"Pill-in-Pocket" anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation burden: Stepping beyond the categorical characterization

Traditional classifications categorize atrial fibrillation (AF) into paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent, but recent advancements in monitoring have revealed AF as a continuous variable, challenging existing paradigms. AF burden, defined basically as the amount of time spent in AF during a monitored period, has emerged as a crucial metric. This review assesses the evolving landscape of AF burden and its measurement methods, diagnostic modalities, and impact on outcomes. Guidelines suggest individualized approaches, combining AF burden with clinical scores (CHA2DS2-VASc), but studies have challenged this. Addressing the impact of AF burden on patients' quality of life before or after ablation is also crucial. Although continuous monitoring technologies offer promising avenues, the field faces challenges, such as defining clinically relevant thresholds. Future research should focus on refining these, designing trials centered around AF burden, and evaluating the efficacy of interventions in reducing AF burden, ultimately paving the way for personalized management strategies.

Comparison of the Latest ESC, ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS, and CCS Guidelines on the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The introduction of evidence-based and structured guidelines has undoubtedly improved the care of cardiologic patients and in many cases simplified decision-making for the treatment team. The European Society of Cardiology in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, and the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society have developed guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Because all 3 guidelines refer to almost the same scientific data, their recommendations are undoubtedly largely in agreement. Nevertheless, there are some interesting differences based on different interpretations of the same study, different publication dates, or differences in local conditions and health care resources. The following article aims at lining out these similarities and differences.

Decentralized Clinical Trials in the Era of Real-World Evidence: A Statistical Perspective

There has been a growing trend that activities relating to clinical trials take place at locations other than traditional trial sites (hence decentralized clinical trials or DCTs), some of which are at settings of real-world clinical practice. Although there are numerous benefits of DCTs, this also brings some implications on a number of issues relating to the design, conduct, and analysis of DCTs. The Real-World Evidence Scientific Working Group of the American Statistical Association Biopharmaceutical Section has been reviewing the field of DCTs and provides in this paper considerations for decentralized trials from a statistical perspective. This paper first discusses selected critical decentralized elements that may have statistical implications on the trial and then summarizes regulatory guidance, framework, and initiatives on DCTs. More discussions are presented by focusing on the design (including construction of estimand), implementation, statistical analysis plan (including missing data handling), and reporting of safety events. Some additional considerations (e.g., ethical considerations, technology infrastructure, study oversight, data security and privacy, and regulatory compliance) are also briefly discussed. This paper is intended to provide statistical considerations for decentralized trials of medical products to support regulatory decision-making.

Stroke in Athletes with Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, linked with a significantly heightened risk of stroke. While moderate exercise reduces AF risk, high-level endurance athletes paradoxically exhibit a higher incidence. However, their stroke risk remains uncertain due to their younger age, higher cardiovascular fitness, and lower rate of comorbidities. Several key studies highlight that AF may increase the risk of stroke in endurance athletes, particularly those over 65. However, the overall risk within this population remains relatively low. Notably, older male athletes show a higher AF incidence but experience lower stroke risk than their non-athletic counterparts. Regular physical activity prior to a first stroke appears to reduce mortality, though recurrent stroke risk in athletes with AF mirrors that of non-athletes, despite an elevated AF incidence. Management of AF in athletes is complex, with limited evidence guiding anti-thrombotic strategies. In this setting, specific recommendations are sparse, particularly in sports where bleeding risk is heightened. Individualized management, emphasizing shared decision-making, is critical to balance stroke prevention with athletic performance. Rhythm control strategies, such as catheter ablation, may be a reasonable first-line treatment option for athletes, particularly in those desiring to avoid long-term medication. This review synthesizes the current literature on the incidence, predictors, and management of stroke in athletes with AF.

[Everyone over the age of 65 years should wear a smartwatch : Pro and contra]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias and has far-reaching consequences not only for patients, but also for our healthcare system. The prevalence of this condition is expected to double in the coming decades. On the one hand, this is due to our aging population, the increasing number of comorbidities, and the improved technical possibilities for detection. A major complication of AF is stroke, whereby at-risk patients can be protected by oral anticoagulation if AF is diagnosed. The extent to which continuous screening for AF in patients with an increased risk of thromboembolic events should be carried out using wearables remains an important point in the current debate.

Risk of Stroke or Systemic Embolism According to Baseline Frequency and Duration of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the ARTESiA Trial

BACKGROUND

In the ARTESiA trial (Apixaban for the Reduction of Thromboembolism in Patients With Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation), apixaban, compared with aspirin, reduced stroke or systemic embolism in patients with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF). Clinical guidelines recommend considering SCAF episode duration when deciding whether to prescribe oral anticoagulation for this population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in ARTESiA. Using Cox regression adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc score and treatment allocation (apixaban or aspirin), we assessed frequency of SCAF episodes and duration of the longest SCAF episode in the 6 months before randomization as predictors of stroke risk and of apixaban treatment effect.

RESULTS

Among 3986 patients with complete baseline SCAF data, 703 (17.6%) had no SCAF episode ≥6 minutes in the 6 months before enrollment. Among 3283 patients (82.4%) with ≥1 episode of SCAF ≥6 minutes in the 6 months before enrollment, 2542 (77.4%) had up to 5 episodes, and 741 (22.6%) had ≥6 episodes. The longest episode lasted <1 hour in 1030 patients (31.4%), 1 to <6 hours in 1421 patients (43.3%), and >6 hours in 832 patients (25.3%). Higher baseline SCAF frequency was not associated with increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism: 1.1% for 1 to 5 episodes versus 1.2%/patient-year for ≥6 episodes (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.59-1.34]). In an exploratory analysis, patients with previous SCAF but no episode ≥6 minutes in the 6 months before enrollment had a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism than patients with at least one episode during that period (0.5% versus 1.1%/patient-year; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27-0.85]). The frequency of SCAF did not modify the reduction in stroke or systemic embolism with apixaban (Pinteraction=0.1). The duration of the longest SCAF episode in the 6 months before enrollment was not associated with the risk of stroke or systemic embolism during follow-up (<1 hour: 1.0%/patient-year [reference]; 1-6 hours: 1.2%/patient-year [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.27 (95% CI, 0.85-1.90)]; >6 hours: 1.0%/patient-year [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.63-1.66)]). SCAF duration did not modify the reduction in stroke or systemic embolism with apixaban (Ptrend=0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In ARTESiA, baseline SCAF frequency and longest episode duration were not associated with risk of stroke or systemic embolism and did not modify the effect of apixaban on reduction of stroke or systemic embolism.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01938248.

Spontaneous fluctuation in atrial fibrillation burden and duration in patients with implantable loop monitors

BACKGROUND

Most studies of device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) have recommended indefinite anticoagulation once a patient crosses a particular threshold for AF duration or burden. However, durations and burdens are known to fluctuate over time, but little is known about the magnitude of spontaneous fluctuations and the potential impact on anticoagulation decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify spontaneous fluctuations in AF duration and burden in patients with implantable loop recorders (ILRs) METHODS: We reviewed all ILR interrogations for patients with non-permanent AF at our institution from 2018 to 2023. We excluded patients treated with rhythm control. The duration of longest AF episode at each interrogation was classified as < 6, 6-24, and > 24 h, and the AF burden reported at each interrogation was classified as < 2%, 2%-11.4%, and > 11.4%.

RESULTS

Out of 156 patients, the mean age at ILR implant was 70.9 ± 12.5 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.2 ± 1.8, duration of ILR follow-up was 23.4 ± 11.2 months, and number of ILR interrogations per patient was 18.0 ± 8.9. The duration of longest AF episode at any point during follow-up was < 6 , 6-24 , and > 24 h in 110, 30, and 16 patients, respectively. Among the 30 patients with a longest AF episode of 6-24 h at some point during follow-up, out of 594 total ILR interrogations, only 75 (12%) showed a longest episode of 6-24 h. In the remaining 519 interrogations, the longest episode was < 6 h. In patients with a longest episode of > 24 h at any point during follow-up (n = 16), only 47 out of 320 total ILR interrogations (15%) showed an episode of > 24 h. When evaluating AF burden, 96, 38, and 22 patients had maximum reported AF burdens of < 2%, 2%-11.4%, and > 11.4% at any point during ILR follow-up. Among those with a maximum burden of 2%-11.4% at some point during follow-up (n = 38), out of 707 ILR interrogations, only 76 (11%) showed a burden of 2%-11.4%. In the remaining 631 interrogations, the burden was < 2%. In the 22 patients with a burden > 11.4% at some point during follow-up, only 80 out of 480 interrogations (17%) showed a burden of > 11.4%. In 65% of interrogations, the burden was < 2%.

CONCLUSION

Significant, spontaneous fluctuations in AF burden and duration are common in patients with ILRs. Even in patients with AF episodes of 6-24 h or > 24 h at some point during follow-up, the vast majority of interrogations show episodes of < 6 h. Similarly, in patients with burdens of 2%-11.4% or > 11.4% at some point during follow-up, the vast majority of interrogations show burdens of < 2%. More data are needed to determine whether crossing an AF burden or duration threshold once is sufficient to merit lifelong anticoagulation or whether spontaneous fluctuations in AF burden and duration should impact anticoagulation decisions.

2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play

Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.

Atrial fibrillation burden: a new outcome predictor and therapeutic target

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is not a dichotomous disease trait. Technological innovations enable long-term rhythm monitoring in many patients and can estimate AF burden. These technologies are already used to detect and monitor AF. This review describes the relation between AF burden and outcomes and potential effects of AF burden reduction. A lower AF burden is associated with a lower risk of stroke and heart failure in patients with AF: stroke risk without anticoagulation is lower in patients with device-detected AF and a low AF burden (stroke rate 1%/year) than in patients with persistent and permanent AF (stroke rate 3%/year). Paroxysmal AF shows intermediate stroke rates (2%/year). Atrial fibrillation burden-reducing interventions can reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF: early rhythm control reduces cardiovascular events including stroke and heart failure in patients with recently diagnosed AF and cardiovascular conditions. In patients with heart failure and AF, early rhythm control and AF ablation, interventions that reduce AF burden, reduce mortality and heart failure events. Recent technological innovations allow to estimate AF burden in clinical care, creating opportunities and challenges. While evidence remains limited, the existing data already suggest that AF burden reduction could be a therapeutic goal. In addition to anticoagulation and treatment of cardiovascular conditions, AF burden reduction emerges as a therapeutic goal. Future research will define the AF burden that constitutes a relevant risk of stroke and heart failure. Technologies quantifying AF burden need careful validation to advance the field.

[Oral anticoagulation in supraventricular arrhythmia]

Atrial fibrillation represents the most frequent persistent cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. An important component of the holistic treatment of atrial fibrillation is oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the prevention of stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score as a risk score is recommended for estimation of the individual stroke risk and the concomitant need of OAC in these patients. In the majority of patients the OAC is nowadays carried out with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), which have proved to be effective with a moderate side effect profile and have replaced vitamin K antagonists as the standard substance. In the meantime, these principles have become established as the usual practice but some issues regarding OAC in patients with atrial fibrillation are still insufficiently answered. Furthermore, it is unclear whether OACs need to be continued after successful treatment of atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein ablation or in some cases can even be discontinued. Unanswered questions also remain regarding the treatment of subclinical atrial fibrillation and atrial high-frequency episodes detected by implanted heart rhythm devices. Especially the duration of atrial high-frequency episodes that should trigger the initiation of OAC treatment is still under debate. Therefore, currently the benefits of stroke prevention must be carefully weighed up against the risk of bleeding complications.

Cardioembolic Stroke

Cardioembolism accounts globally for around 25% of ischemic strokes and is more often associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Potential sources of cardioembolism into the intracranial circulation include paradoxic embolism, dysrhythmias, structural heart disease, and valvular heart disease. To identify the etiology of a patient's ischemic stroke, thorough investigation of the intracardiac structures, assessment of dysrhythmias, and consideration of high-risk events such as cardiac surgery are crucial. Treatment after cardioembolic stroke can be personalized based on the underlying cardioembolic source to minimize the risk of recurrent cerebral ischemic events.

Novel stroke prevention strategies following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Stroke prevention following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation remains a controversial topic. Oral anticoagulation is associated with a significant reduction in stroke risk in the general atrial fibrillation population but may be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, and the benefit: risk ratio must be considered. Improvement in successful catheter ablation and widespread use of cardiac monitoring devices may allow for novel anticoagulation strategies in a subset of patients with atrial fibrillation, which may optimize stroke prevention while minimizing bleeding risk. In this review, we discuss stroke risk in atrial fibrillation and the effects of successful catheter ablation on thromboembolic risk. We also explore novel strategies for stroke prevention following successful catheter ablation.

The potential role for artificial intelligence in fracture risk prediction

Osteoporotic fractures are a major health challenge in older adults. Despite the availability of safe and effective therapies for osteoporosis, these therapies are underused in individuals at high risk for fracture, calling for better case-finding and fracture risk assessment strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) hold promise for enhancing identification of individuals at high risk for fracture by distilling useful features from high-dimensional data derived from medical records, imaging, and wearable devices. AI-ML could enable automated opportunistic screening for vertebral fractures and osteoporosis, home-based monitoring and intervention targeting lifestyle factors, and integration of multimodal features to leverage fracture prediction, ultimately aiding improved fracture risk assessment and individualised treatment. Optimism must be balanced with consideration for the explainability of AI-ML models, biases (including information inequity in numerically under-represented populations), model limitations, and net clinical benefit and workload impact. Clinical integration of AI-ML algorithms has the potential to transform osteoporosis management, offering a more personalised approach to reduce the burden of osteoporotic fractures.

Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned

New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, social media recruitment, and return of results for participants. Some clinical trial elements have worked well when decentralized, while others, including remote recruitment and patient monitoring, need further refinement and assessment to determine their value. Partially decentralized, or "hybrid" trials, offer a first step to optimizing remote methods. Decentralized processes demonstrate potential to improve urban-rural diversity, but their impact on inclusion of racially and ethnically marginalized populations requires further study. To optimize inclusive participation in decentralized clinical trials, efforts must be made to build trust among marginalized communities, and to ensure access to remote technology.