Triage assessment of transitory loss of consciousness in the emergency department-A retrospective observational study

Daily triage audit can improve nurses' triage stratification: A pre-post study

AIMS

The objective was to evaluate whether the error rate in the application of the triage system decreased after the introduction of daily auditing, and it was also evaluated if the agreement rate between physician and nurse on triage priority levels increased after the introduction of daily auditing and if the error-related variables in the pre-intervention period changed in the post-intervention period.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study was performed with a pre-post design, between June 2019 and June 2021 in one emergency department.

METHODS

The accuracy and error rate of triage in the pre- and post-intervention period were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the relationships between the variables related to the error. The comparison between the priority level assigned by the physician and the triage nurse was analysed using Cohen's K.

RESULTS

Nine hundred four patients were enrolled in the pre-intervention period and 869 in the post-intervention period. The error rate in the pre-intervention period was 23.3% and in the post-intervention period was 9.7%. The concordance between the degree of priority expressed by the physician and the nurse varied from a quadratically weighted Cohen's K of 0.447 in the pre-intervention period to 0.881 in the post-intervention period.

CONCLUSION

Daily auditing is a clinical procedure that improves the nurse's application of the triage system. Daily auditing has reduced errors by the nurse, improving performance and concordance with the physician.

IMPACT

Triage systems are a key point for the stratification of the priority level of patients and it is therefore evident that they maintain high-quality standards. Through the practice of daily auditing, not only a reduction in the error rate, which ensures patient safety, but also an improvement in triage performance has been demonstrated.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The study did not involve any patients during its conduction.

Investigation of the usability of the REMS, RAPS, and MPM II0 scoring systems in the prediction of short-term and long-term mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department triage

BACKGROUND

Appropriate triage is an important component of patient management in emergency departments. The risk scoring system used for triage purposes in emergency departments should be obtained quickly and based on parameters directly related to prognosis.

AIMS

To investigate the success of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Rapid Acute Physiology Score (RAPS) as triage scoring systems and the Mortality Probability Model (MPM II₀) as an intensive care scoring system in identifying critical patients visited to the emergency department (ED) triage and predicting mortality, and to evaluate their superiority over each other, if any.

METHODS

This research was planned as a single-center and prospectively. The data of the study were obtained by screening the medical records of all patients who presented to the ED triage between January 1, 2020 and January 31, 2020. Patients under the age of 18 years, those with missing information in their files and pregnant women were not included in the study. Only the patients for whom the REMS, RAPS, and MPM II₀ scores could be calculated were included in the sample.

RESULTS

After excluding the patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, the study was completed with 12,210 patients. The mean age of these patients was 44.7 ± 18.7 years, and 47.3% were male. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values for the prediction of 24-h, 30-day, 90-day, and 180-day mortality were determined as 0.979, 0.921, 0.904, and 0.897, respectively, for REMS; 0.929, 0.778, 0.75, and 0.725, respectively, for RAPS; and 0.925, 0.888, 0.866, and 0.861, respectively, for MPM II₀.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it was concluded that the REMS score was superior to the MPM II₀ and RAPS scores in predicting the short-term and long-term mortality status of patients and determining the discharge and hospitalization status of the patients.