Life Interrupted: Experiences of adolescents, young adults and their family living with malignant melanoma

The mediating roles of family care and self-efficacy between stigma and social alienation among colorectal cancer survivors

To investigate the mediating role of family care and self-efficacy between stigma and social alienation among colorectal cancer survivors. In a cross-sectional study, 357 colorectal cancer survivors were recruited in northern China. The General Alienation Scale, Social Impact Scale, Family Care Index Questionnaire, and General Self-efficacy Scale were used to conduct the survey, and the mediation model was constructed and tested. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software. Colorectal cancer survivors' social alienation was positively correlated with stigma (r = .481), and negatively correlated with family care (r = -.514)、and self-efficacy (r = -.506). Family care and self-efficacy both partially mediated the relationship between stigma and social alienation, with mediator effect values of 0.10 and 0.12, and the two consecutive paths were chained together, with a mediator effect of 0.02. Colorectal cancer survivors' stigma and social alienation are at a moderate level, and the stigma can directly and indirectly contribute to social alienation through family care and self-efficacy. Healthcare professionals can take targeted interventions to improve patients' family care and self-efficacy and reduce their social alienation, to promote the social integration of colorectal cancer survivors and improve the quality of life.

Psychosocial and Support Needs of the Main Caregiver for Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Treatment for Cancer

BACKGROUND

Family relationships and social networks are critically important to adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, impacting their experience and well-being throughout the cancer trajectory. A cancer diagnosis impacts the development of independence and an adult identity, which can present challenges to psychosocial well-being needs and relationships between caregivers and AYAs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the psychosocial and support needs of the main caregivers of AYAs.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the BRIGHTLIGHT caregiver survey, exploring items pertaining to support offered/engaged with, appraisal of helpfulness, and caregivers' emotional and psychological distress experience. Descriptive statistics, a correlational analysis, and a 1-way analysis of variance were conducted.

RESULTS

There were 518 caregiver responses (62%). Over half received information about their caregiving needs, with the majority finding this very/fairly helpful. Most (80%) of those who had not received the information would have valued it. High levels of negative emotional and psychological well-being were reported, with 91% feeling depressed or anxious since the AYAs' diagnosis and 41% always/often experiencing these feelings. Total distress was associated with being younger, a parent, female, and unemployed, and earning a below-average income.

CONCLUSIONS

The needs of caregivers are broad and multidimensional; however, some characteristics were associated with higher distress. When caregiver-specific information was provided by healthcare professionals, it was well received.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals should consider caregivers' needs individually and provide/signpost to support. Caregivers need to be involved in designing and implementing future research, given the heterogeneity of needs identified.

Young people's opinions of cancer care in England: the BRIGHTLIGHT cohort

OBJECTIVES

The BRIGHTLIGHT cohort study was the national evaluation of cancer services for teenager and young adults (TYA). This was analysis of free-text survey data to better understand their experiences of cancer care.

DESIGN

Cohort study SETTING: National Health Service hospitals delivering cancer care in England PARTICIPANTS: 830 young people newly diagnosed with cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Exposure to specialist care in the first 6 months after diagnosis defined as care in a TYA Principal Treatment Centre (PTC). This was categorised as follows: all care in a TYA-PTC (ALL-TYA-PTC), no care in a TYA-PTC (NO-TYA-PTC) so care delivered in a children/adult unit only and some care in a TYA-PTC with additional care in a children's/adult unit (SOME-TYA-PTC).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Data were collected through the BRIGHTLIGHT survey included free-text questions which asked patients 'what was the best aspects of their experiences of care' and 'what aspects could be improved'. These comments were analysed using content analysis. Themes were compared between categories of care, then ranked in order of frequency, ranging from the most endorsed to the least.

RESULTS

Overall, young people were most positive about their healthcare team, while the area highlighted for improvement was diagnostic experience. Differences between the three groups suggested those who had some or all treatment in a TYA-PTC valued the place of care. Regardless of where TYA were treated their healthcare teams were favourably viewed. Age appropriate place of care was highlighted to be of value for those in PTCs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show the value young people placed on the care they received in TYA specific wards. Young people who accessed some or all of their care in a TYA-PTC highly endorsed their place of care as one of the best elements of their care, and it is further emphasised by those who had shared care who experienced difficulty with lack of age-appropriate care when treated outside the TYA-PTC.