1
|
Apelqvist J, Willy C, Fagerdahl AM, Fraccalvieri M, Malmsjö M, Piaggesi A, Probst A, Vowden P. EWMA Document: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. J Wound Care 2019; 26:S1-S154. [PMID: 28345371 DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.sup3.s1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
1. Introduction Since its introduction in clinical practice in the early 1990's negative pressure wounds therapy (NPWT) has become widely used in the management of complex wounds in both inpatient and outpatient care.1 NPWT has been described as a effective treatment for wounds of many different aetiologies2,3 and suggested as a gold standard for treatment of wounds such as open abdominal wounds,4-6 dehisced sternal wounds following cardiac surgery7,8 and as a valuable agent in complex non-healing wounds.9,10 Increasingly, NPWT is being applied in the primary and home-care setting, where it is described as having the potential to improve the efficacy of wound management and help reduce the reliance on hospital-based care.11 While the potential of NPWT is promising and the clinical use of the treatment is widespread, highlevel evidence of its effectiveness and economic benefits remain sparse.12-14 The ongoing controversy regarding high-level evidence in wound care in general is well known. There is a consensus that clinical practice should be evidence-based, which can be difficult to achieve due to confusion about the value of the various approaches to wound management; however, we have to rely on the best available evidence. The need to review wound strategies and treatments in order to reduce the burden of care in an efficient way is urgent. If patients at risk of delayed wound healing are identified earlier and aggressive interventions are taken before the wound deteriorates and complications occur, both patient morbidity and health-care costs can be significantly reduced. There is further a fundamental confusion over the best way to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in this complex patient population. This is illustrated by reviews of the value of various treatment strategies for non-healing wounds, which have highlighted methodological inconsistencies in primary research. This situation is confounded by differences in the advice given by regulatory and reimbursement bodies in various countries regarding both study design and the ways in which results are interpreted. In response to this confusion, the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) has been publishing a number of interdisciplinary documents15-19 with the intention of highlighting: The nature and extent of the problem for wound management: from the clinical perspective as well as that of care givers and the patients Evidence-based practice as an integration of clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research The nature and extent of the problem for wound management: from the policy maker and healthcare system perspectives The controversy regarding the value of various approaches to wound management and care is illustrated by the case of NPWT, synonymous with topical negative pressure or vacuum therapy and cited as branded VAC (vacuum-assisted closure) therapy. This is a mode of therapy used to encourage wound healing. It is used as a primary treatment of chronic wounds, in complex acute wounds and as an adjunct for temporary closure and wound bed preparation preceding surgical procedures such as skin grafts and flap surgery. Aim An increasing number of papers on the effect of NPWT are being published. However, due to the low evidence level the treatment remains controversial from the policy maker and health-care system's points of view-particularly with regard to evidence-based medicine. In response EWMA has established an interdisciplinary working group to describe the present knowledge with regard to NPWT and provide overview of its implications for organisation of care, documentation, communication, patient safety, and health economic aspects. These goals will be achieved by the following: Present the rational and scientific support for each delivered statement Uncover controversies and issues related to the use of NPWT in wound management Implications of implementing NPWT as a treatment strategy in the health-care system Provide information and offer perspectives of NPWT from the viewpoints of health-care staff, policy makers, politicians, industry, patients and hospital administrators who are indirectly or directly involved in wound management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Apelqvist
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden and Division for Clinical Sciences, University of Lund, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Christian Willy
- Department of Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Bundeswehr Hospital Berlin, Research and Treatment Center for Complex Combat Injuries, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ann-Mari Fagerdahl
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Wound Centre, Södersjukhuset AB, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Fraccalvieri
- Plastic Surgery Unit, ASO Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin, University of Turin, 10100 Turin, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Piaggesi
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pisa University Hospital, 56125 Pisa, Italy
| | - Astrid Probst
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen GmbH, 72764 Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Peter Vowden
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, and Honorary Consultant Vascular Surgeon, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Y, Li PY, Sun SJ, Yao YZ, Li ZF, Liu T, Yang F, Zhang LY, Bai XJ, Huo JS, He WB, Ouyang J, Peng L, Hu P, Zhu YA, Jin P, Shao QF, Wang YF, Dai RW, Hu PY, Chen HM, Wang GF, Wang YG, Jin HX, Zhu CJ, Zhang QY, Shao B, Sang XG, Yin CL. Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association for management guidelines of vacuum sealing drainage application in abdominal surgeries-Update and systematic review. Chin J Traumatol 2019; 22:1-11. [PMID: 30850324 PMCID: PMC6529401 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) is frequently used in abdominal surgeries. However, relevant guidelines are rare. Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association organized a committee composed of 28 experts across China in July 2017, aiming to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the application of VSD in abdominal surgeries. Eleven questions regarding the use of VSD in abdominal surgeries were addressed: (1) which type of materials should be respectively chosen for the intraperitoneal cavity, retroperitoneal cavity and superficial incisions? (2) Can VSD be preventively used for a high-risk abdominal incision with primary suture? (3) Can VSD be used in severely contaminated/infected abdominal surgical sites? (4) Can VSD be used for temporary abdominal cavity closure under some special conditions such as severe abdominal trauma, infection, liver transplantation and intra-abdominal volume increment in abdominal compartment syndrome? (5) Can VSD be used in abdominal organ inflammation, injury, or postoperative drainage? (6) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intestinal fistula and pancreatic fistula? (7) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intra-abdominal and extra-peritoneal abscess? (8) Can VSD be used in the treatment of abdominal wall wounds, wound cavity, and defects? (9) Does VSD increase the risk of bleeding? (10) Does VSD increase the risk of intestinal wall injury? (11) Does VSD increase the risk of peritoneal adhesion? Focusing on these questions, evidence-based recommendations were given accordingly. VSD was strongly recommended regarding the questions 2-4. Weak recommendations were made regarding questions 1 and 5-11. Proper use of VSD in abdominal surgeries can lower the risk of infection in abdominal incisions with primary suture, treat severely contaminated/infected surgical sites and facilitate temporary abdominal cavity closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Pei-Yuan Li
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shi-Jing Sun
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuan-Zhang Yao
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhan-Fei Li
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lian-Yang Zhang
- Trauma Center of PLA, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China,Corresponding author.
| | - Xiang-Jun Bai
- Trauma Center/Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China,Corresponding author.
| | - Jing-Shan Huo
- Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangzhou Province, China
| | - Wu-Bing He
- Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Ouyang
- Emergency Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China
| | - Lei Peng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Ping Hu
- Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China
| | - Yan-An Zhu
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ping Jin
- Yuyao People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Yuyao, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qi-Feng Shao
- Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | | | - Rui-Wu Dai
- Chengdu Military General Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Pei-Yang Hu
- Tiantai County People's Hospital, Tiantai, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hai-Ming Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Ge-Fei Wang
- Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yong-Gao Wang
- Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong-Xu Jin
- Shenyang Military General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Chang-Ju Zhu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yong Zhang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Biao Shao
- The First People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China
| | | | - Chang-Lin Yin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Yu A. Complications of negative pressure wound therapy: a mini review. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 22:457-61. [PMID: 24852446 DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2013] [Accepted: 04/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy, with its wide indications and narrow contraindications, has been widely used for various complicated wounds. Despite its excellent properties in promoting wound healing, there are sporadic but increasing reports on the complications. These complications included bleeding, infection, pain, rupture of the heart, and death in the short term. When used for the long term, the therapy may decrease life quality, increase anxiety, and lead to malnutrition. In this review, we briefly summarize the complications of negative pressure wound therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zonghuan Li
- Department of Micro-Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N. Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg 2014; 12:1105-14. [PMID: 25174789 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Revised: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is widely used in the management of the open abdomen despite uncertainty regarding several aspects of usage. An expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations describing the use of NPWT in the open abdomen. METHODS A systematic review was carried out to investigate the efficacy of a range of Temporary Abdominal Closure methods including variants of NPWT. Evidence-based recommendations were developed by an International Expert Panel and graded according to the quality of supporting evidence. RESULTS Pooled results, in non-septic patients showed a 72% fascial closure rate following use of commercial NPWT kits in the open abdomen. This increased to 82% by the addition of a 'dynamic' closure method. Slightly lower rates were showed with use of Wittmann Patch (68%) and home-made NPWT (vac-pack) (58%). Patients with septic complications achieved a lower rate of fascial closure than non-septic patients but NPWT with dynamic closure remained the best option to achieve fascial closure. Mortality rates were consistent and seemed to be related to the underlying medical condition rather than being influenced by the choice of dressing, Treatment goals for open abdomen were defined prior to developing eleven specific evidence-based recommendations suitable for different stages and grades of open abdomen. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The most efficient temporary abdominal closure techniques are NPWT kits with or without a dynamic closure procedure. Evidence-based recommendations will help to tailor its use in a complex treatment pathway for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bruhin
- Department of Trauma and Visceral Surgery, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - F Ferreira
- Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos-Porto, Portugal
| | - M Chariker
- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Institute, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - N Runkel
- Department of General Surgery, Black Forest Hospital, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany; University of Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R, Lindstedt S, Gustafsson L. Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention. Int Wound J 2012; 10:597-605. [PMID: 22716081 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481x.2012.01029.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh binds with and inactivates bacteria and fungus, which makes it an interesting alternative, wound filler for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). This study was conducted to compare the performance of pathogen-binding mesh, foam and gauze as wound fillers in NPWT with regard to pressure transduction, fluid retention, wound contraction and microvascular blood flow. Wounds on the backs of 16 pigs were filled with pathogen-binding mesh, foam or gauze and treated with NPWT. The immediate effects of 0, -40, -60, -80 and -120 mmHg, on pressure transduction and blood flow were examined in eight pigs using laser Doppler velocimetry. Wound contraction and fluid retention were studied during 72 hours of NPWT at -80 and -120 mmHg in the other eight pigs. Pathogen-binding mesh, gauze and foam provide similar pressure transduction to the wound bed during NPWT. Blood flow was found to decrease 0.5 cm laterally from the wound edge and increase 2.5 cm from the wound edge, but was unaltered 5.0 cm from the wound edge. The increase in blood flow was similar with all wound fillers. The decrease in blood flow was more pronounced with foam than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Similarly, wound contraction was more pronounced with foam, than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Wound fluid retention was the same in foam and pathogen-binding mesh, while more fluid was retained in the wound when using gauze. The blood flow 0.5-5 cm from the wound edge and the contraction of the wound during NPWT were similar when using pathogen-binding mesh and gauze. Wound fluid was efficiently removed when using pathogen-binding mesh, which may explain previous findings that granulation tissue formation is more rapid under pathogen-binding mesh than under gauze. This, in combination with its pathogen-binding properties, makes this mesh an interesting wound filler for use in NPWT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Malmsjö
- Department of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|