Demonstration of pulmonary vein exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: A novel use for adenosine

High-resolution mapping as an alternative for exit block testing in the presence of entrance block after high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), it is common as an endpoint to demonstrate an exit block from the pulmonary veins (PVs) in addition to an entrance block into them. By using high-resolution mapping catheters, even very small signals can be detected.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether additional exit block testing is still necessary when using high-resolution mapping catheters after ablation in high-power short-duration (HPSD) techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 114 patients with AF (average age, 65.14 ± 11.3 years; 65.8% male) undergoing radiofrequency PVI were included in the study. Ablation was performed with the HPSD technique using a fixed protocol for energy delivery of 50 W (contact force 3-20 g). Entrance and exit block were tested with a high-resolution mapping catheter. Isolation of the PVs was achieved in all patients.

RESULTS

Capture of local PV tissue was demonstrated in all patients after PVI and exit block was present in all patients after entrance block was detected using a high-resolution mapping catheter.

CONCLUSION

Exit block testing in addition to the demonstration of an entrance block as an endpoint of PVI seems to have no additional benefit and might no longer be necessary when a high-resolution mapping catheter is used in HPSD ablation for PVI of AF.

Pulmonary vein antral isolation causes depolarization of vein sleeves: Implications for the assessment of isolation

PURPOSE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation has been shown to result in inexcitability of a large fraction of pulmonary veins (PVs), but the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanism of PV inexcitability by assessing the effects of PVI on the electrophysiology of PV sleeves.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency PVI were studied. Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability were measured in PVs and the left atrial appendage (LAA) before and after ablation. Adenosine was used to assess both transient reconnection and transient venous re-excitability.

RESULTS

We assessed 248 veins among 67 patients. Mean PV ERP (249.7 ± 54.0 ms) and capture threshold (1.4 ± 1.6 mA) increased to 300.5 ± 67.1 and 5.7 ± 5.6 mA, respectively (P < .0001 for both) in the 26.9% PVs that remained excitable, but no change was noted in either measure in the LAA. In 16.3% of the 73.1% inexcitable veins, transient PV re-excitability (as opposed to reconnection) was seen with adenosine administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Antral PVI causes inexcitability in a majority of the PVs, which can transiently be restored in some with adenosine. Among PVs that remain excitable, ERP and capture threshold increase significantly. These data imply resting membrane potential depolarization of the of PV myocardial sleeves. As PV inexcitability hampers the assessment of entrance and exit block, demonstrating transient PV re-excitability during adenosine administration helps ensure true isolation.