Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in treating atrial fibrillation using different freeze protocols: The “ICE‐T 4 minutes vs 3 minutes” propensity‐matched study (Frankfurt ICE‐T 4 vs. 3)

Cryoablation of atrial fibrillation in "very severe" obese patients (BMI ≥ 40): Indications, feasibility, procedural safety and efficacy, and clinical outcome (the ICE-Obese Extreme)

BACKGROUND

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in very severe obese patients is challenging. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) represents an effective rhythm control strategy. However, data in this patient group were limited.

METHODS

Highly symptomatic AF patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 who had failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy and electrocardioversion and failure to achieve targeted body-weight-reduction underwent CBA.

RESULTS

Data of 72 very severe obese AF patients (Group A) and 129 AF patients with normal BMI (Group B, BMI < 25 kg/m2) were consecutively collected. Group A had significantly younger age (60.6 ± 10.4 vs. 69.2 ± 11.2 years), higher BMI (44.3 ± 4.3 vs. 22.5 ± 1.6 kg/m2). Procedural pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was successful in all patients (2 touch-up ablation in Group A). Compared to Group B, Group A had similar procedural (61.3 ± 22.6 vs. 57.5 ± 19 min), similar fluoroscopy time (10.1 ± 5.5 vs. 9.2 ± 4.8 min) but significantly higher radiation dose (2852 ± 2095 vs. 884 ± 732 µGym2). We observed similar rates of real-time-isolation (78.6% vs. 78.5%), single-shot-isolation (86.5% vs. 88.8%), but significantly longer time-to-sustained-isolation (53.5 ± 33 vs. 43.2 ± 25 s). There was significantly higher rate of puncture-site-complication (6.9% vs. 1.6%) in Group A. One-year clinical success in paroxysmal AF was (Group A: 69.4% vs. Group B: 80.2%; p < .001), in persistent AF was (Group A: 58.1% vs. Group B: 62.8%; p = .889). In Re-Do procedures Group A had a numerically lower PVI durability (75.0% vs. 83.6%, p = .089).

CONCLUSION

For very severe obese AF patients, CBA appears feasible, leads to relatively good clinical outcome.

Single-shot technique of cryoablation for atrial fibrillation has comparable effective and safety outcomes compared to standard technique: insights from multiple clinical studies

Background

Although there are many freezing protocols available, the optimal freezing dose is still not determined. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different freeze strategies of CBA in the treatment of AF.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 1st December 2022. Studies comparing the outcomes between single-shot technique and standard technique of cryoablation were included. Subgroup analysis identified potential determinants for single-shot technique procedure.

Results

Our search resulted in 3407 records after deduplication. A total of 17 qualified studies met our inclusion criteria. Compared with standard technique, single-shot technique of cryoablation has a comparable rate of freedom from AF/AT(RR 1.00; P = 0.968), a trend for lower rate of procedure complications (RR 0.80; P = 0.069), a lower rate in transient phrenic paralysis (t-PNP) (RR 0.67; P = 0.038), a similar rate in persistent phrenic paralysis (per-PNP) (RR 1.15; P = 0.645), as well as a comparable procedure parameters. Importantly, potentially significant treatment covariable interactions in procedure complications were found in freeze strategy subgroup, male proportion subgroup and age subgroup, including single-shot freeze (RR 1.02; P = 0.915) and TTI-guided (RR 0.63; P = 0.007) with interaction P = 0.051, high male proportion (RR 0.54; P = 0.005) and a low male proportion (RR 0.94; P = 0.759) with interaction P = 0.074, as well as age ≥ 65 (RR0.91; P = 0.642) and age <65 (RR 0.54; P = 0.006),interaction P = 0.090. Meanwhile, only one significant treatment covariable interactions in procedure complications was found in the hypertension subgroup, including HT > 60% (RR 0.89; P = 0.549) and HT ≤ 60% (RR 0. 46; P < 0.01) with interaction P = 0.043.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that single-shot technique of cryoablation has comparable effective and safety outcomes for AF ablation compared to standard technique.

Evolving Role of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Early and Effective Rhythm Control

Catheter Ablation (CA) is an effective therapeutic option in treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Importantly, recent data show that CA as a rhythm control strategy not only significantly reduces AF burden, but also substantially improves clinical hard endpoints. Since AF is a progressive disease, the time of Diagnosis-to-Intervention appears crucial. Recent evidence shows that earlier rhythm control is associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with early AF. Particularly, CA as an initial first line rhythm control strategy is associated with significant reduction of arrhythmia recurrence and rehospitalization in patients with paroxysmal AF. CA is shown to significantly lower the risk of progression from paroxysmal AF to persistent AF. When treating persistent AF, the overall clinical success after ablation remains unsatisfactory, however the ablation outcome in patients with "early" persistent AF appears better than those with "late" persistent AF. "Adjunctive" ablation on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), e.g., ablation of atrial low voltage area, left atrial posterior wall, vein of Marshall, left atrial appendage, etc., may further reduce arrhythmia recurrence in selected patient group. New ablation concepts or new ablation technologies have been developing to optimize therapeutic effects or safety profile and may ultimately improve the clinical outcome.

Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs as 'first-line' initial therapy for atrial fibrillation: a pooled analysis of randomized data

AIMS

Catheter ablation (CA) is recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after failure of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). The role of CA as 'initial therapy' for AF is to be determined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Following PRISMA guideline an up-to-date pooled analysis of randomized data comparing ablation vs. AADs as first-line therapy for symptomatic AF was performed. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. The secondary outcomes were improvement in quality-of-life (QoL) and major adverse events. A total of 997 patients from five randomized trials were enrolled (mean age 57.4 years, 68.6% male patients, 98% paroxysmal AF, mean follow-up 1.4 years). The baseline characteristics were similar between the ablation and AADs group. Overall pooled analysis showed that, as compared with AADs, CA as first-line therapy was associated with significantly higher freedom from arrhythmia recurrence (69% vs. 48%, odds ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.48, P < 0.001). This significance was maintained in subgroup analyses of 1- and 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Catheter ablation was associated with significantly greater improvement in QoL regarding AFEQT score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey score. The incidence of serious adverse events between ablation and AADs group (5.6% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.62) was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation as 'initial therapy' was superior to AADs in maintenance of sinus rhythm and improving QoL for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, without increasing risk of serious adverse events.

Left Atrial Fibrosis after Single Shot Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment modality for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with encouraging acute and long-term outcome data. However, the size of collaterally created lesion sets adjacent to the pulmonary veins (PVs) remains unclear, especially when CB ablation is performed with individualized time-to-isolation (TTI) protocols. This study seeks to investigate the extension of lesions at the posterior wall and the roof of the left atrium (LA). Thirty patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent ablation with a fourth-generation CB. The individual freeze-cycle duration was set at TTI + 120 s. A total of 120 PVs were identified, and all were successfully isolated. A three-dimensional electroanatomical high-density (HD) mapping of the LA was performed in every patient before and after PVI. The surface areas of the posterior wall and LA roof were measured and compared with lesion extension after PVI. After CB ablation, 65.6 ± 16.9% of the posterior wall and 75.4 ± 18.4% of the LA roof remained unablated. In addition, non-antral lesion formation was observed in every patient in at least one PV. After CB ablation, anterior antral parts of the superior PVs showed the greatest unablated areas compared with the other antral areas. HD re-mapping after CB-based PVI demonstrated that major regions of the posterior wall and roof remained electrically normal and unaffected. Unablated antral areas were localized predominantly in the anterior segments of the superior PVs and may be partly responsible for AF recurrence.

Optimizing cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: lessons from >1000 procedures- the Frankfurt approach

AIMS

Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted ablation strategy for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation (AF). We describe efficacy and safety in a high volume centre with a long experience in the use of the second-generation CB (CB2).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (persAF) patients undergoing CB2-PVI were enrolled. Procedural data, efficacy, and safety issues were systematically collected. The 28 mm CB2 was used in combination with an inner lumen spiral catheter, a luminal oesophageal temperature (LET) probe was used with a cut-off of 15°C, the phrenic nerve (PN) monitored during septal PVs ablation. Freeze duration was mainly set at 240 s with a bonus application in case of delayed time-to-isolation (TTI > 75 s). A total of 1017 CB2 procedures were analysed (58% male, 66 ± 12 years old, 70% with PAF). 3964 PVs were identified, 99.8% PVs isolated using solely the 28 mm CB. Mean procedure time was 69 ± 25 min, TTI during the first application was recorded in 77% of PVs after a mean of 48 ± 31 s. We recorded 0.2% cardiac tamponade, 4.8% PN injury (1.6% of PN palsy), and 19% of LET < 15°C. Among 725 patients with follow-up data, 84% with PAF and 75% with persAF were in stable SR at 1 year. Shorter freezing duration and longer TTI were procedural predictors for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Cryoballoon procedures are fast and associated with a benign safety profile. Shorter TTI and longer freeze durations are associated with sinus rhythm during follow-up.

Increased procedural safety of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation with a double 120 s freeze protocol

BACKGROUND

Recently a double 120 s freeze cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) protocol proved to be non inferior to a double 240 s freeze protocol in terms of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences. We hypothesized that this approach could also result in an increased procedure safety.

METHODS

Eighty consecutive patients treated with a double 120 s freeze protocol (Group CB120) were compared with 80 previous consecutive patients treated with a single 240 s freeze protocol (Group CB240). Procedures were performed with a temperature probe to monitor the luminal esophageal temperature (LET), using a cut off for cryoenergy interruption of 15°C. During ablation at the septal pulmonary veins (PVs), the phrenic nerve (PN) function was monitored by pacing.

RESULTS

In CB120 and CB240 the rate of single shot isolation was similar in all PVs. Time to isolation was not different between the two groups. Mean minimal esophageal temperature was lower in LSPV and LIPV of the CB240 group. A total of 4/80 patients (5%) of the CB120 group experienced a PN injury, but no persistent form was recorded; 11/80 patients (14%) of the CB240 group experienced a PN injury, three in a persistent form (p = .10). A LET <15°C was recorded in 3/80 patients (4%) in the CB120 group and in 16/80 patients (20%) in the CB240 group (p < .01). Composite rate of energy-related safety events (LET <15°C and PN injury) was significantly lower in the CB120 (34% vs. 9%, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Safety of second generation CB PVI can be increased using a double 120 s freeze protocol.

Duration of Applications Affects the Long-Term Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation Pulmonary Veins

Aim      To evaluate the effect of cryo-exposure duration and the use of the Achieve circular mapping catheter on efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA).Material and methods  CBA of pulmonary vein ostia (PVO) is a major method for heart rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the inception, the PVO CBA method has evolved; the recommended application time was changed, and the Achieve circular catheter appeared. We performed a retrospective analysis of PVO CBA administered to patients with AF in the I.V. Davydovsky Municipal Clinical Hospital from 2017 through 2019. The study included 100 patients with available clinical and demographic characteristics and remote results of the intervention. Three patient groups were analyzed based on differences in surgical techniques: group 1, Guidewire / 240 (n=31) with the cryoballoon placing on a guidewire and PVO exposure duration of 240 s; group 2, Guidewire / 180 (n=26) with the cryoballoon placing on a guidewire and PVO exposure duration of 180 s; and group 3, Achieve / 180 (n=43) with the cryoballoon placing on the mapping catheter Achieve and PVO exposure duration of 180 с. The follow-up period was 33.2±4.5, 15.2±6.1, and 12.2±4.1 months in the Guidewire / 240, Guidewire / 180, and Achieve / 180 groups, respectively. The intervention was considered effective when there was no relapse at the time of interview. A relapse of AF was determined as one or more paroxysms recorded on electrocardiogram (ECG) or during 24-h ECG monitoring; the "blind period" (first 3 months after the procedure) was excluded from the follow-up. Safety evaluation included clinically significant complications, such as phrenic nerve damage, hemopericardium, gastroparesis, hemoptysis, acute cerebrovascular disease, and formation of atrio-esophageal fistula. Effects of independent factors were determined with binary logistic regression.Results In the Guidewire / 240 group, efficacy of PVO CBA for the maximum follow-up period was 74.4%, which was significantly different from the value for the Guidewire / 180 group (57.7 %, р=0.015). At the same time, the difference between the Guidewire / 240 and Achieve / 180 groups was statistically non-significant for a comparable follow-up period (р=0.144). Clinically significant complications were absent in all 3 groups. The independent factors that significantly increased the PVO CBA efficacy were the cryo-exposure duration of 240 s compared to 180 s (р= 0.018) and the use of the Achieve catheter (р=0.014).Conclusion      Decreasing the cryo-exposure duration to less than 240 s is impractical (in absence of Achieve mapping catheter) since it impairs the long-term efficacy of PVO CBA and does not influence the risk of complications.

Cryoballoon Versus Laserballoon: Insights From the First Prospective Randomized Balloon Trial in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation. Cryoballoon and laserballoon catheters have emerged as promising devices but lack randomized comparisons. Therefore, we sought to compare efficacy and safety comparing both balloons in patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Symptomatic AF patients (n=200) were prospectively randomized (1:1) to receive either cryoballoon or laserballoon PVI (cryoballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF versus laserballoon: n=100: 50 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation + 50 persistent AF). All antiarrhythmic drugs were stopped after ablation. Follow-up included 3-day Holter-ECG recordings and office visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary efficacy end point was defined as freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia between 90 and 365 days after a single ablation. Secondary end points included procedural parameters and periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Patient baseline parameters were not different between both groups. In all (n=200) complete PVI was obtained and the entire follow-up accomplished. Balloon only PVI was obtained in 98% (cryoballoon) versus 95% (laserballoon) requiring focal touch-up in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Procedure but not fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the cryoballoon group (50.9±21.0 versus 96.0±20.4 minutes; P<0.0001 and 7.4±4.4 versus 8.4±3.2 minutes, P=0.083). Overall, the primary end point of no atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was met in 79% (cryoballoon: 80.0% versus laserballoon: 78.0%, P=ns). No death, atrio-esophageal fistula, tamponade, or vascular laceration requiring surgery occurred. In the cryoballoon group, 8 transient but no persistent phrenic nerve palsy were noted compared with 2 persistent phrenic nerve palsy and one transient ischemic attack in the laserballoon group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both balloon technologies represent highly effective and safe tools for PVI resulting in similar favorable rhythm outcome after 12 months. Use of the cryoballoon is associated with significantly shorter procedure but not fluoroscopy time.