Value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic masses

One-stop local and whole-body staging of children with cancer

Accurate staging and re-staging of cancer in children is crucial for patient management. Currently, children with a newly diagnosed cancer must undergo a series of imaging tests, which are stressful, time-consuming, partially redundant, expensive, and can require repetitive anesthesia. New approaches for pediatric cancer staging can evaluate the primary tumor and metastases in a single session. However, traditional one-stop imaging tests, such as CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, are associated with considerable radiation exposure. This is particularly concerning for children because they are more sensitive to ionizing radiation than adults and they live long enough to experience secondary cancers later in life. In this review article we discuss child-tailored imaging tests for tumor detection and therapy response assessment - tests that can be obtained with substantially reduced radiation exposure compared to traditional CT and PET/CT scans. This includes diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/MRI and integrated [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI scans. While several investigators have compared the value of DWI/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI for staging pediatric cancer, the value of these novel imaging technologies for cancer therapy monitoring has received surprisingly little attention. In this article, we share our experiences and review existing literature on this subject.

Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created.

RESULTS

A total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67-86%) and 74% (64-81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3-3.8) and 0.3 (0.21-0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7-15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78-85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

ADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

ADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant hepatic lesions

Background

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a novel imaging technique with growing application in onco-imaging. This modality evaluates the diffusion of water molecules in various tissues, which is restricted in hyper cellular regions such as malignant tissue. Apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC) is a method which can quantify the degree of restriction in tissues and can have diagnostic roles in characterization of hepatic lesions. In this study, 93 patients with proven hepatic lesions were included. These patients had undergone initial evaluation via ultrasonography and dynamic CT scan, and had a definite diagnosis confirmed by biopsy. These patients underwent DW imaging and ADC values of their lesions were calculated. Patients were divided into two groups, benign and malignant groups, based on their biopsy results; and ADC values of hepatic lesions were compared in the two groups.

Results

The two groups were gender matched. There was a significant difference in the age distribution between the two groups. Mean ADC values for benign and malignant hepatic lesions were 1.58 ± 0.35 (10-3 mm2/s) and 0.87 ± 0.16 (10-3 mm2/s), respectively. There was a statistically significant differences between benign and malignant hepatic lesions (p value < 10-3). DW imaging had a sensitivity of 97.6% and specificity of 98.7% in detecting malignant hepatic lesions from benign ones (p = 0.0001, AUC = 0.99).

Conclusion

DW MRI imaging can differentiate malignant and benign liver lesions with high sensitivity and specificity using ADC values generated; furthermore, each subgroup of hepatic lesions could be determined based on ADC values.

[Importance of diffusion imaging in liver metastases]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, the availability of liver-specific contrast agents and the possibility of functional imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the method of choice for the evaluation of focal liver lesions.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) enables generation of functional information about the microstructure of a tissue besides morphological information.

PERFORMANCE

In the detection of focal liver lesions DWI shows a better detection rate compared to T2w sequences and a slightly poorer detection rate compared to dynamic T1w sequences. In principle, using DWI it is possible to distinguish malignant from benign liver lesions and also to detect a therapy response at an early stage.

ACHIEVEMENTS

For both detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, DWI represents a promising alternative to the morphological sequences; however, a more detailed characterization with the use of further sequences should be carried out particularly for the characterization of solid benign lesions. For the assessment and prognosis of therapy response, DWI offers advantages compared to morphological sequences.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

For the detection of focal liver lesions DWI is in principle sufficient. After visual detection of a solid liver lesion a more detailed characterization should be carried out using further sequences (in particular dynamic T1w sequences). The DWI procedure should be used for the assessment and prognosis of a therapy response.

Small cholangiolocellular carcinoma that was difficult to distinguish from cholangiocellular carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) is thought to be derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Because of its origin, CoCC has diverse clinicopathological and imaging findings. Here, we report a case of small CoCC that was difficult to diagnose preoperatively.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 62-year-old woman was confirmed with a small liver nodule in the left lobe 2 years after a sustained virological response of hepatitis C virus. The size of the nodule was 11.9 × 6.1 mm, and 6 months later, the size increased to 12.5 × 7.8 mm. The doubling time of this tumor was 285 days. The tumor revealed peripheral early enhancement and delayed internal staining in dynamic computed tomography images and marked high intensity in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. These imaging findings resembled those of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). The tumor was removed by laparoscopic lateral sectionectomy. Pathological findings revealed that the tumor was composed of small cuboidal cells and showed irregular anastomosis small grand. Immunohistochemical findings showed that the tumor cells were negative for Hep-par 1 and positive for cytokeratin 19. Epithelial membrane antigen staining was positive for the membranous side of the lumen. According to these pathological findings, the tumor was diagnosed as CoCC.

CONCLUSION

Although some characteristic imaging findings are reported for CoCC, they are not specific because of the variety in pathological findings. Especially, small CoCCs might have poor characteristic imaging findings and may be difficult to distinguish from CCC in the images. However, slow tumor growth might be one of the characteristics to suspect the possibility of a CoCC.

The Fontan circulation and the liver: A magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging study

BACKGROUND

Patients with a Fontan circulation tend to develop liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis and even hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study is to use the magnetic resonance technique diffusing-weighted imaging (DWI) for detecting liver fibrosis/cirrhosis in Fontan patients and to establish whether DWI results are associated with functional aspects of the Fontan circulation.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 59 Fontan patients were evaluated by liver DWI. The association between apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and patient characteristics, laboratory measurements and functional aspects of the Fontan circulation (NYHA class, maximum oxygen uptake during exercise and cardiac index) was assessed.

RESULTS

Liver ADC values were low (0.82×10(-3)±0.11×10(-3) mm2/s) compared with literature values for healthy volunteers and correlated negatively with calculated liver fibrosis/cirrhosis scores (Fib-4 score, p=0.019; AST/ALT ratio, p=0.009) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (p=0.001). Furthermore, ADC values correlated negatively with follow-up duration (p<0.001) and positively with cardiac index (p=0.019). No correlation between ADC values and exercise tests was found. In multivariable analysis, the ADC values were independently correlated with follow-up duration after Fontan completion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggest that progressive liver damage due to chronic congestion and potential hypoperfusion is reflected in the liver ADC values in Fontan patients. This study highlights that liver damage in the context of the Fontan circulation might be far more common than previously thought, and that the implementation of liver assessment in the routine follow-up of Fontan patients is recommendable.

Detection of small (≤2 cm) HCC in cirrhotic patients: added value of diffusion MR-imaging

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the usefulness of the diffusion-weighted sequence in the detection of small (≤2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Seventy cirrhotic patients with 93 HCCs underwent MR-Imaging at 1.5 T. MR acquisitions comprised unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images and post-contrast Gd-BOPTA-enhanced T1W GRE-3D images acquired after approximately 25, 60, 180 s (dynamic phases) and 90 min (hepatobiliary phase). DWI was performed by a SSEPI sequence (b values 0, 50, 400, 800 s/mm(2)). Quantitative analysis was performed to establish significant difference of ADC values of benign lesions compared with that of HCC. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy of two different protocols with and without diffusion MRI sequence were also calculated and compared each other.

RESULTS

A good inverse correlation was found between reference standard and ADC values (ρ = -0.688). The mean ADC value of HCC was significantly lower than the mean value of benign focal liver lesions (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was reported in term of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy between the two datasets. A trend to a better sensitivity was found when DWI images were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjunction of DWI does not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of small HCC.

Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an emerging role for the assessment of focal and diffuse liver diseases. This growing interest is due to that fact that DWI is a noncontrast technique with inherent high contrast resolution, with promising results for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Recent advances in diffusion image quality have also added interest to this technique in the abdomen. The purpose of this review is to describe the current clinical roles of DWI for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, and to review pitfalls, limitations, and future directions of DWI for assessment of focal liver disease.

Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant pediatric abdominal tumors

BACKGROUND

Solid malignant tumors are more highly cellular than benign lesions and hence have a restricted diffusion of water molecules.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) can differentiate between benign and malignant pediatric abdominal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed DWI scans of 68 consecutive children with 39 benign and 34 malignant abdominal masses. To calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and ADC values, we used 1.5-T sequences at TR/TE/b-value of 5,250-7,500/54-64/b = 0, 500 and 3-T sequences at 3,500-4,000/66-73/b = 0, 500, 800. ADC values were compared between benign and malignant and between data derived at 1.5 tesla (T) and at 3 tesla magnetic field strength, using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, ANOVA and a receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in ADC values obtained at 1.5 T and 3 T (P = 0.962). Mean ADC values (× 10(-3) mm(2)/s) were 1.07 for solid malignant tumors, 1.6 for solid benign tumors, 2.9 for necrotic portions of malignant tumors and 3.1 for cystic benign lesions. The differences between malignant and benign solid tumors were statistically significant (P = 0.000025). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cut-off ADC value for differentiating malignant and benign solid tumors as 1.29 with excellent inter-observer reliability (alpha score 0.88).

CONCLUSION

DWI scans and ADC values can contribute to distinguishing between benign and malignant pediatric abdominal tumors.

Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters

PURPOSE

To determine whether parameters obtained from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using multiple b-values can improve characterization of common focal liver lesions (FLLs), compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCtotal ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. In all, 142 patients with 169 FLLs underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including IVIM-DWI with multiple b factors at 3.0T. ADCtotal and IVIM-DWI-derived parameters including true diffusion (Dt ), pseudodiffusion (Dp ), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated for each lesion and compared using dedicated software.

RESULTS

Dt and ADCtotal were significantly lower in malignancies (0.95 ± 0.21, 1.14 ± 0.24, (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec)) than in benign FLLs (1.61 ± 0.34, 1.72 ± 0.37, (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec)). In the differential diagnosis of malignancies from benign lesions, Dt (Az value: 0.971) showed better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal (Az: 0.933) (P < 0.0005). Dt (Az: 0.961) also showed better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal (Az: 0.919) in differentiating hypervascular malignancies from benign hypervascular FLLs (P < 0.0005). In addition, Dp and f were significantly higher in hypervascular FLLs (35.74 ± 20.08 (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec), 28.14 ± 11.82 (%)) than hypovascular FLLs (21.87 ± 13.8 (×10(-3) mm(2) /sec), 12.2 ± 5.92 (%)) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dt provided better diagnostic performance than ADCtotal in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Dp and f were significant parameters for diagnosing hypervascular FLLs.

Accuracy of visual analysis vs. apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in differentiating solid benign and malignant focal liver lesions with diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

The authors compared the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) visual analysis (VA) vs. apparent diffusion coefficient quantification (ADC-Q) in assessing malignancy of solid focal liver lesions (FLLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a 1.5-T system, two radiologists retrospectively assessed as benign or malignant 50 solid FLLs: (a) by VA of signal intensity on DWI images at b=800 s/mm(2) and ADC map; (b) by quantifying lesion ADC. Reference standard included histology or follow-up confirmation of diagnosis by a consensus panel. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

because of 20 false-negative hepatocellular carcinomas, VA showed lower accuracy than ADC-Q (52.0% VS. 68.0%). however, stratified accuracy for metastases was higher with VA (75.0 VS. 66%). ADC and signal features of malignant and benign FLLs were found to largely overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

VA performed worse than ADC-Q for hepatocellular carcinoma and better for metastases. Overall, the accuracy of both methods was limited because of the overlap in visual appearance and ADC values between solid benign and malignant FLLs.

MRI of Focal Liver Lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI has more advantages than ultrasound, computed tomography, CT, positron emission tomography, PET, or any other imaging modality in diagnosing focal hepatic masses. With a combination of basic T1 and T2 weighted sequences, diffusion weighted imaging, DWI, and hepatobiliary gadolinium contrast agents, that is gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB), most liver lesions can be adequately diagnosed. Benign lesions, as cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, FNH or adenoma, can be distinguished from malignant lesions. In a non-cirrhotic liver, the most common malignant lesions are metastases which may be hypovascular or hypervascular. In the cirrhotic liver hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, is of considerable importance. Besides, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and other less common malignancies has to be assessed. In this review, the techniques and typical MRI features are presented as well as the new algorithm issued by American Association for the Study of the Liver Diseases (AASLD).

Effect of motion on the ADC quantification accuracy of whole-body DWIBS

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal subtraction was introduced as a qualitative approach to detecting metastases in the body. A liver-mimicking phantom with embedded tumours that could be moved to replicate respiratory motion was developed to assess its ability to accurately quantify ADC values.

RESULTS

Mean tumour ADC values were unaltered by the motion; however, a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the spread of ADC values was measured, even for relatively large tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings may be of significance in cancer therapy monitoring where subtle changes in ADC histograms may reveal changes in tumour heterogeneity.

Role of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica in the liver

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic role of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in the diagnosis of focal parenchymal lesions and to understand the discriminating role of the ADC value for differentiating Fasciola lesions from other focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured ADC values of parenchymal lesions and liver parenchyma in 18 patients with Fasciola hepatica infestation at b 100, b 600, and b 1000 s/mm(2) gradients. We further measured average ADC values of hepatic metastases (n = 21), hepatocellular carcinomas (n = 21), cholangiocarcinomas (n = 7), hydatid cysts (n = 12), and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) (n = 12) and compared them with average ADC values for Fasciola hepatica.

RESULTS

The differences between average ADC values of lesions (2.16 ± 0.36 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and parenchyma (1.64 ± 0.2 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) at three gradients were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Mean ADC values of Fasciola hepatica lesions were significantly different from most of the other focal hepatic lesions, except FNH at all gradients and hydatid cyst at only the b 100 gradient.

CONCLUSION

ADC measurement may be a complementary method in the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica, and it may be used to differentiate these lesions from other focal liver lesions.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: sequence optimization and artifacts

The liver is one of the most challenging organs of the body to image with magnetic resonance because it is large and mobile, receives a dual blood supply, and is surrounded by organs and structures that contribute to artifacts from flow and susceptibility. Recent advances in imaging hardware, in addition to improvements in temporal resolution and development of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, make imaging of the liver more approachable than in the past; however, it remains a complex process that requires compromise. In this article the authors discuss development and optimization of a liver imaging protocol at 1.5 T, with common variations in each element of the protocol, as well as the strengths and weaknesses associated with the relevant sequences.

Comparison between MRI with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequence (DWI) and histology in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences (SE-EPI-DWI) in the study of primary and secondary soft-tissue tumours by correlating the results of imaging and histology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 23 patients (14 men, 9 women; age range 25-87 years) affected by soft-tissue lesions. The MRI study was performed with baseline and contrast-enhanced SE-T1, proton density/T2-weighted (PD/T2), fat-saturated (FATSAT) DP/T2 and single-shot SE-EPI-DWI (b value 50-400- 800s/mm2) sequences.

RESULTS

We identified 7/23 benign lesions (three myxoid, four nonmyxoid) and 16/23 malignant tumours (four myxoid, 12 nonmyxoid) with a mean diameter between 21 mm and 20 cm. Qualitative analysis of DWI showed persistence of high signal intensity for increasing b-values in all malignant tumours. Quantitative DWI analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps showed a statistical difference between benign and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, DWI with qualitative and quantitative analysis correlated well with histology.

The role of ADC measurement in differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in characterization of focal solid hepatic lesions and determine the role of ADC values in differentiation of solid benign and solid malignant hepatic lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2006 and December 2010, a total of 95 focal solid hepatic lesions in 95 consecutive patients were evaluated by abdominal MRI. Diffusion weighted MRI was performed with b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients with ADC measurements. Comparison of mean ADC values between solid benign (focal nodular hyperplasia and other solid benign lesions) and solid malignant lesion (hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, and cholangiocarcinoma) groups and between each benign and malignant lesion was done. The ROC analyses were performed in order to determine cut-off ADC values for differentiation of benign and malignant lesion groups at 3 different gradients.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 95 lesions were benign and 69 were malignant. Mean ADC values of solid benign lesions at b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients were 2.25±0.54×10(-3), 1.97±0.64×10(-3) and 1.52±0.47×10(-3) mm2/s, respectively. Mean ADC values of solid malignant lesions at b 100, b 600 and b 1000 gradients were 1.84±0.57×10(-3), 1.37±0.38×10(-3) and 1.08±0.22×10(-3) mm2/s, respectively. The ADC values of solid benign lesions were significantly higher than solid malignant lesions at all 3 gradients (P<0.05). Differentiation of benign and malignant subtype lesions from each other in their groups did not yield as significant findings as comparing results between benign and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSION

Although ADC measurements were not helpful for differentiating subtypes of solid benign or solid malignant lesions, ADC measurements at 3 different gradients may be useful in differential diagnosis of benign lesions from malignant ones.

Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign hepatic tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient on 1.5-T MR imaging: a meta analysis

This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with ADC values for differentiation between malignant and benign hepatic focal lesions. From retrieved articles, we selected 7 sets of data in 6 articles, which met all the included criteria, for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI, 0.83-0.90) and 84% (95% CI, 0.78-0.88), respectively. However, notable heterogeneity between studies was noted and no covariate evaluated can explain the cause. Only b factor correlated with the mean ADC values of malignant and benign hepatic tumors. In conclusion, ADC value was useful for differentiation between malignant and benign hepatic focal lesions. But, significant heterogeneity between studies underlines the need for further efforts to optimize standardization and reproducibility of the utilized techniques and methods.

Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic lesions: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of DW-MRI in differentiating malignant hepatic tumors from benign lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Meta-analysis of 14 diagnostic studies was used. A systematic search in Medline, Embase, Web of Science (from January, 1966, to October, 2009), and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register Database (through third Quarter 2009) was used with screening of the literature.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of all 95 published studies was performed. Fourteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (804 patients with 1665 hepatic lesions). The global sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.94), the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 13.10 (95% CI, 6.30-27.26), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.15), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 133.76 (95% CI, 49.77-359.45). The area under the curve of the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is potential technically feasible to differentiate malignant from benign focal liver lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements can be useful in providing rapid quantifiable information.

The value of hepatic diffusion-weighted MR imaging in demonstrating hepatic congestion secondary to pulmonary hypertension

Background

Congestive hepatomegaly might be the first sign for pulmonary hypertension. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value obtained with quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is affected by liver fibrosis and perfusion. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of DW-MRI in cooperation with biochemical markers, ultrasonography (US) and echocardiography (TTE) in determining the degree of hepatic congestion secondary to pulmonary hypertension (PHT).

Methods

35 patients with PHT and 26 control subjects were included in the study. PHT was diagnosed if pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was measured above 35 mmHg with TTE. Study group was classified into mild and moderate PHT. DW-MRI was performed with b-factors of 0, 500 and 1000 sec/mm². Mean ADC, ADC-II (Average of the ADC values of right lobe anterior and posterior segments), US, TTE and blood biochemical parameters of both groups were compared.

Results

There exists a positive correlation between liver size and the diameters of vena cava inferior, right atrium, right hepatic vein(RHV), mid-hepatic vein(MHV), left hepatic vein(LHV) (p < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between PASP and RHV, MHV, LHV. The patients had lower ejection fractions (p < 0.01) and higher LDH (p < 0.01) and ALP (p < 0.05) levels than the control group. The ADC values of the patients with moderate PASP were higher than those with a mild PASP (p < 0.05). Mean ADC was higher in patients with moderate PHT compared to control group (p = 0.009). There was a positive correlation between PASP and ADC values of right lobe posterior segment of the liver (p < 0.05). The ADC-II and mean ADC values of the patients with moderate PASP were higher than those of the control group (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Congestion due to moderate PHT might be diagnosed with DW-MRI. As PASP increase; mean ADC and ADC-II values increase.