Instruments for measuring empowering patient education competence of nurses: Systematic review

Interventions to improve patient health education competence among nursing personnel: A scoping review

AIM

To determine what intervention strategies have been used in interventions aimed at improving the patient health education competence of nursing personnel.

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of research on educational interventions for improving nursing personnel's patient health education competence, but there are significant differences in the teaching objectives, content and methods of these studies, as well as a lack of standardized educational strategies.

DESIGN

The scoping review was based on the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.

METHODS

In this study, six databases and the gray literature source, the Google search engine, were searched. A search strategy was developed based on the three-step search method recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Two researchers independently performed study selection and data extraction.

RESULTS

22 articles reported on the specifics of educational interventions. The duration of these interventions ranged from a minimum of 1.5 hours to a maximum of 3 months. Most interventions employed face-to-face courses as the teaching model. The studies included a variety of teaching methods, with the most frequently mentioned being lectures, discussions, demonstrations, simulations and role-playing. However, most studies lacked specific teaching objectives and none described the educational content of the implementation process. Additionally, none of the studies developed educational content based on a competence framework for patient health education. Few studies reported on long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

The diverse intervention strategies demonstrated in these studies could serve as valuable evidence to guide the development of relevant educational programs and facilitate the design of future high-quality educational interventions.

Empowering Nurse Health Education: Linguistic and Cultural Validation of the Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument (NHECI) in the Italian Context

BACKGROUND

Nurses worldwide are acknowledged for their role in health education across various settings. However, doubts often arise regarding their competence in this domain. This study aims to validate the Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument (NHECI) linguistically and culturally in the Italian context.

METHODS

Following Beaton et al.'s (2000) guidelines, we conducted cross-cultural adaptation to develop the Italian version of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Italian version demonstrates a good internal consistency and stability, making it suitable for assessing nursing students during clinical internships and practicing nurses. The availability of Italian tools promotes healthcare research, ensuring patient-centric care.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity and reliability of the Italian version of the instrument for assessing health education competencies, essential for self-assessment among health education nurses, are established.

Gamification as an Educational Approach for Oncological Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Education plays a pivotal role in the care of oncological patients, reducing health costs, hospital readmission, and disease relapses. Education can be supportive in achieving multiple outcomes, improving symptom control and quality of life. A new approach is emerging in patient education: gamification. Gamification was defined as the "use of game elements in non-game contexts", including the application of games in serious contexts. The aim of this review is to explore the use of gamification in the oncology setting.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was conducted in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using the JBI guidelines.

RESULTS

The 13 included reports were critically appraised by two reviewers independently. It seems that gamification could be effective both in prevention and cancer treatments. Gamification also seems to improve chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting management, quality of life, and reduced anxiety levels in different cancer groups. Moreover, gamification seems effective in improving self-care in cancer patients, regardless of gender, age, and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamification improves patient engagement and biopsychosocial outcomes and could represent a valid approach to cancer patient education; however, it is not a substitute for healthcare professionals, who remain the leaders in the education process.

Instruments for measuring patient health education competence among nursing personnel: protocol for a COSMIN-based systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Health education, as a crucial strategic measure of disease prevention and control in the 21st century, has become an important part of healthcare. As the main deliverers of patient health education, nursing personnel's patient health education competence (PHEC) has received much attention. Instruments for assessing the PHEC of nursing personnel have been developed internationally, but there is a lack of systematic reviews and evaluations of the psychometric properties of these instruments. To effectively select appropriate PHEC assessment instruments in specific contexts, a systematic and comprehensive review and evaluation of these measurement instruments are needed. The goal of this systematic review is to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of existing PHEC instruments.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this study, eight databases will be searched between 1 March 2023 and 31 2023 to retrieve studies that include instrument(s) measuring the PHEC of nursing personnel. Two researchers will independently perform literature screening, data extraction and literature evaluation. In case of disagreement, a third researcher will be involved in the resolution. The measurement properties of PHEC assessment instruments will be systematically reviewed based on the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COMSIN) methodology and guideline.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not applicable for this study. We will share the findings from the study at national and/or international conferences and in a peer-reviewed journal in the fields of health education and/or patient education.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023393293.

Instruments for measuring patient health education competence among nursing personnel: A COSMIN-based systematic review

AIM

The goal of this systematic review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of existing patient health education competence instruments.

BACKGROUND

The patient health education competence of nursing personnel is a crucial factor that determines the quality of patient education, patients' quality of life, and patients' health-related outcomes. Although different instruments have been developed to assess patient health education competence, there is no comprehensive and rigorous systematic review to provide an overview and critical appraisal on these instruments. Therefore, a comprehensive systematic review of the measurement properties of such instruments is necessary.

DESIGN

A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.

METHODS

In this study, six English databases and two Chinese databases were systematically searched for relevant publications, to retrieve studies that include instrument(s) measuring the patient health education competence of nursing personnel. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and literature evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies reporting 11 eligible instruments were included. No studies have reported cross-cultural validity, measurement error, or responsiveness of the instruments.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, five instruments were recommended as Grade A, and the remaining six instruments were recommended as Grade B. The Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument is considered the most appropriate tool for assessing patient health education competence among the available instruments. Future related instrument development should be based on more rigorous testing and reporting, to ensure the validity and reliability of the instruments.