Complex chromosomal rearrangement in a mentally retarded boy without gross dysmorphic stigmata

Prenatally diagnosed de novo apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: two new cases and review of the literature

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) are rare structural rearrangements. Currently six cases of prenatally diagnosed balanced de novo CCR have been described. We present two new cases of prenatally ascertained balanced de novo CCR. In the first case, an amniocentesis revealed a balanced de novo three-way CCR involving chromosomes 5, 6, and 11 with a pericentric inversion of chromosome 5 [four breaks]. In the second case, a balanced de novo rearrangement was identified by amniocentesis which involved a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 3 and 8 and a CCR involving chromosomes 6, 7, and 18 [six breaks]. The use of whole chromosome painting helped elucidate the nature of these rearrangements. A review of the postnatally ascertained cases suggests that most patients have congenital anomalies, minor anomalies, and/or developmental delay/mental retardation. In addition, there appears to be a relationship between the number of chromosome breaks and the extent of phenotypic effects. The paucity of information regarding prenatally diagnosed CCR and the bias of ascertainment of postnatal CCR cases poses a problem in counseling families.

A complex chromosomal rearrangement detected prenatally and studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization

We report of case of a complex chromosomal rearrangement detected prenatally and studied with traditional banding methods and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The combination of these techniques showed that four chromosomes were involved in the translocation. Nine breakpoints were proposed to explain these results. Some of the findings could only be detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization, demonstrating the usefulness of this technique in characterizing chromosomal abnormalities that would otherwise be difficult to interpret correctly with classical cytogenetics alone.

A balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement (BCCR) with phenotypic effect

The authors report on a case of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement (BCCR) with phenotypic effect, describe the dysmorphisms and malformations observed, and discuss the various pathogenetic mechanisms. On the basis of these considerations, they underline the need for careful reporting of examined cases, distinguishing the characteristic signs from dysmorphisms that are described in several other chromosomal aberrations as well. Finally, they stress the importance of a more precise description of BCCRs for the purpose, among others, of a correct formulation of reproductive risk.

Insertional translocations: report of two new families and review of the literature

We describe two families with insertional translocations. In the first, a large family ascertained because of repeated pregnancy loss, the insertional translocation, ins(1;3)(q32;p13pter), was found to be segregating through three generations. In the second family, ascertained through a proposita with congenital malformations, multiple spontaneous abortions also occurred. The father had an insertional translocation, inv 4(p14,q21.1)ins(7,4)(q32;q21.1 q23). These cases illustrate that recurrent fetal wastage may be caused by insertional translocations and in fact may be the only clinical manifestation of this unusual type of chromosome rearrangement.

Complex chromosome rearrangements and congenital anomalies

Congenital complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) compatible with life are rare in man. Thus patients with CCR usually present considerable diagnostic difficulties both clinically and cytogenetically. We studied a 12-year-old mentally retarded male with minor congenital anomalies as described below and his first-degree relatives. The propositus had an unbalanced karyotype with eight break points and seven derivative chromosomes; two deletions, del(6) (q25----qter) and del(14) (q31----qter), and four translocations, t(2;11), t(5;15), t(6;11), t(6;20) were present. Parental chromosomes were normal; however, the mother had a few metaphases with abnormal chromosomes suggestive of chromosome instability. These findings and a review of reported patients with CCR are presented with regard to speculations about etiology, pathogenesis, phenotypic expression, and prognosis. Physicians should be aware of CCR and broader indications for cytogenetic studies appear warranted in view of these data.

Excess of mental retardation and/or congenital malformation in reciprocal translocations in man

In this report the Leuven experience (1970-1984) on reciprocal translocations is summarized. A total of 153 unrelated index patients, carriers of different types of reciprocal translocations, and their families were investigated. Familial reciprocal, apparently balanced translocations were found in 75 unrelated families bringing the total numbers of translocation carrier parents and their offspring to 132 and 445, respectively. In 61.5% of the patients the reciprocal translocation was detected after the birth of a malformed child with unbalanced karyotype or through investigation because of recurrent spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, or infertility. In 41 patients (28 familial and 13 de novo), however, the reciprocal balanced translocation was found to be associated with mental retardation and/or congenital malformations (MR/CM) which is significantly higher than expected. This excess of MR/CM in de novo and familial balanced translocation carriers is illustrated and discussed.