1
|
Leroux E, Buchanan A, Lombard L, Loo LS, Bridge D, Rousseau B, Hopwood N, Matthews BR, Reuter U. Evaluation of Patients with Insufficient Efficacy and/or Tolerability to Triptans for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther 2020; 37:4765-4796. [PMID: 32990921 PMCID: PMC7595976 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01494-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Use of triptans for acute treatment of migraine is associated with insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability in approximately 30-40% of people. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to synthesize definitions, terminology, subsequent treatment outcomes, and characteristics associated with this subpopulation. METHODS A comprehensive SLR was conducted to identify studies, published from Jan 1995 to May 2019, which focused on insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability to triptans. RESULTS Thirty-five publications were identified, of which 22 described randomized controlled trials and open-label studies, and 13 described observational studies. Across studies, multiple objectives and a high amount of variability in methodologies and outcomes were noted. The most commonly applied measures of efficacy were headache pain freedom and pain relief at 2 h. Ten studies assessed efficacy of switching or optimizing treatment in patients with historical insufficient efficacy or tolerability to previous triptan treatment and demonstrated varying levels of success. Factors associated with increased risk of triptan insufficient efficacy included severe baseline headache severity, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and depression. CONCLUSIONS Irrespective of the methodology or definition used to identify people with insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability to triptans, study results support the assertion that a high unmet need remains for effective acute treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Li Shen Loo
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wichitnithad W, Nantaphol S, Vicheantawatchai P, Kiatkumjorn T, Wangkangwan W, Rojsitthisak P. Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Simple Analysis of Sumatriptan and its Application in Bioequivalence Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:ph13020021. [PMID: 31991540 PMCID: PMC7169407 DOI: 10.3390/ph13020021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This work demonstrated a sensitive, selective, and simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantitation of sumatriptan in human plasma samples. Terazosin was used as an internal standard to minimize the variability during sample processing and detection. Sample cleanup prior to chromatographic analysis was accomplished by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with tert-butyl methyl ether (t-BME). The separation was performed on a reversed-phase Symmetry® C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm) under a gradient mode, using a 0.2% formic acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Sumatriptan (m/z 296.26→251.05) and terazosin (m/z 388.10→290.25) were quantified using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operating in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) under the positive ion mode. The method was fully validated following US-FDA and EMA guidelines. The LC-MS/MS assay had a calibration range of 0.5–50.0 ng/mL. The assay was precise and accurate with a between-run precision of <9.51%, and between-run accuracy between −7.27 to 8.30%. The developed method was subsequently applied in the determination of plasma concentration-time profile of a sumatriptan 50-mg tablet following oral administration in healthy volunteers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wisut Wichitnithad
- Department of Bioanalytical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand; (W.W.); (S.N.); (P.V.); (T.K.)
- Natural Products for Ageing and Chronic Diseases Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Siriwan Nantaphol
- Department of Bioanalytical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand; (W.W.); (S.N.); (P.V.); (T.K.)
- Department of Clinical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand;
| | - Petploy Vicheantawatchai
- Department of Bioanalytical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand; (W.W.); (S.N.); (P.V.); (T.K.)
- Department of Clinical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand;
| | - Thanyaporn Kiatkumjorn
- Department of Bioanalytical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand; (W.W.); (S.N.); (P.V.); (T.K.)
- Department of Clinical Development, Pharma Nueva Co., Ltd., Bangkok 10900, Thailand;
| | | | - Pornchai Rojsitthisak
- Natural Products for Ageing and Chronic Diseases Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Department of Food and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +66-2-218-8310
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cady R. The pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of AVP-825: a potential advancement for acute treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015; 16:2039-51. [PMID: 26255952 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1074178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oral triptans have dominated the prescription market for acute treatment of migraine for nearly 25 years. Today, patients often express dissatisfaction with prescribed acute treatment in part because they do not have confidence that the therapy will provide consistent efficacy over time. Major limitations to sustained successful use of oral triptans are their relatively slow onset of meaningful clinical benefit and variable absorption/efficacy due to impaired gastrointestinal function during migraine. AVP-825, a new intranasal delivery system for sumatriptan , may be an effective alternative to oral triptans. AREAS COVERED This article reviews AVP-825, which deposits low-dose sumatriptan powder deep into the vascular mucosa of the posterior nose, allowing rapid absorption of drug into the systemic circulation. Studies suggest that AVP-825 is a highly effective, well-tolerated acute treatment for episodic migraine. EXPERT OPINION Oral triptans are limited in providing effective patient-centered outcomes to migraine patients. Failed or suboptimal abortive treatment of migraine is a major driver of migraine chronification and increases in healthcare costs. AVP-825 is an easy to use, novel, breath-powered intranasal delivery system that provides early onset of efficacy with low systemic drug exposure and few triptan-associated adverse events. AVP-825 will be a welcomed therapeutic tool for the acute treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Cady
- Headache Care Center , 3805 S, Kansas Expressway, Springfield, MO 65807 , USA +1 417 890 7888 ;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lionetto L, Negro A, Casolla B, Simmaco M, Martelletti P. Sumatriptan succinate: pharmacokinetics of different formulations in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 13:2369-80. [DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.730041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
5
|
Rofail D, Taylor F, Regnault A, Filonenko A. Treatment satisfaction instruments for different purposes during a product's lifecycle: keeping the end in mind. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2012; 4:227-40. [PMID: 21995828 DOI: 10.2165/11595280-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
This review investigates whether the development and implementation of treatment satisfaction instruments during a product's lifecycle are informed by their purpose. A basic literature review was performed between 2000 and 2010 using electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO®, and EMBASE) and the keywords 'satisfaction' and 'questionnaire' and 'medication' or 'drug'. Relevant articles were reviewed to extract the following information: type of study; study objectives; treatment satisfaction instrument used; clinical condition/indication; purpose of instrument; development of instrument; association of satisfaction with other endpoint measures; and main results and conclusions. Of 875 abstracts, 80 articles were further considered. Treatment satisfaction instruments were most commonly used in observational studies and interventional clinical trials. The review indicated similarities regarding the development and validation of satisfaction instruments, such as using patient input to derive the items and exploring classical measurement properties specific to the target population. Although some differences were apparent between instruments intended for use in clinical trials and clinical practice (e.g. the approaches used to enable the interpretation of satisfaction scores), the specificities of the implementation of treatment satisfaction during a product's lifecycle were rarely considered. By 'keeping the end in mind', data from treatment satisfaction instruments can help at three key stages: (i) product access to market: generating evidence as part of an overall value proposition to facilitate product reimbursement at a national level; (ii) market access to product: making the product available at a local level (e.g. local hospital formularies); and (iii) clinical practice: enhancing market penetration and product expansion after launch, and demonstrating value for prescribers. Furthermore, the development, validation, and interpretation of scores from treatment satisfaction instruments should be sensitive to the intended purpose. By considering the stage in the product lifecycle when an instrument is to be used, treatment satisfaction instruments can be developed with the specific research purpose and target audience in mind - whether it be patients, payers, or prescribers. In the future, treatment satisfaction instruments will become increasingly important for informing decisions at the individual level, giving patients a voice towards their overall management and care, and enhancing the relationship between doctor and patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Rofail
- Mapi Values, Adelphi Mill, Bollington, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Migraine is a chronic, recurrent, disabling condition that affects millions of people in the US and worldwide. Proper acute care treatment for migraineurs is essential for a full return of function and productivity. Triptans are serotonin (5-HT)(1B/1D) receptor agonists that are generally effective, well tolerated and safe. Seven triptans are available worldwide, although not all are available in every country, with multiple routes of administration, giving doctors and patients a wide choice. Despite the similarities of the available triptans, pharmacological heterogeneity offers slightly different efficacy profiles. All triptans are superior to placebo in clinical trials, and some, such as rizatriptan 10 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, almotriptan 12.5 mg, and zolmitriptan 2.5 and 5 mg are very similar to each other and to the prototype triptan, sumatriptan 100 mg. These five are known as the fast-acting triptans. Increased dosing can offer increased efficacy but may confer a higher risk of adverse events, which are usually mild to moderate and transient in nature. This paper critically reviews efficacy, safety and tolerability for the different formulations of sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, eletriptan and frovatriptan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie M Johnston
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of sumatriptan after single-dose administration of a fixed-dose combination tablet of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium 85/500 mg followed two hours later by subcutaneous sumatriptan 4- or 6-mg injection: A randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study in healthy volunteers. Clin Ther 2010; 32:1165-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Builders PF, Bonaventure AM, Tiwalade A, Okpako LC, Attama AA. Novel multifunctional pharmaceutical excipients derived from microcrystalline cellulose–starch microparticulate composites prepared by compatibilized reactive polymer blending. Int J Pharm 2010; 388:159-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.12.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2009] [Revised: 12/22/2009] [Accepted: 12/24/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Dowson AJ, Tepper SJ. Migraine: improved outcomes in patients previously poorly responsive to therapy. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62:1822-4. [PMID: 19166426 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01951.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|