New angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker olmesartan improves portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis

From Pathophysiology to Practice: Evolving Pharmacological Therapies, Clinical Complications, and Pharmacogenetic Considerations in Portal Hypertension

Background: Portal hypertension is a major complication of chronic liver diseases, leading to serious issues such as esophageal variceal bleeding. The increase in portal vein pressure is driven by both an organic component and a functional component, including tonic contraction of hepatic stellate cells. These processes result in a pathological rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance, stemming from partial impairment of hepatic microcirculation, which is further exacerbated by abnormalities in extrahepatic vessels, including increased portal blood flow. Objectives: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving pharmacological therapies for portal hypertension, with consideration and discussion of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical complications, and pharmacogenetic considerations, highlighting potential directions for future research. Methods: A review of recent literature was performed to evaluate current knowledge and potential therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. Results: For over 35 years, non-selective beta-blockers have been the cornerstone therapy for portal hypertension by reducing portal vein inflow as an extrahepatic target, effectively preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhages. However, since not all patients exhibit an adequate response to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), and some may not tolerate NSBBs, alternative or adjunctive therapies that enhance the effects of NSBBs on portal pressure are being investigated in preclinical and early clinical studies. Conclusions: A better understanding of pharmacogenetic factors and pathophysiological mechanisms could lead to more individualized and effective treatments for portal hypertension. These insights highlight potential directions for future research.

Evolution of care in cirrhosis: Preventing hepatic decompensation through pharmacotherapy

Cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, impacting more than 120 million people worldwide. Although geographic differences exist, etiologic factors such as alcohol use disorder, chronic viral hepatitis infections, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease are prevalent in nearly every region. Historically, significant effort has been devoted to modifying these risks to prevent disease progression. Nevertheless, more than 11% of patients with compensated cirrhosis experience hepatic decompensation each year. This transition signifies the most important prognostic factor in the natural history of the disease, corresponding to a decline in median survival to below 2 years. Over the past decade, the need for pharmacotherapies aimed at reducing the risk for hepatic decompensation has been emphasized, and non-selective beta-blockers have emerged as the most effective option to date. However, a critical therapeutic gap still exists, and additional therapies have been proposed, including statins, rifaximin, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Based on the results of innovative retrospective analyses and small-scale prospective trials, these pharmacotherapies represent promising options, but further studies, including randomized controlled trials, are necessary before they can be incorporated into clinical use. This report highlights the potential impact of these agents and others in preventing hepatic decompensation and discusses how this paradigm shift may pave the way for guideline-directed medical therapy in cirrhosis.

Vasoconstrictor antagonism improves functional and structural vascular alterations and liver damage in rats with early NAFLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intrahepatic vascular resistance is increased in early non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), potentially leading to tissue hypoxia and triggering disease progression. Hepatic vascular hyperreactivity to vasoconstrictors has been identified as an underlying mechanism. This study investigates vasoconstrictive agonism and antagonism in 2 models of early NAFLD and in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

METHODS

The effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), angiotensin II (ATII) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) agonism and antagonism were studied by in situ ex vivo liver perfusion and preventive/therapeutic treatment experiments in a methionine-choline-deficient diet model of steatosis. Furthermore, important results were validated in Zucker fatty rats after 4 or 8 weeks of high-fat high-fructose diet feeding. In vivo systemic and portal pressures, ex vivo transhepatic pressure gradients (THPG) and transaminase levels were measured. Liver tissue was harvested for structural and mRNA analysis.

RESULTS

The THPG and consequent portal pressure were significantly increased in both models of steatosis and in NASH. ET-1, ATII and TxA2 increased the THPG even further. Bosentan (ET-1 receptor antagonist), valsartan (ATII receptor blocker) and celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) attenuated or even normalised the increased THPG in steatosis. Simultaneously, bosentan and valsartan treatment improved transaminase levels. Moreover, bosentan was able to mitigate the degree of steatosis and restored the disrupted microvascular structure. Finally, beneficial vascular effects of bosentan endured in NASH.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonism of vasoconstrictive mediators improves intrahepatic vascular function. Both ET-1 and ATII antagonists showed additional benefit and bosentan even mitigated steatosis and structural liver damage. In conclusion, vasoconstrictive antagonism is a potentially promising therapeutic option for the treatment of early NAFLD.

LAY SUMMARY

In non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), hepatic blood flow is impaired and the blood pressure in the liver blood vessels is increased as a result of an increased response of the liver vasculature to vasoconstrictors. Using drugs to block the constriction of the intrahepatic vasculature, the resistance of the liver blood vessels decreases and the increased portal pressure is reduced. Moreover, blocking the vasoconstrictive endothelin-1 pathway restored parenchymal architecture and reduced disease severity.

Future Pharmacological Therapies of Portal Hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of recent pharmacological treatments for portal hypertension evaluated in early clinical trials, with particular emphasis on the pathophysiological basis of their use.

RECENT FINDINGS

In patients with compensated cirrhosis, even small decreases in portal pressure (as small as 1 mmHg) are associated with a lower probability of decompensation. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, portal pressure "response" to non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) therapy is associated with a lower mortality. When present, significant portal hypertension persists even after elimination of the etiology of cirrhosis and this justifies the continued development of new drugs that target portal hypertension.

SUMMARY

Over several decades we have gained great depth in the understanding of portal hypertension, its mechanisms and complications. NSBBs, which act by reducing portal venous inflow (an extrahepatic target), are effective in reducing portal pressure and have been the mainstay of therapy for portal hypertension in the last 35 years -being effective in preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhage. However, because not all patients will have a sufficient response to NSBB and some may be intolerant to NSBB, alternative drugs or drugs that will augment the effect of NSBB on portal pressure are being tested in pre-clinical and early-clinical trials. Many of these drugs target more than one of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Out of these proposed therapies, statins have emerged as the most promising new pharmacological therapy for the treatment of portal hypertension.

Effects of 1-year administration of olmesartan on portal pressure and TGF-beta1 in selected patients with cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension. We evaluated the long-term effects of olmesartan, an angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker, on hemodynamics and liver fibrosis.

METHODS

Forty-eight selected patients with cirrhosis were randomly divided into two groups of 24 patients each, those who received and those who did not receive olmesartan treatment for 1 year. Hepatic hemodynamic studies, and measurements of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and blood markers of hepatic fibrosis, including serum hyaluronic acid (HA), type IV collagen, and procollagen III N-terminal propeptide levels, were also performed at the beginning and end of the study.

RESULTS

The median dose of the final drug administration was 20 mg (range 10-40 mg). Olmesartan reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) by -12.9 ± 9.1% (p = 0.035) after 1 year. No significant changes were seen in controls. Six of the 24 patients (25%) in the olmesartan group showed a >20% reduction of HVPG from baseline values. TGF-beta1 was significantly decreased in patients who received olmesartan (7.0 ± 8.2 vs. 3.1 ± 1.6 ng/mL, p = 0.046) but there was no decrease in the controls. A significant trend was shown by correlating HA and TGF-beta1 variations in cirrhosis patients (p = 0.018, r = 0.377). Fibrosis markers were unchanged at the end of the study in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Olmesartan induced a mild reduction of portal pressure and TGF-beta1 for 1 year, but did not suppress hepatic fibrosis markers.

Diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension

Major progress has been made in the area of diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension. Multi-detector row computed tomography (MD-CT) enabled the revelation of the precise overview of portal hemodynamics and was applied into the decision of therapeutic strategies. A noninvasive liver stiffness measurement device, transient elastography, is expected to be applied in the prediction of existence of esophageal varices. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) is performed mainly in Japan to eradiate the fundic varices and high eradiation rate and low recurrence rate are reported. Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been performed to improve hypersplenism without serious side-effect and excellent result is reported. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are promising drugs for its portal hypotensive effect and antifibrotic effect and more investigation is necessary. Anti-fibrotic therapy, including autologous bone marrow therapy, has the possibility to improve not only liver fibrosis but also portal hypertension.

Review: Vasoconstrictors for the treatment of portal hypertension

Vasoconstrictors have long been used in an attempt to mitigate the effects of portal hypertension. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of portal hypertension and the use of vasoconstrictors in the management of its sequlae, including variceal hemorrhage, hepatorenal syndrome, and paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction. Experimental and clinical evidence for the use of vasoconstrictors is considered, and several exciting recent developments are reviewed.