Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital anomaly in newborns. Advances in catheter and surgical techniques led to the majority of these patients surviving into adulthood, leading to evolving challenges due to the emergence of long-term complications such as arrhythmias. Interventional electrophysiology (EP) has had remarkable advances over the last few decades, and various techniques and devices have been explored to treat adult patients with CHD. This comprehensive review aims to summarize findings from recent studies exploring advances in the use of interventional electrophysiology to manage adult patients with CHD. While pacemaker therapy has some indications in adults with CHD, various long-term consequences include pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and complications requiring reintervention. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has shown promising results in some studies to treat CHD patients with heart failure, although further research to clarify guidelines is encouraged. Implantable cardiac defibrillators have demonstrated clear benefits in CHD patients and are indicated for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, although selection criteria for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death are uncertain. Catheter ablation has also been used for various atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CHD with high success rates, although the likelihood of success depends on patient characteristics and the type of arrhythmia, and multidisciplinary assessment is encouraged to improve the chance of successful therapy.

Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Fontan Patients with Multimodality Imaging: Tips and Tricks

Current leadless pacemaker (LP) systems, which have been developed and used in patients with normal cardiac anatomy, are rare and technically even more challenging to implant in patients with congenital heart diseases, especially with univentricular physiology and Fontan palliation. We report two cases of percutaneous LP implantation in an adult and a child, respectively, highlighting the unconventional approaches, different challenges, and use of multimodality imaging in patients who underwent a Fontan operation.

Updates in Arrhythmia Management in Adult Congenital Heart Disease

Arrhythmias are highly prevalent in adults with congenital heart disease. For the clinician caring for this population, an understanding of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of arrhythmia is essential. Herein we review the latest updates in diagnostics and treatment of tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias, all in the context of congenital anatomy, hemodynamics, and standard invasive palliations for congenital heart disease.

Different leadless pacemakers working in harmony (Aveir in the atrium/Micra AV2 in the ventricle) in a patient with dextrocardia and double outlet right ventricle after high-risk infected device extraction

INTRODUCTION

Patients with congenital heart disease are at increased risk for requiring cardiac pacing during their lifetime.

METHODS

We present the first described case of using two leadless pacing systems manufactured by separate companies implanted within the same patient to provide atrial and ventricular pacing due to complex congenital anatomy.

RESULTS

A 27-year-old male with dextrocardia with double outlet right ventricle, subaortic ventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis status-post pulmonary valve replacement complicated by ventricular pacing dependence and subsequent atrial pacing dependence after atriotomy-based atypical flutter ablation developed recurrent mediastinitis and pocket infection with erosion despite prolonged antibiotic treatment. Due to atrial and ventricular pacing dependence, a comprehensive congenital care team concluded the need for lead extraction and replacement of pacemaker via leadless peacemaking device. Laser-lead extraction and temporary atrial pacemaker placement was performed. Afterward, a transesophageal echocardiogram guided implantation of both a Micra AV 2 (Medtronic) leadless pacemaker in the interventricular septum within the right ventricle and an Aveir (Abbott) leadless pacemaker in the superior base of the right atrial appendage was performed with successful pacing. Although there is no communication between these devices, atrial-mechanical ventricular pacing was reliable with good implant thresholds, impedances and sensing from both devices.

CONCLUSION

Our case demonstrates the feasibility of using dual leadless pacing modalities to simultaneously pace someone at complex, prohibitive risk for temporary permanent or permanent pacemaker devices.

Leadless Pacemakers in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Transcatheter leadless pacemakers have benefits in congenital heart disease because they eliminate the risks of lead malfunction, venous occlusions, and pocket complications. This newest pacemaker's utility in this population has been limited by the large sheath and delivery system, need for atrioventricular synchronous pacing, lack of explantation options, and possible lack of adequate access to the subpulmonary ventricle. With careful planning, leadless pacing can be successfully performed in these patients. Consideration of nonfemoral access, alternative implant sites to avoid myocardial scar or prosthetic material, anticoagulation for patients with persistent intracardiac shunts or systemic ventricular implantation, and operator experience are critical.

Leadless Pacemakers: Current Achievements and Future Perspectives

Despite the technological advances in pacemaker technology, the transvenous implanted leads are still considered the Achilles' heel of this rhythm-control therapy. The leadless permanent pacemaker system was developed as an option to bypass the weakness of the transvenous approach. Advances in battery technology and deep miniaturisation of electronics now offer the opportunity to implant the whole pacemaker system into the right ventricle. This review aims to provide a comprehensive report on the advent of leadless pacemakers, their clinical usefulness and the future perspectives of this disruptive and promising technology. Further research is required before some of these technologies are safely and routinely used in clinical practice.

Peri-procedural and mid-term follow-up age-related differences in leadless pacemaker implantation: Insights from a multicenter European registry

BACKGROUND

Age-related differences on leadless pacemaker (LP) are poorly described. Aim of this study was to compare clinical indications, periprocedural and mid-term device-associated outcomes in a large real-world cohort of LP patients, stratified by age at implantation.

METHODS

Two cohorts of younger and older patients (≤50 and > 50 years old) were retrieved from the iLEAPER registry. The primary outcome was to compare the underlying indication why a LP was preferred over a transvenous PM across the two cohorts. Rates of peri-procedural and mid-term follow-up major complications as well as LP electrical performance were deemed secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

1154 patients were enrolled, with younger patients representing 6.2% of the entire cohort. Infective and vascular concerns were the most frequent characteristics that led to a LP implantation in the older cohort (45.8% vs 67.7%, p < 0.001; 4.2% vs 16.4%, p = 0.006), while patient preference was the leading cause to choose a LP in the younger (47.2% vs 5.6%, p < 0.001). Median overall procedural (52 [40-70] vs 50 [40-65] mins) and fluoroscopy time were similar in both groups. 4.3% of patients experienced periprocedural complications, without differences among groups. Threshold values were higher in the younger, both at discharge and at last follow-up (0.63 [0.5-0.9] vs 0.5 [0.38-0-7] V, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

When considering LP indications, patient preference was more common in younger, while infective and vascular concerns were more frequent in the older cohort. Rates of device-related complications did not differ significantly. Younger patients tended to have a slightly higher pacing threshold at mid-term follow-up.

Micra pacemaker in adult congenital heart disease patients: a case series

INTRODUCTION

implantation of transvenous endocardial or epicardial pacemakers presents specific challenges in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. Micra leadless pacemaker (Micra PPM) may overcome some of these difficulties.

METHODS

15 ACHD patients who underwent Micra PPM insertion were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

males 53.3%. Mean age at study: 37.5±10.7 years. Mean age at Micra PPM insertion: 35.5±11.0 years. Mean follow-up so far: 2.0±0.3 years. Concerning the ACHD patients, 6.7% had a simple defect, 66.6% had a moderately complex defect, 26.7% were complex. Four patients (26.7%) had a previous PPM implantation. Three patients (20%) had a systemic right ventricle. Two patients (13.3%) had a single ventricle physiology. Five (33.3%) had Trisomy 21. The most commonly used Micra PPM modality was VVI (73.3%). Mean threshold post implantation was 0.48 V [range: 0.25-1.13 V], while mean threshold at 6 months control was 0.60 V [range: 0.38-1.13 V] (p=ns). Mean R wave post implantation was 10.3 V [range: 3.25-19.4 V], whilst mean R wave at 6 months follow-up was 10.1 V [range:3.5-19.0 V] (p=ns). No major peri and post-procedural complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

since ACHD patients are living longer and surviving into adulthood, the incidence of conduction disorders continues to increase, as part of the natural history of some lesions or as early or late complication of surgery. The Micra leadless PPM can be successfully implanted in ACHD patients and have significant theoretical advantages. They should be considered when transvenous and epicardial pacing are either contraindicated or represent an otherwise suboptimal approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pediatric Micra leadless pacemaker implantation via internal jugular and femoral veins: experience with 11 patients

In pediatrics, conventional transvenous and epicardial pacemaker systems carry complications, such as lead distortion due to growth and activity, in addition to lead and pocket complications. A retrospective review of pediatric leadless pacing at the University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital (MN, USA) from 2018 through 2021 was performed. Diagnoses, rationale for pacing, demographics, pacing thresholds and longevity of devices were recorded. Twelve leadless pacemaker insertions and one removal were performed successfully in patients weighing 19-90 kg. Six patients had Micra implantation via the internal jugular vein without surgical cut-down. Up to 3 years of follow-up were noted, with median follow-up of 22 months. No late complications occurred. Leadless pacemaker implantation and early retrieval were feasible in pediatric patients.

Leadless pacemaker implant guided by intracardiac echocardiography in a patient after Mustard repair

This case report describes a successful leadless pacemaker implant (Micra VR Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) in a 48-year-old patient with a history of Mustard repair. Twenty-one years after dual-chamber pacemaker implant, both conventional leads became dysfunctional. Lead extraction was refused by the patient and the subclavian vein was obstructed. A leadless pacemaker was selected as an alternative. Intracardiac echocardiography allowed the safe introduction of the delivery system into the non-systemic left ventricle. Four months after implant, the pacing parameters are stable and the patient is without new complaints. A leadless pacemaker could be considered in patients with complex grown-up congenital heart disease. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Leadless pacemaker implantation quality: importance of the operator's experience

AIMS

Leadless cardiac pacemaker (PM) implantation differs from conventional PM implantation. While the procedure has been considered safe, recent real-world data raised concerns about the learning curve of new operators and their implantation quality. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of the first operator's experience on leadless PM implantation quality and procedural efficiency.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a bicentric analysis of all Micra TPS™ implantations in two large tertiary referral hospitals. We assessed both leadless PM implantation quality based on the absence of complications (requiring intervention or prolonged hospitalization), good electrical performance (pacing threshold ≤ 1.5 V/0.24 ms, R-wave amplitude > 5 mV), and acceptable fluoroscopy duration (<10 min) as well as procedural efficiency in relation to the operator's experience. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for implantation quality and procedural efficiency. Leadless PM implantation was successful in 106/111 cases (95.5%). Three patients (2.7%) experienced acute complications (one cardiac tamponade, one femoral bleeding, one posture-related PM exit block). Multivariate analysis showed that implantation quality of more experienced first operators was higher [odds ratio 1.09 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.19), P = 0.05]. Procedural efficiency increased with operator experience as evidenced by an inverse correlation of procedure time, time to the first deployment, fluoroscopy time, and the number of procedures performed (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The operator's learning curve is a critical factor for leadless PM implantation quality and procedural efficiency.

Emerging Technologies in Cardiac Pacing From Leadless Pacers to Stem Cells

Modern pacemakers can sense and pace multiple chambers of the heart. These pacemakers have different modes and features to optimize atrioventricular synchrony and promote intrinsic conduction. Despite recent advancements, current pacemakers have several drawbacks that limit their feasibility. In this review article, we discuss several of these limitations and detail several emerging technologies in cardiac pacing aimed to solve some of these limitations. We present several technological advancements in cardiac pacing, including the use of leadless pacemakers, physiologic pacing, battery improvements, and bioartificial pacemakers. More research still needs to be done in testing the safety and efficacy of these new developments.

Pediatric Micra leadless pacemaker implantation via internal jugular and femoral vein: a single center, US experience

Background: In the pediatric population, conventional transvenous and epicardial pacemaker systems carry complications such as lead distortion due to growth/activity, in addition to other lead/pocket complications. Materials & methods: A retrospective review of pediatric leadless pacing at the University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2020 was performed. Rationale for pacing, demographics of patients, thresholds and longevity of devices were recorded. Results: Seven leadless pacemaker insertions and one removal were performed successfully, in patients weighing between 19 kg and 58 kg. Three patients had Micra implantation via internal jugular vein. One pericardial effusion occurred perioperatively in a 19 kg patient with baseline thrombocytopenia, sideroblastic anemia and Pearson Marrow Pancreas syndrome. Conclusion: Leadless pacemaker implantation/early retrieval is feasible in pediatric patients.

Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Arrhythmia Management

Arrhythmia management in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) encompasses a wide range of problems from bradyarrhythmia to tachyarrhythmia, sudden death, and heart failure-related electrical dyssynchrony. Major advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology and treatments of these problems over the past decade have resulted in improved therapeutic strategies and outcomes. This article attempts to define these problems and review contemporary management for the patient with ACHD presenting with cardiac arrhythmia.