Rapid pacing and high-frequency jet ventilation additively improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation

Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Plus Rapid-Atrial Pacing in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and cost-effective strategy that improves catheter stability, first-pass pulmonary vein isolation, and freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the incremental value of adding rapid-atrial pacing (RAP) to HFLTV-ventilation has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of HFLTV-ventilation plus RAP during RFCA of paroxysmal AF on procedural and long-term clinical outcomes compared to HFLTV-ventilation alone.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry, who underwent RFCA of paroxysmal AF using either HFLTV + RAP (500-600 msec) or HFLTV ventilation alone from April 2020 to February 2023 were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, long-term clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the analysis (HFLTV + RAP = 327 vs. HFLTV = 218). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No differences were observed in procedural (HFLTV + RAP 74 [57-98] vs. HFLTV 66 [53-85.75] min, p = 0.617) and RF (HFLTV + RAP 15.15 [11.22-21.22] vs. HFLTV 13.99 [11.04-17.13] min, p = 0.620) times. Both groups showed a similar freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up (HFLTV + RAP 82.68% vs. HFLTV 86.52%, HR = 1.43, 95% CI [0.94-2.16], p = 0.093). There were no significant differences in freedom from AF-related symptoms (HFLTV + RAP 91.4% vs. HFLTV 93.1%, p = 0.476) or AF-related hospitalizations (HFLTV + RAP 98.5% vs. HFLTV 97.2%, p = 0.320). Procedure-related complications were low in both groups (HFLTV + RAP 0.6% vs. HFLTV 0%, p = 0.247).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA for paroxysmal AF, adding RAP to HFLTV-ventilation was not associated with improved procedural and long-term clinical outcomes.

High-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation improves procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: Prospective multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal volume (HFLTV) ventilation increases the efficacy and efficiency of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Whether those benefits can be extrapolated to RFCA of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether using HFLTV ventilation during RFCA in patients with PeAF is associated with improved procedural and long-term clinical outcomes compared to standard ventilation (SV).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + posterior wall isolation (PWI) for PeAF using either HFLTV ventilation or SV were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural and long-term clinical outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included (HFLTV=95 vs. SV=115) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Procedural time (80 [66-103.5] minutes vs 110 [85-141] minutes; P <.001), total radiofrequency (RF) time (18.73 [13.93-26.53] minutes vs 26.15 [20.30-35.25] minutes; P <.001), and pulmonary vein RF time (11.35 [8.78-16.69] minutes vs 18 [13.74-24.14] minutes; P <.001) were significantly shorter using HFLTV ventilation compared with SV. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias was significantly higher with HFLTV ventilation compared with SV (82.1% vs 68.7%; hazard ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval [0.21-0.82]; P = .012), indicating a 43% relative risk reduction and a 13.4% absolute risk reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence. There was no difference in long-term procedure-related complications between the groups (HFLTV 1.1% vs SV 0%, P = .270).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing RFCA with PVI + PWI for PeAF, the use of HFLTV ventilation was associated with higher freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12-month follow-up, with significantly shorter procedural and RF times compared to SV, while reporting a similar safety profile.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Anesthetic Techniques for Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Review

Atrial fibrillation, the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, has witnessed significant advancements in treatment modalities, transitioning from invasive procedures like the maze procedure to minimally invasive catheter ablation techniques. This review focuses on recent improvements in anesthetic approaches that enhance outcomes in catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. We highlight the efficacy of contact force sensing catheters with steerable introducer sheaths, which outperform traditional catheters by ensuring more effective contact time and lesion formation. Comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, we find that general anesthesia provides superior catheter stability due to reduced respiratory variability, resulting in more effective lesion formation, and reduced pulmonary vein reconnection. The use of high-frequency jet ventilation under general anesthesia, delivering low tidal volumes, effectively minimizes left atrial movement, decreasing catheter displacement and procedure time, and reducing recurrence in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. An alternative, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation using conventional ventilators, also shows improved catheter stability and lesion durability compared to traditional ventilation methods. However, a detailed comparative study of high-frequency jet ventilation, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation, and conventional mechanical ventilation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is lacking. This review emphasizes the need for such studies to identify optimal anesthetic techniques, potentially enhancing patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation treatment. Our findings suggest that careful selection of anesthetic methods, including ventilation strategies, plays a crucial role in the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, warranting further research for evidence-based practice.

Lesion characteristics using high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Difference in radiofrequency ablation profile between during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: Considerations in this era of high-power short-duration strategy

Background

The concept of ablation index (AI) was introduced to evaluate radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions. It is calculated from power, contact force (CF), and RF duration. However, other factors may also affect the quality of ablation lesions. To examine the difference in RF lesions made during sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Sixty patients underwent index pulmonary vein isolation during SR (n = 30, SR group) or AF (n = 30, AF group). All ablations were performed with a power of 50 W, a targeted CF of 5-15 g, and AI of 400-450 using Thermocool Smarttouch SF. The CF, AI, RF duration, temperature rise (Δtemp), impedance drop (Δimp), and the CF stability of each ablation point quantified as the standard deviation of the CF (CF-SD) were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 3579 ablation points were analyzed, which included 1618 and 1961 points in the SR and the AF groups, respectively. Power, average CF, RF duration per point, and the resultant AI (389 ± 59 vs. 388 ± 57) were similar for the two rhythms. However, differences were seen in the CF-SD (3.5 ± 2.2 vs. 3.8 ± 2.1 g, p < .01), Δtemp (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.0 ± 1.3°C, p < .005), and Δimp (10.3 ± 5.8 vs. 9.4 ± 5.4 Ω, p < .005).

Conclusions

Despite similar AI, various RF parameters differed according to the underlying atrial rhythm. Ablation delivered during SR demonstrated less CF variability and temperature increase and greater impedance drop than during AF.

Recovery and safety with prolonged high-frequency jet ventilation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A hospital registry study from a New England healthcare network

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate post-procedural recovery as well as peri-procedural respiratory and hemodynamic safety parameters with prolonged use of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) versus conventional ventilation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

DESIGN

Hospital registry study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic teaching hospital in New England.

PATIENTS

1822 patients aged 18 years and older undergoing catheter ablation between January 2013 and June 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

HFJV versus conventional mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. In secondary analyses we assessed the effect of HFJV on intra-procedural hypoxemia, defined as the occurrence of peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) <90%, post-procedural respiratory complications (PRC) as well as intra-procedural hypocarbia and hypotension. Multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for patient and procedural characteristics, were applied.

MAIN RESULTS

1157 patients (63%) received HFJV for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of 307 (253-360) minutes. The median (IQR) length of stay in the PACU was 244 (172-370) minutes in patients who underwent ablation with conventional mechanical ventilation and 226 (163-361) minutes in patients receiving HFJV. In adjusted analyses, patients undergoing HFJV had a longer PACU length of stay (adjusted absolute difference: 37.7 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7-65.8; p = 0.008). There was a higher risk of intra-procedural hypocarbia (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 5.90; 95%CI 2.63-13.23; p < 0.001) and hypotension (ORadj 1.88; 95%CI 1.31-2.72; p = 0.001) in patients undergoing HFJV. No association was found between the use of HFJV and intra-procedural hypoxemia or PRC (p = 0.51, and p = 0.97, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After confounder adjustment, HFJV for catheter ablation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation was associated with a longer length of stay in the PACU. It was further associated with an increased risk of intra-procedural abnormalities including abnormal carbon dioxide homeostasis, as well as intra-procedural arterial hypotension.

Impact of weight adjusted high frequency low tidal volume ventilation and atrial pacing in lesion metrics in high-power short-duration ablation: Results of a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Lesion size index (LSI) was introduced with the use of Tacticath™ and as a surrogate of lesion quality. The metric used to achieve the predetermined values involves combined information of contact force (CF), power and radiofrequency time. Rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve catheter stability and CF and quality of lesions. Data of the impact of body weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation strategy associated with RAP in the lesion metrics still lacking. The study aimed to compare the results of high-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation ablation using simultaneous weight adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol.

METHODS

Prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation divided into two groups; 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). Ablation using 50 W, CF of 5-10 g/10-20 g and 40 mL/minute flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial wall, respectively.

RESULTS

No procedure-related complications. Group A: Mean LSI points 70 ± 16.5, mean total lower LSI 3.4 ± 0.5, mean total higher LSI 8.2 ± 0.4 and mean total LSI 5.6 ± 0.6. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 6.0 ± 0.4 and 4.2 ± 0.3, respectively. Mean local impedance drop (LID) points were 118.8 ± 28.4, mean LID index (%) 12.9 ± 1.5, and mean LID < 12% points 55.9 ± 23.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 13.6 ± 2.0 and 11.9 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 11 (15.7%) patients. Group B: Mean LSI points 56 ± 2.7, mean total lower LSI 2.9 ± 0.7, mean total higher LSI 6.9 ± 0.9, and mean total LSI 4.8 ± 0.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 5.1 ± 0.3 and 3.5 ± 0.5, respectively. Mean LID points were 111.4 ± 21.5, mean LID index (%) 11.4 ± 1.2, and mean LID < 12% points 54.9 ± 25.2. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 11.8 ± 1.9 and 10.3 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 14 (21.2%) patients. Mean follow up was 15.2 ± 4.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation with RAP HPSD ablation produced lower recurrence rate and better LSI and LID parameters in comparison to SV and intrinsic sinus rhythm.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolations (PVI) are being performed using a high-power, short-duration (HPSD) strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes of an HPSD versus low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach to PVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Patients were grouped according to a HPSD (≥40 W) or LPLD (≤35 W) strategy. The primary endpoint was the 1-year recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia lasting ≥30 s, detected using three 14-day ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring. Procedural and safety endpoints were also evaluated. The primary analysis were regression models incorporating propensity scores yielding adjusted relative risk (RRa ) and mean difference (MDa ) estimates.

RESULTS

Of the 398 patients included in the AWARE Trial, 173 (43%) underwent HPSD and 225 (57%) LPLD ablation. The distribution of power was 50 W in 75%, 45 W in 20%, and 40 W in 5% in the HPSD group, and 35 W with 25 W on the posterior wall in the LPLD group. The primary outcome was not statistically significant at 30.1% versus 22.2% in HPSD and LPLD groups with RRa 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]) 0.55-1.10; p = .165). The secondary outcome of repeat catheter ablation was not statistically significant at 6.9% and 9.8% (RRa 1.59 [95% CI 0.77-3.30]; p = .208) respectively, nor was the incidence of any ECG documented AF during the blanking period: 1.7% versus 8.0% (RRa 3.95 [95% CI 1.00-15.61; p = .049) in the HPSD versus LPLD group respectively. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in the HPSD group (MDa 97.5 min [95% CI 84.8-110.4)]; p < .0001) with no difference in adjudicated serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

An HPSD strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedural times with similar efficacy in terms of clinical arrhythmia recurrence. Importantly, there was no signal for increased harm with a HPSD strategy.

Comparison between weight-adjusted, high-frequency, low-tidal-volume ventilation and atrial pacing with normal ventilation in high-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation: Results of a pilot study

Background

Better contact force (CF) and catheter stability (CS) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are associated with higher success rate. Changes in CF and CS are observed during respiratory movements and cardiac contraction. Previous studies have suggested that rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high-frequency, low-tidal-volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve CS and CF and quality of lesions. Data from a body weight-adjusted HFLTV strategy associated with RAP in AF high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation are still lacking.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the results of HPSD AF ablation using simultaneous weight-adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol.

Methods

This was a prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation were divided into 2 groups: 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). The ablation used 50 W, CF of 5 to 10 g and 10 to 20 g, and 40 mL/min flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial walls, respectively.

Results

There were no procedure-related complications. In group A, left atrial and total ablation times were 53.5 ± 8.3 minutes and 67.4 ± 10.1 minutes, respectively. Radiofrequency time was 19.7 ± 5.7 minutes, radioscopy time was 3.4 ± 1.8 minutes, 62 (88.6%) patients had first-pass isolation, 23 (33.3%) patients had elevation of luminal esophageal temperature, and 7 (10%) patients had recurrence. In group B, left atrial time was 56.7 ± 10.8 minutes, total ablation time was 72.4 ± 11.5 minutes, radiofrequency time was 22.4 ± 6.2 minutes, radioscopy time was 3.6 ± 3 minutes, 58 (87.9%) patients had first-pass isolation, and 20 (30.3%) patients had luminal esophageal temperature elevation.

Conclusion

Weight-adjusted HFLTV with RAP in comparison with SV and intrinsic sinus rhythm in HPSD ablation is safe with no CO2 retention. The approach produced significantly reduced radiofrequency, left atrial, and total ablation times and better CF and local impedance drop indexes.

High-Frequency Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Improves Long-Term Outcomes in AF Ablation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-frequency, low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation is a safe and simple strategy to improve catheter stability and first-pass isolation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. However, the impact of this technique on long-term clinical outcomes has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess acute and long-term outcomes of HFLTV ventilation compared with standard ventilation (SV) during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter registry (REAL-AF), patients undergoing PAF ablation using either HFLTV or SV were included. The primary outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and hospitalizations at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients were included. Compared with those in the SV group, patients in the HFLTV group had shorter procedural (66 [IQR: 51-88] minutes vs 80 [IQR: 61-110] minutes; P < 0.001), total RF (13.5 [IQR: 10-19] minutes vs 19.9 [IQR: 14.7-26.9] minutes; P < 0.001), and PV RF (11.1 [IQR: 8.8-14] minutes vs 15.3 [IQR: 12.4-20.4] minutes; P < 0.001) times. First-pass PV isolation was higher in the HFLTV group (66.6% vs 63.8%; P = 0.036). At 12 months, 185 of 216 (85.6%) in the HFLTV group were free from all-atrial arrhythmia, compared with 353 of 445 (79.3%) patients in the SV group (P = 0.041). HLTV was associated with a 6.3% absolute reduction in all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, lower rate of AF-related symptoms (12.5% vs 18.9%; P = 0.046), and hospitalizations (1.4% vs 4.7%; P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

HFLTV ventilation during catheter ablation of PAF improved freedom from all-atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF-related symptoms, and AF-related hospitalizations with shorter procedural times.

Differential gap location after radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: Insights from a randomized trial with protocol-mandated repeat procedure

INTRODUCTION

Reconnections to pulmonary vein (PV) triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the primary cause of AF recurrence after PV isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but method-specific contributions to PV reconduction pattern and conductive gap location are incompletely understood.

METHODS

The objective of this radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation substudy was to determine procedure-specific patterns of PV reconduction in a randomized population with protocol-mandated repeat procedures, irrespective of AF recurrence. Each PV was assessed in turn and PV reconnection sites were identified by high-density electroanatomical mapping and locating the earliest activation site. Gap locations were verified by PV re-isolation.

RESULTS

In 98 patients, 81% versus 76% previously isolated PVs remained isolated after CRYO versus RF (risk ratio [RR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.18; p = .28). There were no significant differences for any PV: left superior PV: 90% versus 80%; left inferior PV: 80% versus 78%; right superior PV: 81% versus 80%, and right inferior PV: 76% versus 73%. For each reconnected PV, 34% of ipsilateral PVs were also reconnected after CRYO compared with 64% after RF (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; p = .01). After RF, gaps were clustered by the carina and adjacent segments, whereas they were more heterogeneously distributed after CRYO.

CONCLUSION

Although RF and CRYO produce similar proportions of durably isolated PVs, gap locations appear to develop in procedure-specific patterns. After RF, ipsilateral PV reconduction is more frequent and gap sites cluster by the carina, suggesting that this region should be selectively ablated for more durable PVI.

Temporal trends in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures at an academic medical center: 2011-2021

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency ablation technology for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved rapidly over the past decade. We investigated the impact of technological and procedural advances on procedure times and ablation outcomes at a major academic medical center over a 10-year period.

METHODS

Clinical data was collected from patients who presented to NYU Langone Health between 2011 and 2021 for a first-time AF ablation. Time to redo AF ablation or direct current cardioversion (DCCV) for recurrent AF during a 3-year follow-up period was determined and correlated with ablation technology and practices, antiarrhythmic medications, and patient comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2021, the cardiac electrophysiology lab adopted irrigated-contact force ablation catheters, high-power short duration ablation lesions, steady-pacing, jet ventilation, and eliminated stepwise linear ablation for AF ablation. During this time the number of first time AF ablations increased from 403 to 1074, the percentage of patients requiring repeat AF-related intervention within 3-years of the index procedure dropped from 22% to 14%, mean procedure time decreased from 271 ± 65 to 135 ± 36 min, and mean annual major adverse event rate remained constant at 1.1 ± 0.5%. Patient comorbid conditions increased during this time period and antiarrhythmic use was unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Rates of redo-AF ablation or DCCV following an initial AF ablation at a single center decreased 36% over a 10-year period. Procedural and technological changes likely contributed to this improvement, despite increased AF related comorbidities.

Jet Ventilation Reduces Coronary Sinus Movement in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Observational Crossover Study

BACKGROUND

One of the reasons that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used is due to the near immobility of thoracic structures. However, no study has quantified the movements of cardiac structures during HFJV compared with normal mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

After ethical approval and written informed consent, we included 21 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation in this prospective crossover study. Each patient was ventilated with both normal mechanical ventilation and HFJV. During each ventilation mode, displacements of the cardiac structure were measured by the EnSite Precision mapping system using a catheter placed in the coronary sinus.

RESULTS

The median [Q1-Q4] displacement was 2.0 [0.6-2.8] mm during HFJV and 10.5 [9.3-13.0] mm during conventional ventilation (p < 0.000001).

CONCLUSION

This study quantifies the minimal movement of cardiac structures during HFJV compared to standard mechanical ventilation.

Anesthetic Considerations in the Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Comprehensive Review

Catheter ablation procedures for arrhythmias or implantation and/or extraction of cardiac pacemakers can present many clinical challenges. It is imperative that there is clear communication and understanding between the anesthesiologist and electrophysiologist during the perioperative period regarding the mode of ventilation, hemodynamic considerations, and various procedural complications. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the anesthetic techniques and considerations for catheter ablation procedures, ventilatory modes using techniques such as high-frequency jet ventilation, and strategies such as esophageal deviation and luminal temperature monitoring to decrease the risk of esophageal injury during catheter ablation. Various hemodynamic considerations, such as the intraprocedural triaging of cardiac tamponade and fluid administration during catheter ablation, also are discussed. Finally, this review briefly highlights the early research findings on pulse-field ablation, a new and evolving ablation modality.

Muscle usage and workload assessment of cardiac ablation procedure with the use of a novel catheter torque tool in a pediatric simulator

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ablation catheters are small in diameter and pose ergonomic challenges that can affect catheter stability. Significant finger dexterity and strength are necessary to maneuver them safely. We evaluated a novel torque tool to reduce muscle activation when manipulating catheters and improve perceived workload of ablation tasks. The objective was to evaluate measurable success, user perception of workload, and muscle usage when completing a simulated ablation task with and without the use of a catheter torque tool.

METHODS

Cardiology attendings and fellows were fitted with surface electromyographic (EMG) sensors on 6 key muscle groups in the left hand and forearm. A standard ablation catheter was inserted into a pediatric cardiac ablation simulator and subjects navigated the catheter tip to 6 specific electrophysiologic targets, including a 1-min simulated radiofrequency ablation lesion. Time to complete the task, number of attempts required to complete the lesion, and EMG activity normalized to percentage of maximum voluntary contraction were collected throughout the task. The task was completed 4 times, twice with and twice without the torque tool, in semi-randomized order. A NASA Task Load Index survey was completed by the participant at the conclusion of each task.

RESULTS

Time to complete the task and number of attempts to create a lesion were not altered by the tool. Subjectively, participants reported a significant decrease in physical demand, effort, and frustration, and a significant increase in performance. Muscle activation was decreased in 4 of 6 muscle groups.

CONCLUSION

The catheter torque tool may improve the perceived workload of cardiac ablation procedures and reduce muscle fatigue caused by manipulating catheters. This may result in improved catheter stability and increased procedural safety.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Approach to Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using Prolonged Apneic Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Improved ablation catheter-tissue contact results in more effective ablation lesions. Respiratory motion causes catheter instability, which impacts durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel ablation strategy involving prolonged periods of apneic oxygenation during PVI.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, prospective controlled study of 128 patients (mean age 63 ± 11 years; 37% women) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing PVI. Patients underwent PVI under general anesthesia using serial 4-minute runs of apneic oxygenation (apnea group; n = 64) or using standard ventilation settings (control group; n = 64). Procedural data, arterial blood gas samples, catheter position coordinates, and ablation lesion characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. Catheter stability was significantly improved in the apnea group, as reflected by a decreased mean catheter displacement (1.55 ± 0.97 mm vs 2.25 ± 1.13 mm; P < 0.001) and contact force SD (4.9 ± 1.1 g vs 5.2 ± 1.5 g; P = 0.046). The percentage of lesions with a mean catheter displacement >2 mm was significantly lower in the apnea group (22% vs 44%; P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the total ablation time to achieve PVI was reduced in the apnea group (18.8 ± 6.9 minutes vs 23.4 ± 7.8 minutes; P = 0.001). There were similar rates of first-pass PVI, acute PV reconnections and dormant PV reconnections between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel strategy of performing complete PVI during apneic oxygenation results in improved catheter stability and decreased ablation times without adverse events. (Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Apnea; NCT04170894).

Feasibility, Safety, and Short‐Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Premature Infants on High‐Frequency Jet Ventilation

Background

Prolonged exposure to a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with major morbidity, particularly in infants born at <27 weeks’ gestation. High‐frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is a standard of care at our center. There are no data about transcatheter PDA closure while on HFJV. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of HFJV during transcatheter PDA closure.

Methods and Results

This is a retrospective cohort study of premature infants undergoing transcatheter device closure on HFJV. The primary outcome was successful device placement. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, fluoroscopy time and dose, time off unit, device complications, need for escalation in respiratory support, and 7‐day survival. Subgroup comparative evaluation of patients managed with HFJV versus a small cohort of patients managed with conventional mechanical ventilation was performed. Thirty‐eight patients were included in the study. Median age and median weight at PDA device closure for the HFJV cohort were 32 days (interquartile range, 25.25–42.0 days) and 1115 g (interquartile range, 885–1310 g), respectively. There was successful device placement in 100% of patients. There were no device complications noted. The time off unit and the procedure time were not significantly different between the HFJV group and the conventional ventilation group. Infants managed by HFJV had shorter median fluoroscopy times (4.5 versus 6.1 minutes; P<0.05) and no increased risk of adverse respiratory outcomes.

Conclusions

Transcatheter PDA closure in premature infants on HFJV is a safe and effective approach that does not compromise device placement success rate and does not lead to secondary complications.

Very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation in atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ventilation strategies in atrial fibrillation ablation affect procedure outcomes by influencing catheter stability. Studies have highlighted favorable atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes with the use of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) which has been shown to improve lesion durability, energy delivery, and tissue contact. However, this mode of ventilation is not readily available. In this systematic review, we highlight the available data on the use of very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation using standard ventilators that aim to provide settings similar to HFJV during AF ablations.

METHODS

Using a combination of search terms in databases and manual searches in bibliographies of identified articles, we reviewed all published data reported in the English language on the use of very low tidal volume with high-frequency ventilation during atrial fibrillation ablation.

RESULTS

A total of 4 manuscripts were identified; 3 cohort studies and 1 case report. The utilization of standard ventilators with a high-frequency, very low tidal volume ventilation strategy appears to closely mimic the catheter stability benefits that HFJV ventilators provide. Across the 3 cohort identified studies, the use of this ventilation strategy was associated with improved catheter stability, tissue contact, and a decrease in radiofrequency time. No increased risk was identified compared to standard ventilation.

CONCLUSION

With a purpose of limiting thoracic excursion and cardiac movement, limited and sparse studies have shown improved outcomes with a very low tidal volume, high-frequency ventilation strategy. Additional studies are needed to solidify this easily accessible and widely available mode of ventilation.

Radiofrequency ablation to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an important alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs in the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. However, the inability to consistently achieve durable isolation of the pulmonary veins hampers the long-term efficacy of PVI procedures. The large number of factors involved in RF lesion formation and the complex interplay of these factors complicate reliable creation of durable and transmural ablation lesions. Various surrogate markers of ablation lesion formation have been proposed that may provide information on RF lesion completeness. Real-time assessment of these surrogates may aid in the creation of transmural ablation lesions, and therefore, holds potential to decrease the risk of PV reconnection and consequent post-PVI arrhythmia recurrence. Moreover, titration of energy delivery until lesions is transmural may prevent unnecessary ablation and subsequent adverse events. Whereas several surrogate markers of ablation lesion formation have been described over the past decades, a 'gold standard' is currently lacking. This review provides a state-of-the-art overview of ablation strategies that aim to enhance durability of RF-PVI, with special focus on real-time available surrogates of RF lesion formation in light of the biophysical basis of RF ablation.

Contemporary Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Uniform Atrial Tachycardia Substrates Allow for Clear Ablation Endpoints With Improved Long-Term Outcome

[Figure: see text].

Hemodynamic intolerance and pericardial effusion associated with high-frequency jet ventilation during pulmonary vein isolation

Background

High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to increase catheter stability and improve outcomes. In prior studies, hemodynamic intolerance to HFJV was rare.

Objectives

To evaluate the incidence of hemodynamic or respiratory intolerance of HFJV during PVI.

Methods

Retrospective observational analysis of consecutive patients undergoing PVI performed by 2 operators (PT, JW) at our institution between February 2019 and June 2020 who developed persistent hypotension or abnormal ventilatory parameters in association with HFJV.

Results

Among 194 PVIs, there were 8 cases (4%) of conversion from HFJV to conventional ventilation, 6 for refractory hypotension and 2 for persistently abnormal gas exchange. In 6 patients, including 5 of the 6 patients with refractory hypotension, a new, small pericardial effusion without tamponade was noted just after HFJV was initiated. In patients with persistent hypotension, a decrease in left ventricular filling and systolic function was frequently noted. Both the hemodynamic changes and effusion resolved almost immediately after discontinuation of HFJV. In 4 patients rechallenged with HFJV, the hypotension and/or effusion recurred quickly and again resolved immediately after return to conventional ventilation.

Conclusion

HFJV-associated hypotension and systolic dysfunction, often accompanied by a transient pericardial effusion, is present in a small proportion of patients undergoing PVI, and resolves with cessation of HFJV. The mechanism of these changes is unclear and warrants further study.

Utility of High-frequency Jet Ventilation in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia that causes major morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation focusing on pulmonary vein isolation is increasingly used for the treatment of symptomatic AF. Advances in ablation technologies and improved imaging and mapping have enhanced treatment efficiency but only modestly improved the efficacy. Another-but less commonly used-technology that can have a favorable impact involves enhancing the catheter-tissue contact by manipulating respiration to promote improved catheter stability and optimal contact. High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is a mode of ventilation that can reduce respiratory movements to almost apneic conditions. In this review article, we aimed to highlight different studies, review the current literature regarding the utility of HFJV in AF ablation, and discuss the safety and efficacy of this approach relative to that of conventional ventilation.

Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation with Ventricular Pacing Results in Similar Spatial Catheter Stability as Compared to Ablation in Sinus Rhythm with Atrial Pacing

Background

Improved catheter stability is associated with decreased arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, atrial voltage mapping in AF was demonstrated to correlate better with scar as compared to mapping in sinus rhythm (SR). However, it is unknown whether ablation of persistent AF in sinus rhythm with atrial pacing or in atrial fibrillation with ventricular pacing results in differences in catheter stability or arrhythmia recurrence.

Methods

We analyzed 53 consecutive patients undergoing first-time persistent AF ablation with pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation: 27 were cardioverted, mapped, and ablated in sinus rhythm with atrial pacing, and 26 were mapped and ablated in AF with ventricular pacing. Ablation data was extracted from the mapping system and analyzed using custom MATLAB software to determine high-frequency (60Hz) catheter excursion as a novel metric for catheter spatial stability.

Results

There was no difference in catheter stability as assessed by maximal catheter excursion, mean catheter excursion, or contact force variability between the atrial-paced and ventricular-paced patients. Ventricular-paced patients had significantly greater mean contact force as compared to atrial-paced patients. Contact-force variability demonstrated poor correlation with catheter excursion. One year arrhythmia-free survival was similar between the atrial paced and ventricular paced patients.

Conclusions

For patients with persistent AF, ablation in AF with ventricular pacing results in similar catheter stability and arrhythmia recurrence as compared to cardioversion and ablation in sinus rhythm with atrial pacing. Given the improved fidelity of mapping in AF, mapping and ablating during AF with ventricular pacing may be preferred.