Drug-induced liver disease: an 8-year study of patients from one gastroenterological department

Fosfomycin-Induced Liver Injury: A Case Report

Fosfomycin is an antibiotic frequently used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. It is normally well-tolerated, but there are some reports of clinically relevant liver injury. We present the case of a 73-year-old female who presented with paucisymptomatic hepatocellular acute liver injury six days after taking fosfomycin. After ruling out viral, ischemic, and autoimmune hepatitis, as well as Wilson disease and biliary disorders, she was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) related to fosfomycin. The patient showed major improvement during the first week and the resolution of liver injury one month after onset. This case report aims to underscore the potential hepatotoxicity of fosfomycin.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Antithyroid Drug-Related Liver Injury

Context

Antithyroid drugs (ATDs) are the cornerstone of hyperthyroidism management. Hepatotoxicity due to ATDs can range from mild transaminase elevation to liver transplantation requirement and mortality.

Objective

The primary objective of the systematic review was to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with drug induced liver injury (DILI) due to ATDs.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of PUBMED, SCOPUS, and EMBASE on characteristics and outcomes of adults (>18 years) with DILI due to ATDs. We defined DILI as bilirubin ≥2.5 mg/dL or international normalized ratio >1.5 with any rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aminotransferase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or an elevation of ALT or AST >5 times or ALP >2 times the upper limit of normal without jaundice/coagulopathy.

Results

The review included 100 articles describing 271 patients; 148 (70.8%) were female (N = 209). Mean age was 42.9 ± 17.2 years. Graves' disease was the most common indication for ATDs. Carbimazole/methimazole (CBM/MMI) was the most common offending agent (55.7%). DILI pattern was hepatocellular in 41.8%, cholestatic in 41.3%, and mixed in 16.9%. Outcomes included death in 11.8%, liver transplantation in 6.4%, partial improvement in 2.2%, and complete resolution in 79.6% with a median time (IQR) to resolution of 45 (20-90) days. Patients in the propylthiouracil (PTU) group had higher initial bilirubin, initial AST, initial ALT, peak ALT, peak AST, severe and fatal DILI, liver transplantation, and mortality than CBM/MMI. Rechallenge of antithyroid medication was infrequently reported (n = 16) but was successful in 75%.

Conclusion

DILI due to ATDs can present with different patterns and should prompt immediate drug discontinuation. Referral to a hepatologist should be considered if severe as transplantation is sometimes required. PTU-induced DILI may have worse outcomes than CBM/MMI.

Systematic review of published data on herb induced liver injury

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Herbal products have been widely used as a means of ethnomedicine worldwide. Recently, the potential hepatotoxicity of herbs has become a medical issue but comprehensive studies are limited.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aims to determine the clinical features of herb induced liver injury (HILI) including its constituent ratio among liver injury case cohorts that included both HILI and drug induced liver injury (DILI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using a literature search for DILI/HILI in seven electric databases including PubMed, Cochrane and Embase. We analyzed the DILI/HILI cases and clinical characteristics in terms of herbs, conventional drugs, concomitant, or others.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the necessary criteria and included 9 prospective and 22 retrospective studies. Among total number of overall DILI/HILI cases (7511, male 2819, female 3669 and unknown 1023), 25.0% (1874 cases) were implicated in herbs. HILI was relatively higher in females (69.8% vs. 30.2% male), compared to conventional drugs (57.3% female vs. 42.7% male, p < 0.01), while it was prone to induce hepatocellular injury (hepatocellular 78.8%, cholestatic 8.9%, mixed type 12.3%), contrary to conventional drugs (hepatocellular 56.7% vs. cholestatic 22.1% vs. mixed 21.2%), respectively (p < 0.01). The main herbs causing HILI included Polygonum multiflorum, Psoralea corylifolia, Corydalis yanhusuo, and Rheum officinale.

CONCLUSIONS

This review created the comparative and comprehensive feature of hepatotoxicity by herbal products, which provides reference data for the clinical applications and establishing pharmacovigilance system of herbs.

Drug-induced liver injury: A 2-year retrospective study of 1169 hospitalized patients in a single medical center

BACKGROUND

Although herbal medicines (HMs) are widely used in Asian and Western countries, medicinal information concerning their hepatic toxicity or interaction with conventional medicines (CMs) is sparse.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to estimate the prevalence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) among total inpatients prescribed HMs or CMs. Furthermore, we noted all medications suspected to be associated with hepatotoxicity in the liver injury group during the period of hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively observed medical records of 1169 inpatients in a single medical center from January 2012 to July 2014.

METHODS

Based on a database of the 1169 inpatients at a single medical center, we researched the occurrence rate and type of liver injury according to the criteria of the Council for International Organization of Medical Science (CIOMS). We also utilized a simplified Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score for probable causality assessment between drugs and liver injury.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1169 inpatients, 13 cases whose baseline LFTs had been in the normal range at admission had abnormal liver parameters at the time of follow-up, and 11 of them (0.94%) were attributed to drugs: 0.43% (5 of 1169) to HMs, 0.43% (5 of 1169) to CMs, and 0.09% (1 of 1169) to combined drug classes. Two of them were found to have liver injury because of pneumonia and sepsis. As for liver injury type, 8 cases were hepatocellular, 2 were cholestatic, and 1 was of mixed pattern. The common causative HMs for hepatotoxicity were Ephedrae Herba and Scutellariae Radix, while CMs included antidepressants, antihistamines, and antibacterials.

CONCLUSIONS

We investigated approximate incidence rates and analyzed suspicious drugs associated with liver damage, which revealed a low frequency of liver injury induced by HMs. However, further study, based on a well-designed, long-term, multicenter prospective study, will be required to determine the safety of HMs.

Adverse Events Associated with Fosfomycin Use: Review of the Literature and Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

Introduction

The growing problem of antibacterial resistance resulted in an increased interest in fosfomycin, especially its parenteral formulation. We reviewed fosfomycin safety profile using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (FAERS) and published literature.

Methods

We conducted a FAERS search and disproportionality analysis of all fosfomycin-associated AEs. We also conducted a FAERS search for AEs implicating fosfomycin as the primary suspect and a search of reports of fosfomycin-associated bone marrow toxicity. We then review the literature for publications reporting AEs associated with fosfomycin by conducting PubMed searches.

Results

The disproportionality analysis of all FAERS reports of fosfomycin-associated AEs produced a higher than expected frequency of agranulocytosis, liver injury, severe skin reactions, and pseudomembranous colitis. Subsequent search for AEs where fosfomycin was the primary suspect and the literature review did not suggest a higher association of fosfomycin with these AEs. The search of bone marrow toxicity reports did not demonstrate an association between aplastic anemia and fosfomycin. The literature review selected 23 trials of parenteral administration of fosfomycin in 1242 patients including 8 comparative and 15 non-comparative trials. For oral fosfomycin, only prospective comparative trials (n = 28) in 2743 patients were included. The most frequent AEs associated with parenteral fosfomycin included rash, peripheral phlebitis, hypokalemia, and gastrointestinal disorders. Serious AEs such as aplastic anemia, anaphylaxis, and liver toxicities were reported infrequently. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common AEs associated with oral fosfomycin.

Conclusion

The identified AEs were consistent with the safety profile of fosfomycin. No new safety signals related to either parenteral or oral fosfomycin were identified.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-015-0092-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Liver enzyme abnormalities in taking traditional herbal medicine in Korea: A retrospective large sample cohort study of musculoskeletal disorder patients

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The objective of this study is to report the incidence of liver injury from herbal medicine in musculoskeletal disease patients as large-scale studies are scarce. Considering that herbal medicine is frequently used in patients irrespective of liver function in Korea, we investigated the prevalence of liver injury by liver function test results in musculoskeletal disease patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 32675 inpatients taking herbal medicine at 7 locations of a Korean medicine hospital between 2005 and 2013, we screened for liver injury in 6894 patients with liver function tests (LFTs) at admission and discharge. LFTs included t-bilirubin, AST, ALT, and ALP. Liver injury at discharge was assessed by LFT result classifications at admission (liver injury, liver function abnormality, and normal liver function). In analyses for risk factors of liver injury at discharge, we adjusted for age, sex, length of stay, conventional medicine intake, HBs antigen/antibody, and liver function at admission.

RESULTS

A total 354 patients (prevalence 5.1%) had liver injury at admission, and 217 (3.1%) at discharge. Of the 354 patients with liver injury at admission, only 9 showed a clinically significant increase after herbal medicine intake, and 225 returned to within normal range or showed significant liver function recovery. Out of 4769 patients with normal liver function at admission, 27 (0.6%) had liver injury at discharge. In multivariate analyses for risk factors, younger age, liver function abnormality at admission, and HBs antigen positive were associated with injury at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of liver injury in patients with normal liver function taking herbal medicine for musculoskeletal disease was low, and herbal medicine did not exacerbate liver injury in most patients with injury prior to intake.

An Update on Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been linked to more than 1,000 medications and remains the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States. Here, we review the most current literature regarding treatment and make recommendations for the management of this relatively common disease. Since treatment of DILI remains largely elusive, recent studies have attempted to define new management strategies for these difficult patients. Early diagnosis and withdrawal of the suspected medication is the mainstay of treatment of DILI. For acetaminophen and Amanita mushroom poisoning, there are specific therapies in use. Finally, there are other possible management modalities for DILI, including corticosteroids and ursodeoxycholic acid.

Changing etiology of liver failure in 3,916 patients from northern China: a 10-year survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the etiological characteristics of patients with liver failure in the past 10 years.

METHODS

Clinical and investigational data in hospitalized patients with liver failure admitted from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Standard definitions and criteria were used to assess disease etiology.

RESULTS

Of these 3,916 patients, 3,429 (87.6 %) had acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), 114 (2.9 %) acute liver failure (ALF), and 373 (9.5 %) subacute liver failure. Viral infection was the most common cause of liver failure in the 3,295 patients (84.1 %). Hepatitis of unknown etiology was deemed responsible for 371 cases of liver failure (9.5 %). Drug-induced liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, and autoimmune hepatitis led to 120 cases (3.1 %), 109 cases (2.8 %), and 19 cases (0.5 %), respectively. The most common cause of ACLF was HBV infection (87.3 %), while the main causes of acute and subacute liver failure were hepatitis of unknown etiology (39.4 %), viral infection (36.6 %), and drug-induced liver injury (19.3 %). Our data showed that the incidence of liver failure caused by HBV gradually decreased from 86.5 % in 2002 to 69.2 % in 2011. However, the incidence of hepatitis of unknown etiology, drug-induced liver injury, and alcoholic hepatitis was increased.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV infection is the main cause of liver failure in China. However, the incidence of HBV-related liver failure has gradually decreased in the past 10 years. Hepatitis of unknown etiology has replaced HBV infection as the most common apparent cause of acute liver failure.

Drug-induced liver injury in the Australian setting

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The causes of drug-induced liver injury vary worldwide, with limited data regarding drug-induced hepatotoxicity in Australia. This study sought to provide information about the incidence, causes and clinical manifestations of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all adult inpatients with abnormal liver function tests, defined as an increase of more than twice the upper limit of the normal range in either serum alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase, over a 12-month period at the major hospital in Tasmania, Australia. A random sample of individual medical records was reviewed and clinical data extracted. The causality of suspected drug-induced liver injury cases was assessed using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

RESULTS

A total of 264 cases were included. Drug-induced liver injury with at least a possible causal relationship was found in 24 cases (9·1%). The mean age at presentation in the 17 patients with possible or probable hepatotoxicity not related to paracetamol or cancer chemotherapy was 60 ± 20·0 years, and 9 (53%) were men. The frequencies of cholestatic, hepatocellular and mixed patterns of liver damage were 9 (53%), 2 (12%) and 6 (35%) respectively. The most common cause was antibiotics (11 of 17; 65%), while flucloxacillin (4 of 17; 24%) was the single agent most often implicated.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Nearly 10% of cases of abnormal liver function could be associated with adverse effects of drugs. The possibility of drug-induced liver injury should always be considered when there is an absence of other apparent hepatic disease.

An overview of the evidence and mechanisms of herb-drug interactions

Despite the lack of sufficient information on the safety of herbal products, their use as alternative and/or complementary medicine is globally popular. There is also an increasing interest in medicinal herbs as precursor for pharmacological actives. Of serious concern is the concurrent consumption of herbal products and conventional drugs. Herb-drug interaction (HDI) is the single most important clinical consequence of this practice. Using a structured assessment procedure, the evidence of HDI presents with varying degree of clinical significance. While the potential for HDI for a number of herbal products is inferred from non-human studies, certain HDIs are well established through human studies and documented case reports. Various mechanisms of pharmacokinetic HDI have been identified and include the alteration in the gastrointestinal functions with consequent effects on drug absorption; induction and inhibition of metabolic enzymes and transport proteins; and alteration of renal excretion of drugs and their metabolites. Due to the intrinsic pharmacologic properties of phytochemicals, pharmacodynamic HDIs are also known to occur. The effects could be synergistic, additive, and/or antagonistic. Poor reporting on the part of patients and the inability to promptly identify HDI by health providers are identified as major factors limiting the extensive compilation of clinically relevant HDIs. A general overview and the significance of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic HDI are provided, detailing basic mechanism, and nature of evidence available. An increased level of awareness of HDI is necessary among health professionals and drug discovery scientists. With the increasing number of plant-sourced pharmacological actives, the potential for HDI should always be assessed in the non-clinical safety assessment phase of drug development process. More clinically relevant research is also required in this area as current information on HDI is insufficient for clinical applications.