Platelet Cyclooxygenase Expression in Normal Dogs

Effectiveness of aspirin vs. clopidogrel in dogs with immune mediated haemolytic anaemia evaluated by serial thromboelastography and platelet mapping

Most dogs with immune mediated haemolytic anaemia (IMHA) are hypercoagulable, as measured by thromboelastography (TEG). Thromboelastography-platelet mapping (TEG-PM) has been used to assess platelet function in human patients treated with aspirin or clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to compare platelet thromboxane A₂-receptor inhibition (TXA_2-RI) and platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) as measured by TEG-PM in dogs with primary IMHA receiving aspirin or clopidogrel to determine if TEG-PM might be useful to monitor treatment. Eighteen client-owned dogs with IMHA were enroled in a prospective double blinded study. Dogs were randomised to receive aspirin or clopidogrel in addition to standard therapy. Thromboelastography was measured before, and 1 and 4 days after commencing treatment. Thromboelastography-PM was performed on days 1 and 4. Non-responders were defined as < 50 % platelet thromboxane A₂-receptor inhibition (TXA_2-RI) in the aspirin group and < 50 % platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor inhibition (ADP-RI) in the clopidogrel group, on day 4. Mean platelet TXA₂-RI and platelet ADP-RI were not significantly different between groups at any timepoint (P > 0.05). The overall mean percentage inhibition of TXA₂-receptor was 25 % (aspirin 33 %, clopidogrel 15 %), and of ADP-receptor was 82 % (aspirin 83 %, clopidogrel 80 %). On day 4, 6/9 dogs (66 %) in the aspirin group and 2/8 dogs (25 %) in the clopidogrel group were non-responders (P = 0.086). Two dogs defined as responders based on TEG-PM developed thromboembolism. Overall, there was no significant difference in efficacy between aspirin and clopidogrel based on measurement of receptor inhibition using TEG-PM (P > 0.05), and routine TEG was not reliable for monitoring treatment response in dogs with IMHA. In some dogs, there was a discrepancy between TEG-PM results and clinical response. Further investigation of TEG-PM use in dogs, including its usefulness to monitor treatment response and adjust treatment in individual dogs and any effect of anaemia, is warranted.

Urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 concentrations in 20 dogs with primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality in dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA). At present, no reliable biomarkers of individual patient thrombotic risk are available. In human medicine, increased urinary thromboxane concentrations have utility as markers of prothrombotic tendency in various situations.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

First, to determine if urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (u11-dTXB) concentrations are increased in dogs with primary IMHA compared to normal dogs; second, to assess whether u11-dTXB concentration is associated with survival, known prognostic indicators, or frequency of thrombosis in dogs with IMHA.

ANIMALS

Twenty client-owned dogs diagnosed with primary IMHA and 17 healthy dogs volunteered by hospital staff.

METHODS

Prospective case-control study. A previously validated ELISA was used to measure urine 11-dTXB concentrations, which were normalized to urine creatinine concentration (u11-dTXB:Cr). Samples were obtained at presentation from patients with primary IMHA. Standard clincopathological data at baseline and survival data were collected. Urinary 11-dTXB:Cr was compared between outcome subgroups, and correlated with known markers of disease severity.

RESULTS

Baseline u11-dTXB:Cr was significantly higher in dogs with IMHA than in healthy dogs (median, 3.75; range, 0.83-25.36 vs 0.65; 0.24-2.57; P = .003) but did not differ between dogs with IMHA that survived and did not survive to 30 days after presentation, nor between dogs with and without clinical suspicion of thrombotic disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Urinary 11-dTXB:Cr is increased in dogs with IMHA compared to healthy controls, consistent with a prothrombotic state. However, in this IMHA population u11-dTXB:Cr was not associated with survival or suspected thrombosis.

Platelet aggregometry testing during aspirin or clopidogrel treatment and measurement of clopidogrel metabolite concentrations in dogs with protein-losing nephropathy

Background

Dogs with protein‐losing nephropathy (PLN) are treated with antiplatelet drugs for thromboprophylaxis but no standardized method exists to measure drug response. It is also unknown if clopidogrel metabolite concentrations [CM] differ between healthy and PLN dogs.

Objectives

Assess response to aspirin or clopidogrel in PLN dogs using platelet aggregometry (PA) and compare [CM] between healthy and PLN dogs.

Animals

Six healthy and 14 PLN dogs.

Methods

Platelet aggregometry using adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), and saline was performed in healthy dogs at baseline and 1‐week postclopidogrel administration to identify responders or nonresponders. A decrease of ≥60% for ADP or ≥30% for AA at 1 or 3 hours postpill was used to define a responder. At 1 and 3 hours postclopidogrel, [CM] and PA were measured in healthy and PLN dogs. Platelet aggregometry was performed in PLN dogs at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 weeks after clopidogrel or aspirin administration.

Results

In PLN dogs receiving clopidogrel, PA differed from baseline at all time points for ADP but not for AA at any time point. Most dogs responded at 1 or both time points except for 1 dog that showed no response. For PLN dogs receiving aspirin, no differences from baseline were observed at any time point for either ADP or AA. No differences in [CM] were found at either time point between healthy and PLN dogs.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Platelet aggregometry may represent an objective method to evaluate response to clopidogrel or aspirin treatment and PLN dogs appear to metabolize clopidogrel similarly to healthy dogs.

Effects of Aspirin and Prednisone on Platelet Function and Thromboxane Synthesis in Healthy Dogs

Glucocorticoid administration is a risk factor for thromboembolism in hypercoagulable dogs, and it is unknown if aspirin counteracts glucocorticoid-induced hypercoagulability. The objective was to determine the effects of sustained aspirin and prednisone administration on platelet function and thromboxane synthesis. Our hypothesis was that aspirin would consistently inhibit platelet function and thromboxane synthesis when administered with or without prednisone. In 24 healthy dogs, platelet aggregometry and urine 11-dehydro-thromboxane-B₂ (11-dTXB₂)-to-creatinine ratios were measured on days 0, 14, and 28. Dogs were administered placebos, aspirin (2 mg/kg/d), prednisone (2 mg/kg/d), or prednisone/aspirin combination therapy PO for 28 days in a randomized double-blinded study. Aspirin response was based on a >25% reduction in platelet aggregation compared to pre-treatment values. Results were compared using mixed model, split-plot repeated measures ANOVAs. P < 0.05 was considered significant. AUC differed significantly by time [F_(2,40) = 10.2, P < 0.001] but not treatment or treatment-by-time. On day 14, 2 dogs were aspirin responders (aspirin, 1; placebo, 1). On day 28, 3 dogs were aspirin responders (aspirin, 2; prednisone/aspirin, 1). Urine 11-dTXB₂-to-creatinine ratios differed significantly by group [F_(3,20) = 3.9, P = 0.024] and time [F_(2,40) = 8.7, P < 0.001), but not treatment-by-time. Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences between aspirin and placebo groups (P=0.008), aspirin and prednisone/aspirin groups (P = 0.030), and placebo and prednisone groups (P = 0.030). In healthy dogs, sustained aspirin, prednisone, and combination therapy do not inhibit platelet aggregation, and when used as individual therapies, aspirin and prednisone decreased thromboxane synthesis. Additional studies using varied platelet function methodologies in hypercoagulable dogs are necessary.

Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE): Domain 3-Defining antithrombotic protocols

OBJECTIVES

To systematically examine the evidence for use of a specific protocol (dose, frequency, route) of selected antithrombotic drugs, in comparisons to no therapy or to other antithrombotic therapies, to reduce the risk of complications or improve outcomes in dogs and cats at risk for thrombosis.

DESIGN

Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor), and development of consensus on conclusions via a Delphi-style survey for application of the concepts to clinical practice.

SETTINGS

Academic and referral veterinary medical centers.

RESULTS

Databases searched included Medline via PubMed and CAB abstracts. Eight different antithrombotic drugs were investigated using a standardized Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) question format both for dogs and cats, including aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban, generating a total of 16 worksheets. Most studies identified were experimental controlled laboratory studies in companion animals (LOE 3) with only four randomized controlled clinical trials in companion animals (LOE 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, evidence-based recommendations concerning specific protocols could not be formulated for most antithrombotic drugs evaluated, either because of the wide range of dosage reported (eg, aspirin in dogs) or the lack of evidence in the current literature. However, clopidogrel administration in dogs and cats at risk of arterial thrombosis, notably in cats at risk of cardiogenic thromboembolism, is supported by the literature, and specific protocols were recommended. Comparably, aspirin should not be used as a sole antithrombotic in cats with cardiomyopathy. Using the available safety profile information contained in the literature, the panel reached consensus on suggested dosage schemes for most antithrombotics. Significant knowledge gaps were highlighted, which will hopefully drive novel research.

Investigation into the causes of aspirin resistance in healthy dogs

Antiplatelet effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) may be poor in some individuals. Additionally, no method exists for predicting poor ASA response (resistance) in individual dogs. This study's main objective was to determine whether poor ASA response results from pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic causes. ASA concentrations causing 50% inhibition of platelet aggregation (in vitro IC50) were determined using whole blood collected from 21 drug-free healthy dogs to evaluate intrinsic sensitivity of platelets to ASA. Dogs were then administered ASA at 4 mg/kg once orally. Percent decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline, and plasma ASA and salicylic acid (SA) concentrations (expressed as AUC values) were measured for up to 3 hr. By 3 hr, 13/21 (62%) dogs showed >50% aggregation inhibition, while 8/21 (38%) dogs showed <50% inhibition. Aggregation inhibition values were negatively correlated with in vitro IC50 values (Rs = -0.49; p = 0.028) and positively correlated with ASA concentrations (Rs = 0.48; p = 0.03). Furthermore, ASA concentrations were strongly negatively correlated (Rs = -0.88; p < 0.001) with SA/ASA concentration ratios, an index of ASA metabolism to SA by esterase enzymes. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that 59% (p < 0.001) of interindividual variability in aggregation inhibition was explained by in vitro IC50 values (29% of variability) and ASA concentrations (29% of variability). Consequently, poor in vivo ASA response in these dogs resulted from both pharmacodynamic (decreased platelet sensitivity) and pharmacokinetic (lower ASA concentrations) causes. Lower ASA concentrations may be explained by reduced bioavailability associated with higher esterase activities.

Establishment of reference ranges and evaluation of in vitro concentration-dependent platelet inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid for multiple electrode impedance aggregometry in healthy dogs

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is an antiplatelet medication used for prevention of thromboembolism. Effects of ASA appear to vary widely between dogs, but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. The Multiplate analyzer is a newer form of whole-blood impedance aggregometry recently validated for use in healthy dogs. A method utilizing this instrument to measure ASA effects on platelet function has not been established. The goals of this study were to establish reference ranges for the Multiplate in healthy dogs and secondly, to develop a technique to determine the in vitro concentration of ASA needed to cause 50% inhibition of platelet aggregation (IC50). Reference ranges established from 40 dogs at multiple test times for three agonists were consistent with previously published values. In vitro IC50 values were calculated using the sigmoid E_max model in 20 healthy dogs on two occasions to determine individual repeatability. Calculated in vitro IC50 demonstrated four ASA response groups: responder (n = 16), poor responder (n = 1), variable responder (n = 2), and nonresponder (n = 1). Multiplate within-assay variability was  <10% for area under the curve (AUC), and between-assay baseline AUC variability was  <15%. The described technique allowed for determination of an in vitro IC50 for ASA in dogs using a multiple electrode impedance aggregometer.

Effects of Leukoreduction and Storage on Erythrocyte Phosphatidylserine Expression and Eicosanoid Concentrations in Units of Canine Packed Red Blood Cells

Background

Storage of canine packed red blood cells (pRBCs) can increase erythrocyte phosphatidylserine (PS) expression and eicosanoid concentrations.

Hypothesis/Objectives

To determine the effects of leukoreduction on erythrocyte PS expression and eicosanoid concentrations in stored units of canine pRBCs. Our hypothesis was that leukoreduction would decrease PS expression and eicosanoid concentrations.

Animals

Eight healthy dogs.

Methods

In a cross‐over study, units of whole blood were leukoreduced (LR) or non‐LR and stored (10 and 21 days) as pRBCs. Samples were collected at donation, and before and after a simulated transfusion. PS expression was measured by flow cytometry, and concentrations of arachidonic acid (AA), prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α), prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂), prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂), thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂), 6‐keto‐prostaglandin F_1α (6‐keto‐PGF_1α), and leukotriene B₄ (LTB₄) were quantified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

There was no change in PS expression during leukoreduction, storage, and simulated transfusion for non‐LR and LR units. Immediately after leukoreduction, there was a significant increase in TXB₂ and PGF_2α concentrations, but during storage, these eicosanoids decreased to non‐LR concentrations. In both LR and non‐LR units, 6‐keto‐PGF_1α concentrations increased during storage and simulated transfusion, but there was no difference between unit type. There was no difference in AA, LTB₄, PGE₂, and PGD₂ concentrations between unit types.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Leukoreduction, storage, and simulated transfusion do not alter erythrocyte PS expression. Leukoreduction causes an immediate increase in concentrations of TXB₂ and PGF_2α, but concentrations decrease to non‐LR concentrations with storage. Leukoreduction does not decrease the accumulation of 6‐keto‐PGF_1α during storage.

Point of Care Assessment of Coagulation

Disorders of hemostasis can be difficult to fully elucidate but can severely affect patient outcome. The optimal therapy for coagulopathies is also not always clear. Point of care (POC) testing in veterinary medicine can assist in the diagnosis of hemostatic disorders and also direct treatment. Advantages of POC testing include rapid turnaround times, ease of use, and proximity to the patient. Disadvantages include differences in analytic performance compared with reference laboratory devices, the potential for operator error, and limited test options per device. Conventional coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and activated clotting time can be measured by POC devices and can accurately diagnose hypocoagulability, but they cannot detect hypercoagulability or disorders of fibrinolysis. Viscoelastic POC coagulation testing more accurately evaluates in vivo coagulation, and can detect hypocoagulability, hypercoagulability, and alterations in fibrinolysis. POC platelet function testing methodologies can detect platelet adhesion abnormalities including von Willebrand disease, and can be used to monitor the efficacy of antiplatelet drugs. It is unlikely that a single test would be ideal for assessing the complete coagulation status of all patients; therefore, the ideal combination of tests for a specific patient needs to be determined based on an understanding of the underlying disease, and protocols must be standardized to minimize interoperator and interinstitutional variability.

The Effects of Cyclosporine and Aspirin on Platelet Function in Normal Dogs

Background

Cyclosporine increases thromboxane synthesis in dogs, potentially increasing the thrombogenic properties of platelets.

Hypothesis/Objectives

Our hypothesis was that the concurrent administration of low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine would inhibit cyclosporine‐associated thromboxane synthesis without altering the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. The objective was to determine the effects of cyclosporine and aspirin on primary hemostasis.

Animals

Seven healthy dogs.

Methods

A randomized, crossover study utilized turbidimetric aggregometry and a platelet function analyzer to evaluate platelet function during the administration of low‐dose aspirin (1 mg/kg PO q24h), high‐dose aspirin (10 mg/kg PO q12h), cyclosporine (10 mg/kg PO q12h), and combined low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine. The urine 11‐dehydro‐thromboxane‐B₂ (11‐dTXB₂)‐to‐creatinine ratio also was determined.

Results

On days 3 and 7 of administration, there was no difference in the aggregometry amplitude or the platelet function analyzer closure time between the low‐dose aspirin group and the combined low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine group. On day 7, there was a significant difference in amplitude and closure time between the cyclosporine group and the combined low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine group. High‐dose aspirin consistently inhibited platelet function. On both days, there was a significant difference in the urinary 11‐dTXB₂‐to‐creatinine ratio between the cyclosporine group and the combined low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine group. There was no difference in the urinary 11‐dTXB₂‐to‐creatinine ratio among the low‐dose aspirin, high‐dose aspirin, and combined low‐dose aspirin and cyclosporine groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Low‐dose aspirin inhibits cyclosporine‐induced thromboxane synthesis, and concurrent use of these medications does not alter the antiplatelet effects of aspirin.

Potential adverse effects of omega-3 Fatty acids in dogs and cats

Fish oil omega-3 fatty acids, mainly eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, are used in the management of several diseases in companion animal medicine, many of which are inflammatory in nature. This review describes metabolic differences among omega-3 fatty acids and outlines potential adverse effects that may occur with their supplementation in dogs and cats with a special focus on omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil. Important potential adverse effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation include altered platelet function, gastrointestinal adverse effects, detrimental effects on wound healing, lipid peroxidation, potential for nutrient excess and toxin exposure, weight gain, altered immune function, effects on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity, and nutrient-drug interactions.

Cyclooxygenase expression and platelet function in healthy dogs receiving low-dose aspirin

BACKGROUND

Low-dose aspirin is used to prevent thromboembolic complications in dogs, but some animals are nonresponsive to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin ("aspirin resistance").

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

That low-dose aspirin would inhibit platelet function, decrease thromboxane synthesis, and alter platelet cyclooxygenase (COX) expression.

ANIMALS

Twenty-four healthy dogs.

METHODS

A repeated measures study. Platelet function (PFA-100 closure time, collagen/epinephrine), platelet COX-1 and COX-2 expression, and urine 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) (11-dTXB(2)) were evaluated before and during aspirin administration (1 mg/kg Q24 hours PO, 10 days). Based on prolongation of closure times after aspirin administration, dogs were divided into categories according to aspirin responsiveness: responders, nonresponders, and inconsistent responders.

RESULTS

Low-dose aspirin increased closure times significantly (62% by Day 10, P < .001), with an equal distribution among aspirin responsiveness categories, 8 dogs per group. Platelet COX-1 mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) increased significantly during treatment, 13% on Day 3 (range, -29.7-136.1%) (P = .047) and 72% on Day 10 (range, -0.37-210%) (P < .001). Platelet COX-2 MFI increased significantly by 34% (range, -29.2-270%) on Day 3 (P = .003) and 74% (range, -19.7-226%) on Day 10 (P < .001). Urinary 11-dTXB(2) concentrations significantly (P = .005, P < .001) decreased at both time points. There was no difference between aspirin responsiveness and either platelet COX expression or thromboxane production.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Low-dose aspirin consistently inhibits platelet function in approximately one-third of healthy dogs, despite decreased thromboxane synthesis and increased platelet COX expression in most dogs. COX isoform expression before treatment did not predict aspirin resistance.