High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns

Very High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding safety and long-term outcome of very high-power-short duration (vHPSD) ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective observational single-center study. The data of 66 consecutive ACHD patients (mean age 60 ± 12.8 years, 46% male) with mild (69.7%), moderate (22.7%), or complex (7.6%) congenital heart disease (CHD) who underwent ablation for paroxysmal (40.9%) or persistent AF (59.1%) were analyzed. Circumferential PVI was performed in all patients and additional substrate ablation in 79,4% of persistent AF patients using irrigated RF energy with vHPSD settings of 70 W/5-7 s or 60 W/7-10 s.

RESULTS

Mean procedure time was 123.6 ± 42 min with a mean RF time of 18.19 ± 10 min. No technique related adverse events occurred. Vascular access complications were detected in seven patients (10.6%) requiring intervention in four patients (6%). A median follow-up time of 491 days (IQR: 194-1054 days). Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) at 1 year was present in 58% of patients (77.8% with paroxysmal AF, 43.6% with persistent AF).

CONCLUSION

vHPSD for ablation of paroxysmal or persistent AF in ACHD patients is safe and effective. Regardless of CHD complexity, no vHPSD ablation modality related complications occurred. Long-term outcome for paroxysmal AF after one ablation was excellent whereas results for persistent AF were limited.

High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Application for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The POWER-FAST III Trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal radiofrequency application (RFa) parameters for safe and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are debated. High-power short-duration (HPSD) has been used as an alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare HPSD 70 W/9-10 s (HPSD-70) with CPD 25-40 W in patients undergoing PVI.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to HPSD-70 or CPD (25-40). The primary outcomes were freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrences and the incidence of esophageal thermal lesions (EDELs) after ablation.

RESULTS

Among 304 patients randomized, 301 remained in the study (median age: 61 years; Q1-Q3: 53-69 years; 72% men): 294 patients (97.7%) underwent ablation, 285 (94.7%) underwent endoscopy, and 290 (98.6%) completed the follow-up. At 12 months, 100 patients (73.5%) in the CPD (25-40) group and 87 patients (67%) in the HPSD-70 group were free from recurrences off antiarrhythmic drugs (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.82-1.99; P = 0.28). The incidences of EDELs were 2.7% in the CPD (25-40) group and 3.6% in the HPSD-70 group (P = 0.94). Median left atrial dwell (153 vs 137 min; P = 0.03) and total RF times for definitive PVI (31 vs 11.2 min; P < 0.001) were shorter with HPSD-70 ablation. Four symptomatic embolic events (2 strokes, 1 transient ischemic attack, and 1 splenic infarct) occurred with HPSD-70 and none with CPD (25-40) RFa (P = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD-70 RFa was noninferior to prevent arrhythmia recurrences, and the incidence of EDELs was similar compared with CPD (25-40) RFa. The embolic events were numerically higher in the HPSD-70 group. (High Radiofrequency Power for Faster and Safer Pulmonary Vein Ablation Trial [POWER FAST III]; NCT04153747).

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Detection of Epicardial Connection Through Intercaval Bundle Involving Right Pulmonary Veins After Ipsilateral Circumferential Ablation by Intra-Atrial Activation Sequence Pacing From the Right Pulmonary Vein

BACKGROUND

An epicardial connection (EC) through the intercaval bundle (EC-ICB) between the right pulmonary vein (RPV) and right atrium (RA) is one of the reasons for the need for carina ablation for PV isolation and may reduce the acute and chronic success of PV isolation. We evaluated the intra-atrial activation sequence during RPV pacing after failure of ipsilateral RPV isolation and sought to identify specific conduction patterns in the presence of EC-ICB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 223 consecutive patients who underwent initial catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. If the RPV was not isolated using circumferential ablation or reconnected during the waiting period, an exit map was created during mid-RPV carina pacing. If the earliest site on the exit map was the RA, the patient was classified into the EC-ICB group. The exit map, intra-atrial activation sequence, and RPV-high RA time were evaluated. First-pass isolation of the RPV was not achieved in 36 patients (16.1%), and 22 patients (9.9%) showed reconnection. Twelve and 28 patients were classified into the EC-ICB and non-EC-ICB groups, respectively, after excluding those with multiple ablation lesion sets or incomplete mapping. The intra-atrial activation sequence showed different patterns between the 2 groups. The RPV-high RA time was significantly shorter in the EC-ICB than in the non-EC-ICB group (69.2±15.2 versus 148.6±51.2 ms; P<0.001), and RPV-high RA time<89.0 ms was highly predictive of the existence of an EC-ICB (sensitivity, 91.7%; specificity, 89.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

An EC-ICB can be effectively detected by intra-atrial sequencing during RPV pacing, and an RPV-high RA time of <89.0 ms was highly predictive.

Impedance-guided modified CLOSE protocol ablation can reduce ablation index necessary for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Real-time monitoring of generator impedance drop is not considered in CLOSE protocol pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We verified whether additional information of impedance drop could minimize ablation index required for PVI using modified CLOSE protocol (target ablation index ≥ 500 on anterior wall and ≥400 on posterior wall along with inter-lesion distance of 3-6 mm and maximum power of 35 W) without any adverse effect of procedural data and efficacy.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive Japanese AF patients [paroxysmal AF: 43 (72 %) patients] underwent first-time PVI with modified CLOSE protocol with real-time monitoring of impedance drop (impedance-guided modified CLOSE protocol). Ablation tags were colored according to impedance drop and ablation was immediately terminated before reaching target ablation index if impedance drop of ≥10 Ω was confirmed. Ablation index needed for PVI, first-pass PVI rate, other procedural data, and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean ablation index and impedance drop on anterior and posterior walls were 437.6 ± 43.5 Ω and 10.2 ± 2.6 Ω and 393.3 ± 27.4 Ω and 9.3 ± 2.2 Ω, respectively. First-pass PVI per PV pair was accomplished in 90/120 (75 %). No complications occurred. PV gaps after first-pass ablation were locationally most often found on right posterior wall than on the other parts (p < 0.001). There were no differences in mean contact force, impedance drop, and ablation index between walls with and without PV gaps after first-pass PV ablation. During a mean follow-up of 24 ± 9 months, survival from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was 51/60 (85 %) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using additional generator impedance drop information may be useful to minimize radiofrequency current application to accomplish PVI with modified CLOSE protocol while maintaining efficacy and safety in Japanese AF population.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Lower contact force predicts right pulmonary vein carina breakthrough after ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation using high-power short-duration

INTRODUCTION

Carina breakthrough (CB) at the right pulmonary vein (RPV) can occur after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) due to epicardial bridging or transient tissue edema. High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation may increase the incidence of RPV CB. Currently, the surrogate of ablation parameters to predict RPV CB is not well established. This study investigated predictors of RPV CB in patients undergoing ablation index (AI)-guided PVI with HPSD.

METHODS

The study included 62 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent AI-guided PVI using HPSD. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of RPV CB. Lesions adjacent to the RPV carina were assessed, and CB was confirmed through residual voltage, low voltage along the ablation lesions, and activation wavefront propagation.

RESULTS

Out of the 62 patients, 21 (33.87%) experienced RPV CB (Group 1), while 41 (66.13%) achieved first-pass RPV isolation (Group 2). Despite similar AI and HPSD, patients with RPV CB had lower contact force (CF) at lesions adjacent to the RPV carina. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified CF < 10.5 g as a predictor of RPV CB, with 75.7% sensitivity and 56.2% specificity (area under the curve: 0.714).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing AI-guided PVI with HPSD, lower CF adjacent to the carina was associated with a higher risk of RPV CB. These findings suggest that maintaining higher CF during ablation in this region may reduce the occurrence of RPV CB.

Comparison of very high-power short-duration, high-power short-duration, and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal power and duration settings for radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to improve efficacy and safety is unclear. We compared low-power long-duration (LPLD), high-power short-duration (HPSD), and very HPSD (vHPSD) RF settings for AF ablation.

METHODS

This network meta-analysis (NMA) was structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Observational and randomized studies were included. Eligible studies compared outcomes in AF patients who underwent first-time RF ablation with the following settings: vHPSD (70-90 W, 3-10 s), HPSD (45-60 W, 5-10 s), or LPLD (20-40 W, 20-60 s).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 10,375 patients were included (33% female). Frequentist NMA showed LPLD tended toward a lower odds of freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) versus HPSD (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00). There was no difference in FFA between vHPSD versus HPSD. Splitwise interval estimates showed a lower odds of FFA in LPLD versus vHPSD on direct (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93) and network estimates (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Frequentist NMA showed less total procedural (TP) time with HPSD versus LPLD (generic variance 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.29) and no difference between HPSD versus vHPSD.

CONCLUSION

This NMA shows improved procedural times in HPSD and vHPSD versus LPLD. Although HPSD tended toward improved odds of FFA compared to LPLD, the overall result was not statistically significant. The odds of FFA in LPLD was lower versus vHPSD on direct and network estimates on splitwise interval analysis. Large prospective head-to-head randomized trials are needed to validate HPSD and vHPSD settings.

50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias while decreasing procedural time. However, the optimal power setting in terms of safety and efficacy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of 50-W vs 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry (Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) undergoing HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF, either using 50-W or 40-W, were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of any procedural complication at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and the occurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months was 80.7% in the 50-W group and 77.3% in the 40-W group (Log-rank P = 0.387). The primary safety outcome occurred in 3.7% of patients in the 50-W group vs 2.8% in the 40-W group (P = 0.646). The 50-W group had a higher rate of first-pass PVI (82.3% vs 76.2%; P = 0.040) as well as shorter procedural (67 minutes [IQR: 54-87.5 minutes] vs 93 minutes [IQR: 80.5-111 minutes]; P < 0.001) and radiofrequency ablation times (15 minutes [IQR: 11.4-20 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR: 21.5-34.6 minutes]; P < 0.001) than the 40-W group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias or procedural safety outcomes between 50-W and 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF. The use of 50-W was associated with a higher rate of first-pass PVI as well as shorter procedural times.

High-density mapping improves detection of conduction gaps after pulmonary vein isolation ablation with a circular mapping catheter

BACKGROUND

High-density (HD) mapping of the pulmonary vein (PVs) has been hypothesized to improve the detection of conduction gaps in the radiofrequency ablation lesions set after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to compare the incidence of gaps after PVI with a standard 20-pole circumferential mapping catheter (CMC-20) and an HD mapping catheter (HD Grid).

METHODS

This prospective study included patients scheduled for high-power short-duration PVI. Acute PVI was defined as an entrance and exit block using the CMC-20 after ≥ 20 min waiting period. The left atrium was then remapped using the HD Grid high-density mapping catheter to identify residual conduction gaps in the PVI lines by voltage and activation criteria. The primary endpoint was the number of gaps identified per patient by the HD Grid catheter.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were included (mean age 59.9 ± 10.8 years, 15% female, 70% paroxysmal AF). The new map with the HD Grid identified 6 gaps in 4 patients (20%) or 0.3 ± 0.7 gaps per patient (p = 0.055 when compared to CMC-20). Five gaps (83%) were located at the right PVs. There was no difference in mapping time (CMC-20 12.2 ± 2.6 min vs HD Grid 11.7 ± 3.4 min, p = 0.452); however, the number of points was significantly higher in the HD Grid map (1662.7 ± 366.1 vs 1171.6 ± 313.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HD mapping during AF ablation identified PVI gaps in 1 out of 5 patients. Therefore, HD mapping may have the potential to improve AF ablation success rates in the long term.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04850508 on April 20, 2021.

Optimal conditions for high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation using a novel, flexible-tipped, force-sensing catheter

Background

High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) reduces procedure time; however, safety and efficacy thresholds vary with catheter design.

Objective

The study sought to determine optimal HPSD ablation conditions with a novel flexible-tipped, contact force-sensing RFA catheter.

Methods

RFA lesions were created in thigh muscle (16 swine) over a range of conditions (51-82 W, 2-40 g, 8-40 mL/min irrigation). An intracardiac study was performed (12 swine) to characterize steam pop thresholds. Lesions were created in a second intracardiac study (14 swine, n = 290 pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] lesions) with combinations of radiofrequency power, duration, and contact force. PVI was tested, animals were sacrificed, and lesions were measured.

Results

The likelihood of coagulation formation in the thigh model was <20% when power was ≤79 W, when contact force was ≤40 g, when duration was ≤11 seconds, and when irrigation rates were 8 to 40 mL/min. The impact of contact force on lesion safety and efficacy was more pronounced using HPSD (60 W/8 seconds) compared with conventional ablation (30 W/45 seconds) (P = .038). During PVI, focal atrial lesions ranged in width from 4.2 to 12.5 mm and were transmural 80.8% of the time. PVI was achieved in 13 of 14 veins. Logistic regression identified that the optimal parameters for radiofrequency application were 60 to 70 W with a duration <8 seconds and <15 g contact force.

Conclusions

Optimal HPSD lesions with this this flexible-tipped, force-sensing RFA catheter were created at 60 to 70 W for <8 seconds with <15 g contact force. Chronic studies are ongoing to assess radiofrequency parameter refinements and long-term lesion durability using these conditions.

Network meta-analysis and systematic review comparing efficacy and safety between very high power short duration, high power short duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with a power of 40-50 W was proved to be safe and effective. Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) AF ablation is a novel method using >50 W to obtain more durable AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vHPSD ablation compared with HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation.

METHODS

A literature search for studies that reported AF ablation outcomes, including short-term freedom from atrial arrhythmia, first-pass isolation (FPI) rate, procedure time, and major complications, was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. All relevant studies were included in this analysis. A random-effects model of network meta-analysis and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to rank the treatment for all outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with 9721 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA analysis, HPSD ablation had the highest probability of maintaining sinus rhythm. Point estimation showed an odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9) between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation and an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI: 0.78-2.2) between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. While the odds ratio of FPI between HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 3.6 (95% CI: 1.5-8.9), the odds ratio between vHPSD ablation and conventional power ablation was 2.2 (95% CI: 0.61-8.6). The procedure times of vHPSD and HPSD ablations were comparable and, therefore, shorter than that of conventional power ablation. Major complications were low in all techniques.

CONCLUSION

vHPSD ablation did not yield higher efficacy than HPSD ablation and conventional power ablation. With the safety concern, vHPSD ablation outcomes were comparable with those of other techniques.

High-Power, Short-Duration Ablation under the Guidance of Relatively Low Ablation Index Values for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Outcomes and Characteristics of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in effectiveness and safety of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) guided by relatively low ablation index (AI) values and conventional RFA in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients.

METHODS

The HPSD RFA strategy (40-50 W, AI 350-400 for anterior, 320-350 for posterior wall; n = 547) was compared with the conventional RFA strategy (25-40 W, without AI; n = 396) in PAF patients who underwent their first ablation. Propensity-score matching analyses were used to compare the outcomes of the two groups while controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

After using propensity-score matching analysis, the HPSD group showed a higher early recurrence rate (22.727% vs. 13.636%, p = 0.003), similar late recurrence rate, and comparable safety (p = 0.604) compared with the conventional group. For late recurrent atrial arrhythmia types, the rate of regular atrial tachycardia was significantly higher in the HPSD group (p = 0.013). Additionally, the rate of chronic pulmonary vein reconnection and non-pulmonary vein triggers during repeat procedures was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For PAF patients, compared with the conventional RFA strategy, the HPSD RFA strategy at relatively low AI settings had a higher early recurrence rate, similar long-term success rate, and comparable safety.

Safety profile and long-term efficacy of very high-power short-duration (60-70 W) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results of a large comparative analysis

AIMS

This retrospective study sought to compare complication rates and efficacy of power-controlled very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) and conventional catheter ablation in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 1115 consecutive patients with AF (38.7% paroxysmal, 61.3% persistent) who received first-time catheter ablation at our centre from 2015 to 2021. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ± additional substrate ablation using an irrigated-tip catheter was performed with vHPSD (70 W/5-7 s or 60 W/7-10 s) in 574 patients and with conventional power (30-35 W/15-30 s) in 541 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups (mean age 65.1 ± 11.2 years, 63.4% male). The 30-day incidence of cardiac tamponade [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598], pericardial effusion ≥ 10 mm [2/574 (0.35%) vs. 1/541 (0.18%), P = 0.598] and transient ischaemic attack [1/574 (0.17%) vs. 2/541 (0.37%), P = 0.529] was not significantly different between vHPSD and conventional ablation. No stroke, atrio-esophageal fistula, cardiac arrest or death occurred. Procedure (122.2 ± 46.8 min vs. 155.0 ± 50.5 min, P < 0.001), radiofrequency (22.4 ± 19.3 min vs. 52.9 ± 22.0 min, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy (8.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 7.4, P = 0.016) duration were significantly shorter in the vHPSD group. At 12 months follow-up, freedom of any atrial arrhythmia was 44.1% vs. 34.2% (P = 0.010) in persistent AF and 78.1% vs. 70.2% in paroxysmal AF (P = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

vHPSD ablation is as safe as conventional ablation and is associated with an improved long-term efficacy in persistent AF.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of high-power vs. conventional-power radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation

Aim

To compare high-power (HP) vs. conventional-power (CP) radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled AF patients undergoing CP (30-40 W, 43 patients) or HP (50 W, 49 patients) radiofrequency ablation. Immediate pulmonary vein (PV) single-circle isolation, PV-ablation time, AF recurrence, AF recurrence-free survival, and complications were analyzed.

Results

Diabetes was more common in the CP group than in the HP group (27.91% vs. 10.20%, P = 0.029). The left PV single-circle isolation rate (62.79% vs. 65.31%), right PV single-circle isolation rate (48.84% vs. 53.06%), and bilateral PV single-circle isolation rate (32.56% vs. 38.78%; all P > 0.05) did not differ between the groups. Single-circle ablation times for the left PVs (12.79 ± 3.39 vs. 22.94 ± 6.39 min), right PVs (12.18 ± 3.46 vs. 20.67 ± 5.44 min), and all PVs (25.85 ± 6.04 vs. 45.66 ± 11.11 min; all P < 0.001) were shorter in the HP group. Atrial fibrillation recurrence within 3 months (13.95% vs. 18.37%), at 3 months (11.63% vs. 8.16%), and at 6 months after ablation (18.60% vs. 12.24%; all P > 0.05) was similar in both groups. Atrial fibrillation recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Cardiac rupture and pericardial tamponade did not occur in any patient. Pops occurred in 2 and 0 patients in the HP and CP groups, respectively (4.08% vs. 0.00%, P = 0.533).

Conclusion

High-power ablation improved operation time and efficiency without increasing complications.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Results. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, $P<0.001$ ), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, $P<0.001$ ), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, $P<0.001$ ), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, $P<0.001$ ), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, $P=0.005$ ) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, $P=0.001$ ). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, $P=0.01$ ) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, $P=0.002$ ). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, $P=0.52$ ). There was no difference in complications between the two groups ( $P=0.71$ ). Conclusion. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.

Comparison between High-Power Short-Duration and Conventional Ablation Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

High-power short-duration (HPSD) setting during radiofrequency ablation has become an attempt to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment outcomes. This study ought to compare the efficacy, safety, and effectiveness between HPSD and conventional settings. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies that compared HPSD and conventional radiofrequency ablation settings in AF patients were included while studies performed additional ablations on nonpulmonary vein targets without clear recording were excluded. Data were pooled with random-effect model. Efficacy endpoints include first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, free from AF, and free from atrial tachycardia (AT) during follow-up. Safety endpoints include esophagus injury rate and major complication rate. Effectiveness endpoints include complete PVI rate, total procedure time, PVI time, and PVI radiofrequency ablation (PVI RF) time. We included 22 studies with 3867 atrial fibrillation patients in total (2393 patients received HPSD radiofrequency ablation). Perioperatively, the HPSD group showed a higher first-pass PVI rate (risk ratio, $\text{RR}=1.10$ , $P=0.0001$ ) and less acute PV reconnection rate ( $\text{RR}=0.56$ , $P=0.0004$ ) than the conventional group. During follow-up, free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P=0.16$ ) or AT ( $\text{RR}=1.06$ , $P=0.24$ ) rate did not differ between HPSD and conventional groups 6-month postsurgery. However, the HPSD group showed both higher free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.17$ , $P=0.0003$ ) and AT ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P<0.0001$ ) rate than the conventional group 12-month postsurgery. The esophagus injury ( $\text{RR}=0.99$ , $P=0.98$ ) and major complications ( $\text{RR}=0.76$ , $P=0.70$ ) rates did not differ between the two groups. The HPSD group took shorter total procedure time ( $\text{MD}=-33.71$ 95% CI: -43.10 to -24.33, $P<0.00001$ ), PVI time ( $\text{MD}=-21.60$ 95% CI: -25.00 to -18.21, $P<0.00001$ ), and PVI RF time ( $\text{MD}=-13.72$ , 95% CI: -14.45 to -13.00, $P<0.00001$ ) than conventional groups while complete procedure rate did not differ between two groups ( $\text{RR}=1.00$ , $P=0.93$ ). HPSD setting during AF radiofrequency ablation has better effectiveness, efficacy, and similar safety compared with the conventional setting.

Incidence of epicardial connections between the right pulmonary vein carina and right atrium during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison between the conventional method and unipolar signal modification

BACKGROUND

When performing an electrical isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs) for atrial fibrillation, physicians often need additional radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the carina region between the superior and inferior PVs to achieve a right PV isolation because of intercaval bundles between the right PVs and right atrium (RA). We compared the efficacy of a high-power and short-duration ablation guided by unipolar signal modification (UM) with the conventional method (CM) for ablating epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA.

METHODS

The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent an initial box isolation of atrial fibrillation from January 2015 to December 2019 at Nara Medical University Hospital. Among these patients, 94 and 65 patients who met the criteria were assigned to the CM and UM groups, respectively. We retrospectively analyzed the anterior ablation line of the right PV using an electroanatomical mapping system. Patients whose initial ablation line included the right PV carina were excluded.

RESULTS

Six and seven patients were, respectively, excluded from the CM and UM groups. Among 88 CM group patients, 21 needed additional right PV carina ablation, while among 58 UM group patients, 30 needed additional right PV carina ablation (p = .001). No anatomical factors were associated with the additional right PV carina ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the CM group, a box isolation was less achievable without RF ablation at the right PV carina in the UM group. We should consider a long-duration ablation for epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA.

Esophageal temperature during atrial fibrillation ablation poorly predicts esophageal injury: An observational study

Background

Esophageal injury (EI) remains a concern when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the high-power short-duration (HPSD) technique.

Objective

We aim to indicate that high esophageal temperature during HPSD PVI does not correlate with positive esophageal endoscopy (EGD) findings.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed on 43 patients undergoing PVI using HPSD (50 W for 6–7 seconds per lesion) at Tulane Medical Center from July 2020 to January 2021. Esophageal temperature was monitored throughout the procedure using a temperature probe and patients underwent EGD the following day. Small ulcers, nonbleeding erosions, erythema, and/or esophagitis were considered positive EGD findings.

Results

Mean age was 64.9 years; 46.5% of the patients were female. Eleven patients had positive EGD findings (group 1) and 32 patients had normal EGD (group 2). There was no statistical difference in mean esophageal peak temperature between group 1 and group 2 (43.9°C ± 2.9°C and 42.5°C ± 2.3°C, respectively, P = .17). There was no association between positive EGD results and esophageal temperature during PVI. Mean baseline esophageal temperature was similar in both groups (36.1°C, P = .78). Average contact force (P = .53), ablation time (P = .67), age (P = .3096), sex (P = .4), body mass index (P = .14), and other comorbidities did not correlate with positive endoscopy results. We found positive correlation between the distance of the left atrium (LA) to esophagus and positive EGD (P = .0001).

Conclusion

EI during HPSD PVI does not correlate to esophageal temperature changes during ablation. However, esophageal injury does correlate to a shorter proximity of the esophagus to the LA.

Assessment of High-Power Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Background: High-power radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation was considered as a promising alternative strategy to conventional-power ablation in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of high-power energy delivery to that of conventional-power setting in AF catheter ablation. Methods: We performed a systematic review of relevant literature in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar database. Sixteen eligible studies totaling 3,307 patients (1,929 for high-power ablation; 1,378 for conventional-power ablation) met inclusion criteria. Results: During a median 12 month follow-up, high-power ablation showed a significantly higher AF/atrial tachycardia-free survival rate in comparison with conventional-power ablation (risk ratio [RR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15, p = 0.008). Notably, a high-power strategy convincingly decreased the procedure time (weighted mean difference [WMD] -46.11 min, 95% CI -59.15 to -33.07, p < 0.001) and RF ablation time (WMD -19.19 min, 95% CI -24.47 to -13.90, p < 0.001), along with reduced fluoroscopy time (WMD -7.82 min, 95% CI -15.13 to -0.68, p = 0.036). In addition, there was no perceptible difference in the potential risk of procedure-related complications between these two approaches (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.37, p = 0.428). Conclusions: High-power RF catheter ablation was associated with an improvement in long-term sinus rhythm maintenance for treatment of AF, without exacerbating the risk of adverse events during the procedure. Impressively, high-power pulmonary vein isolation had the potential to shorten the application duration and minimize fluoroscopic exposure.

Acute and long-term efficacy of ablation index-guided higher power shorter duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: A prospective registry

BACKGROUND

Theoretically, targeting the same ablation index (AI) using higher power may achieve the same lesion size with a shorter ablation time. We evaluated the acute and long-term efficacy of higher-powered ablation guided by ablation index (HPAI) compared with conventional-powered ablation guided by AI (CPAI) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who had been ablated with 40 W on the anterior/roof segments and 30 W on the posterior/inferior/carina segments were enrolled (HPAI group). We compared the HPAI group with the CPAI group who were ablated with 30 W on the anterior/roof segments and 25 W on the posterior/inferior/carina segments. The same AI was targeted (≥450 on the anterior/roof segments and ≥350 on the posterior/inferior/carina segments). We compared ablation time, acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) and 1-year AF recurrence between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included (86 in the HPAI group and 32 in the CPAI group, paroxysmal AF, 73%). There was no significant difference in the acute PVR rate between the HPAI and the CPAI groups (3.7% vs. 4.2%, P = .580) with a 41% reduction in ablation time for PVI (38.7 ± 8.3 vs. 65.8 ± 13.7 minutes, P < .001). The 1-year AF recurrence rate was not significantly different between HPAI and CPAI groups (12.8% vs. 21.9%, Log-rank P = .242). There were no major complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased power during AF ablation, using the same AI targets, reduced the procedure and ablation times, and showed a comparable acute and long-term outcome without compromising safety.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04379557.

Fast anatomical mapping of the carina and its implications for acute pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Fast anatomical mapping (FAM) of the left atrium and pulmonary veins (PV) during PV isolation (PVI) generates anatomical information about the carina region additionally. We aimed to investigate the utility of these data in relation to conduction abilities of the intervenous carina.

METHODS

We investigated 71 patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent first-time circumferential PVI using an electroanatomical mapping system. Carina width between ipsilateral PV was measured using FAM and an integrated distance measurement tool. Encirclings were divided into carina ablation and noncarina ablation groups based on the necessity of carina ablation to achieve PVI.

RESULTS

In total, 142 encirclings were analyzed and first-pass isolation was observed in 102 (72%) encirclings. Nonfirst-pass PVI solely due to a gap on the line or persistent carina conduction was observed in 10 (7%) and 30 (21%) encirclings, respectively. Encirclings were classified into a carina ablation group (n = 30, 21%) and noncarina ablation group (n = 112, 79%). Carina width was significantly larger in the carina ablation vs nonarina ablation group (right: 11.9 ± 1.5 mm vs 8 ± 1.4 mm, P < .001/left: 12.1 ± 1.3 mm vs 8.1 ± 1.1 mm, P < .001) requiring additional carina ablation.

CONCLUSION

Carina-related PV conduction is a common finding after the first-pass ablation during PVI. Measurement of carina width using FAM is feasible and its value correlates with the necessity of carina ablation to achieve PVI.