The reliability of bacterial detection in platelets

Propionibacterium acnes lacks the capability to proliferate in platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Propionibacterium acnes is considered to be one of the most frequent contaminants of platelet concentrates (PCs) when anaerobic culture-based detection methods are used. But Propionibacteria are often detected too late when blood products have already been transfused. Therefore, its transfusion relevance is still demanding clarification because studies of the outcome of patients transfused with P. acnes-contaminated PCs are still uncommon. In this study, we monitored clinical effects in patients after transfusion of PCs, which were detected too late in sterility testing. Furthermore, we assessed the bacterial proliferation of Propionibacterium species seeded into PCs to clarify their significance for platelet bacteria screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the look-back process, we followed the route of the putative contaminated PC units from storage to transfusion. In the in vitro study, PCs were inoculated with 1-100 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml of clinical isolates of Propionibacteria (n = 10). Sampling was performed during 10-day aerobic storage at 22 degrees C. The presence of bacteria was assessed by plating culture and automated BacT/Alert culture system.

RESULTS

Propionibacterium acnes shows slow or no growth under PC storage conditions. Clinical signs of adverse events after transfusion of potentially contaminated PC units were not reported.

CONCLUSION

Propionibacteria do not proliferate under PC storage conditions and therefore may be missed or detected too late when blood products have already been transfused.

The residual risk of sepsis: modeling the effect of concentration on bacterial detection in two-bottle culture systems and an estimation of false-negative culture rates

BACKGROUND

Septic reactions continue to be reported with culture-tested platelet (PLT) products, probably due to false-negative results associated with inadequate sampling of low-concentration bacteria. The mechanism of test failure was modeled and false-negative rates were estimated utilizing published data.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The effect of concentration on the probability of sampling one or more viable bacteria in an 8-mL sample of a 300-mL product was determined. The ratio of single- versus dual-bottle-positive tests in repeated cultures utilizing two-bottle systems was used to assess mean bacterial concentrations and to predict false-negative tests.

RESULTS

Published reports reveal a mean residual risk of sepsis of 2.3 per 10(5) products tested. Modeling the effect of concentration predicts that 50 and 95 percent of samples are detected at 0.09 and 0.36 CFU per mL for organisms that grow under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and suggest a 50 and 5 percent false-negative culture rate at these concentrations. Reanalysis of published studies documenting single-bottle growth of nonfastidious organisms indicate that low bacterial concentrations are frequently encountered and predict false-negative cultures in products contaminated with common bacteria at rates that varied from 4 to more than 75 percent. The model highlights the weakness of the AABB definition of false-positive culture results at low bacterial concentrations, especially for organisms that grow poorly in aerobic storage conditions.

CONCLUSION

Continuing reports of septic reactions after transfusion of culture-tested apheresis PLTs, and frequent single-bottle-positive results when testing with two-bottle systems, suggest appreciable levels of false-negative results with a commercially available bacterial detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMéreiux) as implemented.

Bacterial screening of apheresis platelets and the residual risk of septic transfusion reactions: the American Red Cross experience (2004-2006)

BACKGROUND

The American Red Cross initiated systemwide bacterial testing of all apheresis platelet (PLT) collections in March 2004, yet continues to receive reports of septic reactions after transfusion of screened components.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The rates of confirmed bacterial contamination of apheresis PLT collections detected by prospective quality control (QC) testing, and by surveillance of reported septic reactions to screened-negative apheresis PLTs, were analyzed according to the technology utilized for collection.

RESULTS

Between March 1, 2004, and May 31, 2006, bacterial culture testing was performed on 1,004,206 donations; of these, 186 (1:5,399) had confirmed-positive culture results. Transfusion of all but 1 of the associated 293 components was prevented. A significantly higher rate of confirmed-positive bacterial cultures was seen with products collected utilizing two-arm collection procedures compared to one-arm procedures (22.7 vs. 11.9 per 10(5) donations; odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.7). During this period, 20 septic transfusion reactions were reported, including 3 fatalities (1:498,711 fatalities per distributed component), which implicated screened-negative apheresis PLT products. The frequency of septic reactions was 4.7-fold higher for collections utilizing two-arm procedures (1:41,173; 95% CI, 1:25,000-1:66,667) compared to collections from one-arm procedures (1:193,305; 95% CI, 1:52,632-1:500,000; OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.4); most septic reactions (16 of 20) were due to Staphylococcus spp. and occurred on Day 5 (13 of 20) after collection.

CONCLUSION

PLT contamination with bacteria that evade detection by QC culture remains a significant residual transfusion risk, in particular for older PLTs and skin-commensal bacteria in components collected by two-arm apheresis procedures during the study period.