Genomic prediction in a numerically small breed population using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data

Marker Density and Models to Improve the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Growth and Slaughter Traits in Meat Rabbits

The selection and breeding of good meat rabbit breeds are fundamental to their industrial development, and genomic selection (GS) can employ genomic information to make up for the shortcomings of traditional phenotype-based breeding methods. For the practical implementation of GS in meat rabbit breeding, it is necessary to assess different marker densities and GS models. Here, we obtained low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) data from 1515 meat rabbits (including parent herd and half-sibling offspring). The specific objectives were (1) to derive a baseline for heritability estimates and genomic predictions based on randomly selected marker densities and (2) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for single- and multiple-trait linear mixed models. We found that a marker density of 50 K can be used as a baseline for heritability estimation and genomic prediction. For GS, the multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model results in more accurate predictions for virtually all traits compared to the single-trait model, with improvements greater than 15% for all of them, which may be attributed to the use of information on genetically related traits. In addition, we discovered a positive correlation between the performance of the multi-trait GBLUP and the genetic correlation between the traits. We anticipate that this approach will provide solutions for GS, as well as optimize breeding programs, in meat rabbits.

Alternative SNP weighting for multi-step and single-step genomic BLUP in the presence of causative variants

The accuracy of genetic selection in dairy can be increased by the adoption of new technologies, such as the inclusion of sequence data. In simulation studies, assigning different weights to causative single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers led to better predictions depending on the genomic prediction method used. However, it is still not clear how the weights should be calculated. Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a multi-step method (GBLUP) and single-step GBLUP with simulated data using regular SNP, causatives variants (QTN) and the combination of both. Additionally, we compared the accuracies of all previous scenarios using alternatives for SNP weighting. The data were simulated assuming a single trait with a heritability of 0.3. The effective population size (Ne) was approximately 200. The pedigree contained 440,000 animals, and approximately 16,800 individuals were genotyped. A total of 49,974 SNP markers were evenly placed throughout the genome, and 100, 1000 and 2000 causative QTN were simulated. Both GBLUP and ssGBLUP were used in this study. We evaluated quadratic and nonlinear SNP weights in addition to the unweighted G. The inclusion of QTN to panels led to significant accuracy gains. Nonlinear A was demonstrated to be superior to quadratic weighting and unweighted approaches; however, results from Nonlinear A were dependent on the equation parameters. The unweighted approach was more suitable for less polygenic scenarios. Finally, SNP weighting might help elucidate trait architecture features based on changes in the accuracy of genomic prediction.

Including genotypic information in genetic evaluations increases the accuracy of sheep breeding values

The impact of inclusion of genome-wide genotypes into breeding value predictions for UK Texel sheep is addressed in this article. The main aim was to investigate the level of change in the accuracy values for EBVs when information from animal genotypes is incorporated into the genetic evaluations. New genetic parameters for a range of lamb growth, carcass composition and health traits are described and applied in the estimation of conventional breeding values (EBVs) for almost 822,000 animals as well as genomic breeding values (gEBVs) after adding 10,143 genotypes. Principal component analyses showed that there are no major distinct groups; hence, the population is mainly homogenous and genetically well-linked. Results suggested that the highest change in accuracy was observed for the animals that are not phenotyped but have good links to the reference population. This was seen especially for the lowly heritable health traits thereby proving that the use of genotypes in breeding values estimation may accelerate the genetic gain by producing more accurate values especially for young, un-phenotyped animals.

Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines

Background

Early simulations indicated that whole-genome sequence data (WGS) could improve the accuracy of genomic predictions within and across breeds. However, empirical results have been ambiguous so far. Large datasets that capture most of the genomic diversity in a population must be assembled so that allele substitution effects are estimated with high accuracy. The objectives of this study were to use a large pig dataset from seven intensely selected lines to assess the benefits of using WGS for genomic prediction compared to using commercial marker arrays and to identify scenarios in which WGS provides the largest advantage.

Methods

We sequenced 6931 individuals from seven commercial pig lines with different numerical sizes. Genotypes of 32.8 million variants were imputed for 396,100 individuals (17,224 to 104,661 per line). We used BayesR to perform genomic prediction for eight complex traits. Genomic predictions were performed using either data from a standard marker array or variants preselected from WGS based on association tests.

Results

The accuracies of genomic predictions based on preselected WGS variants were not robust across traits and lines and the improvements in prediction accuracy that we achieved so far with WGS compared to standard marker arrays were generally small. The most favourable results for WGS were obtained when the largest training sets were available and standard marker arrays were augmented with preselected variants with statistically significant associations to the trait. With this method and training sets of around 80k individuals, the accuracy of within-line genomic predictions was on average improved by 0.025. With multi-line training sets, improvements of 0.04 compared to marker arrays could be expected.

Conclusions

Our results showed that WGS has limited potential to improve the accuracy of genomic predictions compared to marker arrays in intensely selected pig lines. Thus, although we expect that larger improvements in accuracy from the use of WGS are possible with a combination of larger training sets and optimised pipelines for generating and analysing such datasets, the use of WGS in the current implementations of genomic prediction should be carefully evaluated against the cost of large-scale WGS data on a case-by-case basis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12711-022-00756-0.