1
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan N, Chen M, Chen S, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim Y, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak H, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Arrhythm 2024; 40:1217-1354. [PMID: 39669937 PMCID: PMC11632303 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of CardiologyRoyal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneAustralia
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Melbourne and Baker Research InstituteMelbourneAustralia
| | - Eduardo B. Saad
- Electrophysiology and PacingHospital Samaritano BotafogoRio de JaneiroBrazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Jason G. Andrade
- Department of MedicineVancouver General HospitalVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular InstituteStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management DepartmentClinique PasteurToulouseFrance
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Ngai‐Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and GeriatricsPrincess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionChina
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Shih‐Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm CenterTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General HospitalTaichungTaiwan
| | | | - Ralph J. Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of SurgeryWashington University School of Medicine, Barnes‐Jewish HospitalSt. LouisMOUSA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center MunichTechnical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and HealthMunichGermany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation DepartmentFondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU)Pessac‐BordeauxFrance
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical CenterAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart InstituteUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation DepartmentFondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU)Pessac‐BordeauxFrance
| | - Young‐Hoon Kim
- Division of CardiologyKorea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery DepartmentVrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, IdipazUniversidad AutonomaMadridSpain
- Hospital Viamed Santa ElenaMadridSpain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia InstituteSt. David's Medical CenterAustinTXUSA
- Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandOHUSA
- Interventional ElectrophysiologyScripps ClinicSan DiegoCAUSA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of CardiologyUniversity of Tor VergataRomeItaly
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)QuebecCanada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de ElectrocardiologíaInstituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’Ciudad de MéxicoMéxico
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular DirectorateSt. Thomas’ Hospital and King's CollegeLondonUK
| | - Hui‐Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital BernBern University Hospital, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia CenterCardioinfantil FoundationBogotaColombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm DisordersUniversity of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum BethanienMedizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion MarkuskrankenhausFrankfurtGermany
| | - Gregory E. Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology SectionUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico MonzinoIRCCSMilanItaly
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental SciencesUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Elaine Y. Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of CardiologyColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:e31-e149. [PMID: 38597857 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece.
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad E, Shamloo AS, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O'Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:921-1072. [PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Gerhard Hindricks
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Charité University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory F Michaud
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología 'Ignacio Chávez', Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O'Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas' Hospital and King's College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, Saad EB, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade JG, Barbhaiya CR, Baykaner T, Boveda S, Calkins H, Chan NY, Chen M, Chen SA, Dagres N, Damiano RJ, De Potter T, Deisenhofer I, Derval N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Dyrda K, Hindricks G, Hocini M, Kim YH, la Meir M, Merino JL, Michaud GF, Natale A, Nault I, Nava S, Nitta T, O’Neill M, Pak HN, Piccini JP, Pürerfellner H, Reichlin T, Saenz LC, Sanders P, Schilling R, Schmidt B, Supple GE, Thomas KL, Tondo C, Verma A, Wan EY. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2024; 26:euae043. [PMID: 38587017 PMCID: PMC11000153 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzeis
- Department of Cardiology, Mitera Hospital, 6, Erythrou Stavrou Str., Marousi, Athens, PC 151 23, Greece
| | - Edward P Gerstenfeld
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and Baker Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eduardo B Saad
- Electrophysiology and Pacing, Hospital Samaritano Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jason G Andrade
- Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Tina Baykaner
- Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
- Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ngai-Yin Chan
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Minglong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shih-Ann Chen
- Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, and Cardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Ralph J Damiano
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Isabel Deisenhofer
- Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich (TUM) School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Derval
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Katia Dyrda
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Meleze Hocini
- IHU LIRYC, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Stimulation Department, Fondation Bordeaux Université and Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac-Bordeaux, France
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark la Meir
- Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jose Luis Merino
- La Paz University Hospital, Idipaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Viamed Santa Elena, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Natale
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Nault
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ), Quebec, Canada
| | - Santiago Nava
- Departamento de Electrocardiología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología ‘Ignacio Chávez’, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Takashi Nitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mark O’Neill
- Cardiovascular Directorate, St. Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College, London, UK
| | - Hui-Nam Pak
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Tobias Reichlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luis Carlos Saenz
- International Arrhythmia Center, Cardioinfantil Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Boris Schmidt
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Gregory E Supple
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Atul Verma
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Babak A, Kauffman CB, Lynady C, McClellan R, Venkatachalam K, Kusumoto F. Pulmonary vein capture is a predictor for long-term success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 10:1150378. [PMID: 38410505 PMCID: PMC10895012 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1150378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The mechanisms of AF development and progression are still not completely understood. Despite the relative efficacy of ablation, the risk of AF recurrence is substantial, particularly in patients with persistent AF (perAF). At present we do not have any reliable intra-procedural electrophysiologic predictors of long-term success of AF ablation other than pulmonary vein isolation. We evaluated selected intraprocedural pulmonary vein characteristics that may be helpful in future guidance of persistent AF ablation. Methods 390 consecutive procedures using cryoballoon for initial AF ablation were divided by clinical presentation (paroxysmal or persistent AF), and by pulmonary vein (PV) response to pacing after completion of ablation (discrete electrogram elicited with pacing-"PV capture" or not-"Control"). Patients were followed (median 20 months) for recurrent atrial arrhythmias as the primary end point of the study. Results PV capture was identified in 20.3% and 17.1% and patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF respectively (ns). In patients with persistent AF presence of PV capture was associated with significantly better outcomes compared to patients without PV capture (p < 0.001). In the group "persistent AF and PV capture", an initial strategy of PV isolation and reisolation of the PVs (without additional lesions) for patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias resulted in 20/23 (87%) patients in sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medications at study completion. In patients with paroxysmal AF, PV capture was not associated with outcome benefits. Specific electrophysiologic characteristics of PV (PV capture cycle length: PVCCL) did not have an impact on AF recurrence, although 25% shortening of PVCCL was observed after 60 s periods of pacing at short cycle lengths. No background demographic patient characteristic differences were identified between patients with vs. without PV capture. Conclusion The presence of PV capture was associated with better outcomes in patients with persistent AF. PV capture may identify those patients with persistent AF in whom cryoballoon PV isolation alone is sufficient as an initial ablation procedure and as the primary ablation strategy for recurrent AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Babak
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Cynthia Lynady
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Reginald McClellan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Kalpathi Venkatachalam
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Fred Kusumoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weyand S, Beuter M, Heinzmann D, Seizer P. High-resolution mapping as an alternative for exit block testing in the presence of entrance block after high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2022; 33:440-445. [PMID: 36083317 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-022-00895-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is common as an endpoint to demonstrate an exit block from the pulmonary veins (PVs) in addition to an entrance block into them. By using high-resolution mapping catheters, even very small signals can be detected. OBJECTIVES We investigated whether additional exit block testing is still necessary when using high-resolution mapping catheters after ablation in high-power short-duration (HPSD) techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 114 patients with AF (average age, 65.14 ± 11.3 years; 65.8% male) undergoing radiofrequency PVI were included in the study. Ablation was performed with the HPSD technique using a fixed protocol for energy delivery of 50 W (contact force 3-20 g). Entrance and exit block were tested with a high-resolution mapping catheter. Isolation of the PVs was achieved in all patients. RESULTS Capture of local PV tissue was demonstrated in all patients after PVI and exit block was present in all patients after entrance block was detected using a high-resolution mapping catheter. CONCLUSION Exit block testing in addition to the demonstration of an entrance block as an endpoint of PVI seems to have no additional benefit and might no longer be necessary when a high-resolution mapping catheter is used in HPSD ablation for PVI of AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Weyand
- Medizinische Klinik II - Kardiologie und Angiologie, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Im Kälblesrain 1, 73430, Aalen, Germany.
| | - Matthias Beuter
- Medizinische Klinik II - Kardiologie und Angiologie, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Im Kälblesrain 1, 73430, Aalen, Germany
| | - David Heinzmann
- Innere Medizin III - Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Seizer
- Medizinische Klinik II - Kardiologie und Angiologie, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Im Kälblesrain 1, 73430, Aalen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Solimene F, Stabile G, Segreti L, Malacrida M, Schillaci V, Rossi P, Bongiorni MG, Shopova G, Cauti FM, Zucchelli G, Arestia A, Bianchi S, Di Cori A, Maddaluno F, De Simone A, Garcia-Bolao I. Targeted ablation of residual pulmonary vein potentials in atrial fibrillation ablation through ultra-high-density mapping: insights from the CHARISMA registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:1414-1424. [PMID: 35524404 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low-voltage activity beyond pulmonary veins (PVs) may contribute to the failure of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the long term. We aimed to assess the presence of gaps (PVG) and residual potential (RAP) within the antral scar by means of an ultra-high density mapping (UHDM) system. METHODS We studied consecutive patients from the CHARISMA registry who were undergoing AF ablation and had complete characterization of residual PV antral activity. The LumipointTM (Boston Scientific) map-analysis tool was used sequentially on each PV component. The ablation endpoint was PV isolation (PVI) and electrical quiescence in the antral region. RESULTS Fifty-eight cases of AF ablation were analyzed. A total of 86 PVGs in 34 (58.6%) patients and 44 RAPs in 34 patients (58.6%) were found. In 16 (27.6%) cases, we found at least one RAP in patients with complete absence of PV conduction. RAPs showed a lower mean voltage than PVG (0.3±0.2mV vs 0.7±0.5mV, p<0.0001), whereas the mean number of EGM peaks was higher (8.4±1.4 vs 3.2±1.5, p<0.0001). The percentage of patients in whom RAPs were detected through LumipointTM was higher than through propagation map analysis (58.6% vs 36.2%, p=0.025). Acute procedural success was 100%, with all PVs successfully isolated and RAPs completely abolished in all study patients. During a mean follow-up of 453±133 days, 6 patients (10.3%) suffered an AF/AT recurrence. CONCLUSION Local vulnerabilities in antral lesion sets were easily discernible by means of the UHDM system in both de novo and redo patients when no PV conduction was present. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT03793998 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giuseppe Stabile
- Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, Avellino, Italy.,Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Luca Segreti
- Second Division of Cardiology, Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Malacrida
- Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy.,Arrhythmology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Rossi
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia, Clinica San Michele, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Bongiorni
- Second Division of Cardiology, Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Maria Cauti
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia, Clinica San Michele, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy
| | - Giulio Zucchelli
- Second Division of Cardiology, Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Bianchi
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia, Clinica San Michele, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Cori
- Second Division of Cardiology, Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Maddaluno
- Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy.,Arrhythmology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio De Simone
- Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia, Clinica San Michele, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy
| | - Ignacio Garcia-Bolao
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Clìnica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Szegedi N, Salló Z, Perge P, Piros K, Nagy VK, Osztheimer I, Merkely B, Gellér L. The role of local impedance drop in the acute lesion efficacy during pulmonary vein isolation performed with a new contact force sensing catheter-A pilot study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257050. [PMID: 34529678 PMCID: PMC8445471 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Our pilot study aimed to evaluate the role of local impedance drop in lesion formation during pulmonary vein isolation with a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter that records local impedance as well and to find a local impedance cut-off value that predicts successful lesion formation. Materials and methods After completing point-by-point radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation, the success of the applications was evaluated by pacing along the ablation line at 10 mA, 2 ms pulse width. Lesions were considered successful if loss of local capture was achieved. Results Out of 645 applications, 561 were successful and 84 were unsuccessful. Compared to the unsuccessful ablation points, the successful applications were shorter (p = 0.0429) and had a larger local impedance drop (p<0.0001). There was no difference between successful and unsuccessful applications in terms of mean contact force (p = 0.8571), force-time integral (p = 0.0699) and contact force range (p = 0.0519). The optimal cut-point for the local impedance drop indicating successful lesion formation was 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall [AUC = 0.80 (0.75–0.86), p<0.0001], and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall [AUC = 0.77 (0.72–0.83), p<0.0001]. A local impedance drop larger than 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall was associated with an increased probability of effective lesion creation [OR = 11.21, 95%CI 4.22–29.81, p<0.0001; and OR = 7.91, 95%CI 3.77–16.57, p<0.0001, respectively]. Conclusion The measurement of the local impedance may predict optimal lesion formation. A local impedance drop > 21.80 Ohms on the anterior wall and > 18.30 Ohms on the posterior wall significantly increases the probability of creating a successful lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nándor Szegedi
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- * E-mail:
| | - Zoltán Salló
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Perge
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Katalin Piros
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Béla Merkely
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Gellér
- Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kobayashi S, Fukaya H, Oikawa J, Saito D, Sato T, Matsuura G, Arakawa Y, Shirakawa Y, Nishinarita R, Horiguchi A, Ishizue N, Kishihara J, Niwano S, Ako J. Optimal interlesion distance in ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2020; 62:123-131. [PMID: 32975734 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00881-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ablation index (AI) is a useful tool of the CARTO® system to make effective lesions during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the optimal distance between neighboring ablation points (interlesion distance (ILD)) is still unclear. Here, we evaluated the optimal ILDs in the AI-guided PVI. METHODS Forty-nine AF patients who underwent AI-guided PVI in our institute from July 2018 to March 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Target AI was set at 500 and 400 for anterior and posterior walls, respectively, and we compared the ILDs with and without electrical gaps after a first encircling PVI. RESULTS In both PV, the ILDs with electrical gaps were longer than those without electrical gaps. The best cutoff values of ILD to detect the electrical gaps using the ROC curve were 5.4 mm for the RPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.42; specificity, 0.84, P < 0.01) and 4.4 mm for the RPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.68; sensitivity, 0.91; specificity, 0.39, P < 0.01). Similarly, the best cutoff values of ILD were 5.5 mm for the LPV anterior wall (AUC, 0.74; sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.82, P < 0.01) and 5.1 mm for the LPV posterior wall (AUC, 0.67; sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.53, P =0.03). CONCLUSION The optimal interlesion distances for PVI were different in each PV segment. To achieve the first-pass isolation, less than 5.4/4.4 mm for the RPV anterior/posterior and 5.5/5.1 mm for the LPV anterior/posterior walls of interlesion distances were the best cutoff values in the patients with AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Kobayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Hidehira Fukaya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Jun Oikawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Daiki Saito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Gen Matsuura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yuki Arakawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yuki Shirakawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Ryo Nishinarita
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Ai Horiguchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Naruya Ishizue
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Jun Kishihara
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Shinichi Niwano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Junya Ako
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mochizuki A, Nagahara D, Kamiyama N, Fujito T, Miura T. Revaluation of the Significance of Demonstrable Exit Block After Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circ Rep 2020; 2:218-225. [PMID: 33693233 PMCID: PMC7921364 DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-19-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Demonstration of exit block from the pulmonary vein (PV) to the left atrium after PV isolation (PVI) is not always possible after demonstration of entrance block. We examined factors associated with demonstrable exit block and the relationship between demonstrable exit block and subsequent PV reconnection. Methods and Results: The subjects consisted of 227 patients (908 PV; mean patient age, 59.2±10.8 years; 72.2% male) who underwent radiofrequency PVI, 49 of whom proceeded to the second session after a mean duration of 563.4±456.3 days after the first session. In the first session, exit block was demonstrated in 73.1% of PV, and the predictors were superior PV, longitudinal diameter of the PV, and spontaneous activity in the PV. In the second session (n=49), exit block was demonstrated in 51.0% (33.1% in PV without reconnection vs. 79.7% in PV with reconnection, P<0.0001). Spontaneous activity (OR, 2.74; 95% CI: 1.12-7.03, P=0.0272) and use of a contact force-sensing catheter (OR, 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85, P=0.0151) were independent predictors of PV reconnection, but demonstrable exit block was not (OR, 1.58; 95% CI: 0.74-3.46, P=0.2377). Conclusions: Inability to demonstrate exit block was not associated with increased risk of future PV reconnection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Mochizuki
- Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
| | - Daigo Nagahara
- Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kamiyama
- Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
| | - Takefumi Fujito
- Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
| | - Tetsuji Miura
- Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saluja D, Pagan E, Maglione T, Kassotis J, Kostis WJ, Coromilas J. Pulmonary vein antral isolation causes depolarization of vein sleeves: Implications for the assessment of isolation. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2019; 43:181-188. [PMID: 31853981 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation has been shown to result in inexcitability of a large fraction of pulmonary veins (PVs), but the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanism of PV inexcitability by assessing the effects of PVI on the electrophysiology of PV sleeves. METHODS Patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency PVI were studied. Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability were measured in PVs and the left atrial appendage (LAA) before and after ablation. Adenosine was used to assess both transient reconnection and transient venous re-excitability. RESULTS We assessed 248 veins among 67 patients. Mean PV ERP (249.7 ± 54.0 ms) and capture threshold (1.4 ± 1.6 mA) increased to 300.5 ± 67.1 and 5.7 ± 5.6 mA, respectively (P < .0001 for both) in the 26.9% PVs that remained excitable, but no change was noted in either measure in the LAA. In 16.3% of the 73.1% inexcitable veins, transient PV re-excitability (as opposed to reconnection) was seen with adenosine administration. CONCLUSIONS Antral PVI causes inexcitability in a majority of the PVs, which can transiently be restored in some with adenosine. Among PVs that remain excitable, ERP and capture threshold increase significantly. These data imply resting membrane potential depolarization of the of PV myocardial sleeves. As PV inexcitability hampers the assessment of entrance and exit block, demonstrating transient PV re-excitability during adenosine administration helps ensure true isolation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Saluja
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.,Present address: Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Eric Pagan
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Theodore Maglione
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - John Kassotis
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - William J Kostis
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - James Coromilas
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wynn G, Gupta D, Maille B, Snowdon R, Waktare J, Todd D, Hall M, Mahida S, Modi S. Demonstration of pulmonary vein exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: A novel use for adenosine. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2018; 29:1493-1499. [PMID: 30230085 DOI: 10.1111/jce.13744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Demonstration of exit block after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). It requires the demonstration of local pulmonary vein (PV) capture and absence of conduction to the atrium but is often challenging due to the inability to see local paced PV-evoked potentials. We retrospectively examined the ability of adenosine to augment this technique during CARTO-based radiofrequency ablation procedures. METHODS Retrospective analysis of evoked PV potentials during adenosine administration while testing for PV exit block at a single UK center. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-nine PVs in 33 patients were isolated using radiofrequency energy to demonstrate entry block. Of those, the pacing of 24 veins under baseline conditions did not clearly demonstrate local PV-evoked potentials sufficient to be sure that the local vein was truly captured and dissociated from the atrium. Adenosine was administered in 19 of these, with 10 of 19 (52.6%) veins then demonstrating clear local PV-evoked potentials transiently during adenosine administration, sufficient to allow assessment of definite exit block. CONCLUSION Adenosine administered during PV pacing allows transient visualization of local PV-evoked potentials after PVI facilitating the clearer demonstration of PV exit block in over 50% veins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Wynn
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dhiraj Gupta
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Derick Todd
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mark Hall
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Simon Modi
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pambrun T, Combes S, Sousa P, Bloa ML, El Bouazzaoui R, Grand-Larrieu D, Thompson N, Martin R, Combes N, Boveda S, Haïssaguerre M, Albenque JP. Contact-force guided single-catheter approach for pulmonary vein isolation: Feasibility, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14:331-338. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
14
|
Baldinger SH, Kumar S, Barbhaiya CR, Nagashima K, Epstein LM, John R, Tedrow UB, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF. The Timing and Frequency of Pulmonary Veins Unexcitability Relative to Completion of a Wide Area Circumferential Ablation Line for Pulmonary Vein Isolation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2016; 2:14-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|