Preliminary evaluation of the apical seal of root canals filled with a Teflon-base material

Tissue reactions to endodontic materials implanted in the mandibles of guinea pigs

Teflon, Intermediate Restorative Material, and Prisma VLC Dycal were implanted in the mandibles of 16 guinea pigs. After experimental periods of 4 and 12 weeks, the animals were killed and tissue sections were prepared. No severe inflammatory response was noted in any of the groups except for a persistence of moderate inflammation in the poorly condensed Teflon group. Bone apposition occurred in the Prisma VLC Dycal group; none-to-mild inflammation and a thin fibrous capsule characterized the IRM group; and the Teflon group had a thick fibrous encapsulation except for samples where the Teflon material appeared to be poorly condensed and dispersed into the bony tissue. In areas where the teflon was loosely condensed, chronic inflammation and active phagocytosis were seen along the surface of the material.

Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance

An increasing number of endodontic leakage studies have been published. In the 1990 volumes of Journal of Endodontics and International Endodontic Journal, there was one leakage study to every 4.3 scientific articles. The most popular method was linear measurement of tracer (dye or radioisotope) penetration along a root filling. Comparing some data on linear measurement of dye penetration following the cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha that were published between 1980 and 1990, a high level of variation has been found, although the experimental methods used in these studies were quite similar. In almost all studies evaluating various techniques, the cold lateral condensation technique has been used as a standard control for comparison. The reliability of these results is questionable. The problems with such studies are discussed. It seems that more research should be done on leakage study methodology, instead of continuing to evaluate the sealing ability of different materials and techniques by methods that may give little relevant information.

Toxic effects of various retrograde root filling materials on gingival fibroblasts and rat sarcoma cells

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of amalgam, glass ionomer, composite and titanium on the growth of gingival fibroblasts (GF) and rat sarcoma cells (UMR) in vitro. The cells were either obtained from gingival biopsies taken during deliberation of unerupted canines (GF) or were of commercial origin (UMR). Equal numbers of cells were placed on culture dishes and incubated for a period of two weeks with the freshly prepared test materials. The cultures were photographed through a light microscope after 7 days incubation and finally counted after 14 days. It was shown that the proliferation of gingival fibroblasts was less disturbed by titanium, being approximately 96% of the control value (cell cultures without test particles), followed by composite, amalgam and glass ionomer (61%, 49% and 35% of the control value respectively). The number of UMR cells after 14 days incubation with the various materials was 76% of the control value with titanium, 12% with composite and 5% with both amalgam and glass ionomer. Inhibition of cell growth (UMR) around the test particles was most prominent around amalgam and glass ionomer, followed by composite and titanium. These effects were noted only with freshly prepared components however, so that the toxic reaction was less pronounced or minimal in a second incubation using the same particles sterilized in between. The results demonstrated that potential retrograde root filling materials have a variable toxic effect on gingival fibroblasts and rat sarcoma cells. The fact that the influence on proliferation disappeared when the test was performed with materials already tested once may be of clinical importance when estimating the biocompatibility in vivo.