Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using second‐generation cryoballoon in patients with atrial fibrillation

Results of ICE-Guided Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava With Pulsed Field Ablation

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies have documented the risk for sinoatrial node injury and phrenic nerve paralysis as complications following radiofrequency catheter ablation for electrical isolation of the superior vena cava (SVCI).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of SVCI in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulsed field ablation (PFA) METHODS: A total of 1,600 consecutive patients undergoing PFA for pulmonary vein isolation plus SVCI were included in this multicenter analysis. Superior vena cava (SVC) ablation was performed under the continuous guidance of intracardiac echocardiography. The PFA catheter was placed at the junction between the SVC and the right atrium at the level of the lower border of the pulmonary artery. A total of 4 applications were given to achieve complete electrical isolation of the SVC. Sinus node injury and phrenic nerve stunning were checked during the procedure, before discharge, and at 2-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 616 patients receiving SVCI were included in the analysis. Acute SVCI was achieved in all 616 patients (100%). In the flower configuration used in the first 10 patients, 2 transient sinus node injuries and 2 episodes of phrenic nerve stunning were observed, which resolved spontaneously during the procedure. In the remaining patients, the basket configuration was used; only 1 episode of phrenic nerve stunning was registered, which regressed before the end of the procedure. No permanent damages were registered at discharge and at 2-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracardiac echocardiography-guided PFA can effectively isolate the SVC with a good safety profile.

Pulsed field ablation of a focal atrial tachycardia from the superior vena cava in proximity to the phrenic nerve: a case report

BACKGROUND

Right phrenic nerve (PN) injury is a major complication of thermal ablation of atrial tachycardias (ATs) originated from the superior vena cava (SVC).

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 41-year-old female patient admitted for catheter ablation of a frequent paroxysmal AT resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs. Electroanatomical activation map demonstrated a focal origin located at the lateral aspect of the SVC, ∼17 mm above the breakthrough of the sinus node wavefront. Importantly, high-output pacing from this site resulted in PN capture. To avoid PN injury, low-output radiofrequency (RF) ablation, with a power output limited to 20 W, was performed. However, this approach was insufficient to terminate AT. High-power RF applications in proximity to the PN were avoided and pulsed-field ablation (PFA) with a pentaspline catheter was chosen. The catheter was advanced into the SVC to the level of the earliest activation under fluoroscopic guidance and visualization within the mapping system. Two pairs of applications, in basket configuration, were delivered inside the SVC, rendering AT non-inducible while sinus node function was not compromised.

DISCUSSION

Phrenic nerve is vulnerable to injury during ablation within the SVC using thermal ablation modalities. Low-output RF ablation may be safe but less efficient. In contrast, non-thermal approaches such as PFA may be preferable to avoid damage to the collateral tissues as PN. Electroanatomical mapping may be important to avoid lesions in proximity to the sinus node.

Empirical superior vena cava electrical isolation guided by quantitative ablation index improves outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The value of empirical superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to improve the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quantitative ablation index (AI)-guided empirical SVCI, in addition to PVI, for patients with PAF.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic PAF who underwent RFCA between October 2021 and May 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorised into PVI-only group and PVI+SVCI group based on the intraoperative ablation strategy. RFCA was guided by quantitative AI in both groups. Regular clinical follow-ups were conducted to detect AF recurrence, defined as any episode of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 s.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were enrolled, with 108 patients in the PVI group and 138 patients in the PVI+SVCI group. Compared with the PVI group, patients in the PVI+SVCI group had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (p=0.04), stroke (p=0.02) and a smaller left atrial diameter (p<0.01). After a follow-up period of 16±6 months, the ablation success rate was significantly higher in the SVCI+PVI group compared with the PVI group (91.3% vs 81.5%, p=0.02). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that SVCI was an independent predictor of reduced AF recurrence postablation (Relative Risk [RR] 0.4, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.90, p=0.026). No significant difference in complication rates was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative AI-guided empirical SVCI, in addition to PVI, improves the success rate of RFCA for PAF without increasing the risk of complications.

Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

AIMS

Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.

Cryoballoon ablation of non-PV triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation

Cryoballoon-based catheter ablation has emerged as an efficacious and safe therapeutic intervention for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). PAF is primarily associated with the triggers in the pulmonary vein (PV). However, persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is a complex condition that involves changes in the atrial substrate and the presence of non-PV triggers. Therefore, a comprehensive treatment approach is necessary for patients with PeAF. Utilizing a 3D electroanatomical map, the radiofrequency-based ablation technique adeptly identifies and targets the atrial substrate and non-PV triggers. On the other hand, the cryoballoon-based AF ablation was initially designed for PV isolation. However, its single-shot feature makes it a great choice for electrophysiologists looking to address non-PV triggers. It is possible to target the left atrial appendage (LAA), superior vena cava (SVC), left atrial roof, and posterior wall using the apparatus's unique configuration and ablation abilities. This review focuses on the increasing literature regarding cryoballoon-based methods for non-PV trigger ablation. Specifically, it delves into the technical procedures used to isolate the LAA, SVC, and ablate the left atrial roof and posterior wall.

Optimization of superior vena cava isolation with aid of ablation index guidance

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the optimal range of quantitative ablation index (AI) value during superior vena cava (SVC) electrical isolation by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

First, in a development cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the RFCA with 40 W was performed to complete SVC isolation guided by the conduction breakthrough point from the right atrium to SVC. Then, the range of AI value was calculated by offline analysis on different segments of SVC. Lastly, for the validation of AF patients, the safety and effectiveness of SVC isolation with the optimized target range of AI value were evaluated with an additional adenosine test.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients with AF were included in the study (44 patients in the development cohort/57 in the validation cohort). The segmental ablation strategy was applied in 70% of the patients. According to the offline analysis of the AI values in the development cohort, the target AI value range was set as 350-400. The success rate of SVC isolation in the validation cohort was significantly higher than that in the exploration cohort (100% vs. 90.9%, p = .02), and no complications occurred in the exploration cohort. During the adenosine test, the recovery rate of electrical conduction in SVC was significantly lower than that in the pulmonary vein (3.5% vs. 17.5%).

CONCLUSION

The target AI value with a range from 350 to 400 is safe and effective for high-power RFCA to complete SVC isolation.

Efficacy, Safety and Feasibility of Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: An Up-to-Date Review

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation; yet, the role of arrhythmogenic superior vena cava (SVC) is increasingly recognized and different ablation strategies have been employed in this context. SVC can act as a trigger or perpetuator of AF, and its significance might be more pronounced in patients undergoing repeated ablation. Several cohorts have examined efficacy, safety and feasibility of SVC isolation (SVCI) among AF patients. The majority of these studies explored as-needed SVCI during index PVI, and only a minority of them included repeated ablation subjects and non-radiofrequency energy sources. Studies of heterogeneous design and intent have explored both empiric and as-needed SVCI on top of PVI and reported inconclusive results. These studies have largely failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit in terms of arrhythmia recurrence, although safety and feasibility are undisputable. Mixed population demographics, small number of enrollees and short follow-up are the main limitations. Procedural and safety data are comparable between empiric SVCI and as-needed SVCI, and some studies suggested that empiric SVCI might be associated with reduced AF recurrences in paroxysmal AF patients. Currently, no study has compared different ablation energy sources in the setting of SVCI, and no randomized study has addressed as-needed SVCI on top of PVI. Furthermore, data regarding cryoablation are still in their infancy, and regarding SVCI in patients with cardiac devices more safety and feasibility data are needed. PVI non-responders, patients undergoing repeated ablation and patients with long SVC sleeves could be potential candidates for SVCI, especially via an empiric approach. Although many technical aspects remain unsettled, the major question to answer is which clinical phenotype of AF patients might benefit from SVCI?

Initial experience of a novel method for electrical isolation of the superior vena cava using cryoballoon in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Damage to the sinus node (SN) has been described as a potential complication of superior vena cava (SVC) isolation. There have been reports of permanent SN injury requiring pacemaker implantation during isolation of the SVC.

HYPOTHESIS

It is safe and effective to isolate SVC with the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon by using a novel method.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (including six redo cases) with SVC-related atrial fibrillation (AF) from a consecutive series of 650 patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation were included. After pulmonary vein isolation was achieved, if the SVC trigger was identified, the SVC was electrically isolated using the cryoballoon. First, the cryoballoon was inflated in the right atrium (RA) and advanced towards the SVC-RA junction. After total occlusion was confirmed by dye injection with total retention of contrast in the SVC, the SVC-RA junction was determined. Next, the cryoballoon was deflated, advanced into SVC, then reinflated, and pulled back gently. The equatorial band of the cryoballoon was then set slightly (4.32 ± 0.71 mm) above the SVC-RA junction for isolation of the SVC.

RESULTS

Real-time SVC potential was observed in all patients during ablation. The mean time to isolation was 24.5 ± 10.7 s. The SVC was successfully isolated in all patients. The mean number of freeze cycles was 2.5 ± 1.4 per patient, and the mean ablation time was 99.8 ± 22.7 s. A transient phrenic nerve (PN) injury occurred in one patient (2.33%). There were no SN injuries. Freedom from AF rates at 6 and 12 months was 97.7% and 93.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel method for SVC isolation using the cryoballoon is safe and feasible when the SVC driver during AF is determined and could avoid SN injury. PN function should still be carefully monitored during an SVC isolation procedure.

Intracardiac echocardiography Chinese expert consensus

In recent years, percutaneous catheter interventions have continuously evolved, becoming an essential strategy for interventional diagnosis and treatment of many structural heart diseases and arrhythmias. Along with the increasing complexity of cardiac interventions comes ever more complex demands for intraoperative imaging. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is well-suited for these requirements with real-time imaging, real-time monitoring for intraoperative complications, and a well-tolerated procedure. As a result, ICE is increasingly used many types of cardiac interventions. Given the lack of relevant guidelines at home and abroad and to promote and standardize the clinical applications of ICE, the members of this panel extensively evaluated relevant research findings, and they developed this consensus document after discussions and correlation with front-line clinical work experience, aiming to provide guidance for clinicians and to further improve interventional cardiovascular diagnosis and treatment procedures.

Cryoballoon ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation has been demonstrated to be a safe and an effective treatment for drug resistant atrial fibrillation (AF); electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the main strategy in paroxysmal AF, since pulmonary vein triggers have a pivotal role in its pathogenesis; non-paroxysmal AF is a complex arrhythmia that results from the interplay of a substrate, namely AF-induced electrical and structural atrial remodeling, and a trigger that can be often found outside pulmonary veins, namely non-pulmonary veins triggers.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of non-pulmonary veins triggers with special focus on cryoballoon (CB) catheter ablation.

EXPERT OPINION

Besides PVI, CB catheter ablation of non-pulmonary veins triggers is a novel and promising strategy for non-paroxysmal AF.

Cryoballoon Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in a Chinese Population: Five-Year Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrence After a Single Procedure

Background

The 5-year outcomes and predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following cryoballoon (CB) ablation in Chinese population remain scarce. Our aim was to report 5-year outcomes and predictors of AF recurrence following a single CB ablation procedure in a Chinese population.

Methods

From December 2013 to August 2016, we included 256 consecutive patients (mean age: 58 ± 10.9 years old; female: 41.0%) with paroxysmal or persistent AF successfully underwent first-generation CB ablation at Fuwai hospital in this prospective study. All patients were followed at least 5 years or when there was recurrent AF. Independent predictors of AF recurrence were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

Results

The 5-year success rate after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by a single procedure was 59.4%. The recurrence rate was the highest (14.5%) within the first year after the index procedure, and then stabilized. Patients with paroxysmal AF had a higher incidence of freedom from AF recurrence than patients with persistent AF (63.2% vs. 36.4%, log-rank P &lt; 0.01). The overall incidence of complications related to CB ablation was 7.8%. Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) was the most common complication, with an incidence of 3.5%, and patients with PNI were recovered within the 1-year follow-up. Only persistent AF (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.028–2.854, P &lt; 0.05) was significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after adjusting for other factors.

Conclusion

Pulmonary vein isolation using CB ablation was safe and effective with an acceptable complication and 5-year success rate in a Chinese population with AF, and persistent AF was the independent predictor for 5-year AF recurrence after a single CB ablation procedure.

Laser balloon in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Visually guided laser balloon (LB) catheter has been an established modality dedicated for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. The newly updated version of this novel device has technically evolved recent years.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the contemporary technical evolution of LB catheter. Available efficacy outcomes and the historical change of ablation style will be evaluated. Furthermore, the future perspectives for clinical practice are discussed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The initial LB ablation system provided comparable clinical results in PV isolation with other technologies, but with a unique strategical concept enabling the direct visualization of the tissue to cauterize. With multigenerational development, the LB catheter has been equipped with more compliant balloon for favorable PV occlusion and a robotically motor driven continuous ablation mode (RAPID mode). These technical innovations changed the concept of the ablation strategy using LB catheter as 'point-by-point' into 'single-shot' fashion. The remaining tasks are further improvements such as equipping with real-time recording system of intracardiac electrogram, durable structured balloon and the instrument for visualizing the cauterization area in a 360-degree panoramic view, which includes potential possibilities to develop this novel device to the more optimal device for PV isolation.

Cryoballoon ablation for extrapulmonary vein targets

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cryoballoon catheter can create large and contiguous lesions with stable contact during ablation. It has proven to be well tolerated and effective in pulmonary vein isolation. But atrial arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and atrial flutter (AFL), also relate to many extrapulmonary vein targets. It is necessary to understand the current evidence for the use of cryoballoon ablation for targets outside of pulmonary veins.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have shown that the cryoballoon ablation can be used in extrapulmonary vein area, including left atrium roof, left atrial appendages, posterior left atrial wall, mitral isthmus, and right atrial appendage. The results indicate cryoballoon ablation is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the atrial arrhythmias in these locations outside of pulmonary vein when clinical necessary.

SUMMARY

The cryoballoon ablation can safely and effectively perform contiguous linear lesions, structure isolations, and local ablation for targets outside of the pulmonary veins.

Procedure characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation procedures using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation: A report from the GWTG-AFIB registry

INTRODUCTION

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and real-world comparisons of this strategy are lacking. As such, we sought to compare patient and periprocedural characteristics and outcomes of CBA versus RFA in the Get With the Guidelines AFIB Registry.

METHODS

Categorical variables were compared via the χ² test and continuous variables were compared via the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Adjusted analyses were performed using overlap weighting of propensity scores.

RESULTS

A total of 5247 (1465 CBA, 3782 RFA) ablation procedures were reported from 33 sites. Those undergoing CBA more often had paroxysmal AF (60.0% vs. 48.8%) and no prior AF ablation (87.5% vs. 73.8%). CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc scores were similar. Among de novo ablations, most ablations involved intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping, but both were less common with CBA (87.3% vs. 93.9%, p < .0001, and 87.7% vs. 94.6%, p < .0001, respectively). CBA was associated with shorter procedures (129 vs. 179 min, p < .0001), increased fluoroscopy use (19 vs. 11 min, p < .0001), and similar ablation times (27 vs. 35 min, p = .15). Nonpulmonary vein ablation was common with CBA: roof line 38.6%, floor line 20.4%, cavotricuspid isthmus 27.7%. RFA was associated with more total complications compared to CBA (5.4% vs. 2.3%, p < .0001), due to more volume overload and "other" events, although phrenic nerve injury was more common with CBA (0.9% vs 0.1%, p = .0001). In the adjusted model, any complication was less common among CBA cases (odds ratio, 0.45; confidence interval, 0.25-0.79, p = .0056).

CONCLUSION

CBA was associated with fewer complications, and shorter procedure times, and greater fluoroscopy times, compared to RFA. Nonpulmonary vein ablation and electroanatomic mapping system use was common with CBA.