A public-health approach to site-specific formulary management: addressing deficient drug supplies in Malawi

Medical donations are not always free: an assessment of compliance of medicine and medical device donations with World Health Organization guidelines (2009–2017)

Medicine and medical device donations have the potential to improve access to healthcare in some of the poorest parts of the world, but can do more harm than good. World Health Organization guidelines advise donors on how to make effective and useful donations. Our objective was to assess compliance of recent medicine or medical device donations with WHO guidelines from 2009 onwards. We searched media, academic and gray literature, including industry and organizational documents, to identify reports describing specific incidences of the donation of medicines or devices. We collected data on donation characteristics and guideline compliance. We identified 88 reports describing 53 donations. Most did not comply with at least some items in WHO guidelines and no reports provided sufficient information to assess compliance against all items. Donations that fail to comply with guidelines may be excessive, expired and/or burden recipient countries with storage and disposal costs. It was estimated that 40–70% of donated medical devices are not used as they are not functional, appropriate, or staff lack training. More effective donations involved needs assessments, training and the use of existing distribution networks. The donation of medicines and medical devices is frequently inadequately reported and at times inappropriate. Guidelines need to be enforced to ensure effective donations.

[Point of view of older adults on the potentially inappropriate medications prescribing in primary care facilities in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso]

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the organization of primary care facilities in sub-Saharan Africa that might lead to potentially inappropriate prescribing. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that could lead to potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care facilities in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso), taking into consideration the patient's perspective.

METHODS

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in primary care facilities from November 2013 to February 2014. People aged 60 years or more with at least one chronic disease were included. Individual interviews were conducted. An analysis of the thematic content of the interviews was conducted.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the patient referral system was insufficient. We also found many different prescribers for older people seeking care and poor communication between prescribers and patients. This caused some consequences such as the absence of review of drugs consumed before a new prescription, a lack of exchange on medication changes and repeated treatment change during hospitalization. Most of the persons who prescribed potentially inappropriate medications were nurses.

CONCLUSION

The poor communication between prescribers and patients is a challenge for the prevention of prescribing potentially inappropriate medications. Teamwork is an important feature of the organizational care system, strengthening it could be a way to improve rational prescription.

Methods for implementing a medicine outlet survey: lessons from the anti-malarial market

BACKGROUND

In recent years an increasing number of public investments and policy changes have been made to improve the availability, affordability and quality of medicines available to consumers in developing countries, including anti-malarials. It is important to monitor the extent to which these interventions are successful in achieving their aims using quantitative data on the supply side of the market. There are a number of challenges related to studying supply, including outlet sampling, gaining provider cooperation and collecting accurate data on medicines. This paper provides guidance on key steps to address these issues when conducting a medicine outlet survey in a developing country context. While the basic principles of good survey design and implementation are important for all surveys, there are a set of specific issues that should be considered when conducting a medicine outlet survey.

METHODS

This paper draws on the authors' experience of designing and implementing outlet surveys, including the lessons learnt from ACTwatch outlet surveys on anti-malarial retail supply, and other key studies in the field. Key lessons and points of debate are distilled around the following areas: selecting a sample of outlets; techniques for collecting and analysing data on medicine availability, price and sales volumes; and methods for ensuring high quality data in general.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The authors first consider the inclusion criteria for outlets, contrasting comprehensive versus more focused approaches. Methods for developing a reliable sampling frame of outlets are then presented, including use of existing lists, key informants and an outlet census. Specific issues in the collection of data on medicine prices and sales volumes are discussed; and approaches for generating comparable price and sales volume data across products using the adult equivalent treatment dose (AETD) are explored. The paper concludes with advice on practical considerations, including questionnaire design, field worker training, and data collection. Survey materials developed by ACTwatch for investigating anti-malarial markets in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia provide a helpful resource for future studies in this area.