Objective Criteria: Guiding and Evaluating Dental Implant Esthetics

Incidence of straight and angulated screw channel following immediate implant placement in esthetic zone: A simulated cone-beam computed tomography study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The demand for immediate implant placement (IIP) in the esthetic zone is rapidly increasing. Despite the treatment's benefits, the sagittal root position often dictates implant angulation, commonly necessitating the use of cement-retained restorations. This study investigates the impact of angulated screw channel on IIP in the esthetic zone.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study was to determine the probability of IIP in the esthetic zone, using four different implant angulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of CBCT images was conducted and accessed on 9 June 2021. The midsagittal images of maxillary anterior teeth were input into an implant planning software (Implant Studio®). Bone Level X Straumann® implant (BLX 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0 mm) and Bone Level Tapered implant (BLT 2.9, 3.3 mm) were selected for 3D implant planning of IIP in the esthetic zone. The frequency distribution and probability of IIP were recorded and compared among all maxillary anterior teeth.

RESULTS

CBCT images from 720 teeth (120 patient) were evaluated, revealing an overall probability of IIP in the esthetic zone is 76.11% (548/720). Different implant restoration type was evaluated in this study, with the following results; straight screw-retained prosthesis at 3.47% (19/548), cement-retained prosthesis at 14.59% (80/548) and angle screw-retained prosthesis at 85.40% (468/548).

CONCLUSION

IIP with traditional straight screw-retained prosthesis demonstrated the lowest probability. Nevertheless, the use of angulated screw channels enhances the probability of achieving straight screw-retained prostheses.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The angulated screw channel is essential for increasing the probability of screw-retained prosthesis in IIP in the esthetic zone. However, limitation in screw angle correction still necessitate the use of cement-retained prostheses for numbers of patients undergoing IIP.

Comprehensive analysis of the maxillary esthetic zone for immediate implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: A study of 352 maxillary images

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Previous studies have examined the maxillary esthetic zone for immediate implant placement, but these studies had small sample sizes and did not investigate multiple parameters.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate the sagittal root position (SRP), alveolar bone concavity, labial bone perforation (LBP), and tooth-ridge angle in the maxillary anterior teeth region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 352 CBCT images of patients (180 men and 172 women) who visited the dental hospital between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. The sample included 2112 anterior maxillary teeth. SRP, alveolar bone concavity, tooth ridge angle, and LBP were assessed using virtual implant simulation. The data were analyzed by using chi-squared and kappa tests to analyze distributions and agreement, respectively, dependent and independent t-tests to assess sex and tooth-specific differences, and the Spearman correlation test to explore potential correlations (α<.05).

RESULTS

The CBCT images revealed that the majority of SRP were in Class I (85.4%), with smaller percentages in Class II (12.5%) and Class IV (2.3%); Class III was the least common (1%). The canine exhibited the most significant alveolar bone concavity angle average (149.14 ±6.35 degrees), followed by the lateral incisor (142.32 ±8.7 degrees). The canines had the highest occurrence of LBP (63.1%) (P<.01). Women had a higher frequency of labial bone perforation and deeper alveolar bone concavities than men (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicate that careful assessment and planning are necessary for immediate implant placement in the maxillary anterior region. The significant occurrence of LBP highlights the importance of thorough planning and evaluation to avoid surgical mishaps and complications which may necessitate bone grafting and result in added costs and time. Special attention should be given to women and the canine area.

Evaluation of the Stability of Open-Tray Impression Coping Using Two Different Impression Materials at Three Different Subgingival Implant Placement Depths

Objective To evaluate and compare the stability of the open tray impression coping within the set impression while attaching the lab analog when polyether (PE) heavy body and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) putty impression materials were used and the implant platform was placed sub-gingivally at three different depths. Methods Two impression materials, PE and PVS, and custom-made plexiglass models with embedded single implants to simulate implant positioning depths of 0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm, sub-gingivally, were used in the study. Open tray impressions were made after attaching impression coping to the implant embedded in the model. Implant lab analog was attached to the impression coping in the set impression, and its stability was measured using a universal testing machine. Forty-two open tray impressions were made in six groups, with seven impressions in each group. Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation were calculated. A comparison of the mean stability between the two impression materials at each depth was done using an independent t-test. Comparison of the mean stability between the three different subgingival implant depths in each material was done by one-way ANOVA with the Scheffe multiple comparison test (post-hoc analysis). The level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results The stability of the impression coping was measured as the force in Newtons required for the displacement of the analog attached to the impression coping embedded in the set impression. PE with the embedded impression coping at a depth of 0 mm gave the highest mean stability value (4.37+/-0.41), and the least mean stability was offered by PVS with the embedded impression coping at 4 mm depth (1.88+/-0.37). When an independent t-test was done to compare the mean stability values of PE and PVS, there was a statistically significant difference at 0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm. On doing one-way ANOVA to compare the mean stability between the different depth groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the three depth groups in PE and PVS. Scheffe multiple comparison tests (post-hoc analysis) revealed a statistically significant difference between 0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm subgingival depths of the impression coping placement in both PE and PVS. Conclusion The accuracy of the master cast is an important determinant for the precise fit and long life of the final prosthesis. In the case of maxillary anterior implant placements where deep subgingival placement of the implant platform is needed for aesthetic and functional reasons, the impression material should be selected carefully to ensure the stability of the impression coping. Among the materials included in the present study, the PE impression material offered the maximum stability for impression coping compared to PVS.

Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss with the all-on-4 immediate-loading strategy: A clinical retrospective study with 1 to 4 years of follow-up

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Assessing peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) and its risk factors with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) may clarify the risk factors for the all-on-4 (5 or 6) strategy and further improve its survival rate.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the implant survival rate, MBL, and associated risk factors of all-on-4 (5 or 6) prostheses after 1 to 4 years of follow-up with CBCT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 56 participants rehabilitated with 325 implants by using the all-on-4 (5 or 6) concept between October 2015 and December 2019 were included. Outcome measures were cumulative implant survival (life-table analysis) and MBL. Four CBCT scans, a scan immediately after surgery (T0), a scan 1 year after surgery (T1), a scan 2 years after surgery (T2), and a scan 3 to 4 years after treatment (T3), were obtained to evaluate the MBL. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis and linear mixed models were performed to assess the potential risk factors for MBL (α=.05).

RESULTS

The implant survival rate was 99.38%, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100%. The reductions in the vertical buccal bone height (△VBBH) were 0.74 ±0.10 mm (T0-T1), 0.37 ±0.12 mm (T1-T2), and 0.15 ±0.14 mm (T2-T3). Except for T2-T3, the △VBBH showed a significant difference at T0-T1 and T1-T2 (P≤.05). The alterations in vertical mesial bone height (VMBH), vertical distal bone height (VDBH), and vertical lingual bone height (VLBH) were similar to the trend observed in VBBH. The △VBBH (T0-T3) was negatively correlated with the horizontal buccal bone thickness (HBBT) (T0) (r=-.394, P<.001). Linear mixed models revealed that factors such as smoking (P=.001), mandible implant site (P<.001), immediate implant (P=.026), tilted implant (P<.001), female sex (P=.003), systemic disease (P=.025), and bruxism (P=.022) negatively affected MBL. The cantilever length (CL) also had a negative effect on MBL around the implants at the distal extension (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high implant and prosthesis survival rates and low MBL confirmed the predictability of the all-on-4 (5 or 6) concept. Smoking, mandible implant site, systemic disease, bruxism, female sex, immediate implant, tilted implant, and CL were identified as potential risk factors for MBL.

The clinical use of computer aided designed/computer aided manufactured titanium nitride coated implant abutments: Surgical and prosthetic considerations-A case series

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical use of nitride-coated titanium CAD/CAM implant abutments in the maxillary esthetic zone in two patients with high esthetic and functional demands and, to highlight the advantages of nitride-coated milled titanium abutments when compared to stock/custom titanium, one-piece monolithic zirconia, and hybrid metal-zirconia implant abutments.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Due to the inherent mechanical and esthetic clinical challenges, single implant-supported reconstructions in the maxillary esthetic zone are a complex restorative treatment. While CAD/CAM technology has been suggested to enhance and ease implant abutment design and manufacturing, implant abutment material selection remains as a critical decision affecting restoration's long-term clinical outcomes. To date, considering the esthetic disadvantages of conventional titanium implant abutments, the mechanical limitations of one-piece zirconia abutments and the manufacturing time and costs associated with hybrid metal-zirconia abutments, no abutment material can be considered "ideal" for all clinical scenarios. Due to their biocompatibility, biomechanical characteristics (hardness and wear resistance), optical properties (yellow color), and peri-implant soft tissue esthetic integration, the use of CAD/CAM titanium nitride-coated implant abutments has been suggested as a predictable implant abutment material in mechanically challenging but esthetically demanding clinical situations, as the maxillary esthetic zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Two patients requiring a combined tooth-implant restorative treatment in the maxillary esthetic zone were treated using CAD/CAM nitride coated titanium implant abutments. The principal advantages of TiN coated abutments include comparable clinical outcomes to stock abutments, optimal biocompatibility, adequate fracture, wear, and corrosion resistance, reduced bacterial adhesion, and excellent esthetic integration with adjacent soft tissues.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinical reports and short term mechanical, biological and esthetic clinical outcomes indicate that CAD/CAM nitride coated titanium implant abutments can represent a predictable restorative alternative to stock/custom and metal/zirconia implant abutments and be considered a clinical relevant option in mechanically challenging but esthetically demanding situations, as often found in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Restoration of a nonideally placed anterior implant: A clinical report

This article describes a restorative solution for implants placed at an insufficient depth and in a patient with limited interarch space, making the esthetics, emergence profile, and retention of a cemented restoration problematic. These challenges were overcome by adhesively bonding a pressed lithium disilicate veneer to a custom cast metal abutment veneered with a thin layer of feldspathic porcelain. The ceramic veneer with the attached core engaged a facially located screw-access channel, which increased retention and resistance form and facilitated seating of the veneer. Adhesive bonding via the application of a thin layer of feldspathic porcelain on the custom dental implant abutment was also used to overcome the lack of resistance form with a veneer preparation.

The application of individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional restoration in optimizing the peri-implant soft tissue contour in the esthetic zone

OBJECTIVE

This article introduced a modified method to fabricate an individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional restoration for single-tooth implant restoration in the esthetic zone, which created a satisfactory peri-implant soft tissue architecture.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Three months after the implant placement, the individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional restoration was designed and fabricated in the laboratory, by referring to the profile of natural contra-lateral tooth digitally, and seated on the implant afterwards. The peri-implant soft tissue architecture was evaluated and the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) was recorded. The provisional restoration stayed on the implant for 3 months until the individualized definitive ceramic abutment and crown were fixed on the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol provided an alternative solution for shaping the peri-implant soft tissue morphology in the esthetic zone by using an individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional restoration and showed promising effect on the esthetics of anterior single-tooth implant restoration.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The individualized abutment-crown integrated provisional restoration whose emergence profile mirroring that of the natural contra-lateral tooth, was designed with the help of computer-aided design-manufacture (CAD/CAM). It may help shaping the peri-implant soft tissue in the esthetic zone with merits of saving amount of hand labor of technicians as well as clinicians, and reducing the visits of patients.

Cervical tooth anatomy considerations for prefabricated anatomic healing abutment design: A mathematical formulation

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A custom emergence profile offers the ideal horizontal dimensions for an anatomic healing abutment. However, developing such an emergence profile can be a time-consuming and complex process.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a mathematical formula defining horizontal cervical tooth geometry to design prefabricated, tooth-specific, healing abutments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) horizontal cross sections of 989 teeth on 54 participants were measured. For anterior and premolar teeth, 2 perpendicular ellipses were fitted onto the cervical tooth cross section that was defined by 3 parameters. The lingual ellipse followed the lingual outline of the tooth, and its diameter was the largest mesiodistal diameter of the tooth (parameter "a"); its buccolingual radius became parameter "b." The buccal ellipse was perpendicular to the lingual ellipse and followed the buccal outline of the tooth. The buccolingual radius of the smaller ellipse became parameter "c." For molars, the first ellipses followed the mesial outline of the tooth, and its larger diameter (parameter "a") matched the largest buccolingual diameter of the tooth. Its smaller radius became parameter "h1." The second ellipse was parallel to the first ellipse and followed the distal outline of the tooth. Its larger diameter became parameter "b", and its mesiodistal diameter became parameter "h2". Statistical differences between parameters were evaluated by the linear mixed model (α=.05 after Bonferroni adjustment). Pairwise comparisons were made separately for each parameter of the molars and separately for each parameter for the anterior teeth plus premolars. Teeth were put into the same parameter cluster if no significant differences were found between them for a specific parameter. If neither parameter (4 for molars and 3 for the other teeth) was different for 2 teeth, they were put into the same abutment cluster. The abutment clusters determined the type of anatomic healing abutment. The areas were calculated from the developed mathematical formula by using the parameters. In addition, cervical areas of 106 randomly chosen teeth were measured directly with a photo-editing software program. A computer algorithm was used to select 5 CBCT scans from the 54 by using the simple randomization method. The agreement between the 2 methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The lower and upper limits of agreement between the 2 methods were -8.57 and 7.36 mm², respectively, with no bias (-0.61 mm², P=.224). Significant differences were found between most parameters among the 14 tooth types (P<.001). Based on the parameters, 12 specifically distinct clusters were defined. Two tooth types were pooled into 1 abutment cluster: the maxillary first and second premolars and the mandibular first and second molars.

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical tooth cross section can be accurately defined by combining 2 elliptical elements. A comprehensive array of tooth specific emergence profiles can be provided by just 12 different prefabricated abutments, designed as per the recommended parameters.

One-by-one immediate dental implants: A papillae preservation concept for adjacent implants in a compromised periodontal case

In an immediate implant placement and provisionalization strategy, the esthetic results of multiple adjacent implants can be obtained even with compromised periodontium by implementing the "one-by-one" protocol. Staged extractions of multiple adjacent teeth to maintain soft tissue architecture are a key feature of the technique described.

Considerations in the replacement of over-retained primary teeth with implant restorations in the esthetic zone: A case report

OBJECTIVE

There exist several treatment planning and clinical challenges when treating over-retained primary teeth with dental implants-especially in the esthetic zone where the existing hard and soft tissue positions are not in harmony with adjacent dentition and do not serve as reliable landmarks for implant placement and restoration. In this report, we highlight some of the key aspects for achieving predictable treatment outcomes for implant restorations replacing over-retained primary teeth in the esthetic zone.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This clinical report describes the treatment of a patient who presented with over-retained deciduous canines consequent to congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors. The deciduous canines were deemed hopeless, and subsequently replaced with immediately placed implants following a computer-guided protocol. The optimal implant positions were determined through a diagnostic wax-up correcting the existing gingival discrepancies with the adjacent teeth. Existing periapical infections were addressed utilizing a vestibular approach to minimize the postoperative recession and scarring and achieve a more predictable esthetic outcome. Final restorations were fabricated with all ceramic materials for optimal esthetics.

CONCLUSION

When planning for implants to replace over-retained primary teeth, it is essential to visualize the desired contours of the final restorations and correct the level of the existing gingival discrepancies by planning the proper implant position and angulation in relation to the adjacent teeth and gingival positions.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Careful treatment planning coupled with a guided implant workflow allows for a successful surgical and esthetic outcome for the replacement of over-retained primary teeth with implant restorations.

Influence of the fixed implant-supported provisional phase on the esthetic final outcome of implant-supported crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the use of a provisional implant-supported crown improves the final esthetic outcome of implant crowns that are placed within esthetic sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty endosseous implants were inserted in sites 13 to 23 (FDI) in 20 patients. Following the reopening procedure, a randomization process assigned them to either cohort group 1: a provisional phase with soft tissue conditioning using the "dynamic compression technique" or cohort group 2: without a provisional phase. Screw-retained all ceramic crowns were inserted. Clinical follow-up appointments were completed at 36 months evaluating clinical, radiographic outcomes, and implant success and survival.

RESULTS

After 3 years, all implants survived; one implant-supported crown was excluded from the study due to adjacent tooth failure replaced with a further implant supported crown. Modified pink esthetic score (ModPES) scores were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (P = .018); white esthetic scores (WES) were not statistically different between both groups (P = .194). Mean values of combined modPES and WES were 15.6 for group 1, with a SD of 3.20. Group 2 had a mean combined modPES and WES of 12.2, with a SD of 3.86. Mean bone loss after 3 year was -0.05 and -0.04 mm for groups 1 and 2 respectively, without being statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Fixed implant-supported provisionals improve the final esthetic outcome of the peri-implant mucosa.

Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites

The key to achieving pleasing esthetics in implant dentistry is a thorough understanding of the biological processes driving dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction. The aim of the present report is first to characterize the extent of bone and soft tissue changes post-extraction and second to identify potential factors influencing tissue preservation in order to facilitate successful treatment outcomes. The facial bone wall thickness has been identified as the most critical factor influencing bone resorption and can be used as a prognostic tool in order to identify sites at risk for future facial bone loss subsequent to tooth extraction. Clinical studies indicated that thin bone wall phenotypes exhibiting a facial bone wall thickness of 1 mm or less revealed progressive bone resorption with a vertical loss of 7.5 mm, whereas thick bone wall phenotypes showed only minor bone resorption with a vertical loss of 1.1 mm. This is in contrast to the dimensional soft tissue alterations. Thin bone wall phenotypes revealed a spontaneous soft tissue thickening after flapless extraction by a factor of seven, whereas thick bone wall phenotypes showed no significant changes in the soft tissue dimensions after 8 weeks of healing. In sites exhibiting a limited bone resorption rate, immediate implant placement may be considered. If such ideal conditions are not present, other timing protocols are recommended to achieve predictable and pleasing esthetics. Socket preservation techniques for ridge preservation utilizing different biomaterials and/or barrier membranes often result in a better maintenance of tissue volumes, although the inevitable biological process of post-extraction bone resorption and bone modeling cannot be arrested. In summary, the knowledge of the biological events driving dimensional tissue alterations post-extraction should be integrated into the comprehensive treatment plan in order to limit tissue loss and to maximize esthetic outcomes.

Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics

Digital protocols are increasingly influencing prosthodontic treatment concepts. Implant-supported single-unit and short-span reconstructions will benefit mostly from the present digital trends. In these protocols, monolithic implant crowns connected to prefabricated titanium abutments, which are created based on data obtained from an intraoral scan followed by virtual design and production, without the need of a physical master cast, have to be considered in lieu of conventional manufacturing techniques for posterior implant restorations. No space for storage is needed in the complete digital workflow, and if a remake is required a replica of the original reconstruction can be produced quickly and inexpensively using rapid prototyping. The technological process is split into subtractive methods, such as milling or laser ablation, and additive processing, such as three-dimensional printing and selective laser melting. The dimensions of the supra-implant soft-tissue architecture can be calculated in advance of implant placement, according to the morphologic copy, and consequently are individualized for each patient. All these technologies have to be considered before implementing new digital dental workflows in daily routine. The correct indication and application are prerequisite and crucial for the success of the overall therapy, and, finally, for a satisfied patient. This includes a teamwork approach and equally affects the clinician, the dental assistant and the technician as well. The digitization process has the potential to change the entire dental profession. The major benefits will be reduced production costs, improvement in time efficiency and fulfilment of patients' perceptions of a modernized treatment concept.

Prosthetically guided bone sculpturing for a maxillary complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prosthesis based on a digital smile design: A clinical report

A digital smile design was used to create an average smile and to develop a removable interim restoration for an edentulous patient with a high smile line and different bone levels in the maxilla. The interim restoration was used as a guide to perform bone sculpturing to create space for the biological width and to restore a monolithic zirconia implant-supported fixed restoration.

The Impact of Buccal Bone Defects and Immediate Placement on the Esthetic Outcome of Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Implants

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of buccal bone defects and immediate placement on the esthetic outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth implants. The archives of the Department of Dental Implants & Tissue Regeneration at Hygeia Hospital during a 5-year period (2010–2014) were retrospectively analyzed, in search of patients treated with a single-tooth implant after extraction of a maxillary incisor. The status of the buccal bone plate and the time of implant placement were recorded. The pink esthetic score (PES) of each case was evaluated, with a maximum score of 14. In total, 91 patients were included in the study. The mean PES was 10.5. The outcome was considered satisfactory (PES ≥ 8) in 89% and (almost) perfect (PES ≥ 12) in 35% of the cases. Immediate implant placement had no impact on PES (P &gt; .05), even though it demonstrated slightly greater variability. On the other hand, buccal bone defects had a negative effect on PES (P &lt; .0001). In conclusion, a satisfactory esthetic outcome can be achieved in single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. The presence of buccal bone defects is considered a negative prognostic factor, whereas immediate implant placement does not affect the esthetic outcome.

Adjunctive Orthodontic Applications in Dental Implantology

Implant placement is often necessitated for replacement of teeth with pathologically damaged alveolar bone due to periodontitis or traumatic injury. Surgical augmentation of resorbed bone has many limitations, including lower efficacy of vertical augmentation than horizontal augmentation, as well as morbidity associated with grafting procedure. Orthodontic therapy has been proposed as a useful method for augmenting the resorbed alveolar bone and reforming aesthetically appealing gingival margin, prior to implant placement. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence for the application of orthodontic strategies that can be used as adjunct in selected cases to augment bone volume for the future implant site and maintain space for the prosthetic parts of the implant. These are (1) orthodontic extrusion of compromised teeth to generate vertical bone volume and enhance gingival architecture, (2) tooth preservation and postponing orthodontic space opening to maintain bone volume in future implant site, (3) orthodontic implant site switching to eliminate the deficient bone volume or risky implant sites, and (4) the provision of a rigid fixed-bonded retainer to maintain the implant site. Although there are no randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of orthodontic therapy for implant site development, clinical case reports and experience document the efficacy of orthodontic therapy for this application.

Papilla dimension and soft tissue level after early vs. delayed placement of single-tooth implants: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM

To present the10-year esthetic outcome data for single-tooth implants placed early or delayed after tooth extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four patients randomly allocated to two equal size groups were treated with a single-tooth implant approximately 10 days (Ea; N = 22), or 3 months (De; N = 22) after tooth extraction. Healing abutments were mounted after 3 months of submerged healing, and metal-ceramic crowns cemented after one additional month. Presence of buccal bone defects was registered at the second-stage surgery. Patients attended control visits 1 week and 1-1.5 years after mounting of the crown and 5 and 10 years after implant placement. Marginal bone level at the implant and the adjacent teeth as well as the distance between the implant and the teeth were measured in standardized periapical radiographs. The papilla dimension and clinical crown height (CCH) were assessed on clinical photographs by an experienced prosthodontist.

RESULTS

Two Ea and one De implants failed to osseointegrate. Twenty-eight patients (13 Ea and 15 De) who attended all four control visits were included in the data analysis. Complete papilla fill interproximally was achieved in one-third of the cases and an appropriate clinical crown height in <60% after 10 years. Although not statistically significant, early-placed implants tended to be superior to delayed-placed implants regarding soft tissue appearance just after crown delivery and after 10 years. An improvement in papilla dimensions was seen during the follow-up period for both groups while the CCH was unchanged. The implant region (anterior vs. posterior) did not significantly influence the papilla or CCH scores while younger patients (<50 years of age) received significantly better papilla scores than older patients (≥ 50 years). An apically located bone level at the tooth neighboring the implant influenced negatively the papilla dimension. In contrast, the presence of a bone defect buccally to the implant at second-stage surgery did not have a negative impact on the CCH 10 years after implant placement.

CONCLUSION

Early placement of single-tooth implants after tooth extraction performed equally to delayed placement in regard to the esthetic outcome of the soft tissues after 10 years in function.

Patient selection and treatment planning for implant restorations

Dental implants are an indispensible tool for the restoration of missing teeth. Their use has elevated the practice of dentistry by improving both our technical ability to rehabilitate patients and general quality of life. To routinely achieve the associated high expectations, diligent attention to details must be observed and addressed from the outset. Of central concern is the attainment of osseointegration and the location of implants to ideally support the intended restoration. The pivotal point in treatment planning for dental implants occurs when the location of bone is viewed radiographically in the context of the planned prosthesis. This most often requires diagnostic waxing or tooth arrangement using mounted diagnostic casts.

Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets

PURPOSE

Delayed placement of implant abutments has been associated with peri-implant marginal bone loss; however, long-term results obtained by modifying surgical and prosthetic techniques after implant placement are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal bone loss around titanium implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using two loading protocols after a 5-year follow-up period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 36 patients received 40 titanium implants (Astra Tech) intended for single-tooth replacement. Implants were immediately placed into fresh extraction sockets using either a one-stage (immediate loading by placing an interim prosthesis into functional occlusion) or a two-stage prosthetic loading protocol (insertion of abutments after 8 weeks of healing time). Marginal bone levels relative to the implant reference point were evaluated at four time intervals using intraoral radiographs: at time of implant placement, and 1, 3, and 5 years after implant placement. Measurements were obtained from mesial and distal surfaces of each implant (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

One-stage immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets resulted in a significant reduction in marginal bone loss (p < 0.002) compared to the traditional two-stage technique. Whereas mesial surfaces remained stable for the 5-year observation period, significant marginal bone loss was observed on distal surfaces of implants after cementation of interim prostheses (p < 0.007) and after 12 months (p < 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets reduced marginal bone loss and did not compromise the success rate of the restorations.

Biological aspects as a rule for single implant placement. The 3A-2B rule: a clinical report

For an implant restoration to be both esthetically and functionally successful, the prosthodontist must conduct a thorough treatment plan and complete a prosthesis design. The prosthodontist must carefully calculate the space needed for the restoration and soft tissue in the restoration process. The restoration and soft tissue are affected by the three-dimensional (3D) position of the implant, as the implant's depth determines the ideal length of the crown. When determining the 3D position of the implant, the clinician must consider the biological aspects required to ensure the restoration's biological integration with the patient's hard and soft tissues. The restoration must be the first component considered in the treatment plan. In addition, the clinician must understand that the distance between the cervical contour (of the planned restoration) and the level of the bone will dictate how the surgical and prosthetic treatment plan is enacted. In this report, a novel Radiographic Biological Ruler© (with biological information) was used to help facilitate the treatment plan's analysis.

Esthetics in implant-supported prostheses: a literature review

Esthetics is important for success of implant-supported prostheses. This study aimed to review esthetics concepts for implant treatment. Research in the PubMed database included studies published from 1995 to 2010 with the keywords implant esthetics, implant-supported prostheses, and esthetics. Forty-five studies were evaluated regarding the presurgical planning, surgical phase, and temporary and final restoration phases. It was concluded that esthetics in implant-supported prostheses results from a multidisciplinary approach from planning until insertion of the final restoration.

Soft tissue considerations in implant site development

Healthy soft tissue surrounding a dental implant is essential for health, function, and esthetics. The development of the tooth includes the formation of a biologic connection between the living tissues that has to be created during the healing process after placement of the implant. The success of dental implants is dependent on the establishment of a soft-tissue barrier that is able to shelter the underlying osseous structures and the osseointegration surrounding the implant body. The esthetics of a dental implant prosthesis depends on the health and stability of the peri-implant mucosa. Understanding of soft-tissue healing and maintenance around dental implants is paramount for implant success. This article discusses the soft-tissue interface, aspects of soft-tissue health, and esthetics during treatment planning and therapy.