Computer imaging versus conventional esthetic consultation: a prospective clinical study

The psychological aspects of rhinoplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Literature on the psychological aspects of rhinoplasty is sparse compared with publications on methods and instrumentation. Understanding the psychological aspects of rhinoplasty and, more importantly, recognizing the patient who may have an unfavorable postoperative course regardless of the objective outcome is of fundamental importance to the surgeon.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several profiles of patients with a high risk of postoperative dissatisfaction have been described and the important role of body dysmorphic disorder and its treatment has been stressed. Still, these criteria can be insufficient when facing the individual patient, as reliable screening instruments for clinical practice have not been developed and the question when not to operate is subject to controversy. The role of computer imaging as a safeguard in preoperative counseling has been highlighted.

SUMMARY

The surgeon must rely on instinct and experience to avoid overlooking any signs of psychological imbalance in the patient that may herald adversity. Archetypes described in the literature should be recognized and computer imaging should be used during the preoperative consultation.

Biometric morphing: a novel technique for the analysis of morphologic outcomes after facial surgery

The results of facial surgery are intuitively judged in terms of the visible changes in facial features or proportions. However, describing these morphologic outcomes objectively remains a challenge. Biometric morphing addresses this issue by merging statistical shape analysis and image processing. This study describes the implementation of biometric morphing in describing the average morphologic result of facial surgery. The biometric morphing protocol was applied to pre- and postoperative images of the following: (1) 40 dorsal hump reduction rhinoplasties and (2) 20 unilateral enophthalmos repairs. Pre- and postoperative average images (average morphs) were generated. The average morphs provided an objective rendering of nasal and periorbital morphology, which summarized the average features and extent of deformity in a population of patients. Subtle alterations in morphology after surgery, which would otherwise be difficult to identify or demonstrate, were clearly illustrated. Biometric morphing is an effective instrument for describing average facial morphology in a population of patients.

The effect of esthetic consultation methods on acceptance of diastema-closure treatment plan: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a study to determine which of four consultation methods helped patients best understand a proposed treatment plan for maxillary anterior diastema closure.

METHODS

The authors presented 24 subjects with four types of consultation in random order: before-and-after photographs of other patients, diagnostic models with wax setups, resin-based composite/esthetic preview/mock-ups and computer-imaging simulations. After viewing each method, the authors asked the subjects about treatment acceptability. At the end of the demonstrations of all four methods, the authors asked the subjects which consultation method helped them best understand the proposed treatment plan.

RESULTS

A total of 87.5 percent of the subjects indicated that they would accept the proposed treatment plan after they were shown the computer-imaging simulation, 50 percent said they would after they were shown the resin-based composite/esthetic preview/mock-up, 41.7 percent said they would after they were shown photographs of other patients, and 25 percent said they would after they were shown diagnostic models with wax setups. When asked which method helped them best understand the proposed treatment, 54.2 percent of the subjects selected computer-imaging simulation, 33.3 percent selected resin-based composite/esthetic preview/mock-ups, and 12.5 percent selected before-and-after photographs of other patients. None of the subjects selected diagnostic models with wax setups. A chi2 test for goodness of fit indicated that these differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Subjects preferred computer-imaging simulation to the other three consultation methods, and they indicated that computer-imaging simulation provided a better understanding of the proposed treatment plan for diastema closure.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The use of computer-imaging simulation enhances the patient's understanding of a proposed treatment plan concerning maxillary anterior diastema closure.