) had multiple renal arteries in the remnant kidney (Group B). We compared the demographic and intraoperative data between the two groups. The follow-up data of donors in each group were divided into three subgroups based on the length of the follow-up period (12-24 months, 24-48 months and ≥48 months). Subgroups were created based on blood pressure and serum creatinine level. The δblood pressure (follow-up blood pressure minus preoperative blood pressure) and δserum creatinine (follow-up serum creatinine minus preoperative serum creatinine) in each subgroup in Group A were compared with the counterparts in Group B.

RESULTS

Renal arterial stenosis and calcification of renal arterial wall were not observed in all donors. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative characteristics (e.g. age, body mass index, operative duration and estimated blood loss) between the two groups. In addition, the blood pressure and serum creatinine level among subgroups within each group were similar. Furthermore, significant differences in δblood pressure and δserum creatinine were not observed between subgroups within the same follow-up period. Recipient survival rate and serum creatinine level were similar and acceptable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of multiple renal arteries in the remnant kidney does not have additional negative influence on kidney donors after kidney donation.

Evaluation of living related kidney donors in China: policies and practices in a transplant center

BACKGROUND

Rigorous donor evaluation is essential for living related donor kidney transplantation (LRDKT). However, guidelines for living kidney donor evaluation are absent in China. The aim of this study is to describe the initial experience in the living kidney donor evaluation process in a single transplant center in China.

METHODS

The evaluation process of our center is sequentially divided into five steps: outpatient consultation and information, preliminary evaluation, comprehensive evaluation, final informed consent, and ethics committee oversight.

RESULTS

Between June 2007 and March 2009, 124 potential living donors were evaluated in our center, of whom 82 (66.1%) became effective donors and the remaining 42 (33.9%) were excluded. The exclusion reasons were related to clinical problems in 27 cases, psychosocial problems in seven cases, and suspected organ trading in eight cases.

CONCLUSION

Although strongly forbidden by Chinese laws, organ trading remains a threat to the healthy development of LRDKT in China. To prohibit organ trading, the kinship between the donor and recipient should be carefully identified. Guidelines for living donor evaluation appropriate to the actual situation in China should be set up for the sake of safety and to protect the rights and interests of both donors and recipients.

Technical modifications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Chinese experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to report a single-center experience and technical modifications of retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-one 3-port RPLDNs were performed at our institution. No prisoners or organs from prisoners were used to collect the data for this study. The tributaries of renal artery and vein were transected using a harmonic scalpel after both ends of the tributary were coagulated intermittently until the color turned light yellow. Transection was made using shifting coagulation. A longitudinal 6-8-cm skin incision was extended inferiorly from the primary trocar with muscles intact. The renal artery was clipped using two Hem-o-Lok clips at the proximal end, and then sheared by scissors without any clips on the kidney side. The renal vein was controlled similarly. The graft was retrieved by insertion of a hand through the longitudinal lumbar incision.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and warm ischemia time were 126.1 and 3.6 minutes, respectively. No blood transfusion or open conversion was required. None of the donors encountered a major complication, but 7 suffered minor complications. Preoperative and postoperative mean serum creatinine levels of the donors were 1.00 and 1.29 mg/dL, respectively. The mean serum creatinine levels of the recipients postoperatively at day 1 and month 1 were 5.48 and 1.60 mg/dL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified approach of RPLDN may be a useful alternative with flexible control of the renal vessels and tributaries and easy retrieval of the graft.