Effect of body position on oesophageal and gastric pressures in the anaesthetised dog

Evaluation of automated staple sizes on gastric layer incorporation and intraluminal pressure for partial gastrectomy closure in an ex vivo canine model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of automated staple sizes on a cadaveric canine partial gastrectomy model.

METHODS

Stomachs were transected through the gastric body axis and randomly allocated to two closure groups: Group B, thoracoabdominal (TA) stapler 3.5 mm staple cartridge (blue); Group G, TA stapler 4.8 mm staple cartridge (green). After construct completion, leak testing was performed for both groups and compared. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal leakage pressure (MLP) and leakage location were recorded. Staple lines were evaluated by direct observation and fluoroscopy to assess sub-mucosal layer incorporation and staple conformation. Staple shape was classified as optimal or suboptimal. Significance was set at p less than 0.5.

RESULTS

Following gastrectomy, the mean double gastric wall thickness was 7.82 ± 2.05 mm at the gastric body. Mean ILP was significantly lower in groups G (17.13 ± 1.19 mmHg) compared to group B (50.46 ± 6.03 mmHg, p = 0.0013). Similarly, mean MLP was significantly lower in group G (21.41 ± 1.39 mmHg) compared to group B (64.61 ± 10.21 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Although group G had higher percentage of B-shaped staple formation compared to group B, this was not significant (group G; 92.38%, group B; 54.56%; p = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

The 3.5 mm TA staple cartridge (blue) achieved superior bursting pressures compared with the 4.8 mm TA staple cartridge (blue) for the closure of a canine partial gastrectomy model. Both staple sizes incorporated all gastric layers. No differences were noticed in optimal staple conformation between groups. In vivo investigation is warranted to evaluate the use of different staple sizes on gastric tissue perfusion, successful healing and post-operative stasis and dehiscence.

The Effect of Premedication on the Incidence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in 270 Dogs Undergoing General Anesthesia

The aim of this prospective, non-randomized study was to evaluate the effect of nine different premedication medications on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) in anesthetized dogs. Two hundred and seventy dogs undergoing non-intrathoracic, non-intrabdominal elective surgeries or invasive diagnostic procedures were included in the study, and were allocated into nine groups (30 dogs/group) defined by the type of premedication administered. Premedication consisted of dexmedetomidine with either morphine, pethidine or butorphanol, acepromazine with either one of the three opioids or midazolam with one of the above-mentioned opioids. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Esophageal pH was measured with the use of a pH-meter electrode and a pH-value less than 4 and over 7.5 was considered to be GOR. The study revealed that 119/270 (44.1%) dogs experienced a reflux episode during anesthesia. The incidence of reflux did not differ among groups (p = 0.117). In group AB the dogs refluxed within 10 min of the beginning of pH-measurements, in comparison with group DB in which dogs refluxed within 30 min (p = 0.029). Invasive diagnostic procedures had a lower incidence of GOR in comparison to castrations (p = 0.09). The outcome of the study suggests that none of the opioids used increased the incidence of GOR in anesthetized dogs.

Factors Affecting Intraoperative Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux in Dogs and Cats

Simple Summary

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is an anaesthetic complication that causes oesophageal inflammation and stricture in animals. The aim of this systematic review is to systematically identify the effect of preoperative fasting duration and drugs (anaesthetic and nonanaesthetic agents) on GOR in dogs and cats during anaesthesia. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Many factors seem to affect the development of GOR in dogs and cats. However, there is a limited number of studies investigating these factors, and as the level of evidence is low-to-medium, no reliable conclusions can be extracted.

Abstract

In animals, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) may occur during anaesthesia, and it can lead to severe consequences such as oesophagitis and oesophageal stricture. This systematic review investigates the effect of fasting duration and anaesthetic and nonanaesthetic drugs on GOR in dogs and cats during general anaesthesia. Fifteen clinical studies met the inclusion criteria in this systematic review. In thirteen studies the population was dogs, while in two studies the population was cats. In the meta-analysis, seven studies were included. Four studies on the effect of fasting duration on GOR in dogs were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 191 dogs had a fasting duration less than 5 h, while 311 dogs had a fasting duration more than 5 h. The heterogeneity of the studies was high and statistically significant (p = 0.0002, I² = 85%), but the overall effect was statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.82, odds ratio = 0.81, 95% CI 0.15, 4.26), in favour of the low fasting duration (<5 h). Concerning the effect of antacids on GOR, three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity of the studies was low and nonsignificant (p = 0.13, I² = 52%) and the overall effect was statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.24). The low number of studies and the diverse factors affecting the incidence of reflux prevented us from reaching valuable conclusions on the risk factors for GOR.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux in large-sized, deep-chested versus small-sized, barrel-chested dogs undergoing spinal surgery in sternal recumbency

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether an increased frequency of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is more common in large-sized, deep-chested dogs undergoing spinal surgery in sternal recumbency than in small-sized, barrelchested dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, cohort study.

ANIMALS

Nineteen small-sized, barrel-chested dogs (group B) and 26 large-sized, deep-chested dogs (group D).

METHODS

All animals were premedicated with intramuscular (IM) acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^-1) and pethidine (3 mg kg^-1) IM. Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous sodium thiopental and maintained with halothane in oxygen. Lower oesophageal pH was monitored continuously after induction of anaesthesia. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was considered to have occurred whenever pH values > 7.5 or < 4 were recorded. If GOR was detected during anaesthesia, measures were taken to avoid aspiration of gastric contents into the lungs and to prevent the development of oesophagitis/oesophageal stricture.

RESULTS

The frequency of GOR during anaesthesia was significantly higher in group D (6/26 dogs; 23.07%) than in group B (0/19 dogs; 0%) (p = 0.032). Signs indicative of aspiration pneumonia, oesophagitis or oesophageal stricture were not reported in any of the GOR cases.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In large-sized, deep-chested dogs undergoing spinal surgery in sternal recumbency, it would seem prudent to consider measures aimed at preventing GOR and its potentially devastating consequences (oesophagitis/oesophageal stricture, aspiration pneumonia).

Influence of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on gastroesophageal reflux during anesthesia in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether maintenance of anesthesia with halothane or sevoflurane is associated with a lower incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) than the use of isoflurane in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery.

ANIMALS

90 dogs.

PROCEDURES

Dogs were evaluated during elective orthopedic surgery. Dogs with a history of vomiting or that had received any drugs that would alter gastrointestinal tract function were excluded from the study. The anesthetic protocol used was standardized to include administration of acepromazine maleate and morphine prior to induction of anesthesia with thiopental. Dogs were allocated to receive halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane to maintain anesthesia. A sensor-tipped catheter was placed to measure esophageal pH during anesthesia. Gastroesophageal reflux was defined as an esophageal pH < 4 or > 7.5.

RESULTS

51 dogs had 1 or more episodes of acidic GER during anesthesia. Reflux was detected in 14 dogs receiving isoflurane, 19 dogs receiving halothane, and 18 dogs receiving sevoflurane. In dogs with GER, mean +/- SD time from probe placement to onset of GER was 36 +/- 65 minutes and esophageal pH remained < 4 for a mean of 64% of the measurement period. There was no significant association between GER and start of surgery or moving a dog on or off the surgery table. Dogs that developed GER soon after induction of anesthesia were more likely to regurgitate.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Maintenance of anesthesia with any of the 3 commonly used inhalant agents is associated with a similar risk for development of GER in dogs.

Barrier pressure at the gastroesophageal junction in anesthetized dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of body position on barrier pressure at the gastroesophageal junction in anesthetized Greyhounds and to assess alterations in barrier pressure following gastropexy.

ANIMALS

8 adult Greyhounds.

PROCEDURE

Barrier pressure at the gastroesophageal junction was measured by fast (1 cm/s) and slow (1 cm/10 s) withdrawal of a subminiature strain gauge transducer through the gastroesophageal junction in 8 anesthetized dogs. The effect of body position was measured. Each dog then was placed in right-lateral recumbency, and gastropexy was performed in the left flank. Additional measurements were obtained 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after gastropexy.

RESULTS

Barrier pressure for dogs positioned in sternal recumbency (mean +/- SEM, 1.1 +/- 0.53 mm Hg) was significantly less than for dogs positioned in right lateral or left lateral recumbency. Following gastropexy, there was a steady increase in barrier pressure. Thirty minutes after gastropexy, barrier pressure was significantly higher (13.36 +/- 3.46 mm Hg), compared with the value before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Barrier pressure in anesthetized dogs is highly variable and influenced by body position. This is most likely the result of anatomic interrelationships between the diaphragm, stomach, and terminal portion of the esophagus. Gastropexy also increases barrier pressure in the immediate postoperative period, which may be clinically relevant in terms of understanding how resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease associated with hiatal hernia may be affected by gastropexy combined with hernia reduction.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux during thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in the cat

Lower oesophageal pH was monitored in 50 cats anaesthetized with either thiopentone or propofol. Gastro-oesophageal reflux, as evidenced by a decrease in lower oesophageal pH to less than 4.0 or an increase to more than 7.5, occurred in 16% (4/25) and 12% (3/25) of the cats anaesthetized with thiopentone and propofol, respectively, the difference between the two groups being non-significant. Reflux usually occurred shortly after the induction of anaesthesia and had a mean duration of about 23 min. The refluxate was always acidic (pH < 4.0). Gastric contents of pH below 2.5 were refluxed on three occasions, two in the thiopentone group and one in the propofol group. Regurgitation and flow of gastric contents from the mouth occurred in only one cat anaesthetized with propofol. None of the cats that exhibited reflux developed any signs of postanaesthetic oesophagitis or stricture formation.