Response to 'Tolerance versus immunosuppression: a perspective'

Tolerance--is it worth it?

We are entering an exciting time in the study of immunologic tolerance. Several cellular and molecular strategies have been developed that show promise in nonhuman transplant models and these approaches are just now appearing in clinical trials. Tolerance strategies that prevent immune rejection and obviate the need for immunosuppressive medications (with inherent risk of cancer, infection, and organ toxicity) would improve both graft and patient survival. Each tolerance protocol brings its own set of associated risks. As the results of these trials become available, we must continue to evaluate their successes and failures. The balance of these outcomes will help us answer the question: "Tolerance-Is it worth it?"

Prevention of renal allograft rejection without immune suppression: a model to revisit

Spectacular success in preventing renal allograft rejection in rats was obtained over 40 yr ago using only the reactants of the response: donor-type antigen and homologous antiserum directed against donor-type antigen. Tolerance was antigen specific and sustained by persistent antigen of the graft. The model has never been tested rigorously in a large species, though the rationale for why the procedures should work applies across species including humans. Confirming the results in a large species would have profound impact on research for treating multiple immune mediated diseases, in addition to providing a way for treating some transplant recipients. This is a propitious time to confirm the applicability to larger species. If successful, only the lack of imagination limits the potential impact.

[Current problems of kidney transplantation]

The long-term problems after kidney transplantation have changed considerably in recent years. While formerly immunosuppression and prevention of acute rejection were of prime concern, now attention focuses on chronic alterations of the transplanted organ and long-term survival of the patients. The transplantation procedure itself has evolved into a standardized technique with a high level of surgical quality. Problems involving organ preservation and ischemia/reperfusion damage also play a role, especially in view of chronic aspects. Monitoring of long-term complications should follow a program for the transplanted organ as well as a program for the patient. Monitoring kidney function should address the organ more precisely than has previously been the case. Serum creatinine level and proteinuria alone provide insufficient information and only change long after cellular deterioration has begun. Hence it is imperative that new testing methods be developed. One possibility is offered by protocol biopsies that allow histological and molecular analysis of the kidney at regular intervals. The patient programs concentrate on diagnostics and treatment of the cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, the patients must be screened for occurrence of neoplasia. There are no prospective studies covering all cardiovascular risk factors after kidney transplantation. This pertains particularly to the subject of hypertension.