Making sense of desensitization

Analysis of anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates subjected to desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab

BACKGROUND

Preexisting donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens are major risk factors for acute antibody-mediated and chronic rejection of kidney transplant grafts. Immunomodulation (desensitization) protocols may reduce antibody concentration and improve the success of transplant. We investigated the effect of desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab on the antibody profile in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

METHODS

In 31 transplant candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA], 34%-99%), desensitization included intravenous immunoglobulin on days 0 and 30 and a single dose of rituximab on day 15. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were analyzed before and after desensitization.

RESULTS

Reduction of cPRA from 25% to 50% was noted for anti-class I (5 patients, within 20-60 days) and anti-class II (3 patients, within 10-20 days) antibodies. After initial reduction of cPRA, the cPRA increased within 120 days. In 24 patients, decrease in mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies by more than 50% was noted at follow-up, but there was no reduction of cPRA. Rebound occurred in 65% patients for anti-class I antibodies at 350 days and anti-class II antibodies at 101 to 200 days. Probability of rebound effect was higher in patients with mean fluorescence intensity of more than 10,700 before desensitization, anti-class II antibodies, and history of previous transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

The desensitization protocol had limited efficacy in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate because of the short period with antibody reduction and high frequency of rebound effect.

Compatibility and kidney transplantation: the way to go

Long lasting debates in the past questioned the relevance of any sort of compatibility in post mortal kidney transplantation. It is for no say that fully compatible transplants have the highest chances for a long patient and graft survival. In the present report the use of HLA-DR as a representative of the Major Histocompatibility Complex class II genes in the allocation of organs is discussed. The major arguments are the easiness to offer to patients a compatible graft in a relatively short waiting time, an increase in graft survival, the less sensitization during the transplantation period, and the lower waiting time for a retransplant. Even if the number of organ donors remains the same a lowering of the mean waiting time is expected because of the longer period of graft survival.

Proteasome inhibitor therapy for antibody-mediated rejection

AMR is being recognized with increasing efficiency, but continues to present a significant threat to renal allograft survival. Traditional therapies for AMR (IVIG, plasmapheresis, rituximab, and antilymphocyte preparations) in general have provided inconsistent results and do not deplete the source of antibody production, viz., the mature plasma cell. Recently, the first plasma cell-targeted therapy in humans has been developed using bortezomib (a first in class PI) for AMR treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Initial experience with bortezomib involved treatment of refractory AMR. Subsequently, the efficacy of bortezomib in primary therapy for AMR was demonstrated. In a multicenter collaborative effort, the initial results with bortezomib in AMR have been confirmed and expanded to pediatric and adult heart transplant recipients. More recently, results from a prospective, staged desensitization trial has shown that bortezomib alone can substantially reduce anti-HLA antibody levels. These results demonstrate the significant potential of proteasome inhibition in addressing humoral barriers. However, the major advantage of proteasome inhibition lies in the numerous potential strategies for achieving synergy.