A prospective and randomized comparison of limited versus extensive atrial substrate modification after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation

Reliable focal and rotational activations in CARTOFINDER mapping using the OctaRay catheter

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study was to elucidated the reliable atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers identified by CARTOFINDER using OctaRay catheter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The reliability of focal and rotational activations identified by CARTOFINDER using OctaRay catheter was assessed by the sequential recordings in each site of both atrium before and after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 10 persistent AF patients. The outcome measures were the reproducibility rate during the sequential recordings and the stability rate between pre- and post-PVI as reliable focal and rotational activations. The study results were compared with those under use of PentaRay catheter (N = 18). Total 68928 points of 360 sites in OctaRay group and 24 177 points of 311 sites in PentaRay were assessed. More focal activation sites were identified in OctaRay group than PentaRay group (7.9% vs. 5.7%, p < .001), although the reproducibility rate and the stability rate were significantly lower in OctaRay group (45.3% vs. 58.9%, p < .001; 11.2% vs. 28.4%, p < .001). Meanwhile, the prevalence of reproducible focal activation sites among overall points was comparable (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p = .08). Regarding rotational activation, more rotational activation sites were identified in OctaRay group (5.1% vs. 0.2%, p < .001), and the reproducibility rate and the stability rate were significantly higher in OctaRay group (45.2% and 12.5% vs. 0.0%, p < .001). Both reliable focal and rotational activation sites were characterized by significantly shorter AF-cycle length (CL) and higher repetition of focal and rotational activations during the recordings compared with the sites of non or unreliable focal and rotational activations.

CONCLUSION

In CARTOFINDER, OctaRay catheter could identify reliable focal activation with high resolution and reliable rotational activation compared with PentaRay catheter. The repetitive focal and rotational activations with short AF-CL could be the potential target during ablation.

Neurohumoral Markers of Cardiac Autonomic Denervation after Surgical Ablation of Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Although the autonomic nervous system has an evident impact on cardiac electrophysiology and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the conventional technique for treating persistent atrial fibrillation, the specific effects of RFA have been insufficiently studied to date. Here, we investigated whether RFA affects neurohumoral transmitter levels and myocardial 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) uptake. To perform this task, we compared two groups of patients with acquired valvular heart disease: patients who had undergone surgical AF ablation and patients with sinus rhythm. The decrease in norepinephrine (NE) level in the coronary sinus had a direct association with the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (p = 0.02) and a negative correlation with 123I-MIBG uptake defects (p = 0.01). The NE level decreased significantly after the main surgery, both in patients with AF (p = 0.0098) and sinus rhythm (p = 0.0039). Furthermore, the intraoperative difference between the norepinephrine levels in the ascending aorta and coronary sinus (ΔNE) of -400 pg/mL was determined as a cut-off value to evaluate RFA efficacy, as denervation failed in all patients with ΔNE < -400 pg/mL. Hence, ΔNE can be utilized to predict the efficacy of the "MAZE-IV" procedure and to assess the risk of AF recurrence after RFA.

Low voltage-guided ablation of posterior wall improves 5-year arrhythmia-free survival in persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The posterior wall (PW) has been proposed as a standard target for ablation beyond pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies have shown inconsistent outcomes with the addition of PW ablation. The presence or absence of low voltage on the PW may explain these inconsistencies. We evaluated whether PW ablation based on the presence or absence of low voltage improves long-term arrhythmia-free outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 5-year follow-up in 152 consecutive patients who received either standard ablation (SA) with PVI alone or PVI + PW ablation (PWA) based on physician discretion (n = 77) or voltage-guided ablation (VGA) with PVI and addition of PWA only if low voltage was present on the PW (n = 75).

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. At 5-year follow-up, 64% of patients receiving VGA were atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT)/AF free compared to 34% receiving SA (HR 0.358 p < .005). PWA had similar AF recurrence in SA and VGA groups (0.30 vs. 0.27 p = .96) but higher AT recurrence when comparing SA and VGA groups (0.39 vs. 0.15 p = .03). In multivariate analysis, both VGA and PWA predicted AF arrhythmia-free survival (HR 0.33, p = .001 and HR 0.20, p = .008, respectively). For AT, VGA predicted arrhythmia-free survival (HR 0.22, p = .028), while PWA predicted AT recurrence (HR 4.704, p = .0219).

CONCLUSION

VGA of the posterior wall ablation beyond PVI in persistent AF significantly improves long-term arrhythmia-free survival when compared with non-voltage-guided ablation. PW ablation without voltage-guidance reduced AF recurrence but at the cost of a higher incidence of AT.

Left atrial structure and function predictors of recurrent fibrillation after catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) has become a conventional treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but remains with high recurrence rate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine left atrial (LA) structure and function indices that predict recurrence of AF.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Registry, up to September 2017 in order to select clinical trials and observational studies which reported echocardiographic predictors of AF recurrence after CA. Eighty-five articles with a total of 16 126 patients were finally included.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis showed that after a follow-up period of 21 ± 12 months, patients with AF recurrence had larger LA diameter with weighted mean difference (WMD: 2·99 ([95% CI 2·50-3·47], P<0·001), larger LA volume index (LAVI) maximal and LAVI minimal (P<0·0001 for both), larger LA area (P<0·0001), lower LA strain (P<0·0001) and lower LA total emptying fraction (LA EF) (P<0·0001) compared with those without AF recurrence. The most powerful LA predictors (in accuracy order) of AF recurrence were as follows: LA strain <19% (OR: 3·1[95% CI, -1.3-10·4], P<0·0001), followed by LA diameter ≥50 mm (OR: 2·75, [95% CI 1·66-4·56,] P<0·0001), and LAVmax >150 ml (OR: 2·25, [95% CI, 1.1-5·6], P = 0·0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis results, a dilated left atrium with diameter more than 50 mm and volume above 150 ml or myocardial strain below 19% reflect an unstable LA that is unlikely to hold sinus rhythm after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Is ablation to atrial fibrillation termination of persistent atrial fibrillation the end point?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The ideal ablation strategy and end point for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been well founded. Defining periprocedural AF termination as the end point of catheter ablation is still controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the differences between periprocedural AF termination and non-termination in the long-term AF recurrence rate and postoperative complications.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic search of electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 2008 to August 2019. The primary outcome was freedom from AF or any atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs at the long-term (≥12 months) follow-up. The secondary outcome was overall postoperative complication rates. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was pooled for these outcomes. A forest plot, fixed-effects model or random-effect model, Q test, I statistic, and Egger funnel plot were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant difference was found in freedom from AF at the long-term follow-up between patients in whom AF termination was achieved and not achieved (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.78-1.09, P = .36, I = 69%). Patients with AF non-termination had a lower complication occurrence rate than those with AF termination (RR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.11-2.73, P = .02, I = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that AF termination is not a reliable procedural end point during ablation of persistent AF.

Clinical Utility of Intravenous Nifekalant Injection during Radiofrequency catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging even in RFCA-era for AF. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of nifekalant, a pure potassium channel blocker,during RFCA for persistent AF.

Methods and results

We retrospectively enrolled 157 consecutive persistentAF patientsundergoing first RFCA procedure withcomplex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)ablation after pulmonary veins isolation and compared outcomes between patientswith (NFK group: N=79) and without (No-NFK group: N=78)additional CFAE ablation using intravenous nifekalant (0.3mg/kg). Primary endpoint was 24-month atrial arrhythmia-free survival post ablation.The prevalence of AF terminationwas significantly higher in NFK group than No-NFK group (64.6% versus 7.7%, P<0.001). Arrhythmia-free survival, however, was not significantly different between 2 groups (61.5% versus 54.1%, P=0.63).There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the prevalence of recurrent atrial tachycardia(25.0% versus 23.5%, P=0.89). Arrhythmia-free survivalin patients with AF termination during procedure was significantly higher thanthose without (73.0% versus 41.0%, P=0.002; adjusted hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.84, P=0.02) amongNFK group,but not amongNo-NFK group (66.7% versus 53.2%, P=0.53).

Conclusions

Intravenous nifekalant injection during additional CFAE ablation did not improve sinus maintenancerate after RFCA procedure for AF, but AF termination by nifekalant injection could be a clinical predictor of better success rates after procedure.

Impact of electrophysiological and pharmacological noninducibility following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Two methods for testing inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF)-atrial pacing and isoproterenol infusion-have been proposed to determine the endpoint of catheter ablation. However, the utility of the combination for testing electrophysiological inducibility (EPI) and pharmacological inducibility (PHI) is unclear.

METHODS

After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia was assessed with the dual methods in 291 consecutive patients with AF (65% paroxysmal) undergoing initial catheter ablation.

RESULTS

The incidence of EPI was significantly higher in patients with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (32.0% vs 11.7%, respectively, P < .001). The incidence of PHI was not significantly different between the two groups (25.2% vs 26.1%, respectively, P = .87). There was no significant difference in AF recurrence according to inducibility in paroxysmal AF. In persistent AF, however, patients achieving neither EPI nor PHI under PVI-only strategy had significantly lower rates of AF recurrence than those achieving either EPI or PHI and consequently requiring additional ablation for inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia (68.5% vs 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test, P = .022). In persistent AF, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that achieving neither EPI nor PHI was a negative independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 0.492, 95% CI 0.254-0.916, P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving neither EPI nor PHI following PVI was associated with favorable outcome in patients with persistent AF. The combination of tests may discriminate patients responsive to the PVI-only strategy. Further selective approaches are necessary to improve outcome for inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with persistent AF.

Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation: the Role of Additional Sites in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the long-term procedural outcome remains suboptimal and there is a frequent need for repeat ablation procedure, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. The review article summarizes the rationales, recent evidences, and strategies of ablation of extra-PV sites and its clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is a consensus that durable PV isolations are a definite therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF. In non-paroxysmal AF, many laboratories still believe that adequate substrate ablation outside PVs is definitely required. Empirical linear ablation is not recommended because of difficulty in achieving complete linear block, unless macro-reentry atrial tachycardia developed during procedure. Most of laboratories applied complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation after PV isolation in non-paroxysmal AF, but the efficacy is limited in the long-term follow-up studies. A combined approach using CFAE, non-linear similarity, and phase mapping strategy to identify rotors or focal sources for substrate modification increases the ablation outcome, when compared to CFAE ablation alone. Provocative test with mapping of non-PV triggers is also recommended in all patients to improve long-term ablation success. Ablation beyond PV isolation is important, especially in non-paroxysmal AF patients, to modify the diseased atrial substrate and eliminate the non-PV triggers, which in turn improve the ablation outcome.

Spatial Relationships of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms and Continuous Electrical Activity to Focal Electrical Sources: Implications for Substrate Ablation in Human Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the spatial relationships of focal electrical sources (FSs) to complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) and continuous electrical activity (CEA).

BACKGROUND

Fractionated atrial electrograms have been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers in computational studies and represent ablation targets in the management of persistent AF.

METHODS

We included a subset of 66 patients (age: 63 [56, 67] years, 69% persistent AF) with electroanatomic data from the SELECT AF (Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation) randomized control trial that compared the efficacy of CFAE with CEA ablation in AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein antral ablation. Focal sources were identified based on bipolar electrogram periodicity and QS unipolar electrogram morphology.

RESULTS

A total of 77 FSs (median: 1 [1st quartile, 3rd quartile: 1, 2] per patient) were identified most commonly in the pulmonary vein antrum and left atrial appendage. The proportions of FSs inside CFAE and CEA regions were similar (13% vs. 1.3%, respectively; p = 0.13). Focal sources were more likely to be on the border zone of CFAEs than in CEAs (49% vs. 7.8%, respectively; p = 0.012). Following ablation, 53% of patients had ≥1 unablated extrapulmonary vein FS. The median number of unablated FS was higher in patients with AF recurrence post ablation than in patients without (median: 1 [0, 1] vs. 0 [0, 1], respectively; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

One-half of the FSs detected during AF localized to the border of CFAE areas, whereas most of the FSs were found outside CEA areas. CFAE or CEA ablation leaves a number of FS unablated, which is associated with AF recurrence. These findings suggest that many CFAEs may arise from passive wave propagation, remote from FS, which may limit their therapeutic efficacy in AF substrate modification.

Surgical perspectives in the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and a huge public health burden associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For decades an increasing number of patients have undergone surgical treatment of AF, mainly during concomitant cardiac surgery. This has sparked a drive for conducting further studies and researching this field. With the cornerstone Cox-Maze III “cut and sew” procedure being technically challenging, the focus in current literature has turned towards less invasive techniques. The introduction of ablative devices has revolutionised the surgical management of AF, moving away from the traditional surgical lesions. The hybrid procedure, a combination of catheter and surgical ablation is another promising new technique aiming to improve outcomes. Despite the increasing number of studies looking at various aspects of the surgical management of AF, the literature would benefit from more uniformly conducted randomised control trials.

Pharmacological Tests in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

The invasive management of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considerably changed by the identification of major sites of AF initiation and/or maintenance within the pulmonary vein antra. Percutaneous catheter ablation of these targets has become the standard of care for sustained maintenance of sinus rhythm. Long-term failure of ablation is related to an inability to create a durable transmural lesion or to identify all of the non-pulmonary vein arrhythmia triggers. Pharmacological challenges during catheter ablation have been suggested to improve outcomes in both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Herein we review the mechanism and evidence for the use of pharmacological adjuncts during the catheter ablation of AF.

Mapping Atrial Fibrillation: 2015 Update

Atrial fibrillation requires a trigger that initiates the arrhythmia and substrate that favors perpetuation. Cardiac mapping is necessary to locate triggers and substrate so that an ablation strategy can be optimized. The most commonly used cardiac mapping approach is isochronal or activation mapping, which aims to create a spatial model of electrical wavefront propagation. Historically, activation mapping has been successful for mapping point source and single or double wave reentrant arrhythmias, while mapping multiple wavelets or driving sources that underlie most episodes of atrial fibrillation remains challenging. In the multiple wavelet model of AF there is no particular area critical to sustain atrial fibrillation, and a "critical mass" of atrium is required to maintain AF. Recent studies suggest endocardial and epicardial dissociation may play an important role. Investigation of driving sources that sustain AF has focused on the presence of rotors. Rotors in human AF have now been observed using multiple imaging modalities, however ablation strategies targeting rotors remain of unproven benefit. In addition, substrate mapping of AF is now feasible. Increasing degrees of atrial fibrosis on delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) has been shown to correlate with poor procedural outcomes for AF ablation, which suggests the increased burden of scar promotes more complex and extensive arrhythmia substrate. Atrial fibrosis is also identifiable using electrogram voltage tagging in an electro-anatomic mapping system. Patient-specific ablation strategies targeting areas of fibrosis are currently under investigation. Recent technological advances have facilitated greater understanding of the potential role for AF mapping and has allowed initiation of clinical studies to evaluate the effectiveness of mapping-based intervention. Multi-modality mapping is likely to play an increasingly important role in AF ablation, but is currently limited by the inability to simultaneously record and interpret electrical signals from both atria and from both the epicardium and endocardium.

Is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation?

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a frequently used therapy after failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug. The cornerstone of AF ablation has been durable pulmonary vein isolation. However, understanding the positive and negative outcomes of catheter ablation of AF is severely limited by diverse ablation methodologies that do not seem to result in durable pulmonary vein isolation. Without durable pulmonary isolation ablation, it is unclear if ablation strategies need to be modified to include extrapulmonary vein ablation targets in combination with pulmonary vein isolation or alone to improve long-term procedural success rates. The marked discrepancy between AF ablation procedure success rates and actual long-term pulmonary vein isolation rates does suggest that targeting other mechanisms can be considered to achieve similar or better results when compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone.