Acid:base and serum biochemistry changes in horses competing at a modified 1 Star 3-day-event

Traditional and quantitative analysis of acid-base and electrolyte imbalances in horses competing in cross-country competitions at 2-star to 5-star level

Background

Early recognition and management of acid‐base, fluid, and electrolyte disorders are crucial for the maintenance of health and performance in equine athletes.

Objectives

To analyze changes in acid‐base and electrolyte status associated with exercise during cross‐country competitions at different levels using traditional and quantitative approaches.

Animals

Thirty‐eight eventing horses.

Methods

Prospective observational study. Jugular venous blood samples were collected before and after the cross‐country test of 25 international eventing competitions ranging from 2‐star (formerly 1‐star) to 5‐star (formerly 4‐star) level. Blood gas analysis was performed to determine pH, pCO₂, Na⁺, Cl⁻, and K⁺ and calculate HCO₃⁻, tCO₂ base excess (BE_ECF), anion gap (AG), strong ion difference calculated from Na⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻, and lactate⁻ (SID₄), strong ion difference calculated from Na⁺, K⁺, and Cl⁻ (SID₃), strong ion gap (SIG), and total nonvolatile weak buffer concentration (A_tot). Postexercise acid‐base imbalances, diagnosed on the basis of the traditional approach, and the simplified strong ion model were compared.

Results

Significant decreases in pH, Cl⁻, SID₄, pCO₂, HCO₃⁻, tCO₂, and BE_ECF as well as increases in K⁺, SID₃, AG, TP, and A_tot were observed between pre‐ and postexercise samples. The changes in acid‐base parameters were significantly affected by the competition level. Using the strong ion approach, a higher proportion of horses was diagnosed with postexercise metabolic acidosis.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Regarding the complex acid‐base changes in horses competing at cross‐country competitions, the quantitative approach provided a more detailed analysis of the different factors contributing to acid‐base balance than did the traditional approach.

Comparison of two portable clinical analyzers to one stationary analyzer for the determination of blood gas partial pressures and blood electrolyte concentrations in horses

Portable blood gas analyzers are used to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of disorders related to disturbances of acid-base and electrolyte balance in the ambulatory care of equine patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether 2 portable analyzers produce results in agreement with a stationary analyzer. Blood samples from 23 horses hospitalized for various medical reasons were included in this prospective study. Blood gas analysis and electrolyte concentrations measured by the portable analyzers VetStat and epoc were compared to those produced by the cobas b 123 analyzer via concordance analysis, Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Limits of agreement indicated relevant bias between the VetStat and cobas b 123 for partial pressure of oxygen (pO2; 27.5-33.8 mmHg), sodium ([Na+]; 4.3-21.6 mmol/L) and chloride concentration ([Cl-]; 0.3-7.9 mmol/L) and between the epoc and cobas b 123 for pH (0.070-0.022), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2; 3.6-7.3 mmHg), pO2 (36.2-32.7 mmHg) and [Na+] (0.38.1 mmol/L). The VetStat analyzer yielded results that were in agreement with the cobas b 123 analyzer for determination of pH, pCO2, bicarbonate ([HCO3-]) and potassium concentration [K+], while the epoc analyzer achieved acceptable agreement for [HCO3-] and [K+]. The VetStat analyzer may be useful in performing blood gas analysis in equine samples but analysis of [Na+], [Cl-] and pO2 should be interpreted with caution. The epoc delivered reliable results for [HCO3-] and [K+], while results for pH, pCO2, pO2 and [Na+] should be interpreted with caution.