The role of intracavernosal injection therapy and the reasons of withdrawal from therapy in patients with erectile dysfunction in the era of PDE5 inhibitors

Exploring the Clinical Landscape of Priapism related to Intracavernosal Injection Therapy: Patient Characteristics, Management Patterns, and Erectile Dysfunction Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of priapism following intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy, with specific focus on comparing in-office, prescribed, and recreational ICI patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients presenting with priapism (ICD-10: N48.3) at a single institution from November 2015 through September 2024. Cases were classified as acute ischemic, recurrent ischemic, or nonischemic, and stratified by ICI administration setting: in-office, prescribed, or recreational. Demographics, clinical presentation, management strategies, and erectile function outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 186 priapism cases, 102 (54.8%) were ICI-related. Among these, 75.4% presented as acute ischemic and 24.5% as recurrent ischemic (mean 2.5 ± 0.7 recurrences). In-office and prescribed injections each accounted for 39.2% of cases, while recreational use comprised 21.6%. Median priapism duration varied significantly by setting: 3 hours (IQR: 2-4) for in-office, 7 hours (IQR: 6-12) for prescribed, and 30 hours (IQR: 12-63) for recreational use (p<0.001). Recreational users demonstrated significantly higher rates of HIV and illicit drug use (p<0.001). Post-priapism outcomes revealed that 57% of patients discontinued prescribed ICI therapy, while 65% of previously unaffected recreational users developed de novo erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

ICI-induced priapism represents a significant clinical challenge, with duration of priapism varying markedly between in-office, prescribed, and recreational use. The high rate of ICI discontinuation following priapism suggests a substantial impact on ED management decisions. The association between recreational use and adverse outcomes, including de novo ED, identifies an important area for clinical outreach and risk mitigation strategies.

Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy on young and middle-aged patients with erectile dysfunction responsive to PDE5Is: reducing the use of PDE5Is

Background

Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) is a new method for treating erectile dysfunction (ED), but there are no standards yet for its indications.

Aim

The study aimed to suggest the early clinical efficacy of Li-ESWT and explore its related factors in young and middle-aged patients with ED who responded to phosphodiesterase type 5 Inhibitors (PDE5Is).

Methods

Data from 61 patients with ED who had previously responded to oral PDE5Is and subsequently underwent Li-ESWT were collected. This included information on age, body mass index, total testicular volume, sex hormones, as well as IIEF-EF scores before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The treatment regimen involves a weekly session for four consecutive weeks, with each session administering 5000 shock wave pulses. Linear regression analysis was utilized to identify factors associated with the efficacy of Li-ESWT treatment. Additionally, the improvement in different severity groups of ED before and after treatment, along with their IIEF-EF scores, was compared.

Outcomes

Li-ESWT was more targeted and effective for young and middle-aged patients with erectile dysfunction who responded to PDE5Is.

Results

The age of enrolled patients ranges from 22 to 53 years old, and the IIEF-EF scores at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment were compared to baseline for efficacy assessment, showing significant improvements (P < .0001) in all instances. Linear regression analysis using baseline data revealed predictive factors associated with treatment efficacy: treatment efficacy was negatively correlated with baseline IIEF-EF scores (t = -2.599, P = .013) and positively correlated with baseline LH levels (t = 2.170, P = .036).

Clinical Implications

Given the considerable cost of Li-ESWT treatment and the emphasis on treatment continuity, we hope to identify the most suitable candidates for Li-ESWT therapy, thereby optimizing its application.

Strengths and Limitations

Our findings provide a better solution for nonelderly ED patients who are responsive to PDE5Is. This study was limited by our sample size and follow-up time.

Conclusion

After 3 months of Li-ESWT, the IIEF-EF score gradually stabilizes and short-term maintenance of PDE5Is medication increases the responsiveness to shock wave therapy.

The management of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus unresponsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction is associated with diabetes mellitus with an estimated prevalence of 52.5% in the diabetic population. The first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction is phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, but data suggest that diabetic men may be less responsive than non-diabetic men. Thus, other treatments, including intracavernosal injections, intraurethral prostaglandin, vacuum erection devices and penile prosthetic surgery, should be considered in management of diabetic men with erectile dysfunction refractory to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Furthermore, combination therapy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and other oral treatments such as arginine or l-carnitine may have synergistic effects resulting in better outcomes. In addition, there are novel therapies such as low-intensity shockwave therapy and stem-cell therapy, which may also be effective in targeted treatment modalities. Furthermore, studies suggest that erectile dysfunction can be improved by targeting concurrent comorbidities or metabolic diseases such as depression, hypertension, hypogonadism, and dyslipidaemia. We present an evidence-based narrative review focusing on the management of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men who have not responded to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Both clinicians and patients should be aware of the different management options in diabetic patients who have not responded to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

Frequency and anatomic distribution of arterial obstructions in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction not responding to intracavernous prostaglandin

Background: The extent of arterial disease in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) non-responsive to intracavernosal injection of Alprostadil is of importance for therapeutic options. However, published evidence, in particular angiographically validated is scarce. Here we investigated arterial lesion patterns in this specific patient cohort by selective angiography. Patients and methods: A cohort of 239 patients received a clinical and duplex-sonographic workup for ED of suspected vascular origin. Duplex ultrasound of the cavernosal arteries was performed after intracavernosal injection of 10 μg Alprostadil. Consequently, standardized workup included grading of the erectile and determination of peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in both cavernosal arteries. PSV-values below 30 cm/sec indicated reduced arterial flow, whereas EDV-values above 15 cm/sec indicated a venous leak of the pudendal veins. All patients with suspected arterial ED based on duplex sonography underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Endovascular therapy was carried out in ED patients not responsive or with significant side effects to PDE-5-inhibitors or Alprostadil by selective angiographic depiction of erection-related arteries. Results: 54 patients with a mean age of 61.2 (±9.8) years underwent angioplasty of erectionr elated arteries. Out of these 48/54 (89%) patients presented with an erection considered insufficient for penetration (E0-E3) subsequent to intracavernous application of 10 μg Alprostadil. 14/48 (29%) patients had bilateral arterial obstructions and 34/48 (71%) had unilateral disease. Commonly affected was the internal pudendal artery (n = 31, 65%), followed closely by the common penile artery (n = 30, 64%). The least affected arteries were the dorsal penile (n = 6, 13%), hypogastric (n = 4, 8%), common iliac (n = 4, 8%), cavernosal (n = 4, 8%), and inferior gluteal (n = 1, 2%) arteries. Conclusions: Arterial obstructions amenable to endovascular revascularization are frequent in patients non-responsive to intracavernosal prostaglandin administration. Therapeutic strategies in ED patients non-responsive to conservative measures should therefore consider endovascular treatment opportunities.

Men's beliefs about treatment for erectile dysfunction-what influences treatment use? A systematic review

Successful treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with improvements in quality of life; however, treatment utilisation is sub-optimal. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the rates of ED treatment utilisation and the barriers and enablers men experience when using treatment. We searched: MEDLINE^®, Embase, the Cochrane library; AMED; HMIC; HTA; CINAHL; PsychARTICLES; PsychINFO up to August 2018. Data on rates of treatment utilisation and barriers and enablers of utilisation were extracted and summarised. Fifty studies were included. Discontinuation rates ranged from 4.4 to 76% for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, 18.6 to 79.9% for intracavernosal injections, and 32 to 69.2% for urethral suppositories. In relation to those with a penile prosthesis, 30% discontinued having sex due to, e.g. device complications, lack of partner or a loss of sexual interest. Most research included in the current review examined barriers to treatment utilisation and therefore focussed on reasons for discontinuing treatment. However, a small number explored factors that men found helpful with regards to treatment utilisation. The most prevalent barriers to utilisation were treatment ineffectiveness, side effects, the quality of men's intimate relationships and treatment costs. With regards to treatment enablers, the most salient finding was that men who reported side effects to a healthcare professionals (HCPs) were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment. There were limitations in methodology in that the studies did not use validated measures of treatment utilisation or barriers and enablers and no study used psychological theory to inform the examination of factors that influenced treatment utilisation. This review identifies a number of influential factors relating to ED treatment utilisation and highlights the importance of men's beliefs with regards to ED and its treatment. Beliefs are potentially modifiable and therefore the findings of this review highlight important considerations for HCPs with regards to supporting men to make better use of treatment.

Erectile dysfunction management after failed phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitor trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternate erectile dysfunction (ED) management options after failed first line phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5-I).

METHODS

An empiric, repetitive decision tree analysis model was constructed using literature review and expert clinical judgement. This assessed the expected costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of decision alternatives over a 10-year period. The model incorporated interventions including alternate PDE5-Is, intracorporal injections (ICI) with alprostadil or trimix (alprostadil, phentolamine, and papaverine), and inflatable penile prosthesis placement (IPP) and included respective risks of failure, subsequent interventions, and other complications (including priapism risk). Average model QALY estimates obtained from the literature were as follows: ED =0.56, successful alternate PDE5-I =0.70, successful ICI =0.70, and successful IPP =0.78. Cost data were calculated from a high-volume academic center and published manufacturer data.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year period, IPP placement was the most cost-effective management option per preserved QALY (QALY =7.82, cost =$22,009/10 years) as compared to ICI alprostadil (QALY =8.51, cost =$62,890/10 years), ICI trimix (QALY =8.47, cost =$48,617/10 years) and alternate PDE5-I (QALY =7.73, $52,883/10 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Using expert opinion and published utility, cost, and complication data in a decision analysis, we demonstrated that IPP placement is the most cost-effective ED intervention following failed initial PDE5-I over a 10-year period as compared to alternate treatment options. Such cost-effectiveness outcomes may be used in ED management counseling.

Non-invasive Management Options for Erectile Dysfunction When a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Fails

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the drug of choice for medical management of erectile dysfunction (ED). On-demand PDE5Is have an overall efficacy of 60-70% for ED; 30-35% of patients fail to respond to a PDE5I, and 30-50% of non-responders can be salvaged with detailed counseling on proper use and physician follow-up to ensure that the patient has been prescribed an appropriate and full PDE5I clinical trial. True non-responders may be offered intracavernosal injections of erectogenic drugs, intraurethral alprostadil, or surgical insertion of a penile prosthesis. Such options are not discreet and are associated with more adverse effects than PDE5Is. Thus patients may request additional non-invasive medical management options. This review describes published literature on patients who failed to respond to an on-demand PDE5I regimen and were treated with a non-invasive PDEI-based regimen, including switching from one PDE5I to another; increasing the dose of PDE5I above the labeled dosage range; using two PDE5Is concurrently; using a daily PDE5I regimen; or combining a PDE5I with a testosterone supplement, α-adrenergic antagonist, intraurethral or intracavernosal alprostadil, vacuum erection device, or low-intensity shock wave therapy. The limitations of published clinical trials do not allow for sufficient evidence to recommend one option over another. Therefore, in PDE5I-refractory patients, the choice of a specific next step should be individualized based on the preference of the patient and his sexual partner, the advantages and disadvantages of the various options, the concurrent medical illnesses and medications of the patient, and the patient's response to treatment.

Scrotal hemorrhage after testicular sperm aspiration may be associated with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor administration: a retrospective study

Background

Scrotal hemorrhage after testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is uncommon in clinical operation. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are commonly given to men who have difficulty providing a sperm sample for assisted reproductive technique such as in vitro fertilization. In this study, we examine the incidence of scrotal hemorrhage after TESA in men who received a PDE5i.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 504 men with TESA operation in Center for Reproductive Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University were collected. Men in the drug group had taken orally PDE5i before TESA. Men in the control group only operated TESA. The testis volume, coagulation function were measured. Sonographic examination with Doppler imaging was performed when scrotal hemorrhage appeared.

Results

A total of 504 men with a mean age of 28.63 ± 4.22 years were included in the analysis. Of these, 428 did not receive a PDE5i prior to TESA and 76 received a PDE5i prior to TESA. Measures of coagulation function were not different between the groups. The incidence of hemorrhage was 0.0% in the control group and the drug group was 5.3%. The incidence of hemorrhage between two groups was different significantly (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

In summary, the results of this study suggest that a PDE5i administration increases the risk of scrotal hemorrhage in men undergoing TESA, although the study design does not allow drawing a conclusion of cause and effect. Given the potential risk of scrotal hemorrhage after the ingestion of PDE5i, it may be wise not to administer it to men in whom a TESA may be performed.

PDGF-mediated PI3K/AKT/β-catenin signaling regulates gap junctions in corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most common sexual disorder that men report to healthcare providers. Gap junctions (GJs) are thought to be responsible for synchronous shrinkage of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells (CCSMCs), and play thus an important role in the maintenance of an erection. Hypoxia has been suggested as a pathological mechanism underlying ED. Here we demonstrate that hypoxia increased the expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and the main GJ component connexin (Cx)43 in CCSMCs. Inhibiting PDGF receptor (PDGFR) activity decreased Cx43 expression. Treatment with different concentrations of PDGF increased the levels of phosphorylated protein kinase B (AKT), β-catenin, and Cx43, whereas inhibition of PDGFR or activation of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling altered β-catenin and Cx43 expression. Meanwhile, silencing β-catenin resulted in the downregulation of Cx43. These results demonstrate that PDGF secretion by CCSMCs and vascular endothelial cells is enhanced under hypoxic conditions, leading to increased Cx43 expression through PI3K/AKT/β-catenin signaling and ultimately affecting GJ function in ED. Thus, targeting this pathway is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ED.

Drugs in preclinical to phase II clinical development for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Erectile function is an important aspect in the quality of life of many men. For men with erectile dysfunction (ED), a spectrum of treatment options exists. Novel therapies for ED are currently being developed in order to delay surgical placement of a penile prosthesis - the final step in the management of treatment-refractory ED. Areas covered: This review examines innovative treatments such as alternative vasoactive agents, trophic factors and bio-compounds as well as gene and stem cell therapy. All therapies are currently in some phase of development for the management of ED. Using the MedLine and FDA Clinical Trials Registry, recent developments in treatment of ED were queried. Expert opinion: Recent studies have demonstrated the potential for multiple, novel therapies in the treatment of ED. Much of the work requires further experimentation in large-scale, blinded, placebo-controlled studies. This will require a concerted effort to bring these products to market.

Satisfaction and treatment adherence in erectile dysfunction in the medium and long term

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to show the satisfaction and treatment adherence in erectile dysfunction (ED) in the medium and long term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A descriptive, comparative study was conducted in 2 centres through telephone interviews with patients who came for an initial visit between 2012 and 2014 for ED. A complete case history review was conducted on the use of and withdrawal from treatment. For current use, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) were filled out; for past use, only the GAQ was filled out. For the statistical analysis, we employed Fisher's exact test for comparisons of percentages and the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare means.

RESULTS

The study included 250 patients; 20.8% were prescribed intraurethral alprostadil (ALP-IU), 17.2% were prescribed intracavernous alprostadil (ALP-IC), 92.8% were prescribed a first IPD5, and 24.8% were prescribed at least a second IPD5. The treatment withdrawal rate was 62.07% for the first IPD5, 41.94% for the last IPD5, 69.23% for the ALP-IU and 65.11% for the ALP-IC (P=.007). The main reason for withdrawal for the IPD5 was a lack of response (32.76% of those who took IPD5). In addition to withdrawal, there were adverse reactions for ALP-IU and ALP-IC (28.85% and 11.63%, respectively). The mean duration of use until withdrawal was 4.3 months for IPD5, 2.2 months for ALP-IU and 5.5 months for ALP-IC (P=.064). The most favourable GAQ and EDITS scores were observed for IPD5 (EDITS score of 74). Sildenafil and tadalafil had the longest usage times (mean >5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The withdrawal rate for treating ED is high, with short usage times of a few months. A lack of response and adverse reactions were the main causes for withdrawal. The drugs that provide greater satisfaction are the IPD5, although there are no significant differences in the mean usage time between the different types and in aspects such as the mean usage time to withdrawal or the withdrawal rates.

An Empirical vs Risk-Based Approach Algorithm to Intracavernosal Injection Therapy: A Prospective Study

Introduction

Intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy is widely used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Its use in practice is largely empirical and has not been validated with evidence-based approaches.

Aim

To compare two strategies for ICI, specifically a risk-based approach and an empiric-based approach, and assess the efficacy, patient satisfaction, and complication rates of the two treatment approaches.

Methods

After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, a prospective database of patients enrolled in the ICI program at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD, USA) from May 2012 through May 2014 was amassed. Demographic information, treatment outcomes, and subjective patient evaluations of sexual function (International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain [IIEF-EF], Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ], Sexual Quality of Life [SQoL], and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction [EDITS]) were obtained at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Two approaches were compared. Group 1 received empiric ICI treatment initially with prostaglandin E₁ (PGE1) 10 μg irrespective of ED etiology or severity. After initial dosing with PGE1 in the clinic, adjustments were made to titrate or change formulations pending on patient results. Group 2 received a risk-based approach, in which an algorithm that factored in ED etiology and number of ED risk factors was used for a bimix (papaverine 30 mg/mL, phentolamine 1 mg/mL), a low-dose trimix (papaverine 30 mg/mL, phentolamine 1 mg/mL, PGE1 10 μg/mL), or a high-dose trimix (papaverine 30 mg/mL, phentolamine 2 mg/mL, PGE1 40 μg/mL). Dose titration was permitted in the two groups. Statistical analysis was carried out using t-test and χ² analysis.

Main Outcome Measures

The study design was powered for a non-inferiority comparison of the two approaches, in which the primary end point was a 15-point difference on the EDITS score or a 20% difference in the IIEF-EF score.

Results

One hundred seventy-five patients were enrolled (57 in group 1, 118 in group 2) with 3- and 6-month follow-up at 57% and 35%, respectively, and similar between groups. Baseline patient characteristics and sexual function questionnaire responses were similar between groups 1 and 2, although group 1 reported higher-quality erections at baseline (QEQ score = 14.3 vs 7.3, P = .05) and had a smaller proportion of patients with prostatectomy (54.4% vs 74.6%, P = .02). In the two groups, QEQ score (mean = 10.78 vs 56.76, P < .05), SQoL score (mean = 38.41 vs 50.25, P < .05), and IIEF-EF score (mean = 7.51 vs 18.48, P < .05) improved with treatment. However, at 3 and 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences in responses for IIEF, QEQ, SQoL, or EDITS scores and no difference in failure or medication switch rates between groups. There were no significant differences in complication rates, although at 3 months group 2 reported a higher incidence of priapism and pain (23% vs 7.4%, P = .08).

Conclusion

Empiric and risk-based strategies for ICI therapy resulted in significant improvements across multiple domains of sexual function. Complication rates, satisfaction, and efficacy overall were similar between the two approaches. Clinicians can be reassured that no one approach to ICI therapy for ED management appears inferior to another.

Penile Low Intensity Shock Wave Treatment is Able to Shift PDE5i Nonresponders to Responders: A Double-Blind, Sham Controlled Study

PURPOSE

We performed sham controlled evaluation of penile low intensity shock wave treatment effect in patients unable to achieve sexual intercourse using PDE5i (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study was done in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction who stopped using PDE5i due to no efficacy. All patients had an erection hardness score of 2 or less with PDE5i. A total of 58 patients were randomized, including 37 treated with low intensity shock waves (12 sessions of 1,500 pulses of 0.09 mJ/mm(2) at 120 shock waves per minute) and 18 treated with a sham probe. In the sham group 16 patients underwent low intensity shock wave treatment 1 month after sham treatment. All patients were evaluated at baseline and 1 month after the end of treatment using validated erectile dysfunction questionnaires and the flow mediated dilatation technique for penile endothelial function. Erectile function was evaluated while patients were receiving PDE5i.

RESULTS

In the low intensity shock wave treatment group and the sham group 54.1% and 0% of patients, respectively, achieved erection hard enough for vaginal penetration, that is an EHS (Erection Hardness Score) of 3 (p <0.0001). According to changes in the IIEF-EF (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function) score treatment was effective in 40.5% of men who received low intensity shock wave treatment but in none in the sham group (p = 0.001). Of patients treated with shock waves after sham treatment 56.3% achieved erection hard enough for penetration (p <0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Low intensity shock wave treatment is effective even in patients with severe erectile dysfunction who are PDE5i nonresponders. After treatment about half of them were able to achieve erection hard enough for penetration with PDE5i. Longer followup is needed to establish the place of low intensity shock wave treatment in these challenging cases.

Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment

Many therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED) after prostate cancer treatment improve erectile firmness, yet, most couples stop using aids within 1-2 years. Patients and partners who expect immediate and complete success with their first ED treatment can be demoralized when they experience treatment failure, which contributes to reticence to explore other ED aids. Comprehensive patient education should improve sustainability and satisfaction with ED treatments. Pre-emptive and realistic information should be provided to couples about the probability of recovering natural erections. Beginning intervention early and using a couple-based approach is ideal. Recommendations are provided about the timing of ED treatment, the order of aid introduction, and combination therapies. Renegotiation of sexual activity is an essential part of sexual adaptation. From the outset of therapy, couples should be encouraged to broaden their sexual repertoire, incorporate erection-independent sexual activities, and continue to be sexual despite ED and reduced libido.

A comparison of the available phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a focus on avanafil

BACKGROUND

Numerous pathways can lead to erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients, with some patients having multiple causes. Regardless of the etiology, ED has been successfully treated in many patients with the advent of oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is). With the release of avanafil, there are currently four PDE5I options available, and choosing between them should be based on patient-specific considerations and preferences.

OBJECTIVE

To review the treatment of ED with PDE5Is, taking into account the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of these agents, as well as avanafil's place in therapy.

METHODS

A PubMed search was completed to find articles published in English studying patient satisfaction and adherence to ED medication. Additional searches looked specifically for any data regarding the use of avanafil.

RESULTS

ED is effectively treated in most patients with PDE5Is, with the most common side effects from the medications being headache, flushing, and visual disturbances. Patients have identified many different factors, such as efficacy, side effects, duration of action, and daily use, in determining overall satisfaction and the right medication for them. While avanafil does not have any patient satisfaction trials to date, it has been proven to be a safe and effective treatment for ED with possibly the fastest onset of action and fewer visual disturbances than its competitors.

CONCLUSION

Avanafil along with the other PDE5Is has shown to be a safe and effective oral treatment for ED, with avanafil's possible place in therapy for patients who want an on-demand option or as an alternative in patients who experience visual disturbances with the other agents.