Community-based mealtime management for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives and experiences

Patient and clinician perspectives on supported mealtimes as part of anorexia nervosa treatment: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on clinicians' and patients' experiences of supported mealtimes in the treatment of anorexia nervosa.

METHOD

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022372565). PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Embase were searched up to the 20th of November 2023 for qualitative articles investigating the perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients on clinician-supported meals across all clinical settings. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to evaluate the quality of selected studies.

RESULTS

This review comprised of 26 studies; eight concerned with the perspectives of clinicians only, 16 addressing patients' views, and two studies exploring the views of both groups. Experiences of both groups were generally negative, and three overlapping themes were identified: lack of consistency in care provided, high levels of negative emotions and an uncomfortable power dynamic.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that supported mealtimes are experienced more positively by patients when rules are clear and consistently enforced, and when clinicians make informal conversation and supportive comments. Our findings highlight the need for best practice guidelines and clinician training to improve the delivery of supported mealtimes. Such guidelines and training should be coproduced in collaboration with patients and carers.

Meal support intervention for eating disorders: a mixed-methods systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Mealtimes are a period of heightened distress for individuals with eating disorders. Patients frequently display maladaptive coping strategies, such as hiding food and using distraction techniques to avoid eating. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for meal support interventions as a first-line intervention for eating disorders.

METHOD

Six databases were systematically searched in January 2024. Papers including patients with an eating disorder, and meal support or meal supervision, were examined. Quality appraisal was conducted.

RESULTS

Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Meal support was conducted individually and in group settings. Two studies examined the practical or interpersonal processes of meal support. Carers and trained clinicians implemented meal support. Individuals across the lifespan were examined. Settings included inpatient units, community clinics, and the home. Studies were heterogeneously evaluated with retrospective chart audits, pre- and post- cohort studies, semi-structured interviews, video analysis, and surveys.

DISCUSSION

Meal support intervention is potentially suitable and beneficial for patients of various age groups and eating disorder diagnoses. Due to the lack of consistent approaches, it is apparent there is no standardised framework and manualised approach. This highlights the need for the development of a co-designed approach, adequate training, and rigorous evaluation.

Effects of mealtime assistance in the nutritional rehabilitation of eating disorders

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of meal supervision, provided by health professionals, volunteers or family members, on anthropometric, nutritional, psychological, and behavioural outcomes in patients with eating disorders (EDs).

METHODS

The present systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The last search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library). Inclusion criteria considered paediatric and adult patients suffering from EDs, regardless of ethnicity, and treated in different therapeutic settings. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies and Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool for randomised trials.

RESULTS

3282 articles were retrieved, out of which only 6 met the eligibility criteria. A marked heterogeneity in definitions and approaches to supervised mealtime was observed. This variability emerged in the methodologies used in the supervised meal, and in the reference values for the outcome measures that were used, such as the analysis of different parameters. Based on these observations, mealtime assistance provided to patients with EDs shows an overall positive effect on eating behaviour and dysfunctional attitudes. Future research should be prompted to provide a thorough definition of a structured procedure for meal assistance to be potentially and systematically included in the nutritional rehabilitation protocols for patients with EDs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV systematic reviews of uncontrolled trials.

Perceptions of health professionals in providing care for people with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

This study sought to synthesize and reinterpret findings from primary qualitative studies on the experience of health professionals in caring for people with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the SPIDER search strategy assessing six databases. A meta-synthesis was performed with data from qualitative studies. Two independent reviewers screened and assessed the articles, extracted data from the articles and elaborated thematic synthesis. Nineteen articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The meta-synthesis revealed three descriptive themes: Going outside the comfort zone: hard relational experiences of health professionals in providing care for people with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa; Reflecting on treatment: relevance of discussion, communication, and flexibility in health professionals' work with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa; and Dealing with ambivalences: experiences of health professionals with family members of people with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. We elaborated two analytical themes: Making work with eating disorders palatable: malleability necessary for health professionals in bonding with people with anorexia and bulimia nervosa and their families; and Leaving the professional comfort zone: transition from multi to interdisciplinary. Thus, mental health professionals who work with people diagnosed with anorexia and bulimia nervosa cope with hard emotional experiences that makes them feel out of their comfort zone, requiring flexibility to benefit a good therapeutic alliance, but there are still difficulties in promoting interdisciplinarity.

'It stopped you thinking about food' - The experiences of mealtimes and attending a post-meal support group for young people with anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa presents as an international public health concern as it is the mental health problem with the greatest risk of mortality, and the average age of onset is decreasing. For those experiencing anorexia nervosa, mealtimes have long been recognized as a difficult and distressing time when young people need additional support. However, the post mealtime period can be associated with even greater distress, yet there is little research on interventions to support young people in this vulnerable time, and even less on how young people experience these interventions. This study, therefore, explores young peoples' perceptions of mealtimes and a post mealtime support group. Using a qualitative descriptive design, telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of six young people who participated in a post-meal support group while an inpatient in a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Unit. Using a semi-structured interview guide, participants were asked about their experiences of this support group and their perceptions of how to improve this intervention. Content analysis resulted in the development of three themes: 'The Challenges of Mealtimes and Post Mealtimes', 'The Benefits of Post-meal Support Groups', and 'Improving Unhelpful Aspects of Post-meal Support Groups'. Findings are reported in accordance with COREQ guidelines and suggest that for young people experiencing anorexia nervosa, post mealtimes are often more distressing than the meal itself and that participants found post-meal support groups to be a helpful intervention in reducing post-mealtime distress. Post-meal support groups can be improved by ensuring a consistent approach from staff and providing staff with the training and knowledge required to support those affected by eating disorders.