Loss of local capture of the pulmonary vein myocardium after antral isolation: prevalence and clinical significance

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Pulmonary vein capture is a predictor for long-term success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

The mechanisms of AF development and progression are still not completely understood. Despite the relative efficacy of ablation, the risk of AF recurrence is substantial, particularly in patients with persistent AF (perAF). At present we do not have any reliable intra-procedural electrophysiologic predictors of long-term success of AF ablation other than pulmonary vein isolation. We evaluated selected intraprocedural pulmonary vein characteristics that may be helpful in future guidance of persistent AF ablation.

Methods

390 consecutive procedures using cryoballoon for initial AF ablation were divided by clinical presentation (paroxysmal or persistent AF), and by pulmonary vein (PV) response to pacing after completion of ablation (discrete electrogram elicited with pacing-"PV capture" or not-"Control"). Patients were followed (median 20 months) for recurrent atrial arrhythmias as the primary end point of the study.

Results

PV capture was identified in 20.3% and 17.1% and patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF respectively (ns). In patients with persistent AF presence of PV capture was associated with significantly better outcomes compared to patients without PV capture (p < 0.001). In the group "persistent AF and PV capture", an initial strategy of PV isolation and reisolation of the PVs (without additional lesions) for patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias resulted in 20/23 (87%) patients in sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medications at study completion. In patients with paroxysmal AF, PV capture was not associated with outcome benefits. Specific electrophysiologic characteristics of PV (PV capture cycle length: PVCCL) did not have an impact on AF recurrence, although 25% shortening of PVCCL was observed after 60 s periods of pacing at short cycle lengths. No background demographic patient characteristic differences were identified between patients with vs. without PV capture.

Conclusion

The presence of PV capture was associated with better outcomes in patients with persistent AF. PV capture may identify those patients with persistent AF in whom cryoballoon PV isolation alone is sufficient as an initial ablation procedure and as the primary ablation strategy for recurrent AF.

High-resolution mapping as an alternative for exit block testing in the presence of entrance block after high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is common as an endpoint to demonstrate an exit block from the pulmonary veins (PVs) in addition to an entrance block into them. By using high-resolution mapping catheters, even very small signals can be detected.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether additional exit block testing is still necessary when using high-resolution mapping catheters after ablation in high-power short-duration (HPSD) techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 114 patients with AF (average age, 65.14 ± 11.3 years; 65.8% male) undergoing radiofrequency PVI were included in the study. Ablation was performed with the HPSD technique using a fixed protocol for energy delivery of 50 W (contact force 3-20 g). Entrance and exit block were tested with a high-resolution mapping catheter. Isolation of the PVs was achieved in all patients.

RESULTS

Capture of local PV tissue was demonstrated in all patients after PVI and exit block was present in all patients after entrance block was detected using a high-resolution mapping catheter.

CONCLUSION

Exit block testing in addition to the demonstration of an entrance block as an endpoint of PVI seems to have no additional benefit and might no longer be necessary when a high-resolution mapping catheter is used in HPSD ablation for PVI of AF.

Targeted ablation of residual pulmonary vein potentials in atrial fibrillation ablation through ultra-high-density mapping: insights from the CHARISMA registry

INTRODUCTION

Low-voltage activity beyond pulmonary veins (PVs) may contribute to the failure of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the long term. We aimed to assess the presence of gaps (PVG) and residual potential (RAP) within the antral scar by means of an ultra-high density mapping (UHDM) system.

METHODS

We studied consecutive patients from the CHARISMA registry who were undergoing AF ablation and had complete characterization of residual PV antral activity. The Lumipoint^TM (Boston Scientific) map-analysis tool was used sequentially on each PV component. The ablation endpoint was PV isolation (PVI) and electrical quiescence in the antral region.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight cases of AF ablation were analyzed. A total of 86 PVGs in 34 (58.6%) patients and 44 RAPs in 34 patients (58.6%) were found. In 16 (27.6%) cases, we found at least one RAP in patients with complete absence of PV conduction. RAPs showed a lower mean voltage than PVG (0.3±0.2mV vs 0.7±0.5mV, p<0.0001), whereas the mean number of EGM peaks was higher (8.4±1.4 vs 3.2±1.5, p<0.0001). The percentage of patients in whom RAPs were detected through Lumipoint^TM was higher than through propagation map analysis (58.6% vs 36.2%, p=0.025). Acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated and RAPs completely abolished in all study patients. During a mean follow-up of 453±133 days, 6 patients (10.3%) suffered an AF/AT recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Local vulnerabilities in antral lesion sets were easily discernible by means of the UHDM system in both de novo and redo patients when no PV conduction was present.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT03793998 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The role of local impedance drop in the acute lesion efficacy during pulmonary vein isolation performed with a new contact force sensing catheter-A pilot study

Introduction

Our pilot study aimed to evaluate the role of local impedance drop in lesion formation during pulmonary vein isolation with a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter that records local impedance as well and to find a local impedance cut-off value that predicts successful lesion formation.

Materials and methods

After completing point-by-point radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation, the success of the applications was evaluated by pacing along the ablation line at 10 mA, 2 ms pulse width. Lesions were considered successful if loss of local capture was achieved.

Results

Out of 645 applications, 561 were successful and 84 were unsuccessful. Compared to the unsuccessful ablation points, the successful applications were shorter (p = 0.0429) and had a larger local impedance drop (p<0.0001). There was no difference between successful and unsuccessful applications in terms of mean contact force (p = 0.8571), force-time integral (p = 0.0699) and contact force range (p = 0.0519). The optimal cut-point for the local impedance drop indicating successful lesion formation was 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall [AUC = 0.80 (0.75–0.86), p<0.0001], and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall [AUC = 0.77 (0.72–0.83), p<0.0001]. A local impedance drop larger than 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall was associated with an increased probability of effective lesion creation [OR = 11.21, 95%CI 4.22–29.81, p<0.0001; and OR = 7.91, 95%CI 3.77–16.57, p<0.0001, respectively].

Conclusion

The measurement of the local impedance may predict optimal lesion formation. A local impedance drop > 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and > 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall significantly increases the probability of creating a successful lesion.

Optimal interlesion distance in ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Ablation index (AI) is a useful tool of the CARTO® system to make effective lesions during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal distance between neighboring ablation points (interlesion distance (ILD)) is still unclear. Here, we evaluated the optimal ILDs in the AI-guided PVI.

METHODS

Forty-nine AF patients who underwent AI-guided PVI in our institute from July 2018 to March 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Target AI was set at 500 and 400 for anterior and posterior walls, respectively, and we compared the ILDs with and without electrical gaps after a first encircling PVI.

RESULTS

In both PV, the ILDs with electrical gaps were longer than those without electrical gaps. The best cutoff values of ILD to detect the electrical gaps using the ROC curve were 5.4 mm for the RPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.42; specificity, 0.84, P < 0.01) and 4.4 mm for the RPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.68; sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.39, P < 0.01). Similarly, the best cutoff values of ILD were 5.5 mm for the LPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.74; sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.82, P < 0.01) and 5.1 mm for the LPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.53, P =0.03).

CONCLUSION

The optimal interlesion distances for PVI were different in each PV segment. To achieve the first-pass isolation, less than 5.4/4.4 mm for the RPV anterior/posterior and 5.5/5.1 mm for the LPV anterior/posterior walls of interlesion distances were the best cutoff values in the patients with AF.

Revaluation of the Significance of Demonstrable Exit Block After Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Background: Demonstration of exit block from the pulmonary vein (PV) to the left atrium after PV isolation (PVI) is not always possible after demonstration of entrance block. We examined factors associated with demonstrable exit block and the relationship between demonstrable exit block and subsequent PV reconnection. Methods and Results: The subjects consisted of 227 patients (908 PV; mean patient age, 59.2±10.8 years; 72.2% male) who underwent radiofrequency PVI, 49 of whom proceeded to the second session after a mean duration of 563.4±456.3 days after the first session. In the first session, exit block was demonstrated in 73.1% of PV, and the predictors were superior PV, longitudinal diameter of the PV, and spontaneous activity in the PV. In the second session (n=49), exit block was demonstrated in 51.0% (33.1% in PV without reconnection vs. 79.7% in PV with reconnection, P<0.0001). Spontaneous activity (OR, 2.74; 95% CI: 1.12-7.03, P=0.0272) and use of a contact force-sensing catheter (OR, 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85, P=0.0151) were independent predictors of PV reconnection, but demonstrable exit block was not (OR, 1.58; 95% CI: 0.74-3.46, P=0.2377). Conclusions: Inability to demonstrate exit block was not associated with increased risk of future PV reconnection.

Pulmonary vein antral isolation causes depolarization of vein sleeves: Implications for the assessment of isolation

PURPOSE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation has been shown to result in inexcitability of a large fraction of pulmonary veins (PVs), but the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanism of PV inexcitability by assessing the effects of PVI on the electrophysiology of PV sleeves.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency PVI were studied. Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability were measured in PVs and the left atrial appendage (LAA) before and after ablation. Adenosine was used to assess both transient reconnection and transient venous re-excitability.

RESULTS

We assessed 248 veins among 67 patients. Mean PV ERP (249.7 ± 54.0 ms) and capture threshold (1.4 ± 1.6 mA) increased to 300.5 ± 67.1 and 5.7 ± 5.6 mA, respectively (P < .0001 for both) in the 26.9% PVs that remained excitable, but no change was noted in either measure in the LAA. In 16.3% of the 73.1% inexcitable veins, transient PV re-excitability (as opposed to reconnection) was seen with adenosine administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Antral PVI causes inexcitability in a majority of the PVs, which can transiently be restored in some with adenosine. Among PVs that remain excitable, ERP and capture threshold increase significantly. These data imply resting membrane potential depolarization of the of PV myocardial sleeves. As PV inexcitability hampers the assessment of entrance and exit block, demonstrating transient PV re-excitability during adenosine administration helps ensure true isolation.

Demonstration of pulmonary vein exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: A novel use for adenosine

INTRODUCTION

Demonstration of exit block after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). It requires the demonstration of local pulmonary vein (PV) capture and absence of conduction to the atrium but is often challenging due to the inability to see local paced PV-evoked potentials. We retrospectively examined the ability of adenosine to augment this technique during CARTO-based radiofrequency ablation procedures.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of evoked PV potentials during adenosine administration while testing for PV exit block at a single UK center.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-nine PVs in 33 patients were isolated using radiofrequency energy to demonstrate entry block. Of those, the pacing of 24 veins under baseline conditions did not clearly demonstrate local PV-evoked potentials sufficient to be sure that the local vein was truly captured and dissociated from the atrium. Adenosine was administered in 19 of these, with 10 of 19 (52.6%) veins then demonstrating clear local PV-evoked potentials transiently during adenosine administration, sufficient to allow assessment of definite exit block.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine administered during PV pacing allows transient visualization of local PV-evoked potentials after PVI facilitating the clearer demonstration of PV exit block in over 50% veins.