Remifentanil in neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia practice

Visceral Pain in Preterm Infants with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Underlying Mechanisms and Implications for Treatment

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a relatively rare but very severe gastrointestinal disease primarily affecting very preterm infants. NEC is characterized by excessive inflammation and ischemia in the intestines, and is associated with prolonged, severe visceral pain. Despite its recognition as a highly painful disease, current pain management for NEC is often inadequate, and research on optimal analgesic therapy for these patients is lacking. Insight into the mechanisms underlying intestinal pain in infants with NEC-visceral pain-could help identify the most effective analgesics for these vulnerable patients. Therefore, this comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of visceral nociception, including transduction, transmission, modulation, and experience, and discuss the implications for analgesic therapy in preterm infants with NEC. The transmission of visceral pain differs from that of somatic pain, contributing to the diffuse nature of visceral pain. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of analgesics for treating visceral pain in infants are scarce. However, research in visceral pain models highlights agents that may be particularly effective for treating visceral pain based on their mechanisms of action. Further research is necessary to determine whether agents that have shown promise for treating visceral pain in preclinical studies and adults are effective in infants with NEC as well.

Antibiotics, Analgesic Sedatives, and Antiseizure Medications Frequently Used in Critically Ill Neonates: A Narrative Review

Antibiotic, analgesic sedative, and antiseizure medications are among the most commonly used medications in preterm/sick neonates, who are at high risk of nosocomial infections, central nervous system complications, and are exposed to numerous painful/stressful procedures. These severe and potentially life-threatening complications may have serious short- and long-term consequences and should be prevented and/or promptly treated. The reported variability in the medications used in neonates indicates the lack of adequate neonatal studies regarding their effectiveness and safety. Important obstacles contributing to inadequate studies in preterm/sick infants include difficulties in obtaining parental consent, physicians' unwillingness to recruit preterm infants, the off-label use of many medications in neonates, and other scientific and ethical concerns. This review is an update on the use of antimicrobials (antifungals), analgesics (sedatives), and antiseizure medications in neonates, focusing on current evidence or knowledge gaps regarding their pharmacokinetics, indications, safety, dosage, and evidence-based guidelines for their optimal use in neonates. We also address the effects of early antibiotic use on the intestinal microbiome and its association with long-term immune-related diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopment (ND). Recommendations for empirical treatment and the emergence of pathogen resistance to antimicrobials and antifungals are also presented. Finally, future perspectives on the prevention, modification, or reversal of antibiotic resistance are discussed.

Remifentanil attenuates endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory injury in LPS-induced damage in HK-2 cells

Renal injury is a fatal complication in critically ill patients with sepsis. As an ultrashort-acting synthetic opioid derivative, remifentanil has been reported to mitigate renal injury and sepsis. Nevertheless, whether remifentanil also suppresses sepsis-triggered renal injury is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of remifentanil on endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and inflammatory response in an in vitro lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated renal tubular epithelial cell (HK-2) model and its mechanism. The viability of HK-2 cells with the absence or presence of LPS treatment was surveyed by cell counting kit-8 assay. Under the condition of LPS treatment, apoptosis was appraised by TUNEL assay and western blot. Levels of inflammatory factors were estimated though corresponding kits. Western blot tested the expression of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB) signaling-associated proteins. Also, the expression of ERS-related proteins was detected by western blot. Further, ERS inducer tunicamycin (TM) was added and the aforementioned experiments were conducted again. The results underlined the protective effects of remifentanil on LPS-evoked viability injury, inflammation, activation of TLR4/NF-κB signaling and ERS in HK-2 cells. Moreover, the impacts of remifentanil on the biological events of LPS-insulted HK-2 cells were all reversed by TM administration. To conclude, remifentanil might have a remarkable ameliorative effect on sepsis-induced renal injury, which implied the potential of remifentanil-based drug therapy in sepsis-induced renal injury.

Remifentanil alleviates hypoxic-ischemic brain damage-induced cognitive impairment via BACH1

Hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is among the most frequent causes of death and disability in neonates. We aimed here to examine the neuroprotective effects of Remifentanil (RE) and the underlying mechanisms in a rat model of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage (HIBD). We found that RE improved the learning memory ability, reduced neuronal cell damage and apoptosis, reduced inflammation induced by suppressing the expression of BTB domain and CNC homolog 1 (BACH1) in rats with HIBD. BACH1 attenuated the alleviating effect of RE on cognitive impairment in HIBD rats. Moreover, RE inhibited TRAF3 expression by downregulating BACH1, and TRAF3 attenuated the therapeutic effect of RE on cognitive impairment by activating the NF-κB signaling. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that RE inhibits the expression of BACH1, which in turn inhibits the NF-κB signaling pathway by suppressing TRAF3. RE may be a promising therapeutic agent to attenuate HIBD-induced cognitive impairment.

Remifentanil Protects against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation through PARP-1/NF-κB Signaling Pathway

Sepsis is a leading cause of death in patients with severe infection worldwide. Remifentanil is an ultra-short-acting, potent opioid analgesic. In the study, we aimed to investigate the role and underlying mechanism of remifentanil in lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced inflammation in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). HAECs were pretreated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or remifentanil (2.5 μM) for 30 min, then stimulated by LPS (10 μg/ml) for another 24 h. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) was inhibited by small interfering RNA (siRNA). Superoxide anion production and DNA damage were analyzed by dihydroethidium (DHE) staining and comet assay. The inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), and nuclear factor-kappa B p65 (NF-κB p65) expressions were analyzed by RT-PCR or western blotting analysis. NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation was assessed by immunofluorescence. Compared with the control group, pretreatment with remifentanil significantly reduced superoxide anion production and DNA damage, with downregulation of iNOS, ICAM-1, and PARP-1 expressions as well as PAR expression. Moreover, pretreatment with PARP-1 siRNA or remifentanil inhibited LPS-induced NF-κB p65 expression and nuclear translocation. Remifentanil reduced LPS-induced inflammatory response through PARP-1/NF-κB signaling pathway. Remifentanil might be an optimal choice of analgesia in septic patients.

Practicalities of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target-controlled Infusion in Children

Propofol administered in conjunction with an opioid such as remifentanil is used to provide total intravenous anesthesia for children. Drugs can be given as infusion controlled manually by the physician or as automated target-controlled infusion that targets plasma or effect site. Smart pumps programmed with pharmacokinetic parameter estimates administer drugs to a preset plasma concentration. A linking rate constant parameter (keo) allows estimation of effect site concentration. There are two parameter sets, named after the first author describing them, that are commonly used in pediatric target-controlled infusion for propofol (Absalom and Kataria) and one for remifentanil (Minto). Propofol validation studies suggest that these parameter estimates are satisfactory for the majority of children. Recommended target concentrations for both propofol and remifentanil depend on the type of surgery, the degree of surgical stimulation, the use of local anesthetic blocks, and the ventilatory status of the patient. The use of processed electroencephalographic monitoring is helpful in pediatric total intravenous anesthesia and target-controlled infusion anesthesia, particularly in the presence of neuromuscular blockade.

Beneficial Effects of Remifentanil Against Excitotoxic Brain Damage in Newborn Mice

Background: Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid used for analgesia during cesarean sections, has been shown in ex vivo experiments to exert anti-apoptotic activity on immature mice brains. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of remifentanil on brain lesions using an in vivo model of excitotoxic neonatal brain injury. Methods: Postnatal day 2 (P2) mice received three intraperitoneal injections of remifentanil (500 ng/g over a 10-min period) or saline just before an intracortical injection of ibotenate (10 μg). Cerebral reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, cell death, in situ labeling of cortical caspase activity, astrogliosis, inflammation mediators, and lesion size were determined at various time points after ibotenate injection. Finally, behavioral tests were performed until P18. Results: In the injured neonatal brain, remifentanil significantly decreased ROS production, cortical caspase activity, DNA fragmentation, interleukin-1β levels, and reactive astrogliosis. At P7, the sizes of the ibotenate-induced lesions were significantly reduced by remifentanil treatment. Performance on negative geotaxis (P6-8) and grasping reflex (P10-12) tests was improved in the remifentanil group. At P18, a sex specificity was noticed; remifentanil-treated females spent more time in the open field center than did the controls, suggesting less anxiety in young female mice. Conclusions: In vivo exposure to remifentanil exerts a beneficial effect against excitotoxicity on the developing mouse brain, which is associated with a reduction in the size of ibotenate-induced brain lesion as well as prevention of some behavioral deficits in young mice. The long-term effect of neonatal exposure to remifentanil should be investigated.

A different perspective: anesthesia for extreme premature infants: is there an age limitation or how low should we go?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To put in perspective, the various challenges that faces pediatric anesthesiologists because of the recently lowered limits with regards to the viability of a fetus. Both medical and ethical considerations will be highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Issues related to: who should anesthetize these tiny babies; can we provide adequate and legal monitoring during the anesthetic; does these immature babies need hypnosis and amnesia and the moral/ethical implications associated with being involved with care of doubtful long-term outcome are reviewed.

SUMMARY

There does currently not exist sufficient research data to provide any evidence-based guidelines for the anesthetic handling of extreme premature infants. Current practice relies on extrapolations from other patient groups and from attempting to preserve normal physiology. Thus, focused research initiatives within this specific field of anesthesia should be a priority. Furthermore, in-depth multiprofessional ethical discussions regarding long-term outcome of aggressive care of extremely premature babies are urgently needed, including the new concepts of disability-free survival and number-need-to-suffer.

Neonatal pain management: still in search for the Holy Grail

Inadequate pain management but also inappropriate use of analgesics in early infancy has negative effects on neurodevelopmental outcome. As a consequence, neonatal pain management is still in search for the Holy Grail. At best, effective pain management is based on prevention, assessment, and treatment followed by a re-assessment of the pain to determine if additional treatment is still necessary. Unfortunately, epidemiological observations suggest that neonates are undergoing painful procedures very frequently, unveiling the need for effective preventive, non-pharmacological strategies. In addition, assessment is still based on validated, multimodal, but subjective pain assessment tools. Finally, in neonatal intensive care units, there is a shift in clinical practices (e.g., shorter intubation and ventilation), and this necessitates the development and validation of new pharmacological treatment modalities. To illustrate this, a shift in the use of opioids to paracetamol has occurred and short-acting agents (remifentanil, propofol) are more commonly administered to neonates. In addition to these new modalities and as part of a more advanced approach of the developmental pharmacology of analgesics, pharmacogenetics also emerged as a tool for precision medicine in neonates. To assure further improvement of neonatal pain management the integration of pharmacogenetics with the usual covariates like weight, age and/or disease characteristics is needed.

Maternal and Neonatal Effects of Remifentanil in Women Undergoing Cesarean Section in Relation to ABCB1 and OPRM1 Polymorphisms

The aim of our study was to evaluate possible effect of ABCB1, and OPRM1 polymorphisms on the efficacy and safety of remifentanil in women undergoing elective cesarean section under general anesthesia. Women received remifentanil (1 µg/kg i.v.) 30 s prior to the induction to standardized general anesthesia. The ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642) and OPRM1 (rs1799971) polymorphisms were analyzed from maternal peripheral blood. The basal hemodynamic and demographic parameters in the study population (n=54) were similar in all the subgroups. The median ± SD increase of systolic blood pressure at 5 min from the baseline was practically completely abolished in homozygous carriers of ABCB1 variants in comparison with wild-type subjects -2.67±25.0 vs. 16.57±15.7 mm Hg, p<0.05 for rs2032582, and 2.00±23.9 vs. 22.13±16.8 mm Hg, p<0.05, for rs1045642, respectively. While no neonate belonging to ABCB1 wild-type homozygous or OPRM1 variant carrying mothers needed any resuscitative measure, 10.5 % of the neonates belonging to OPRM1 wild-type homozygous mothers received resuscitative support similarly as 11.1 %, and 12.5 % of neonates of mothers carrying variants of rs2032582, and rs1045642, respectively. Decreased stabilizing effects of remifentanil on maternal hemodynamics has been observed in ABCB1 wild type mothers, while the adaptation of the neonates was clinically worse in OPRM1 wild type, and ABCB1 variant allele carriers.

A comparative study of two remifentanil doses for procedural pain in ventilated preterm infants: a randomized, controlled study*

OBJECTIVES

Remifentanil is an ultrashort-acting synthetic opioid, and the metabolism of which is not influenced by hepatic or renal function. This study aims to compare the efficacy of two remifentanil doses during procedures in ventilated preterm infants.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial.

SETTING

Neonatal ICU.

PATIENTS

Preterm infants who were supported by a mechanical ventilator with tracheal tube and requiring central venous access.

INTERVENTIONS

Two remifentanil dosages were administered in mechanically ventilated preterm infants during peripherally inserted central catheter insertion. Fourteen preterm infants were randomly assigned to low-dose (0.1 μg/kg/min) or high-dose (0.25 μg/kg/min) remifentanil infusion. The Premature Infant Pain Profile was used to score pain during the procedure, and changes in the Premature Infant Pain Profile score between needle puncture and baseline were analyzed to investigate the noninferiority of low-dose to high-dose remifentanil. Occurrence of cardiorespiratory complications was also recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median gestational age (minimum, maximum) was 26 weeks (24, 31), and the median birth weight was 825 g (610, 1,280). Changes in Premature Infant Pain Profile in the high-dose and low-dose groups were 1.43 ± 3.10 and -0.60 ± 5.32, respectively. The difference in changes in the Premature Infant Pain Profile score between the high-dose and low-dose groups was -2.03 ± 4.13. The corresponding lower limit of one-tailed 97.5% CI was -7.24, below the noninferiority margin. Apneic events and bradycardia did not occur in the low-dose group; however, there were three episodes of apnea (42.9%) and one of bradycardia (14.3%) in the high-dose group (p = 0.683 and 0.366, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For mechanically ventilated preterm infants, the use of remifentanil at 0.25 μg/kg/min as an analgesic for short procedures represents a therapeutic option. Our pilot study suggests the need for larger randomized trials.

Pain assessment and management in the NICU: analysis of an educational intervention for health professionals

OBJECTIVE

to study the perception of a Neonatal Intensive Care team on pain assessment and management before and after an educational intervention created and implemented in the unit.

METHODS

intervention study developed as action research, in three phases. In Phase 1, a quantitative study was performed to identify how professionals perceive pain management in the unit. In Phase 2, an educational intervention was carried out, using the Operational Group (OG), which defined strategies to be adopted to seek improvements in pain assessment and management. In Phase 3, the initial questionnaire was reapplied to assess professionals' perceptions about the subject after the intervention. All professionals directly working in newborn care were included.

RESULTS

the perception of professionals about pain management and assessment in the unit showed a statistically significant difference between the two phases of research, highlighting the increase in frequency of reference for evaluation and use of some method of pain relief procedures for most analyzed procedures. Participation in training (one of the strategies defined by the operational group) was reported by 86.4% of the professionals. They reported the use of scales for pain assessment, established by the protocol adopted in the service after the intervention, with a frequency of 94.4%. Changes in pain assessment and management were perceived by 79.6% of the participants.

CONCLUSION

the professionals involved in the educational intervention observed changes in pain management in the unit and related them to the strategies defined and implemented by the OG.

Remifentanil versus morphine-midazolam premedication on the quality of endotracheal intubation in neonates: a noninferiority randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare remifentanil and morphine-midazolam for use in nonurgent endotracheal intubation in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective noninferiority randomized trial, newborns of gestational age ≥28 weeks admitted in the neonatal intensive care unit requiring an elective or semielective endotracheal intubation were divided into 2 groups. One group (n = 36) received remifentanil (1 μg/kg), and the other group (n = 35) received morphine (100 μg/kg) and midazolam (50 μg/kg) at a predefined time before intubation (different in each group), to optimize the peak effect of each drug. Both groups also received atropine (20 μg/kg). The primary outcome was to compare the conditions of intubation, and the secondary outcome was to compare the duration of successful intubation, physiological variables, and pain scores between groups for first and second intubation attempts. Adverse events and neurologic test data were reported.

RESULTS

Intubation with remifentanil was not inferior to that with morphine-midazolam. At the first attempted intubation, intubation conditions were poor in 25% of the remifentanil group and in 28.6% of the morphine-midazolam group (P = .471). For the second attempt, conditions were poor in 28.6% of the remifentanil group, compared with 10% of the morphine-midazolam group (P = .360). The median time to successful intubation was 33 seconds (IQR, 24-45 seconds) for the remifentanil group versus 36 seconds (IQR, 25-59 seconds) for the morphine-medazolam group (P = .359) at the first attempt and 45 seconds (IQR, 35-64 seconds) versus 56 seconds (IQR, 44-68 seconds), respectively, for the second attempt (P = .302). No significant between-group difference was reported for hypotension, bradycardia, or adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, remifentanil was at least as effective as the morphine-midazolam regimen for endotracheal intubation. Thus, premedication using this very-short-acting opioid can be considered in urgent intubations and is advantageous in rapid extubation.

Sedation of newborn infants for the INSURE procedure, are we sure?

Background. Neonatal intubation is a stressful procedure that requires premedication to improve intubation conditions and reduce stress and adverse physiological responses. Premedication used during the INSURE (INtubation, SURfactant therapy, Extubation) procedure should have a very short duration of action with restoration of spontaneous breathing within a few minutes. Aims. To determine the best sedative for intubation during the INSURE procedure by systematic review of the literature. Methods. We reviewed all relevant studies reporting on premedication, distress, and time to restoration of spontaneous breathing during the INSURE procedure. Results. This review included 12 studies: two relatively small studies explicitly evaluated the effect of premedication (propofol and remifentanil) during the INSURE procedure, both showing good intubation conditions and an average extubation time of about 20 minutes. Ten studies reporting on fentanyl or morphine provided insufficient information about these items. Conclusions. Too little is known in the literature to draw a solid conclusion on which premedication could be best used during the INSURE procedure. Both remifentanil and propofol are suitable candidates but dose-finding studies to detect effective nontoxic doses in newborns with different gestational ages are necessary.

Sedation and analgesia to facilitate mechanical ventilation

Regardless of age, health care professionals have a professional and ethical obligation to provide safe and effective analgesia to patients undergoing painful procedures. Historically, newborns, particularly premature and sick infants, have been undertreated for pain. Intubation of the trachea and mechanical ventilation are ubiquitous painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit that are poorly assessed and treated. The authors review the use of sedation and analgesia to facilitate endotracheal tube placement and mechanical ventilation. Controversies regarding possible adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes after sedative and anesthetic exposure and in the failure to treat pain is also discussed.

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labor - monitoring of newborn heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during the first 24 hours after delivery

INTRODUCTION

There is no available information about the effects of remifentanil labor analgesia on newborns' vital signs in the first hours after delivery. The aim of the study was to assess changes in the heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation during the first 24 h of neonatal life after using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for labor analgesia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four full-term neonates, 23 from intravenous PCA remifentanil labor anesthesia 0.2 µg/kg, repeated not more frequently than every 2 min, and 21 born to mothers without any pharmacological forms of analgesia, were studied. Heart rate, oxygen saturation, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were monitored using a Nellcor Oxi Max monitor N5500 (Tyco Healthcare), and recorded at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h.

RESULTS

No significant differences in heart rate (p = 0.54; p = 0.26; p = 0.60; p = 0.83), oxygen saturation (p = 0.21; p = 0.27; p = 0.61; p = 0.9) and DBP (p = 0.98; p = 0.31; p = 0.83; p = 0.58) between the groups at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. Newborns from the remifentanil group had lower SBP at 1 h of life (59 mm Hg vs. 68.5 mm Hg) but the difference was just on the borderline of statistical significance (p > 0.06). There were no significant differences in SBP between the groups at 6 h (p = 0.65), 12 h (p = 0.11), and 24 h (p = 0.89) of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil PCA analgesia during labor does not significantly modify the oxygen saturation, heart rate and blood pressure in infants during the first day of their life. Therefore, further studies are needed to explain the observed trend for arterial hypotension in the first hour of life in infants born to mothers treated with remifentanil.

Pharmacological treatment of neonatal pain: in search of a new equipoise

Inadequate management of pain in early human life contributes to impaired neurodevelopmental outcome and alters pain thresholds, pain or stress-related behavior and physiological responses. However, there are also emerging animal experimental data on the impact of exposure to analgo-sedatives on the incidence and extent of neuro-apoptosis. Since this association has also been suggested in humans, the pharmacological treatment of neonatal pain is in search of a new equipoise since these 'conflicting' observations are the main drivers to further reconsider our current treatment regimens. This review focuses on new data concerning clinical pharmacology of morphine, followed by data on more recently introduced opioids like remifentanil and tramadol, locoregional anesthesia and minimally invasive techniques in neonates, and finally with data on intravenous paracetamol. Since the available data are still incomplete, priorities for both clinical management and future research will be proposed.

Remifentanil/midazolam versus fentanyl/midazolam for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Common opioids for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated infants may tend to accumulate and cause prolonged sedation with an unpredictable extubation time. Remifentanil is a promising option due to its unique pharmacokinetic properties, which seem to be valid in adults as well as in infants.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial mechanically ventilated neonates and young infants (<60 days) received either a remifentanil or fentanyl-based analgesia and sedation regimen with low dose midazolam. The primary endpoint of the trial was the extubation time following discontinuation of the opioid infusion. Secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety aspects.

RESULTS

Between November 2006 and March 2010, we screened 431 mechanically ventilated infants for eligibility. The intention to treat group included 23 infants who were assigned to receive either remifentanil (n = 11) or fentanyl (n = 12). Although this was designed as a pilot study, median extubation time was significantly shorter in the remifentanil group (80.0 min, IQR = 15.0-165.0) compared to the fentanyl group (782.5 min, IQR = 250.8-1,875.0) (p = 0.005). Remifentanil and fentanyl provided comparable efficacy with more than two-thirds of the measurements indicating optimal analgesia and sedation (66.4 and 70.2 %, respectively; p = 0.743). Overall, both groups had good hemodynamic stability and a comparably low incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

As neonates and young infants have a decreased metabolism of common opioids like fentanyl and are more prone to respiratory depression, remifentanil could be the ideal opioid for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated infants.

Experience of remifentanil in extremely low-birth-weight babies undergoing laparotomy

Premature babies experience pain and require adequate analgesia for any painful procedure. Fentanyl and morphine resulted in safe and effective anesthesia in the past; however, their pharmacokinetics may be impaired in preterm babies with multiorgan failure. Remifentanil, despite the absence of available pharmacokinetic data in preterm infants and few reports in newborns, demonstrated its advantages in children undergoing either major surgery or minor painful procedures and has been shown to be useful even in neonates, because its elimination is independent of organ function. We report two cases of babies born at 26 weeks' and 27 weeks' gestation, weighing 580 g and 400 g, respectively, undergoing laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis. Both received midazolam bolus and remifentanil infusion at high doses. This technique seems to be an advantageous alternative even in extremely low-birth-weight prematures. Furthermore, it becomes a technique of choice in these babies because the available ventilators are often not equipped with halogenated vaporizers. Particularly in intensive care, where there are no scavenger systems, it could allow to operate without moving out the preterm babies and avoiding stress and hypothermia.

Propofol versus midazolam for intubating preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The ideal combination of premedication for neonatal tracheal intubation has not been established. The aim of this preliminary study was to compare the intubation conditions between propofol and midazolam as premedication for tracheal intubation in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was performed, and 20 preterm neonates (28 to 34 week) underwent tracheal intubation following the use of remifentanil associated to either propofol (n = 10) or midazolam (n = 10). Intubation conditions were scored according to a four-point scale.

RESULT

According to the main outcome measured (identification of a 50% difference in the intubation conditions), there were no differences regarding the number of attempts and the overall intubation conditions among the groups (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Both combinations of premedications have no differences regarding the quality of intubation, which could be of clinical interest. Besides midazolam, propofol could be a valid alternative as hypnotic for premedication for endotracheal intubation in neonates.