Role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma: Experience of a single institution in China

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of EBUS-TBNA for Intrathoracic Metastasis in Previously Treated Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The present study assessed the diagnostic and prognostic significance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for suspected intrathoracic metastasis after HNC treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 75 patients with a prior history of head and neck cancer treatment who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected intrathoracic metastases between March 2012 and December 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 126 targeted lesions, including 107 mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and 19 intrapulmonary/mediastinal masses, were sampled. The metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) cases detected by EBUS-TBNA consisted of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (n = 24), oropharyngeal carcinoma (n = 3), hypopharynx carcinoma (n = 6), laryngeal carcinoma (n = 6), and oral cavity carcinoma (n = 6). Cases with negative EBUS-TBNA results consisted of tuberculosis (n = 9), sarcoidosis (n = 3), anthracosis (n = 9), and reactive lymphadenitis (n = 9). Six false-negative cases were found among the 75 patients with suspected intrathoracic metastases. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the EBUS-TBNA procedure for metastatic HNC were 88.2, 100.0, 100.0, 80, and 92.0%, respectively. The diagnosis of HNC intrathoracic metastasis by EBUS-TBNA correlated with an adverse prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) (P = .008). The log-rank univariate analysis and Cox regression multivariate analysis results indicated that the detection of metastatic HNC through EBUS-TBNA was a significant independent prognostic factor for patients with HNC who had received prior treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for assessing suspected intrathoracic metastasis in HNC patients after treatment. The intrathoracic metastasis detected by EBUS-TBNA has crucial prognostic significance in previously treated HNC patients.

Utility and Safety of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Isolated Mediastinal Masses

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a valuable tool for diagnosing pulmonary disease due to its efficiency and safety. We retrospectively analyzed patients with mediastinal masses who underwent diagnostic EBUS-TBNA at Shanghai Chest Hospital, and evaluated the clinical accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis mediastinal masses.

Method

From 2009 and 2014, patients who received EBUS-TBNA to diagnose a isolated mediastinal mass were enrolled. Clinical follow-up was performed to ascertain the patient’s final diagnosis.

Results

Forty-six patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven were diagnosed with an oncologic disease, 3 were diagnosed with a mediastinal infection, and 2 were found to have a mediastinal goiter. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic yield was 63.6%, 100%, 100%, 42.9%, and 71.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

EBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective means of diagnosing mediastinal masses.

Next-Generation Sequencing for Genotyping of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Samples in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can obtain a small amount of specimen. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and robustness of using EBUS-EBNA samples to perform capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Tissue samples from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were collected by EBUS-TBNA and were formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. Three representative genes, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, were examined by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The remaining samples were processed with NGS assay with a 56-gene panel. Classic driver mutations detected by NGS were verified by conventional methods.

RESULTS

Of the 85 samples from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 77 were performed successfully with all assays. Forty-one mutations in EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 were detected in both conventional methods and NGS, representing a 100% concordance. In contrast, four EGFR mutations detected by NGS were not covered in the targeted regions of amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction, leading to a negative call in these patients. Altogether, NGS detected 12 additional variants, including six KRAS mutations, one BRAF mutation, one RET fusion, one MET amplification concurrent with EGFR L858R, one KRAS amplification together with EGFR 19del, and one ERBB2 amplification. The mean number of needle passes per lymph node was 5.2 in samples successfully applied in all assays.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS assay can be successfully conducted with limited tissue samples obtained from EBUS-TBNA. Compared with conventional methods, NGS assay provides more comprehensive information on genetic alterations in tumors, which greatly assists therapeutic decision making for advanced lung cancer.

Determining factors of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for lung cancer subtyping and molecular testing

Objective:

This study is to explore the determining factors for testing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion after subtyping by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using samples obtained from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).

Materials and Methods:

Patients suspected with advanced lung cancer were performed EBUS-TBNA without rapid on-site evaluation(ROSE) from January 2015 to March 2016 in Shanghai Chest Hospital. All samples diagnosed as lung cancer by histopathology underwent IHC to identify subtypes. EGFR mutation and ALK fusion were tested in adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer-not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS) using remnant tissue samples.

Results:

A total of 453 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer, including 44.15% (200/453) with adenocarcinoma and 11.04% (50/453) with NSCLC-NOS. With the average passes of 3.41 ± 0.68, samples obtained from EBUS-TBNA were adequate for performing EGFR mutation and ALK fusion gene analysis in 80.4% (201/250) of specimens after routine IHC. On univariate analysis, successful molecular testing was associated with passes per lesion (P = 3.80E-05), long-axis diameters (P = 6.00E-06) and short-axis diameters (P = 4.77E-04), and pathology subtypes of lesions (P = 3.00E-03). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that passes per lesion (P = 1.00E-03), long-axis diameters (P = 3.50E-02), and pathology subtypes (P = 8.00E-03) were independent risk factors associated with successful molecular testing.

Conclusions:

With at least three passes of per lesion, EBUS-TBNA is an efficient method to provide adequate samples for testing of EGFR mutation and ALK gene arrangement following routine histopathology and IHC subtyping. Determining factors associated with successful pathology subtyping and molecular testing using samples obtained by EBUS-TBNA are passes of per lesion, long-axis diameter, and pathology subtypes. During the process of EBUS-TBNA, selecting larger lymph nodes and the puncturing at least 3 passes per lesion may result in higher success rate in lung cancer subtyping and molecular testing.

Utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing non-specific inflammatory intrathorcacic lymphadenitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive technique for diagnosing intrathoracic malignancies and some benignancies; however, there are no data available on the utility of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of non-specific inflammatory intrathoracic lymphadenitis.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was performed from 104 patients with enlarged lymphadenopathy suspected of non-specific lymphadenitis referred for EBUS-TBNA between October 2009 and March 2012. Rapid on-site cytological evaluation was not adopted. Microbiological tests were carried out in all patients. Patients were excluded from the study if there was other diagnosis being defined.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-one lesions were aspirated in 94 patients with enlarged mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes within reach of EBUS-TBNA, which were diagnosed as non-specific intrathorcacic lymphadenitis by pathology and clinical follow-up. According to EBUS-TBNA pathologies, 94 patients were categorized into four kinds: (i) inflammatory cell infiltrates and/or noncaseating necrosis in 38 cases; (ii) granuloma formed by epithelioid cells and/or fiber hyperplasia in 13 cases; (iii) lymph node tissue/lymphocyte without obvious abnormal lesions in 41 cases; (iv) inadequate sample in 2 cases. Bacterial and/or fungal smears and cultures were carried out in all 94 patients (100%), with pathogens being found in 4 (4.3%) cases. All patients (100%) underwent acid-fast staining and culture for mycobacterium tuberculosis to exclude tuberculosis. No procedure-related complication was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA can provide pathological and microbiological evidences for diagnosing non-specific inflammatory intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, and it is a safe and effective first-line investigation for ruling out malignancies and other benign diseases.

[Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Intrathoracic Metastasis from Extrapulmonary Malignancy]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely applied in diagnosing mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. This study is further to evaluate value and safety of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic metastasis from extrapulmonary malignancy.

METHODS

Prospectively analysis of 41 patients suspected intrathoracic metastasis from previous diagnosed/concurrent extrapulmonary malignancies in Shanghai Chest Hospital, with radiologic findings showing mediastinal/hilar lymph node enlargement or intrapulmonary lesion requiring EBUS-TBNA examination for pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

41 candidate patients enrolled, and 67 mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and 5 intrapulmonary lesions were aspirated. 14 intrathoracic metastasis, 10 primary lung cancer, 9 reactive lymphadenitis, 4 sarcoid-like reactions, and 1 tuberculosis was diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA. Sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic metastasis was 87.50% and 95.12%, respectively. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 18 malignant tumors to obtain definite type or origin, twelve intrathoracic metastasis and 6 primary lung cancer were further confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a safe, effective method for the diagnosis of intrathoracic metastasis from extrapulmonary malignancy. IHC can provide additional evidence for distinguishing extrapulmonary malignancy from primary lung cancer.

Determining factors in diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

BACKGROUND

Although the role of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in pulmonary sarcoidosis has previously been investigated, the determining factors in diagnosing sarcoidosis by EBUS-TBNA without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) are unclear.

METHODS

Patients with clinically and radiographically suspected sarcoidosis underwent EBUS-TBNA without ROSE in a prospective study. Presence of non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas was pathologic evidence of sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

The EBUS-TBNA was performed in 120 patients, 111 of whom had confirmed sarcoidosis. For the patients with sarcoidosis (62 stage I, 49 stage II) EBUS-TBNA provided sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 93.69%, 100%, 100%, 56.25%, and 94.17%, respectively, in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was associated with disease stage, but not associated with serum angiotensin converting enzyme level, number of lymph node stations sampled per patient, or total number of passes performed per patient. At EBUS-TBNA, 284 mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were aspirated in 111 patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that short-axis diameter and more than 1 needle pass per lymph node were independent risk factors associated with positive pathology. No major procedure-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration is a safe procedure with high sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis, having a higher diagnostic yield in stage I than stage II. To obtain a higher diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA in pulmonary sarcoidosis without ROSE, operators should select the largest mediastinal or hilar lymph node accessible and puncture with 3 to 5 passes.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing intrathoracic tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has enabled mediastinal and hilar lymph node assessment with a high sensitivity, but its role in the diagnosis of intrathoracic tuberculosis (TB) has not been established.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 59 patients suspected of having TB with thoracic lymph node lesions or intrapulmonary lesions accessible by EBUS-TBNA at a clinical center for thoracic medicine from January 2010 to December 2011. Bronchoscopic findings, EBUS-TBNA procedures, pathologic findings, and microbiologic results were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 59 eligible patients, 41 patients had TB, 5 had lung cancer, 7 had inflammation, and 6 had sarcoidosis. Sensitivity was 85%, specificity was 100%, positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 75%, respectively, and accuracy was 90% by EBUS-TBNA for TB. Pathologic findings were consistent with TB in 80% of patients (33 of 41), and in 27% (11 of 41) the smear was positive. A total of 37 patients with TB had cultures, of whom 17 (46%) were positive. There were 80 mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and 5 intrapulmonary lesions that were biopsied in the 41 patients with TB. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that short-axis diameter was an independent risk factor associated with positive pathology, smear, and culture (p < 0.05). Additionally, pathology showing necrosis was an independent risk factor associated with a positive culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration has a high diagnostic yield in the investigation of suspected intrathoracic TB by means of aspiration of intrathoracic lymph nodes and tracheobronchial wall-adjacent lung lesions.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of non-lymph node thoracic lesions

AIMS:

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has shown excellent diagnostic capabilities for mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. However, its value in thoracic non-lymph node lesions is less clear. This study was designed to assess the value of EBUS-TBNA in distinguishing malignant from benign thoracic non-lymph node lesions.

METHODS:

From October 2009 to August 2011, 552 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA under local anesthesia and with conscious sedation. We retrospectively reviewed 81 of these patients who had tracheobronchial wall-adjacent intrapulmonary or isolated mediastinal non-lymph node lesions. On-site cytological evaluation was not used. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to distinguish the origin or type of malignancy when necessary.

RESULTS:

EBUS-TBNA was performed in 68 tracheobronchial wall-adjacent intrapulmonary and 13 isolated mediastinal non-lymph node lesions. Of the 81 patients, 77 (95.1%, 60 malignancies and 17 benignancies) were diagnosed through EBUS-TBNA, including 57 primary lung cancers, 2 mediastinal tumors, 1 pulmonary metastatic adenocarcinoma, 7 inflammation, 5 tuberculosis, 3 mediastinal cysts, 1 esophageal schwannoma, and 1 focal fibrosis. There were four false-negative cases (4.9%). Of the 60 malignancies, there were 9 (15.0%) which originally had no definite histologic origin or type. Thus, IHC was performed, with 7 (77.8%) being subsequently confirmed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions were 93.4% (60/64), 100% (17/17), 100% (60/60), 81.0% (17/21), and 95.1% (77/81), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

EBUS-TBNA is a safe procedure with a high sensitivity for distinguishing malignant from benign thoracic non-lymph node lesions within the reach of EBUS-TBNA, with IHC usually providing a more definitive diagnosis.