A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Parallel Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Once‐A‐Day Tadalafil in Men with Erectile Dysfunction Who Are Naïve to PDE5 Inhibitors

Single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human corpus cavernosum

The corpus cavernosum is the most important structure for penile erection, and its dysfunction causes many physiological and psychological problems. However, its cellular heterogeneity and signalling networks at the molecular level are poorly understood because of limited access to samples. Here, we profile 64,993 human cavernosal single-cell transcriptomes from three males with normal erection and five organic erectile dysfunction patients. Cell communication analysis reveals that cavernosal fibroblasts are central to the paracrine signalling network and regulate microenvironmental homeostasis. Combining with immunohistochemical staining, we reveal the cellular heterogeneity and describe a detailed spatial distribution map for each fibroblast, smooth muscle and endothelial subcluster in the corpus cavernosum. Furthermore, comparative analysis and related functional experiments identify candidate regulatory signalling pathways in the pathological process. Our study provides an insight into the human corpus cavernosum microenvironment and a reference for potential erectile dysfunction therapies.

The corpus cavernosum is the most important structure for penile erection, and its dysfunction causes physiological and psychological problems. Here the authors perform single-cell RNA-sequencing on corpus cavernosum samples from males with normal erection and erectile dysfunction patients, providing insights into this pathology.

Effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition on cardiovascular function in resistant hypertension: A systematic review

Approximately 12-18% of hypertensive patients are diagnosed with resistant hypertension (RH). The risk of having worse cardiovascular outcomes is twice higher in those patients. The low effectiveness of conventional antihypertensive drugs in RH emphasizes the need to evaluate complementary drug therapies to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Previous studies have demonstrated that phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors improve hemodynamics and reduce BP on essential hypertension. So, the authors aimed to summarize current clinical trials-based evidence published concerning the use of PDE-5 inhibitors on BP, cardiovascular function, and hemodynamics of patients with RH. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry databases on May 15th, 2020 using pre-defined search terms. Two independent reviewers assessed and extracted data from clinical trials that evaluated the effect of PDE-5 inhibitors on BP. We have included five articles in this systematic review. Four of them developed a single-day protocol, while one has developed a 14-day study. The main findings indicate that PDE-5 inhibitors ameliorate BP, vascular hemodynamics, and diastolic function parameters. Some data demonstrated improvement of endothelial function, but it was not a consensus. The side effects seemed to be limited and well-tolerated. In brief, our systematic review highlights the potential of PDE-5 inhibitors as a therapeutic alternative in addition to the multiple-drug regime for RH. Larger studies are still needed to determine whether the beneficial effects of PDE-5 inhibitors on RH would be maintained with chronic administration.

State-of-the-art pharmacotherapy for diabetic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

The global epidemic of diabetes has led to an epidemic of diabetes complications. Diabetic neuropathy is the most common microvascular complication, of which diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and autonomic neuropathy (AN) are the most prevalent, affecting ~50% of patients. DPN results in pain with a poor quality of life and a loss of sensation with an increased risk of foot ulceration. Autonomic neuropathy can cause significant morbidity in a minority and is associated with increased mortality. The cornerstone of treatment to prevent or limit the progression of DPN/AN is multifactorial risk factor modification including treatment of glycemia, lipids and blood pressure. Whilst, there are no FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies, there are a number of therapies to relieve symptoms in DPN and AN.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss current approved therapies for painful diabetic neuropathy and autonomic neuropathy. They also address the potential role of improving risk factors to limit the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy and new pathogenetic and pain-relieving treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

The FDA-approved Pregabalin and Duloxetine over 25 years ago and Tapentadol, 6 years ago for painful diabetic neuropathy. There are currently no FDA-approved disease-modifying treatments for diabetic neuropathy which has been attributed to inappropriate models of the disease with limited translational capacity and major limitations of trial designs and endpoints in clinical trials.

Comparing Outcomes of Medical Management and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to BPH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Compare outcomes of medical therapy as compared to minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for treatment of bladder outlet obstruction RECENT FINDINGS: Treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) remains largely driven by patient symptomatology with medical therapy or watchful waiting as the first-line management strategies. However, most patients are not adherent to prescribed medical therapies and are hesitant to accept the risks associated with more invasive therapies. Minimally invasive surgical therapies are treatments providing short-term symptom relief superior to medical therapies without the sequela of more invasive procedures. Though there are few direct comparisons, MIST seems to relieve LUTS/BPH symptoms at least as well as medical therapy without the need for daily adherence.

Efficacy of Continuous Dosing of Tadalafil Once Daily vs Tadalafil On Demand in Clinical Subgroups of Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Descriptive Comparison Using the Integrated Tadalafil Databases

Introduction

Various factors play a role in the development of erectile dysfunction (ED).

Aim

To provide a descriptive comparison of erectile function response for tadalafil on-demand (PRN) and once-daily (OAD) dosing regimens in patients with common comorbid conditions, treatments, or risk factors that can be considered when treating ED.

Methods

In total, 17 PRN and 4 OAD placebo-controlled studies were included in the integrated database in these pooled analyses. Data were analyzed from patients treated with placebo, tadalafil 10 mg (low dose), and 20 mg (high dose) for the PRN studies and placebo, tadalafil 2.5 mg (low dose), and 5 mg (high dose) for the OAD studies.

Main Outcome Measures

The effects of tadalafil were measured using the International Index of Erectile Function administered from baseline to week 12. A descriptive comparison of the efficacy of tadalafil PRN vs OAD was examined in the clinical populations.

Results

Baseline characteristics of 4,354 men were comparable between the PRN and OAD groups, with differences seen only in the variables of race, body mass index (BMI) of at least 30 kg/m², and alcohol use. Tadalafil was efficacious at improving erectile function for all clinical populations, except for the low-dose OAD group, which demonstrated a weaker effect vs placebo than the high-dose OAD group, and the low- and high-dose PRN groups vs placebo for patients with BMI of at least 30 kg/m² for patients without a cardiovascular disorder, smokers, patients with ED duration shorter than 1 year, and patients without previous phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use. Tadalafil was efficacious for patients with or without diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and alcohol use at baseline.

Conclusion

Tadalafil OAD and PRN regimens showed efficacy in patients with ED. No clinical populations of patients with ED seemed to benefit overwhelmingly from one dose regimen over the other.

Aging and sexual health: getting to the problem

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common disorders in male and is often associated with other age-related comorbidities. The aging process affects the structural organization and function of penile erectile components such as smooth muscle cell and vascular architecture. These modifications affect penile hemodynamics by impairing cavernosal smooth muscle cell relaxation, reducing penile elasticity, compliance and promoting fibrosis. This review aims to identify the mechanisms of ED in the penile aging process in experimental and clinical data. It also highlights areas that are in need of more research. The search strategies yielded total records screened from PubMed. Clarification of the molecular mechanisms that accompanies corpus cavernosum aging and aging-associated ED will aid new perspectives in the development of novel mechanism-based therapeutic approaches. Age is not a limiting factor for ED medical management, and it is never too late to treat. Hypogonadism should be managed regardless of age, and synergistic effects have been found during testosterone (T) replacement therapy when used along with oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors. Therefore, the clinical management of ED related to aging can be done by therapeutic interventions that include PDE-5 inhibitors, and other pharmacological treatments.

Tadalafil 5 mg Once Daily Improves Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess tadalafil 5 mg once-daily for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of tadalafil 5 mg once-daily for the treatment of LUTS and ED. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were also investigated.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications involving a total of 3973 patients were used in the analysis, including 13 RCTs that compared tadalafil 5 mg once-daily with placebo. We found that tadalafil 5 mg once-daily was effective in improving LUTS suggestive of BPH and treating ED over 12 weeks in our meta-analysis. Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (SMD = - 2.02, 95% CI = - 2.52 to -1.53, P < 0.00001); Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPH-II) (SMD = -0.58, 95% CI = -0.84 to -0.33, P < 0.00001); International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function (IIEF) domain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 5.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.13-6.23, P < 0.00001) indicated that tadalafil 5 mg once-daily was more effective than the placebo. Safety assessments included discontinuations due to adverse event (odds ratio (OR) = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.12-2.85, P = 0.01) indicated that tadalafil 5 mg once-daily was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that tadalafil 5 mg once-daily to be an effective treatment for LUTS and ED with a low occurrence of side effects.

Tadalafil 5 mg once daily for the treatment of erectile dysfunction during a 6-month observational study (EDATE): impact of patient characteristics and comorbidities

BACKGROUND

To explore the impact of patient-characteristics and relevant comorbidities on treatment continuation rates, effectiveness, and satisfaction in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) who started or switched to tadalafil 5 mg once daily (TAD-OaD) at baseline.

METHODS

In the EDATE observational study, phosphodiesterase-type-5 (PDE5)-inhibitor pretreated or naïve ED patients who started or switched to TAD-OaD were prospectively followed for 6 months. Time to discontinuation of TAD-OaD was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method at Months 2, 4, and 6 in subgroups stratified by age (18 - 65 years and >65 years), PDE5-inhibitor pretreatment, ED-severity (mild, moderate, severe), and presence or absence of relevant comorbidities (BPH, diabetes, CVD, hypertension, dyslipidemia). LSmean change from baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores and associated 95 % CIs were assessed using a mixed-model for repeated measures. Visit, ED etiology, and subgroups were included as fixed-effects.

RESULTS

Overall, 778 patients received prescriptions for initiating or switching to TAD-OaD at baseline. At Month 2, >90 % of patients remained on TAD-OaD, except those aged >65 years (86.7 %) and patients with severe ED (89.0 %). More than 80 % of patients in all subgroups, except those aged >65 years (75.0 %), continued TAD-OaD at Month 6. There was a significant LSmean negative effect on IIEF- EF domain-score improvement for BPH (LSmean effect [95 % CI]: -2.77 [-4.98, -0.55], p = 0.014), previous PDE5-inhibitor treatment (-2.13 [-3.33,-0.94], p < 0.001), and mild vs moderate ED (-2.00 [-3.54,-0.46], p = 0.011); the latter possibly linked with a bigger treatment-effect in those with more severe ED at baseline. The LSmean effect on change in IIEF-EF was significantly positive for diabetes (2.28 [0.64,3.92], p = 0.007), most likely because those with diabetes had more severe ED at baseline. For all other parameters, no statistically significant LSmean effects in IIEF-EF changes were observed. No comorbidity or baseline-characteristic except age (18 - 65 years vs >65 years: 11.25 [2.96,19.54], p = 0.008) affected changes in EDITS.

CONCLUSIONS

Under routine clinical conditions, treatment continuation rate or satisfaction does not seem to be significantly affected by the presence of comorbidities in men who choose ED-treatment with TAD-OaD. The magnitude of treatment effectiveness was affected by certain baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study (H6D-EW-LVIU) is registered in the German VfA Registry of Non-Interventional Studies (Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller) since 06 December 2011; available at: http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/datenbanken-zu-arzneimitteln/nisdb/nis-details/_741 .

The efficacy of combination treatment with injectable testosterone undecanoate and daily tadalafil for erectile dysfunction with testosterone deficiency syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Both testosterone therapy and chronic treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) have positive effects on the histology of penile corpora and erectile function. However, few clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy with both testosterone replacement and chronic PDE5Is.

AIM

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with long-acting injectable testosterone undecanoate (TU) and a once-daily tadalafil 5 mg for erectile dysfunction with testosterone deficiency syndrome.

METHODS

Sixty patients were consecutively enrolled and followed for 36 weeks. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to group I and received 1,000 mg of parenteral TU on day 1, followed by additional injections at weeks 6 and 18 with on-demand tadalafil 10-20 mg during the 30 weeks of treatment. The remaining 30 patients received the same dose and schedule of TU as group I, and were prescribed once-daily tadalafil 5 mg during 30 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serological tests were performed, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) questionnaires, and Global Assessment Question (GAQ) were administered to the patients.

RESULTS

Total IIEF and AMS scores were significantly improved during the 30 weeks of treatment in both groups. When IIEF scores were compared between the two groups, group II showed better symptom scores than group I at weeks 6 and 30. A similar pattern was observed when comparing AMS scores between the groups. At week 36, changes in IIEF and AMS scores that indicated worsened symptoms compared with week 30 were observed in both groups; group II showed better symptom scores than group I. On the GAQ, the ratio of patients reporting improvement in erectile function was significantly higher in group II than group I.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of long-acting injectable TU and once-daily tadalafil 5 mg produced a significant improvement in erectile function. Moreover, the improvement in erectile function was well maintained, even after the cessation of treatment.

Continuation and effectiveness of tadalafil once daily during a 6-month observational study in erectile dysfunction: the EDATE study

AIMS

This was the first observational study evaluating treatment continuation, effectiveness and tolerability of tadalafil 5 mg once daily (TAD-OaD) in patients who chose and paid for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Men ≥ 18 years with ED, treated previously with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5)-inhibitor on-demand (PRN) or treatment-naïve, were enrolled at 59 sites. For patients prescribed TAD-OaD at baseline (T1), change in erectile function (IIEF-EF and GAQ) was documented after 1-3 (T2) and 4-6 (T3) months. The primary outcome was the probability to switch/discontinue from TAD-OaD, estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method. Changes in IIEF-EF were evaluated using a mixed model for repeated measures adjusting for patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 975 men enrolled (median age 56.8 years, 33.7% with previous PDE5-inhibitor use), 778 were prescribed TAD-OaD, 135 TAD-PRN and 62 sildenafil or vardenafil PRN. During the 6-month longitudinal observation, 107 patients (13.8% of 778) switched or discontinued TAD-OaD-treatment. KM-rates (95%CI) for continuing TAD-OaD at 2, 4 and 6 months were 94.0% (92.3, 95.7), 88.3% (85.9, 90.6) and 86.3% (83.7, 88.9), respectively. The 25th percentile of time to switch/discontinuation of TAD-OaD was estimated as 31.1 weeks (lower 95%CI 30.3 weeks). At T3, IIEF-EF scores had increased by 7.1 (LSmean; 95%CI 5.8, 8.5) points; 91.3% of patients reported improved erections. The most frequently reported AE was headache (10 patients; 1.3%); no new/unexpected safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Under routine conditions, and when patients were involved in treatment decision-making, more than 86% of men starting/switching to tadalafil once daily (OaD) at baseline continued tadalafil OaD treatment for ≥ 6 months.

Psychosocial outcomes after initial treatment of erectile dysfunction with tadalafil once daily, tadalafil on demand or sildenafil citrate on demand: results from a randomized, open-label study

Initiation of ED treatment with a particular PDE5I may influence treatment-adherence and other outcomes. In this multicenter, open-label study, men with ED, naïve to PDE5I, were randomized to tadalafil 5 mg once-a-day (OaD; N=257), 10 mg on demand (PRN; N = 252) or sildenafil-citrate (sildenafil) 50 mg PRN (N = 261) for 8 weeks (dose adjustments allowed), followed by 16 weeks of pragmatic treatment (switching between PDE5I allowed). Primary outcomes (treatment-adherence) were reported previously. Here, we report effects on: Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales, Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire, ED Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and Global Assessment Questions (GAQ). Mixed-model for repeated measures and analysis of covariance were used to analyze changes from baseline; GAQ-responses were evaluated by logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for treatment, country, ED-severity, baseline and baseline-by-treatment interaction. Patients randomized to tadalafil OaD or PRN reported greater improvement (least-square mean (s.e.) change) in Sexual Self-Confidence (OaD +0.90 (0.048), PRN +0.93 (0.050), vs +0.73 (0.049); P=0.006 and P=0.001) and Spontaneity (OaD +0.11 (0.035), PRN +0.13 (0.035), vs +0.02 (0.035); P = 0.044 and P = 0.010) compared with sildenafil. Improvements in GAQ and SEP responses, IIEF-EF, orgasmic function, sexual desire, overall satisfaction domains, SEAR and EDITS scores did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 5 mg Once Daily in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily use in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study retrospectively evaluated 92 patients who underwent RALP at Dong-A University Hospital. The patients were surveyed by use of the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire, which was self-administered before surgery and at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The 92 patients were classified into the tadalafil group (n=47) and the non-tadalafil group (n=45). Each group was then classified depending on the nerve-sparing (NS) procedure used: bilateral NS or unilateral NS.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the total IIEF-5 scores of the tadalafil group and the non-tadalafil group were 10.0±3.4 and 7.0±4.0, respectively. At 1 year, the total IIEF-5 score in the tadalafil group was significantly greater than that in the non-tadalafil group (13.2±5.6 vs. 7.7±4.8, p<0.0001). Statistically significant improvements (p<0.05) were observed in the tadalafil group for all 5 domains of the IIEF-5 score, whereas in the non-tadalafil group there was no significant improvement in any of the domains at 1 year. The reported side effects were flushing (8.5%, n=4), headache (4.3%, n=2), and dizziness (2.1%, n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

In ED patients after NS RALP, a once-daily dose of tadalafil 5 mg was well tolerated and significantly improved EF compared with that in the non-tadalafil group.

PDE5 inhibitors: considerations for preference and long-term adherence

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent condition affecting nearly one in five men worldwide. The advent of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) has revolutionised the ED treatment landscape and provided effective, minimally invasive therapies to restore male sexual function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pubmed search was performed of all English language articles from 1996 to present reviewing PDE5i, including pharmacokinetics, efficacy profiles and comparisons, where available.

RESULTS

Currently available PDE5i in the United States include sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil and avanafil, each of which has unique side effect, pharmacokinetic and outcome profiles. Sildenafil is associated with increased rate of visual changes, vardenafil with QT prolongation and tadalafil with lower back pain. Avanafil and vardenafil orodispersible tablet rapidly achieve peak plasma concentration, which results in faster onset of action, whereas tadalafil exhibits the longest half-life. First time response to PDE5i is approximately 60-70%, with no significant differences in efficacy noted among therapies. The literature does not clearly demonstrate a preference for one drug. High-treatment success rates (89%) were reported when patients were prescribed all available PDE5i. Daily dosing with tadalafil is associated with improved erectile function (EF) over time. Finally, novel modes of patient-provider interaction, including internet-based education, communication and prescribing, may also improve long-term adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

PDE5i represent first line therapy for ED with excellent overall efficacy and satisfactory side effect profiles. Enhanced communciation, coupled with increased knowledge of drug characteristics, comparative treatment regimens and optimal prescribing patterns, offer compelling tools to improve long-term treatment success.

A return to normal erectile function with tadalafil once daily after an incomplete response to as-needed PDE5 inhibitor therapy

INTRODUCTION

An optimal outcome of an erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment is to enable a return to normal erectile function (as defined by an International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function [IIEF-EF] domain score ≥ 26). As-needed (PRN) phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor treatment does not always result in a return-to-normal erectile function.

AIM

The combined studies evaluated whether treatment with tadalafil once daily would allow men to return to normal erectile function who had less than normal IIEF-EF domain scores while using a maximum dose of a PRN PDE5 inhibitor treatment.

METHODS

Men were ≥ 18 years of age, sexually active, reported a ≥ 3-month history of ED, and had been taking the maximum dose of sildenafil citrate, vardenafil, or tadalafil PRN. Randomization to once-daily therapy with tadalafil 2.5 mg to 5 mg (N = 207), tadalafil 5 mg (N = 207), or placebo (N = 209) for 12 weeks followed a 4-week maximum dose PRN PDE5 treatment and 4-week nondrug lead periods. Two identical double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies were conducted; combined results are reported.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measure was the percentage of subjects with a return-to-normal erectile function (IIEF-EF domain score ≥ 26) when treated with tadalafil once daily compared with placebo.

RESULTS

In subjects not achieving normal erectile function with the maximum dose of a PRN PDE5 inhibitor, a higher percentage of subjects treated with tadalafil had an IIEF-EF domain score ≥ 26 at end point (tadalafil 2.5- to 5-mg group [39%]; tadalafil 5-mg group [40%]) compared with the placebo group (12.1%; P < 0.001). Tadalafil was generally well tolerated and adverse events observed were consistent with previous reports of tadalafil once daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with tadalafil once daily significantly improved erectile function in men with mild to mild-moderate impairments in erectile function following PRN PDE5 inhibitor treatment.

A randomized open-label trial with a crossover comparison of sexual self-confidence and other treatment outcomes following tadalafil once a day vs. tadalafil or sildenafil on-demand in men with erectile dysfunction

AIM

To compare Sexual Self-Confidence and other treatment outcomes following 8 weeks of treatment with tadalafil 5 mg once a day (OaD) vs. tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 100 mg as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, crossover study in men ≥18 years of age with history of ED and satisfactory response to current oral phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor PRN. Data were analyzed with a mixed effects model for crossover design.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Sexual Self-Confidence domain of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) between tadalafil OaD and sildenafil PRN. SECONDARY OUTCOMES INCLUDED: Time Concerns and Spontaneity domains of PAIRS, and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) scale.

RESULTS

Men naive to tadalafil OaD were enrolled (N = 378), with 61-69% prior PDE5 inhibitor use. There were improvements in all PAIRS domains from baseline when comparing tadalafil OaD and PRN with sildenafil PRN (P < 0.001). The Sexual Self-Confidence domain improved from baseline and was 0.50 ± 0.78 following tadalafil OaD, 0.5 ± 0.72 for tadalafil PRN, and 0.39 ± 0.67 for sildenafil PRN. The difference in least-squares mean was 0.12 ± 0.04 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.04, 0.19; P = 0.001) between tadalafil OaD and sildenafil PRN and 0.01 ± 0.04 (CI = -0.06, 0.08; P = 0.872) between tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN. The Time Concerns domain score was lower with tadalafil OaD than tadalafil PRN (P < 0.001). There were no differences in SEAR scores between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN compared with sildenafil PRN demonstrated greater improvements in Sexual Self-Confidence, Time Concerns, and Spontaneity. There was no significant difference in Sexual Self-Confidence between tadalafil OaD and tadalafil PRN. Changes in SEAR, the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction scores from baseline to end point were similar.