Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Efficacy With an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and a Calcium Channel Blocker in Asian Hypertensive Patients

Home blood pressure-lowering effect of esaxerenone vs trichlormethiazide for uncontrolled hypertension: a prespecified subanalysis of the EXCITE-HT randomized controlled study by age subgroup

This predefined subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group EXCITE-HT study aimed to determine whether the comparative efficacy and safety of esaxerenone and trichlormethiazide differs with age. Patients were divided into two age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years). The non-inferiority of esaxerenone to trichlormethiazide was assessed based on the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) changes. Esaxerenone was considered non-inferior if this value was <3.9/ < 2.1 mmHg; if it was <0 mmHg, esaxerenone was considered superior in its BP-lowering effect. The results showed that the least squares mean changes in morning home SBP/DBP from baseline to the end of treatment (primary endpoint) were -9.5/-5.7 with esaxerenone and -8.2/-4.9 mmHg with trichloromethiazide (between-group difference: -1.3 [95% CI, -3.3, 0.8]/-0.8 [ - 2.1, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged <65 years. These changes were -14.6/-7.2 and -11.5/-6.7 (-3.0 [-4.9, -1.2]/-0.5 [-1.5, 0.5] mmHg) in the subgroup aged ≥65 years. The incidences of serum potassium level ≥5.5 mEq/L were 2.2% and 1.9% in the esaxerenone-treated subgroups aged <65 and ≥65 years, respectively. In conclusion, esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged <65 years, esaxerenone achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering both SBP and DBP. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone was superior to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP and achieved the non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering DBP. The impact of esaxerenone on serum potassium levels did not show a specific age-related effect. A subgroup analysis of the EXCITE-HT study according to age (<65 and ≥65 years) showed that esaxerenone achieved the pre-defined non-inferiority margin to trichlormethiazide in its BP-lowering effect regardless of age. In patients aged ≥65 years, esaxerenone achieved the superiority margin to trichlormethiazide in lowering SBP.

Rationale and Design of a Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study of Esaxerenone Versus Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Older Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension on Calcium Channel Blocker Monotherapy (ESCORT-HT)

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly prescribed as first- and second-line treatments for older Japanese patients with hypertension. However, due to age-related decline in renin activity, the effectiveness of ARBs may decrease. This highlights the need for other antihypertensive agents to be used in combination with CCBs to replace ARBs for more effective blood pressure (BP) control. The ESCORT-HT study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study with a 4-week run-in period and 12-week treatment period. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of esaxerenone as a second-line treatment for hypertension and to determine whether its BP-lowering effect is noninferior to that of ARBs in older patients with uncontrolled hypertension on CCB monotherapy. The safety profiles of esaxerenone and ARBs will also be evaluated. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either esaxerenone or an ARB. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the change from baseline in morning home systolic BP at the end of the treatment period. The BP-lowering effect of esaxerenone will be considered noninferior to that of ARBs if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in systolic BP change between esaxerenone and ARB is <3.8 mmHg, and will be considered superior if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI is <0. The findings may elucidate the possible benefits of earlier use of mineralocorticoid receptor blockers in combination with CCBs in older patients with essential hypertension.

Sex and gender differences in the treatment of arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Arterial hypertension represents the leading modifiable risk factor for all-cause death and early development of cardiovascular disease in women. Current clinical guidelines for the treatment of hypertension noted that women respond to antihypertensive drugs similarly to men and, therefore, treatment recommendations remain the same for both sexes. However, clinical evidence suggests the existence of sex- and gender-related differences (SGRD) in the prevalence, pathophysiology, pharmacodynamics (efficacy and safety) and pharmacokinetics of antihypertensive drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes SGRD in the prevalence of hypertension, hypertension-mediated organ damage and blood pressure control, prescription patterns, and pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics and doses of antihypertensive drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

There is limited information on SGRD in antihypertensive drug efficacy because of the underrepresentation of women in randomized clinical trials and, more important, because few trials reported results stratified by sex or performed sex-specific analyses. However, there are SGRD in hypertension-mediated organ damage, drug pharmacokinetics and, particularly, in drug safety. Prospective trials specifically designed to better understand the basis for SGRD in the pathophysiology of hypertension and in the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive drugs are needed to achieve a more personalized treatment of hypertension and hypertension-mediated organ damage in women.

Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the effects of Angiotensin II receptor blocker on renal function among African Americans: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial

We tested the hypothesis that vitamin D status may modify the effect of Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on renal function among African Americans. Sixty-four participants were included in this ancillary study from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial among normotensive African Americans to test the effect of ARB on stress response of blood pressure and renal sodium handling. The participants were randomly assigned to receive either ARB or placebo for one week, washed out for one week and then cross-overed to receive the other intervention for one week. On the final day of each intervention, the participant underwent a mental stress test. Baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level was measured in this ancillary study. Sixty-four participants were included, aged 26.5 ± 10.2 years and 47% were female. Among the participants with the serum 25(OH)D concentrations in the low tertile, ARB treatment was associated with 2.58 mg/dL higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (P < .001) and was not associated with serum creatinine (SCr) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Ps > .05). Among the participants in the high 25(OH)D tertile, ARB was associated with 1.59 mg/dL lower BUN (P < .001), 0.08 mg/dL lower SCr (P = .001), and 8.59 mL/min/1.73 m² higher eGFR (P = .001). The interactions between vitamin D and ARB on renal function were more significant during stress and recovery than at rest. The effects of ARB treatment on renal function are modified by the vitamin D status among African Americans. ARB may improve renal function only among the ones with optimal vitamin D status.

Gender-specific therapeutic approach in arterial hypertension - Challenges ahead

Hypertension was thought to be more important cardiovascular risk factor in men than in women. However, studies showed that overall incidence of hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases is higher in women comparing with men and this is particularly valid in menopause when prevalence of hypertension and its complications sharply and suddenly rises. It was also noticed that the effect of various antihypertensive groups was different in women and men. Some medications are prescribed more often in women, but it does not necessary mean that these drugs are more effective in this gender. There are several important reasons that could explain gender-induced differences in blood pressure levels, blood pressure control and antihypertensive treatment. They involve sex hormones, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous system, and arterial stiffness. However, taking into account many observational studies and trials, there are no consistent data regarding the impact of gender on effect of antihypertensive medications. Longitudinal study focused on gender and current antihypertensive groups would significantly help to understand the impact of gender. This might change therapeutic approach and improve cost-effectiveness in antihypertensive therapy in both genders. A full understanding of the pathophysiological characteristics of variations between genders demands additional research. This review article summarized the current knowledge regarding differences in the prevalence and awareness of arterial hypertension in women and men; alterations in pathophysiological mechanisms of hypertension between sexes; as well as the impact of sex on the effects of main antihypertensive groups of medications.