CD44, bFGF and hyaluronan in human pancreatic cancer cell lines

3D pancreatic carcinoma spheroids induce a matrix-rich, chemoresistant phenotype offering a better model for drug testing

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer related death. It is lethal in nearly all patients, due to an almost complete chemoresistance. Most if not all drugs that pass preclinical tests successfully, fail miserably in the patient. This raises the question whether traditional 2D cell culture is the correct tool for drug screening. The objective of this study is to develop a simple, high-throughput 3D model of human PDAC cell lines, and to explore mechanisms underlying the transition from 2D to 3D that might be responsible for chemoresistance.

Methods

Several established human PDAC and a KPC mouse cell lines were tested, whereby Panc-1 was studied in more detail. 3D spheroid formation was facilitated with methylcellulose. Spheroids were studied morphologically, electron microscopically and by qRT-PCR for selected matrix genes, related factors and miRNA. Metabolic studies were performed, and a panel of novel drugs was tested against gemcitabine.

Results

Comparing 3D to 2D cell culture, matrix proteins were significantly increased as were lumican, SNED1, DARP32, and miR-146a. Cell metabolism in 3D was shifted towards glycolysis. All drugs tested were less effective in 3D, except for allicin, MT100 and AX, which demonstrated effect.

Conclusions

We developed a high-throughput 3D cell culture drug screening system for pancreatic cancer, which displays a strongly increased chemoresistance. Features associated to the 3D cell model are increased expression of matrix proteins and miRNA as well as stromal markers such as PPP1R1B and SNED1. This is supporting the concept of cell adhesion mediated drug resistance.

Concentration- and time-dependent effects of enoxaparin on human adenocarcinomic epithelial cell line A549 proliferation in vitro

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major health problem. Surgery is the only potential curative treatment, in spite of the high recurrence and mortality rates. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been suggested to have a positive impact on the outcome of various cancers, mainly attributed to their anticoagulant properties; yet a direct antineoplastic effect has not been excluded. We thought to evaluate the direct effect of the LMWH enoxaparin on the human lung adenocarcinomic epithelial cell line A549 and to determine potential antiproliferative and antimetastatic effects that could guide future trials. A549 cells were cultured with different concentrations of enoxaparin (1–30 U/mL). Cell counting was performed at 24, 48, and 72 h. Detection of c-Myc protein and CD44 protein was performed by electrophoresis and Western blotting. Statistical analysis was performed using paired Student’s t tests. Cell counts were decreased with increasing concentrations and time of exposure to enoxaparin. This corresponds to decreased expression of c-Myc and CD44. In conclusion, enoxaparin displayed a direct dose and exposure duration dependent suppressor effect on A549 cell proliferation and the expression of both c-Myc and CD44 in vitro, suggesting reduced proliferative and metastatic potentials of these cells.

Synthesis of hyaluronan in oesophageal cancer cells is uncoupled from the prostaglandin-cAMP pathway

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are common in tumours and both independently promote tumour progression. Furthermore, COX2-dependent synthesis of prostaglandins (PGs) stimulates HA synthase-1 (HAS1) and HAS2 mRNA expression, together with HA synthesis via the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to elucidate whether COX2-mediated PGs induce transcription of HAS isoforms in cancer cells as well.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Human oesophageal squamous cell (OSC) carcinoma specimens were characterized with respect to HA, COX2 and CD44 expression by immunohistochemistry. OSC cell lines (OSC1, OSC2) and HeLa cell lines (D98, H21) were exposed to exogenous PG analoques (100 nmol.L(-1)), etoricoxib (10 micromol.L(-1)) and forskolin (10 micromol.L(-1)). Subsequently, cAMP levels, HA secretion and HAS isoform expression were determined by elisa and real-time RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) respectively.

KEY RESULTS

COX2, HA and CD44 were detected immunohistochemically in >90% of human oesophageal tumour samples. Under basal conditions, OSC1 and OSC2 cells express HAS2 and HAS3, COX2 and Galpha(s)-coupled EP(2) and EP(4) PG receptors. Neither stimulation with the PGI(2) analogue, iloprost, addition of exogenous PGE(2) nor forskolin induced HAS1 or HAS2 mRNA expression in OSC1 and OSC2 cells. Furthermore, in HeLa cells after induction of COX2 by tumour necrosis factor alpha and subsequent PGE(2) release, inhibition of COX2 by etoricoxib did not affect HAS expression or HA secretion.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We conclude that in oesophageal and HeLa cancer cells, HAS1/2 expression was not responsive to the PG/cAMP pathway.

Biomarker discovery from pancreatic cancer secretome using a differential proteomic approach

Quantitative proteomics can be used as a screening tool for identification of differentially expressed proteins as potential biomarkers for cancers. Candidate biomarkers from such studies can subsequently be tested using other techniques for use in early detection of cancers. Here we demonstrate the use of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) method to compare the secreted proteins (secretome) from pancreatic cancer-derived cells with that from non-neoplastic pancreatic ductal cells. We identified 145 differentially secreted proteins (>1.5-fold change), several of which were previously reported as either up-regulated (e.g. cathepsin D, macrophage colony stimulation factor, and fibronectin receptor) or down-regulated (e.g. profilin 1 and IGFBP-7) proteins in pancreatic cancer, confirming the validity of our approach. In addition, we identified several proteins that have not been correlated previously with pancreatic cancer including perlecan (HSPG2), CD9 antigen, fibronectin receptor (integrin beta1), and a novel cytokine designated as predicted osteoblast protein (FAM3C). The differential expression of a subset of these novel proteins was validated by Western blot analysis. In addition, overexpression of several proteins not described previously to be elevated in human pancreatic cancer (CD9, perlecan, SDF4, apoE, and fibronectin receptor) was confirmed by immunohistochemical labeling using pancreatic cancer tissue microarrays suggesting that these could be further pursued as potential biomarkers. Lastly the protein expression data from SILAC were compared with mRNA expression data obtained using gene expression microarrays for the two cell lines (Panc1 and human pancreatic duct epithelial), and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.28 was obtained, confirming previously reported poor associations between RNA and protein expression studies.