In vivo tissue temperatures during 90 W/4 sec-very high power-short-duration (vHPSD) ablation versus ablation index-guided 50 W-HPSD ablation: A porcine study

In Vivo Tissue Temperature Characteristics of Contact Force Catheter With a Mesh-Shaped Irrigation Tip: A Porcine Study

BACKGROUND

Neither the actual in vivo tissue temperatures reached with a novel contact force sensing catheter with a mesh-shaped irrigation tip (TactiFlex SE, Abbott) nor the safety profile has been elucidated.

METHODS

In a porcine model (n = 8), thermocouples were implanted epicardially in the superior vena cava, right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava following a right thoracotomy. After chest closure, endocardial ablation was conducted near the thermocouples under fluoroscopic guidance. We compared tissue temperatures during 50 W/13-s high-power short-duration (HPSD) and 30 W/30-s standard ablation.

RESULTS

No steam pops were observed in 34 HPSD and 35 standard ablation applications. Tmax (maximum tissue temperature when the thermocouple was located ≤5 mm from the catheter tip) was modestly higher in HPSD compared to standard ablation (60.1°C ± 12.4°C vs. 57.8°C ± 12.9°C; p = 0.46). The peak tissue temperature correlated inversely with the catheter tip-to-thermocouple distance (HPSD: r = -0.40; standard: r = -0.57). Lethal temperatures (≥50°C) were reached faster with HPSD (6.5 ± 3.2 s vs. 10.3 ± 8.6 s; p = 0.04) and the distance from the catheter tip achieving a lethal tissue temperature ≥50°C (indicative of the lesion depth) was slightly shallower with HPSD (4.2 and 4.8 mm, respectively). The esophageal injury occurred superficially in both settings (0.98 ± 0.22 mm vs. 1.16 ± 0.18 mm; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD ablation produced a modestly higher and more rapid increase in the tissue temperature around the veno-atrial junction with a shorter catheter tip-to-thermocouple distance required to reach lethal temperatures. This data contributes to understanding effective lesion creation and collateral injury prevention with the TactiFlex catheter.

Combined approach of high-power and very high-power, short-duration ablation in superior vena cava isolation

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness and safety of 50 W, high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation in superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported. However, the acute outcomes of SVCI combined with 90 W/4 s, very high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate a novel approach that combines 50 W-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation in SVCI and to elucidate the characteristics, outcomes, and safety of this approach by comparing SVCI with conventional ablation index (AI)-guided middle-power, middle-duration (MPMD) ablation.

METHODS

Overall, 126 patients who underwent AF ablation with SVCI using the QDOT MICROTM catheter were retrospectively reviewed; one group underwent SVCI with a combined approach of HPSD and vHPSD ablation (50 W/90 W group, n = 73) and another group underwent AI-guided MPMD ablation (30-40 W group, n = 53). This study compared the procedural details, radiofrequency (RF) ablation profiles, and complications. The RF settings used in the 50 W/90 W group were 50 W/7 s for the lateral segment close to the phrenic nerve and 90 W/4 s for the nonlateral segment.

RESULTS

The 50 W/90 W group required a significantly shorter procedural time (3.2 vs. 5.9 min, p < .001), shorter RF duration (42.0 vs. 162.0 s, p < .001), and lower RF energy (2834 vs. 5480 J, p < .001) than the 30-40 W group. Procedural success, first-pass SVCI, number of RF applications, and SVC reconnection after isoproterenol loading were comparable between the groups. The maximum tip-electrode temperature of the multi-thermocouple system was significantly higher in the 50 W/90 W group than in the 30-40 W group (50.0°C vs. 47.0°C, p < .001). No complications, such as phrenic nerve injury or bleeding requiring transfusion, were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach of 50 W/7 s-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation resulted in successful and safe SVCI with shorter procedural time, shorter RF duration, and lower RF energy.

Lesion metrics and 12-month outcomes of very-high power short duration radiofrequency ablation (90W/4 s) under mild conscious sedation

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often performed under general anaesthesia (GA) or deep sedation. Anaesthetic availability is limited in many centers, and deep sedation is prohibited in some countries without anaesthetic support. Very high-power short duration (vHPSD-90W/4 s) PVI using the Q-Dot catheter is generally well tolerated under mild conscious sedation (MCS) though an understanding of catheter stability and long-term effectiveness is lacking. We analyzed lesion metrics and 12-month freedom from atrial arrythmia with this approach.

METHODS

Our approach to radiofrequency (RF) PVI under MCS is standardized and includes a single catheter approach with a steerable sheath. We identified patients undergoing Q-Dot RF PVI between March 2021 and December 2022 in our center, comparing those undergoing vHPSD ablation under MCS (90W/MCS) against those undergoing 50 W ablation under GA (50 W/GA) up to 12 months of follow-up. Data were extracted from clinical records and the CARTO system.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients met our inclusion criteria (51 90W/MCS; 32 50 W/GA). Despite shorter ablation times (353 vs. 886 s; p < .001), the 90 W/MCS group received more lesions (median 87 vs. 58, p < .001), resulting in similar procedure times (149.3 vs. 149.1 min; p = .981). PVI was achieved in all cases, and first pass isolation rates were similar (left wide antral circumferential ablation [WACA] 82.4% vs. 87.5%, p = .758; right WACA 74.5% vs. 78.1%, p = .796; 90 W/MCS vs. 50 W/GA respectively). Analysis of 6647 ablation lesions found similar mean impedance drops (10.0 ± 1.9 Ω vs. 10.0 ± 2.2 Ω; p = .989) and mean contact force (14.6 ± 2.0 g vs. 15.1 ± 1.6 g; p = .248). Only median 2.5% of lesions in the 90 W/MCS cohort failed to achieve ≥ 5 Ω drop. In the 90 W/MCS group, there were no procedural related complications, and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia was observed in 78.4%.

CONCLUSION

vHPSD PVI is feasible under MCS, with encouraging acute and long-term procedural outcomes. This provides a compelling option for centers with limited anaesthetic support.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of a Very High-Power Very Short-Duration (vHPvSD) Ablation Protocol versus a Hybrid Ablation Approach-Procedural and Mid-Term Outcome Data

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard-of-care treatment in the rhythm control strategy of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation protocols, varying in the power and duration of energy delivery, have changed rapidly in recent years. Very high-power very short-duration ablation (vHPvSD) is expected to shorten procedural times compared to conventional ablation approaches. However, the existing data suggest that this might come at the cost of lower first-pass isolation rates, a predictor of poor ablation long-term outcomes. This study aims to compare a vHPvSD protocol to a hybrid strategy, in which the power and duration of the energy transfer are adapted depending on the anatomical location. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed procedural and outcome data from 93 patients (55 vHPvSD vs. 38 hybrid) scheduled for de novo pulmonary vein isolation. A vHPvSD ablation protocol (90 Watt (W), 4 s) was compared to a hybrid protocol using vHPvSD on the posterior wall and 50 W HPSD (high-power short-duration) ablation guided by the Ablation Index along the remaining spots. Results: Ablation times were significantly shorter in the vHPvSD cohort (5.4 min. vs. 14.2 min, p < 0.001), thus resulting in a significant reduction in the overall procedural duration (91 min vs. 106 min, p = 0.003). The non-significant slightly higher first-pass isolation rates in the vHPvSD cohort (85% vs. 76%, p = 0.262) did not affect freedom from AF 6 months after the procedure (83% vs. 87%, p = 0.622). Conclusions: vHPvSD helps in shortening the PVI procedural duration, thus neither affecting first-pass isolation rates nor freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 6 months after the index procedure.

Where is the gap after a 90 W/4 s very-high-power short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation?: Association with the left atrial-pulmonary vein voltage and wall thickness

Background

Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) utilizing radiofrequency (RF) applications with a very high-power and short-duration (vHPSD) has shortened the procedure time, the determinants of pulmonary vein (PV) gaps in the first-pass PVI and acute PV reconnections are unclear.

Methods

An extensive encircling PVI was performed with the QDOT MICRO catheter with a vHPSD (90 W-4 s) in 30 patients with AF (19 men, 64 ± 10 years). The association of the PV gap sites (first-pass PVI failure, acute PV reconnections [spontaneous reconnections or dormant conduction provoked by adenosine triphosphate] or both) with the left atrial (LA) wall thickness and LA bipolar voltage on the PVI line and ablation-related parameters were assessed.

Results

PV gaps were observed in 29 (6%) of 480 segments (16 segments per patient) in 17 patients (56%). The PV gaps were associated with the LA wall thickness, bipolar voltage, and the number of RF points (LA wall thickness, 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4 mm, p < .001; bipolar voltage, 2.59 ± 1.62 vs. 1.34 ± 1.14 mV, p < .001; RF points, 6 ± 2 vs. 4 ± 2, p = .008) but were not with the other ablation-related parameters. Receiver operating characteristic curves yielded that an LA wall thickness ≥2.3 mm and bipolar voltage ≥2.40 mV were determinants of PV gaps with an area under the curve of 0.82 and 0.73, respectively.

Conclusions

The LA voltage and wall thickness on the PV-encircling ablation line were highly associated with PV gaps using the 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation.

Characteristics of tissue temperature during ablation with THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF versus TactiCath versus QDOT MICRO catheters (Qmode and Qmode+): An in vivo porcine study

INTRODUCTION

High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation at 50 W, guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion size index (LSI), and a 90 W/4 s very HSPD (vHPSD) setting are available for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Yet, tissue temperatures during ablation with different catheters around venoatrial junction and collateral tissues remain unclear.

METHODS

In this porcine study, we surgically implanted thermocouples on the epicardium near the superior vena cava (SVC), right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We then compared tissue temperatures during 50W-HPSD guided by AI 400 or LSI 5.0, and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation using THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (STSF), TactiCath ablation catheter, sensor enabled (TacthCath), and QDOT MICRO (Qmode and Qmode+ settings) catheters.

RESULTS

STSF produced the highest maximum tissue temperature (Tmax ), followed by TactiCath, and QDOT MICRO in Qmode and Qmode+ (62.7 ± 12.5°C, 58.0 ± 10.1°C, 50.0 ± 12.1°C, and 49.2 ± 8.4°C, respectively; p = .005), achieving effective transmural lesions. Time to lethal tissue temperature ≥50°C (t-T ≥ 50°C) was fastest in Qmode+, followed by TacthCath, STSF, and Qmode (4.3 ± 2.5, 6.4 ± 1.9, 7.1 ± 2.8, and 7.7 ± 3.1 s, respectively; p < .001). The catheter tip-to-thermocouple distance for lethal temperature (indicating lesion depth) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was deepest in STSF at 5.2 mm, followed by Qmode at 4.3 mm, Qmode+ at 3.1 mm, and TactiCath at 2.8 mm. Ablation at the SVC near the phrenic nerve led to sudden injury at t-T ≥ 50°C in all four settings. The esophageal adventitia injury was least deep with Qmode+ ablation (0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4 mm for Qmode, 0.9 ± 0.3 mm for TactiCath, and 1.1 ± 0.5 mm for STSF, respectively; p = .005), correlating with Tmax .

CONCLUSION

This study revealed distinct tissue temperature patterns during HSPD and vHPSD ablations with the three catheters, affecting lesion effectiveness and collateral damage based on Tmax and/or t-T ≥ 50°C. These findings provide key insights into the safety and efficacy of AF ablation with these four settings.

High-Power Short-Duration Ablation of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone in atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy, improving freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias, as well as outperforming antiarrhythmic drugs in alleviating AF-related symptoms, reducing hospitalizations, and enhancing quality of life. Nevertheless, the success rate of traditional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) methods remains less than ideal. To address these issues, refinement in RFA strategies has been developed to improve efficacy and laboratory efficiency during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). High-power short-duration (HPSD) RFA has emerged as a safe strategy to reduce the time required to produce durable lesions. This article reviews critical aspects of HPSD ablation in the management of both paroxysmal and persistent AF, covering aspects such as effectiveness, safety, procedural intricacies, and the underlying biophysics.

50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and freedom from atrial arrhythmias while decreasing procedural time. However, the optimal power setting in terms of safety and efficacy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of 50-W vs 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

Patients from the REAL-AF prospective multicenter registry (Real-World Experience of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) undergoing HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF, either using 50-W or 40-W, were included. The primary efficacy outcome was freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of any procedural complication at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, AF-related symptoms, and the occurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients were included. Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias at 12 months was 80.7% in the 50-W group and 77.3% in the 40-W group (Log-rank P = 0.387). The primary safety outcome occurred in 3.7% of patients in the 50-W group vs 2.8% in the 40-W group (P = 0.646). The 50-W group had a higher rate of first-pass PVI (82.3% vs 76.2%; P = 0.040) as well as shorter procedural (67 minutes [IQR: 54-87.5 minutes] vs 93 minutes [IQR: 80.5-111 minutes]; P < 0.001) and radiofrequency ablation times (15 minutes [IQR: 11.4-20 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR: 21.5-34.6 minutes]; P < 0.001) than the 40-W group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias or procedural safety outcomes between 50-W and 40-W during HPSD ablation of paroxysmal AF. The use of 50-W was associated with a higher rate of first-pass PVI as well as shorter procedural times.