Pregabalin in the treatment of alcohol and benzodiazepines dependence

Pregabalin Dependence and Management in a 55-Year-Old Female with Chronic Low Back Pain

This case report explores the complexities of managing chronic pain and the subsequent development of pregabalin dependence in a 55-year-old female patient with a prior history of vertebral fracture. Over a period of 10 years, the patient relied on a combination of Aceclofenac and pregabalin to alleviate her pain. An alternative treatment approach was implemented, involving adjustments to medication dosages and gradual tapering. Throughout the treatment process, interdisciplinary collaboration played a pivotal role in addressing unexpected symptoms such as facial movements and neck swelling. This case report highlights the significance of recognizing and addressing pregabalin dependence in patients with chronic pain.

Gabapentinoid Abuse in France: Evidence on Health Consequences and New Points of Vigilance

Introduction: Gabapentinoid drugs (gabapentin and pregabalin) are widely used worldwide for epileptic and pain disorders. First signals of gabapentinoid abuse occurred in the last decade. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics of gabapentinoid use related disorders and health consequences in France. Materials and Methods: We designed a multisource investigation reviewing data reported to the French Addictovigilance Network (FAN) with pregabalin and gabapentin from 2010 to 2019. Information was obtained through the analysis of Spontaneous Reports (SRs) notified by health professionals and the pharmacoepidemiological surveys OSIAP (suspicious prescriptions forms indicators of potential abuse), OPPIDUM (observation of illicit drugs and misuse of psychotropic medications), DRAMES (death related to prescription drugs and other substances), and DTA (toxic deaths due to analgesics). Results: Over 2010-2019 period, were collected: (i) 265 SRs (258 pregabalin; 7 gabapentin); (ii) 816 forged prescription forms (805 pregabalin, 10 gabapentin, 1 involving both drugs); (iii) 145 cases of gabapentinoid use in people who use drugs (121 pregabalin; 24 gabapentin) and (iv) 31 cases of gabapentinoid-related deaths (25 pregabalin; 6 gabapentin). Risk factors of gabapentinoid abuse were opioid use disorders or psychiatric history, but cases of primary abuse in subjects without any substance abuse history were observed. Adverse outcomes concern almost exclusively pregabalin, with coma, dyspnea, convulsion, and conduction disorders. Treatment demands increased from 10.6% in 2018 to 23.1% in 2019, with pregabalin cited as the first substance leading to addictological care in the 2019 OPPIDUM survey. Gabapentinoid-related deaths increased over time. Pregabalin has become the first drug mentioned in forged prescriptions in 2019 (23.8% of OSIAP), while it ranked at the 15th position in 2017 (2.6%). Discussion: This study shows the importance of addictovigilance monitoring for gabapentinoids. Addictovigilance data helped to make visible the gabapentinoid-abuse related health harms (hospitalization for serious neurologic, psychiatric or cardiac effects, requests for addictological support and deaths) and to confirm the intrinsic abuse potential of pregabalin. These data highlight new points of vigilance considering observed primary abuse. At this point in France, the risk of abuse and related complications is very apparent with pregabalin. Still, it is identical to that observed elsewhere with gabapentin.

[A double blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in induction of remission in patients with alcohol dependence]

AIM

To study the efficacy of pregabalin for relapse prevention and reduction of drinking in patients with alcohol dependence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred recently detoxified out-patients with alcohol dependence were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Patients of the first group (n=50; 38 men, 12 women, age 43.0±1.27) received pregabalin (150 mg once a day at night time) for 3 months, while patients of the second group (n=50; 45 men, 5 women, age 45.92±1.4) received identically looking placebo. All patients received standardized manualized weekly counseling (medical management). Drinking was measured on the weekly basis with Time Line Follow Back technique and GGT enzyme activity. Also, craving for alcohol, depression, and anxiety were measured weekly with the number of scales.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher retention in treatment and in remission in the pregabalin group (lower drop out and relapse rate) mediana (CL)-12 (10.4-13.6) weeks in the pregabalin group vs. 6 (4.5-7.5) in the placebo group, Log Rank Mantel-Cox test = 0.005). Proportion of patients, who completed treatment in the pregabalin group, was significantly higher compared to the placebo group: 50% vs. 24%. Mean duration of participation in the treatment program was also higher in the pregabalin group: 9.1±0.5 weeks vs. 7.1±0.5 in the placebo group. General linear model demonstrated the significant treatment group effect on: (1) total alcohol consumption (TAC) (mean grams of alcohol per day) with lower TAC in the pregabalin group and (2) on the number of heavy drinking days (NHDD) with lower NHDD in the pregabalin group. Mean NHDD per patient for the period of participation in the study was lower in the pregabalin group (3.6±0.7 vs. 6.4±0.8; p=0.009), while the mean number of abstinent (sober) days was higher (55.9±3.6 vs. 40.0±3.3; p=0.001). No significant differences between the two groups were found in the scores on craving for alcohol, depression and anxiety scales. GGT activity was also similar in both groups throughout the study with no significant between group differences. The rate of adverse events (sleepiness, dizziness, and headache) was insignificantly higher in the pregabalin group compared with the placebo group. All adverse events were mild, gradually disappeared, and did not require any medication.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study provide evidence that pregabalin in a low dose of 150 mg per day is an effective and safe medication for relapse prevention and reduction of drinking in patients with alcohol dependence.

Patterns of gabapentin and pregabalin use and misuse: Results of a population-based cohort study in France

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the use and factors associated with the misuse of gabapentin and pregabalin in the general French population, through a cohort study in the EGB (General Sample of Beneficiaries), a national representative sample of the French general population.

METHODS

New users of gabapentin and pregabalin were identified from June 2006 to December 2014, and new users of duloxetine served as control group. Misuse was defined as a use of higher daily doses than recommended. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to identify associated factors of misuse.

RESULTS

Misuse was more frequent in the 8692 new users of pregabalin (12.8%) than in the 1963 gabapentin (6.6%) or the 3214 duloxetine new users (9.7%) (P < 0.001). Factors associated with misuse were pregabalin (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.29-1.69]), age (HR_{[18-45] versus > 70 years} 1.98 [1.70-2.31] and HR_{[58-70] versus > 70 years} 1.25 [1.06-1.47]), multiple prescribers (HR_{2 or 3 versus 1 prescriber} 1.29 [1.15-1.45]; HR_{4 or more versus 1 prescriber} 1.54 [1.30-1.83]), cancer (1.28 [1.11-1.47]), multiple sclerosis (1.53 [1.07-2.18]), neuropathy (1.85 [1.19-2.89]), depression (1.26 [1.07-1.49]) and methadone (2.61 [1.16-5.84]). After this first episode of drug misuse, 11.6% of gabapentin and 10.7% of pregabalin misusers developed a primary addiction.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of new users, misuse is more likely to occur in new users of pregabalin, with different associated factors of misuse compared to gabapentin and duloxetine. Health professionals and prescribers must be aware of this misuse potential, which could lead to abuse and dependence.

Pharmacotherapy for Co-Occurring Alcohol Use Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Targeting the Opioidergic, Noradrenergic, Serotonergic, and GABAergic/Glutamatergic Systems

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are highly comorbid, and treatment outcomes are worse in individuals with both disorders. Several neurobiological systems have been implicated in the development and maintenance of AUD and PTSD, and pharmacologic interventions targeting these systems for singular diagnoses of AUD or PTSD have proven effective. However, there are no established treatments for co-occurring AUD and PTSD, and relatively few studies have examined potential pharmacotherapy for treating symptoms of both AUD and PTSD in comorbid populations. This review provides a brief overview of the studies to date on pharmacotherapeutic treatment interventions for comorbid AUD and PTSD and highlights future directions for promising targets that have potential in the treatment of individuals with this dual diagnosis. Clinical implications of these findings are also discussed. While current medications targeting the opioidergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and GABAergic/glutamatergic brain systems are only modestly efficacious in improving symptoms in individuals with comorbid AUD and PTSD, novel targets within these neurobiological systems may be clinically useful for treating alcohol use outcomes and PTSD symptom severity. More work is needed to optimize pharmacologic treatment strategies that target both alcohol-motivated behavior and PTSD-related symptoms in individuals with co-occurring AUD and PTSD.

Gabapentinoids in penitentiaries: An abuse and addiction research

Objectives

This study aims to examine the abuse and addiction of gabapentinoids in penal institutions.

Patients and methods

Between September 2014 and November 2014, a total of 1,639 participants were administered an electronic questionnaire investigating the drug use and addiction. The questionnaire was requested to be asked and filled by the officers in charge for all voluntary convicts and prisoners in all penitentiaries throughout Turkey.

Results

The rate of answering the questions varied between 20.5% and 100%. It was found that 2% of the participants used pregabalin and gabapentin simultaneously, while 25.2% of them used multiple drugs. The usage rate of pregabalin and gabapentin was higher in some penitentiaries, compared to the normal population. There was a significant positive correlation between the use of gabapentinoids and multiple drugs and alcohol and drug addiction, various withdrawal symptoms, the number of going to the infirmary, and the number of referral to the hospital (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Although gabapentinoids seem to be used in the treatment of addiction, and are proved effective treatment agents. With a definite diagnosis, appropriate follow-up, and timely completion of the treatment, it is necessary to strictly control their use due to the probability of abuse and addiction.

Pregabalin for the Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms: A Comprehensive Review

Treatments for physical dependence and associated withdrawal symptoms following the abrupt discontinuation of prescription drugs (such as opioids and benzodiazepines), nicotine, alcohol, and cannabinoids are available, but there is still a need for new and more effective therapies. This review examines evidence supporting the potential use of pregabalin, an α2δ voltage-gated calcium channel subunit ligand, for the treatment of physical dependence and associated withdrawal symptoms. A literature search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases up to and including 11 December 2015 was conducted. The search term used was '(dependence OR withdrawal) AND pregabalin'. No other date limits were set and no language restrictions were applied. Works cited in identified articles were cross-referenced and personal archives of references also searched. Articles were included based on the expert opinions of the authors. There is limited evidence supporting the role of pregabalin for the treatment of physical dependence and accompanying withdrawal symptoms associated with opioids, benzodiazepines, nicotine, cannabinoids, and alcohol, although data from randomized controlled studies are sparse. However, the current evidence is promising and provides a platform for future studies, including appropriate randomized, placebo- and/or comparator-controlled studies, to further explore the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for the treatment of withdrawal symptoms. Given the potential for pregabalin misuse or abuse, particularly in individuals with a previous history of substance abuse, clinicians should exercise caution when using pregabalin in this patient population.

Pharmacological Approaches for Treatment-resistant Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder is prevalent, with high risks of disability, substance abuse and premature mortality. Treatment responses typically are incomplete, especially for depressive components, so that many cases can be considered “treatment resistant.” We reviewed reports on experimental treatments for such patients: there is a striking paucity of such research, mainly involving small incompletely controlled trials of add-on treatment, and findings remain preliminary. Encouraging results have been reported by adding aripiprazole, bupropion, clozapine, ketamine, memantine, pramipexole, pregabalin, and perhaps tri-iodothyronine in resistant manic or depressive phases. The urgency of incomplete responses in such a severe illness underscores the need for more systematic, simpler, and better controlled studies in more homogeneous samples of patients.

Effects of pregabalin in patients with hypnotic-dependent insomnia

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Long-term use of hypnotics runs the risk of dependency, and subjects usually experience difficulties in withdrawal. The objective of this study was to investigate the success of withdrawal using pregabalin and its efficacy on sleep in patients with hypnotic-dependent insomnia.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with hypnotic-dependent insomnia who were 18 years or older. The starting dosage of pregabalin was 75 mg/day and was increased up to as much as 300 mg/day, depending on the individual patient's condition, while tapering off hypnotics. After 4 weeks of titration, the final dosage amount was maintained for at least another 4 weeks. Sleep and clinical variables were evaluated at baseline and after treatment, using the Korean versions of various sleep questionnaires as well as polysomnography.

RESULTS

Forty subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 52.0 ± 8.5 years, of whom 28 (70.0%) were women. Twenty-one (52.5%) subjects successfully withdrew from hypnotics. The duration of withdrawal was 42.1 ± 16.0 days (range: 27.0∼84.0). The mean pregabalin dose was 121.4 ± 69.0 mg/day (range: 75.0∼300.0). After pregabalin treatment, there was a significant improvement in the total score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (15.0 ± 2.1, 8.9 ± 3.0, p < 0.001), and insomnia severity index (20.9 ± 4.3, 9.6 ± 4.4, p < 0.001); however, most of the sleep variables of the PSG showed no differences. The main adverse effects of pregabalin were nausea and dizziness.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed pregabalin may be a promising candidate for withdrawal from hypnotics and improved sleep in patients with hypnotic-dependent insomnia.

Cognitive effects of pregabalin in the treatment of long-term benzodiazepine-use and dependence

OBJECTIVE

Long-term benzodiazepine (BDZ) use and dependence affect cognitive functioning adversely and partly irreversibly. Emerging evidence suggests that pregabalin (PGB) might be a safe and efficacious treatment of long-term BDZ use. The aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in several core cognitive functions after successful treatment of long-term BDZ use and dependence with PGB.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with long-term BDZ use (mean duration >15 years) underwent neuropsychological assessment with the mini-mental state examination and four tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) battery before the initiation of PGB treatment and at a two months follow-up after the cessation of BDZs. Patients' CANTAB percentile score distributions were compared with normative CANTAB data.

RESULTS

Patients improved on cognitive measures of global cognitive functioning, time orientation, psychomotor speed, and visuospatial memory and learning with strong effect sizes. By contrast, they failed to improve on measures of attentional flexibility. Despite their significant improvement, patients' scores on most tests remained still at the lower percentiles of CANTAB normative scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, our findings suggest that successful treatment of long-term BDZ use with PGB is associated with a substantial, though only partial, recovery of BDZ-compromised neuropsychological functioning, at least at a 2-month follow-up.

Quantification of pregabalin using hydrophilic interaction HPLC-high-resolution MS in postmortem human samples: eighteen case reports

Pregabalin is a drug for treating epilepsy, anxiety disorders and neuropathic pain. Cases of poisoning are rare, though some have been fatal. Concentrations of pregabalin in postmortem human samples and its distribution have very rarely been documented. As the literature is so scarce, we propose to report the concentrations in autopsy samples of 18 people who had been taking Lyrica(®), including one case of a mixed overdose involving pregabalin. Analysis was carried out using an original Hydrophilic Interaction LIquid Chromatography (HILIC) technique coupled with a high-resolution mass spectrometer (m/z 160.1334 ± 5 ppm). The sensitivity of the technique enables a quick and simple treatment of the samples by protein precipitation. The method was validated in the whole blood with detection and quantification limits of 0.025 and 0.060 µg/mL, respectively. Pregabalin was a likely factor in the cause of death in 3 of the 18 cases. In the other individuals, the concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 17.0 in the peripheral blood, 1.5 to 11.1 in the central blood, 126.6 to 2004.6 in the urine and 10.5 to 58.3 µg/mL in the bile, with median values of 5.6, 4.6, 534.6 and 17.7, respectively.

Pharmacological strategies for detoxification

Detoxification refers to the safe discontinuation from a substance of dependence and is distinct from relapse prevention. Detoxification usually takes between a few days and a few weeks to complete, depending on the substance being misused, the severity of dependence and the support available to the user. Psychosocial therapies alongside pharmacological treatments are essential to improve outcome. The dependencies considered in this overview are detoxification from opioids (with methadone, buprenorphine, α2-adrenoceptor agonists and adjunct medications), alcohol (with benzodiazepines, anti-glutamatergics and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic drugs), stimulants and cannabis (with no clear recommended pharmacological treatments), benzodiazepines (with dose tapering) and nicotine (with nicotine replacement therapy, antidepressants and partial agonists). Evidence is limited by a lack of controlled trials robust enough for review bodies, and more research is required into optimal treatment doses and regimes, alone and in combination.

Pregabalin- and topiramate-mediated regulation of cognitive and motor impulsivity in DBA/2 mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Impulsivity is a core symptom in many neuropsychiatric disorders. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of topiramate and pregabalin on the modulation of different impulsivity dimensions in DBA/2 mice.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effects of acute and chronic administration of pregabalin (10, 20 and 40 mg·kg(-1) ) and topiramate (12.5, 25 and 50 mg·kg(-1) ) were evaluated in the light-dark box (LDB), hole board test (HBT) and delayed reinforcement task (DRT). α(2A) -Adrenoceptor, D(2) -receptor and TH gene expression were evaluated by real-time PCR in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), accumbens (ACC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), respectively.

KEY RESULTS

Acute pregabalin administration showed a clear anxiolytic-like effect (LDB) but did not modify novelty-seeking behaviour (HBT). In contrast, topiramate produced an anxiolytic effect only at the highest dose, whereas it reduced novelty seeking at all doses tested. In the DRT, acute pregabalin had no effect, whereas topiramate only reduced motor impulsivity. Chronically, pregabalin significantly increased motor impulsivity and topiramate diminished cognitive impulsivity. Pregabalin decreased α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively, and increased TH in the VTA. In contrast, chronic administration of topiramate increased α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively, and also increased TH in the VTA.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These results suggest that the usefulness of pregabalin in impulsivity-related disorders is related to its anxiolytic properties, whereas topiramate modulates impulsivity. These differences could be linked to their opposite effects on α(2A) -adrenoceptor and D(2) -receptor gene expression in the PFC and ACC, respectively.

Pregabalin in zolpidem dependence and withdrawal

Several recent reports attest to zolpidem's strong potential for abuse, dependence, and severe withdrawal symptoms upon its discontinuation. We report, for the first time, on 1 case of heavy zolpidem abuse and dependence with severe withdrawal symptoms twice treated safely and successfully with pregabalin, a newer antiepileptic agent devoid of known strong potential for abuse and dependence.

Clinical evolution of substance use disorder patients during treatment with quetiapine: a 12-week, open-label, naturalistic trial

OBJECTIVE

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are associated with a variety of psychiatric disorders and mood and behavioral instability. Growing evidence suggests that the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine may be useful in the treatment of SUDs. The primary objective of the current open-label trial was to examine the effects of quetiapine on SUD outcomes in patients entering detoxification.

METHODS

Thirty-three nonpsychosis SUD patients participated. Patients received quetiapine for a 12-week beginning in detoxification. Craving, quantities used and psychiatric symptoms were evaluated on baseline and at end point.

RESULTS

Out of 33 recruited patients, 26 completed > 9 weeks of treatment. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) analyses revealed that craving, SUD severity and quantities used improved during the study. Psychiatric and depressive symptoms also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results cannot be attributed per se to the pharmacological effects of quetiapine owing to the open-label design of the study, the small sample size involved and the fact that patients were involved in an intensive therapy program. Nevertheless, our results indicate that quetiapine may be helpful for the treatment of SUD patients entering detoxification. Controlled studies are warranted to determine whether these results are quetiapine-related.

Augmentation with pregabalin in schizophrenia

Anxiety is a core symptom of schizophrenia that elicits significant subjective burden of disease and contributes to treatment resistance in schizophrenia. Anxious syndromes might be attributed to incompletely remitted delusions, the negative syndrome, depressive episodes, panic attacks, social phobia, avoidance after hospitalization, and down-tapering of benzodiazepine medication. Pregabalin, an antagonist at the alpha2delta subunit of voltage-gated Ca channels, modulates several neurotransmitter systems and was found to alleviate anxiety in different mental disorders. In schizophrenia, this treatment option has not been evaluated before.Here, we report a case series of 11 schizophrenic patients who had treatment-resistant anxiety and received augmentation with pregabalin. This observational analysis reveals that the strategy was able to significantly reduce scores on the Hamilton anxiety scale; furthermore, we observed improvements of psychotic positive and negative symptoms and mood as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. After augmentation, both a complete discontinuation of concomitant benzodiazepine treatment as well as a dose reduction of antipsychotics could be achieved. We did not observe pharmacokinetic interactions or adverse events.These observations suggest that treating anxious syndromes in schizophrenia with pregabalin can be effective and tolerable. Further investigations should differentiate schizophrenic subsyndromes of anxiety and evaluate benefits and risks of pregabalin in comparison to placebo and active competitors.