The ezetimibe Jonah: the trials and tribulations of an unlucky drug

A Brief Review of Cardiovascular Diseases, Associated Risk Factors and Current Treatment Regimes

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of premature death and disability in humans and their incidence is on the rise globally. Given their substantial contribution towards the escalating costs of health care, CVDs also generate a high socio-economic burden in the general population. The underlying pathogenesis and progression associated with nearly all CVDs are predominantly of atherosclerotic origin that leads to the development of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and, peripheral vascular disease, subsequently causing myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmias or stroke. The aetiological risk factors leading to the onset of CVDs are well recognized and include hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking and, lack of physical activity. They collectively represent more than 90% of the CVD risks in all epidemiological studies. Despite high fatality rate of CVDs, the identification and careful prevention of the underlying risk factors can significantly reduce the global epidemic of CVDs. Beside making favorable lifestyle modifications, primary regimes for the prevention and treatment of CVDs include lipid-lowering drugs, antihypertensives, antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies. Despite their effectiveness, significant gaps in the treatment of CVDs remain. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology and pathology of the major CVDs that are prevalent globally. We also determine the contribution of well-recognized risk factors towards the development of CVDs and the prevention strategies. In the end, therapies for the control and treatment of CVDs are discussed.

An update on trials of novel lipid-lowering drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A number of novel trials have assessed the efficacy of new lipid-lowering therapies in cardiovascular disease (CVD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibitors reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 50-55%. A CVD outcome trial in patients with acute coronary syndromes with evolocumab achieved a LDL-C of 0.8 mmol/l (31 mg/dl) and a 20% relative risk reduction in CVD events in 2.2 years. Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and can lower LDL-C. Anacetrapib reduced coronary artery disease events by 7%, but not wider composite CVD outcomes, in a population with chronic CVD with pretreatment LDL-C of 1.6 mmol/l (62 mg/dl). The conflicting outcomes of cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor trials means these compounds are not being developed further. Trials using lipid drugs targeting inflammation have previously been generally unsuccessful, but recent data on the interleukin-1B receptor antagonist canakinumab has proven the concept of intervention on inflammation in atherosclerosis by showing a reduction in acute coronary interventions, but at the predictable cost of increased infections.

SUMMARY

Despite the success of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibition, the ability to achieve low LDL-C with off-patent medications and the costs of novel therapies will limit their use even in high-risk patients and confine them to the highest-risk sub-groups of patients.

IMPROVE-IT: what have we learned?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent studies and dyslipidemia treatment guidelines indicate that combination lipid-lowering therapy is frequently needed and its use has increased in recent years. Ezetimibe and simvastatin as a fixed dose is an efficacious treatment choice based on positive results of the recent IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT). In this review, we discuss recent controversies surrounding ezetimibe and provide clinical perspective on the results of the IMPROVE-IT study.

RECENT FINDINGS

IMPROVE-IT is the first trial that demonstrates a significant clinical benefit of a nonstatin hypolipidemic agent (ezetimibe) used in combination with statin (simvastatin) therapy in patients who have experienced an acute coronary syndrome. For almost a decade, the use of ezetimibe was limited by a relative lack of definitive evidence. However, the most recent Plaque Regression With Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound study showed greater coronary plaque regression by statin/ezetimibe combination compared with statin monotherapy. The results of the IMPROVE-IT trial are fostering new debate about the value of adjunctive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering over and above a statin.

SUMMARY

Ezetimibe/simvastatin combination, either as a single pill or as the combined use of the individual compounds, represents a well-tolerated and efficacious choice for dyslipidemia treatment in high-risk subjects, including patients with diabetes. Limited additional risk for adverse events compared with simvastatin monotherapy is observed, and an individualized, patient-centered approach to therapy is recommended.

The hinterland of familial hypercholesterolaemia: what do we not know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is the commonest autosomal dominant disorder in man, but many questions about familial hypercholesterolaemia remain to be answered. Guidelines are increasing in importance as healthcare becomes standardized. The review suggests areas that require more investigation or where pertinent guidelines may need to be reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is commoner than previously thought, but its epidemiology needs further investigation against a background of changing environmental and lifestyle factors that may bear on its phenotypic expression. Screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia may be more difficult than might be thought as cascade testing may not capture all cases effectively and universal screening appears compelling, but requires testing and evaluation. Cardiovascular disease guidelines are moving to being risk based, but familial hypercholesterolaemia stands alone as defined by large database of lipids-cholesterol criteria. A risk-based approach may need to be considered for familial hypercholesterolaemia, but a good evidence base is required. The effects of older therapies on prognosis in familial hypercholesterolaemia are based on surrogate as opposed to cardiovascular disease outcomes. Novel efficacious but expensive therapies are on the horizon, but no specific outcome trials in familial hypercholesterolaemia are planned and they may not be cost-effective outside very severe familial hypercholesterolaemia. Further research is also required to trial and test different models of care for familial hypercholesterolaemia.

SUMMARY

Despite familial hypercholesterolaemia being a common genetic condition, aspects of basic epidemiology, risk assessment, treatment, and models of care remain uncertain.

Ezetimibe plus moderate-dose simvastatin after acute coronary syndrome: what are we IMPROVEing on?

The recent IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) is the first study to demonstrate a significant benefit of another medication (ezetimibe) on top of statin therapy in patients who have recently experienced an acute coronary syndrome. Despite the fact that ezetimibe led to positive results on the primary endpoint, the clinical benefit translated to real-life practice is only modest at best. However, this is the first major trial to demonstrate a significant benefit of a lipid medication in addition to statins. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of IMPROVE-IT in the context of current-day acute coronary syndrome practice, where high-dose statins now are prescribed widely.

Improving the odds: ezetimibe and cardiovascular disease

The beauty of science is that well-conducted experiments provide answers to questions which were posed in times of greater ignorance. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and will be for some time. Cholesterol is a critical player which drives the underlying pathophysiological process of atherosclerosis. Statins are the first line treatment for lipids in CVD given their ability to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by up to 50%, and their proven benefits in both primary and secondary intervention . Despite the unprecedented efficacy of statins, additional treatments are sought to potentially reduce the residual risk that remains despite statin treatment such as that associated with reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (HDL-C) or triglycerides . In the last 5 years, several trials have reported on their potential additional benefit beyond statin therapy. These include omega-3 fatty acids in patients with prediabetes or diabetes , fibrates in diabetes , nicotinic acid/niacin in cardiovascular disease and cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors in cardiovascular disease . Despite their promise, none of these treatments were able to demonstrate benefit beyond baseline statin therapy when compared with placebo . The idea that benefit beyond statin treatment may be an unachievable goal has dogged the medical community working on CVD prevention. The phrase, 'Statins for atherosclerosis - as good as it gets?' was coined in 2005 and has rung true up until now .

Dyslipidaemia: what's around the corner?

Hyperlipidaemia is a major risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Statins are the mainstay of therapy and new guidelines focus on the use of these agents without specific targets for low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol or non high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. However, patients remain at risk of cardiovascular disease despite statin therapy so new drugs are required. This article reviews therapies in development to further lower LDL-cholesterol (Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors), raise HDL-holesterol (cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors (CETPIs)) and reduce triglycerides (novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-agonists and omega-3 fatty acid preparations). Specialised therapies are in development for treatment of orphan disoders such as homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (lomitapide) or familial chylomicroaemia (alipogene tiparvovec). These novel lipid-lowering agents are likely to find uses in treating patients at the highest cardiovascular risk.

New therapies to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipid-lowering is an intervention that reduces atherosclerosis and its complications. Statins currently form the standard of care but are not able to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) adequately in all patients - particularly those with familial hypercholesterolaemia and those with statin intolerance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination therapy with statins is well established and ezetimibe is often used as an additional LDL-C-lowering agent reducing LDL-C by 20%. However, its clinical efficacy still remains controversial. Newer, more potent methods of LDL-C reduction are in development. Both lomitapide, a microsomal transfer protein inhibitor (MTPI), and mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), have been shown to improve LDL-C levels by 25-50% in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia or statin intolerance antibody-based inhibitors of preprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) produce reductions in LDL-C of 30-65%. Cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors (CETPIs) reduce LDL-C by 30-40% as well as raising levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and may also have a role as additional LDL-C-reducing drugs.

SUMMARY

Surrogate outcome trials will be required with lomitapide or mipomersen to confirm their effects in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and clinical endpoint trials will be needed for PCSK9 and CETPIs if these are to be used widely.

Lipid-lowering agents

The role of lipid lowering in reducing the risk of mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well established. Treatment particularly aimed at decreasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is effective in reducing the risk of death from coronary heart disease and stroke. Statins form the cornerstone of treatment. However, in some individuals with a high risk of CVD who are unable to achieve their target LDL-C due to either intolerance or lack of efficacy, there is the need for alternative therapies. This review provides an overview of the different classes of currently available lipid-lowering medications including statins, fibrates, bile acid sequestrants (resins), and omega-3 fatty acids. Data are presented on their indications, pharmacology, and the relevant end point clinical trial data with these drugs. It also discusses the human trial data on some novel therapeutic agents that are being developed including those for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia--the antisense oligonucleotide mipomersen and the microsomal transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide. Data are presented on phase II and III trials on agents with potentially wider applications, cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inhibitors. The data on a licensed gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency are also presented.

Does it make sense to combine statins with other lipid-altering agents following AIM-HIGH, SHARP and ACCORD?

Hypercholesterolemia is one of the main risk factors for the development of atherosclerotic diseases. Multiple clinical trials of lipid-lowering agents have demonstrated that lowering cholesterol effectively reduces the risk of cardiovascular events and death. Currently, treatment with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") is the most commonly used approach, given their superior efficacy relative to other cholesterol lowering agents. However, not all patients on statin monotherapy achieve target cholesterol levels, and even when cholesterol lowering is successful, significant residual cardiovascular risk remains. There is increasing interest in developing combination cholesterol-modifying therapies that may augment the treatment effect and minimize the side effects of statins. Although there is currently no evidence that any of the potential therapy combinations can improve clinical outcome compared to statin monotherapy alone, results of several large ongoing trials will help to clarify this important field.

The fats of life in diabetes

Dyslipidaemia is a feature of diabetes and a risk factor for future cardiovascular disease (CVD) though the exact relationships for lipid fractions differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. CVD risk equivalence is a well established concept for easy prioritisation of treatment of patients with diabetes as a group but masks a wide range of CVD risk within the group depending on type of diabetes, its duration, the extent of microvascular disease and presence of other risk factors. The first line treatment for CVD risk in diabetes is the use of statins though reduction in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may be a better indicator of efficacy of treatment than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The status of all second line therapies for dyslipidaemia in diabetes is unclear as though fibrates and niacin have monotherapy evidence, in general CVD trials to date do not show clear benefits of combination therapy. Multiple novel medications for dyslipidaemia are in development but all require specific investigations in patients with diabetes and also endpoint trials before they can be accepted into general use.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and lipids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the mechanisms leading to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and the effects of hypoglycaemic and lipid-lowering therapies on NAFLD/NASH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The interaction of lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress and hepatic insulin resistance contribute to the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH. Few large scale clinical trials exist with biopsy or magnetic resonance endpoints as opposed to ultrasonographic and transaminase endpoints. Trial evidence that exists supports the utility of weight loss, metformin, thiazolidinediones, fibrates, niacin, ezetimibe and statins in improving the steatosis component of NAFLD/NASH though with less or minimal effects on the fibrotic component of NASH.

SUMMARY

Hypoglycaemic and lipid-lowering therapies may have a role in the treatment of NAFLD/NASH but large scale endpoint trials remain to be performed.

Statins and kidney disease: is the study of heart and renal protection at the cutting edge of evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dyslipidaemias are noted in all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Currently most evidence for their treatment comes from secondary retrospective analyses of patient subgroups with CKD recruited into clinical trials powered of hypertensive and dyslipideamic cohorts powered for cardiovascular endpoints.These analyses suggest a number of different beneficial effects of statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) on renal, cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. However, there is disagreement on the impact of interventions at different CKD stages, and on treatment targets.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) trial published in June 2011 was the first trial specifically powered to investigate atherosclerotic outcomes in CKD patients. It found a 17% overall reduction in major adverse cardiac events in the statin-treated group compared with placebo, yet no effect on any renal outcomes of proteinuria and progressive decline of glomerular filtration rate. Furthermore, the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidencebased care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) investigators provided further important observational data on the beneficial effect of statins in CKD stages I-IV.

SUMMARY

The evidence that statins have a cardiovascular and mortality benefit in CKD stages I-IV has been reinforced by SHARP, which also definitively shows that there are no special safety concerns for their administration in CKD. However, the utility of the use of statins in patients on dialysis is far from clear, at least in our opinion. The effect of statins on renal outcomes is unconvincing and the evidence does not presently support their use for these indications alone.

New lipid-lowering drugs: an update

Lipid lowering is established as a proven intervention to reduce atherosclerosis and its complications. Statins form the basis of care but are not able to treat all aspects of dyslipidaemia. Many novel therapeutic compounds are being developed. These include additional therapeutics for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, for example, thyroid mimetics (thyroid receptor beta-agonists), antisense oligonucleotides or microsomal transfer protein inhibitors (MTPI); triglycerides, for example, novel peroxosimal proliferator activating receptors agonists, MTPIs, diacylglycerol acyl transferase-1 inhibitors and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), for example, mimetic peptides; HDL delipidation strategies and cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors and modulators of inflammation, for example, phospholipase inhibitors. Gene therapy for specific rare disorders, for example, lipoprotein lipase deficiency using alipogene tiparvovec is also in clinical trials. Lipid-lowering drugs are likely to prove a fast-developing area for novel treatments as possible synergies exist between new and established compounds for the treatment of atherosclerosis.